A former policy lawyer at crypto exchange Coinbase is running for attorney general of New York. His bid to represent the crypto industry’s interests runs against a strong Democratic bias and concerns over industry influence in policymaking.
Khurram Dara, who also worked as a regulatory and policy principal at Bain Capital Crypto, announced his campaign on Nov. 21. In a video accompanying his post on X, Dara said he wants to stop the supposed “lawfare” that current Attorney General (AG) Letitia James is waging against the crypto industry.
Dara said that the reportedly unfair treatment of the industry drives up costs for New Yorkers. New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani recently won his election with a focus on cost-of-living issues.
Dara’s campaign faces strong headwinds. James won her last two elections by a wide margin, and there are broader concerns over how much the crypto lobby is influencing policymaking.
Khurram Dara speaking with the Erie County GOP in October. Source: Khurram Dara
Former Coinbase lawyer to oppose AG Letitia James
According to Dara, James’ policies hurt New York’s business climate and drive prices higher.
“When you play politics with the law, when you regulate by enforcement. When you use lawsuits to make policy that increases the cost of doing business, that increases legal and insurance costs; that increases prices, which hurts small businesses, new entrepreneurs and working-class New Yorkers the most,” Dara said in his announcement video.
As AG, Dara would curb the powers of the state’s Martin Act. The statute gives the AG’s office broad powers to investigate and prosecute securities and real estate fraud. Critically, it allows the AG to prosecute these activities “detrimental to the public without requiring proof of intentional or negligent conduct.”
Dara and other critics claim that James has used this act for her own political purposes, rather than as a neutral enforcement tool.
Crucially for the cryptocurrency industry, Dara wants to reexamine the BitLicense, the state’s regulatory regime for companies involved in digital assets. BitLicense holds stricter standards for reporting, licensing and compliance than other states. Dara and other critics claim that these rules have driven crypto companies from the city. In his announcement video, Dara called the BitLicense “unlawful.”
But Dara faces an uphill battle. He’s running as a Republican in a state that hasn’t seen a Republican AG in nearly 30 years. Dennis Vacco, the last Republican to hold the office, lost to Eliot Spitzer in 1998.
In 2018, when James was first elected to the office, she defeated her opponent, Keith Wofford, by almost 20 percentage points. The gap narrowed in 2022, but she still won out over Republican Michael Henry 54.6% to 45.37%.
Historical tendencies aside, overall approval of Republicans has been dropping nationwide, and New York City, a crucial metropolitan area to secure for an AG candidate, just voted for a progressive Democratic mayor, Zohran Mamdani.
Dara’s challenge also comes at a time when the interests of the crypto lobby are increasingly represented in politics, with some of its most notable actors becoming overtly political.
Since then, the industry’s interests have become well-represented in Washington. Landmark legislation like the GENIUS Act, which regulates stablecoins, has passed. The industry is also pushing hard for Congress to pass the CLARITY/Responsible Financial Innovation Act by year’s end.
Lobbies are ubiquitous in Washington; crypto is no exception. Crypto lobbying operates with breakneck speed, which has raised concerns over regulatory capture — i.e., when a regulatory body or agency serving the public interest is controlled by the industry that it is supposed to regulate.
Fundraising has also increased apace. Gemini founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss have shelled out tens of millions of dollars this year alone. Their funding has become partisan, with millions going to organizations fighting to keep the Republicans’ slim majority in Congress.
This tendency has some in the industry concerned that, when the partisan pendulum eventually swings back in the Democratic direction, a Republican-aligned crypto industry could find itself in a precarious political situation.
Crypto-friendly Democratic Representative Sam Liccardo told Politico in early October, “I don’t think anybody in this town would recommend that an industry put their eggs in one party’s basket.”
How the crypto connection, complete with its growing political connections, will affect Dara’s campaign remains to be seen. His campaign is still in its early days; it doesn’t appear to have a website, just a donation link with a campaign logo, which resembles the logo Mamdani used in his mayoral race.
Mamdani’s lack of position on crypto didn’t appear to affect his popularity with voters. Nor did ex-Governor Andrew Cuomo’s last-minute crypto Hail Mary help him secure the lead. There’s a good chance New Yorkers’ choice will boil down to other pressing issues.
South Korea is likely to end the year without a framework for locally issued stablecoins, amid ongoing disputes over the role of banks in stablecoin issuance.
The country’s central bank, the Bank of Korea (BOK), and other financial regulators have clashed over the extent of banks’ involvement in issuing Korean won-backed stablecoins, delaying a framework widely expected to arrive in late 2025, the Korea JoongAng Daily reported Tuesday.
According to the BOK, a consortium of banks should own at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking regulatory approval in South Korea, while regulators are more open to the involvement of diverse industry players.
“Banks, which are already under regulatory oversight and have extensive experience handling anti-money laundering protocols, are best positioned to serve as majority shareholders in stablecoin issuers,” a BOK official reportedly said.
Banks should play leading role to curb stablecoin risks, BOK says
The central bank said that giving banks a leading role in stablecoin issuance would help mitigate potential risks to financial and foreign exchange stability.
The BOK also warned that allowing non-bank companies to take the lead in issuing stablecoins could undermine existing regulations that bar industrial firms from owning financial institutions, as stablecoins effectively function like deposit-taking instruments by collecting funds from users.
Financial Supervisory Service Governor Lee Chan-jin, Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong, Deputy Prime Minister Koo Yun-cheol and Financial Services Commission Chairman Lee Eog-weon (from left to right). Source: Korea JoongAng Daily
“Allowing non-bank companies to issue stablecoins is essentially equivalent to permitting them to engage in narrow banking — simultaneously issuing currency and providing payment services,” the BOK reportedly wrote in a recent stablecoin study. It added that stablecoins issued by technology firms could also pose monopoly risks.
According to a report by the local industry publication Bloomingbit, the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee is now reviewing three bills related to stablecoin issuance submitted by ruling and opposition party lawmakers on Monday.
The proposed legislation includes two bills put forward by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) and one from the opposition People Power Party (PPP).
While all three proposed bills stipulate a minimum capital of 5 billion won ($3.4 million) for issuers, some of the disputed areas include whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer interest on holdings.
“While Kim Eun-hye’s bill allows interest payments, Kim Hyun-jung’s bill and Ahn Do-geol’s bill seek to prohibit them,” the report states.
As South Korean lawmakers remain divided over a stablecoin framework, local tech giants such as Naver are accelerating stablecoin-related initiatives amid a potential merger with Dunamu, operator of the major exchange Upbit.
According to local reports, Naver Financial is set to launch a stablecoin wallet next month in collaboration with Hashed and the Busan Digital Exchange.
Banking giant JPMorgan Chase’s decision to cut ties with the CEO of Bitcoin payments company Strike is reigniting concerns about a renewed wave of US “debanking,” an issue that haunted the crypto industry during the 2023 banking turmoil.
Jack Mallers, CEO of the Bitcoin (BTC) Lightning Network payments company Strike, said Sunday on X that JPMorgan closed his personal accounts without explanation.
“Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase threw me out of the bank,” Mallers wrote. “Every time I asked them why, they said the same thing: We aren’t allowed to tell you.”
Cointelegraph has contacted JPMorgan Chase for comment.
“Operation Chokepoint 2.0 regrettably lives on,” said US Senator Cynthia Lummis in a Monday X post. Actions like JP Morgan’s “undermine the confidence in traditional banking” while sending the digital asset industry overseas, she said, adding:
“It’s past time we put Operation Chokepoint 2.0 to rest to make America the digital asset capital of the world.”
Other crypto founders, including Caitlin Long of Custodia Bank, said the debanking efforts targeting crypto may persist until January 2026, pending the appointment of a new Federal Reserve governor.
“Trump won’t have the ability to appoint a new Fed governor until January. So, therefore, you can see the breadcrumbs leading up to a potentially big fight,” Long said during Cointelegraph’s Chainreaction daily X show on March 21.
Long’s Custodia Bank was repeatedly targeted by US debanking efforts, which cost the company months of work and “a couple of million dollars,” she said.
The collapse of crypto-friendly banks in early 2023 sparked the first allegations of Operation Chokepoint 2.0, during which at least 30 technology and cryptocurrency founders were reportedly denied access to banking services under the administration of former President Joe Biden.
In August 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order related to debanking, aiming to prevent banks from cutting off services to politically unfavorable industries, including the cryptocurrency sector.
Debanking concerns took another turn in January, when Lummis’s office was contacted by an anonymous whistleblower, alleging that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was “destroying material” related to Operation Chokepoint 2.0.
“The FDIC’s alleged efforts to destroy and conceal materials from the U.S. Senate related to Operation Chokepoint 2.0 is not only unacceptable, it is illegal,” said Lummis in a letter published on Jan. 16, threatening “swift criminal referrals” if the wrongdoing was uncovered.
Senator Lummis’s open letter to FDIC Chair Marty Gruenberg. Source: Lummis.senate.gov
Traditional financial institutions have long criticized crypto firms for enabling illicit finance. But US banks have themselves paid more than $200 billion in fines over the past two decades for compliance failures, according to data compiled by Better Markets and the Financial Times.
Fines and penalties paid by the six leading US banks over the past 20 years. Source: Better Markets/FT
Bank of America reportedly accounted for about $82.9 billion of those penalties, while JPMorgan Chase paid more than $40 billion.
A new financial law in the United Arab Emirates is set to bring decentralized finance (DeFi) and broader Web3 into regulatory parameters, signaling an important shift for the industry.
The UAE’s new central bank law, Federal Decree Law No. 6 of 2025, introduces “one of the most consequential regulatory shifts” for the crypto industry in the region, Irina Heaver, a local crypto lawyer and founder of NeosLegal, told Cointelegraph.
“It brings protocols, DeFi platforms, middleware, and even infrastructure providers into scope if they enable activities such as payments, exchange, lending, custody, or investment services,” Heaver said.
According to the lawyer, industry projects building or operating in the UAE should treat this as a pivotal regulatory milestone and align their systems before the September 2026 transition deadline.
“We’re just code” is no longer a defence
Issued in the Official Gazette and legally effective since Sept. 16, 2025, the UAE’s Federal Decree Law No. 6 is a central bank law that regulates financial institutions, insurance business as well as digital asset-related activities.
Its key provisions, Article 61 and Article 62, provide a list of activities that require a license from the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE), including crypto payments and digital stored value.
“Article 62 states that any person who carries on, offers, issues, or facilitates a licensed financial activity ‘through any means, medium, or technology’ falls under the regulatory perimeter of the CBUAE,” Heaver said.
An excerpt from the UAE’s Federal Decree Law No. 6. Source: CBUAE
In practice, this means DeFi projects can no longer avoid regulation by claiming they are “just code,” the lawyer said, adding that the argument of “decentralization” does not exempt a protocol from compliance.
Protocols that support stablecoins, real-world assets (RWA), decentralized exchange (DEX) functions, bridges, or liquidity routing “may require a license,” Heaver said. The enforcement is already active, she added, with penalties for unlicensed activity including fines of up to 1 billion dirhams ($272.3 million) and potential criminal sanctions.
The law does not ban self-custody
As the UAE’s new central bank law is directly related to providing “stored value services,” the legislation is likely to affect cryptocurrency wallet providers, Kokila Alagh, founder and managing partner of Karm Legal Consultants, told Cointelegraph.
According to Alagh, there has been a “fair bit of confusion” around whether the law affects self-custody, or non-custodial wallets, which are designed to enable users to store their assets independently from any third party.
Although some industry observers like Trading Strategy’s Mikko Ohtamaa have suggested that the law translates to the “de facto ban” of crypto and self-custodial wallet apps in the UAE, Alagh and Heaver said that’s not the case.
An excerpt from the UAE’s Federal Decree Law No. 6. Source: CBUAE
“The law does not ban self-custody, nor does it restrict individuals from using their own wallets,” Alagh said, adding that it “simply expands” the regulatory perimeter for companies.
“If a wallet provider enables payments, transfers, or other regulated financial services for UAE users, licensing requirements may apply,” she noted.
Alagh mentioned that Karm Legal has received a significant number of queries regarding the issue, adding:
“Further clarification from the Central Bank is expected as the law moves through implementation, but for now, individuals remain unaffected while companies should assess whether their activities fall within regulated scope.”
Ironically, Ohtamaa’s post specifically criticized UAE lawyers, arguing that their business is “free of interest in the UAE.”
“For independent law firms, anything that makes the UAE less attractive for crypto is a loss of income, and these lawyers are happy to obfuscate facts and legal texts just to secure their yearly bonuses,” Ohtamaa argued.
Karm Legal’s Alagh told Cointelegraph that the firm is actively following up with CBUAE regarding the issue, but there is no set date for the authority to provide a clarification.