Connect with us

Published

on

Rachel Reeves has announced a mansion tax on homes worth more than £2 million.

The “high value council tax surcharge” will apply in England from 2028 and will raise £400m a year for the government, the chancellor said in Wednesday’s budget.

Homeowners will have to pay the annual charge on top of their council tax bill.

Politics latest: Reeves freezes income tax thresholds and scraps two-child benefit cap

The move was widely rumoured before the budget, but what is notable is another proposal expected to be announced was not.

Ms Reeves was expected to introduce a re-evaluation of homes in the three highest council tax tiers (F, G and H), with a surcharge on them.

She did not announce this, but instead said there will be four bands for the new mansion tax, with values based on 2026 prices.

More on Budget 2025

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Mansion tax’ announced

The lowest band, for properties worth between £2m and £2.5m, will pay £2,500.

The highest band, for homes worth £5m or more, will pay £7,500.

Ms Reeves and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) did not reveal the two middle bands and charges.

But she said the surcharge would be uprated annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation.

The extra revenue will go straight to central government, not to local councils, as is the case for standard council tax.

Ms Reeves said the charge would apply to fewer than 1% of all properties, and would help “deal with a long-standing source of wealth inequality”.

There will be a consultation on support for homeowners and a deferral scheme for those unable to pay immediately, taking into account homes bought decades ago that have soared in value.

Read more:
Main budget announcements
Will you be hit by Reeves’s ‘stealth tax’?
Cash ISA limit slashed – but some are exempt

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Badenoch: ‘A budget for benefits street’

The OBR said it was highly uncertain about the £400m it predicted the tax would raise each year, and would adjust the forecast, if needed, after the consultation.

Paul Johnson, former director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the bands would create “big spikes at specific valuations”.

Rob Hillock, head of personal financial planning at financial services consultancy Broadstone, said: “The chancellor’s introduction of a ‘mansion tax’ on houses valued above £2m will likely prompt many homeowners to get an up-to-date valuation of their property wealth.

“It has the potential to create market distortions as homeowners look to reduce the value of their home to avoid additional tax or prompt some to downsize to smaller, cheaper homes.

“The OBR notes in its comments that the reform could see price bunching below each of the four new price bands as homeowners look to minimise their tax liability.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: Budget 2025

Mark Campbell, head of wealth at financial consultancy Isio, said the mansion tax makes a “flawed assumption” that those living in homes worth more than £2m have the liquid wealth or income to pay the tax.

He said it risks penalising people who are asset-rich and cash-poor, especially in London and the southeast.

He also warned the mansion tax risks sending a message that the UK is a less attractive place for investors, wealth creators and entrepreneurs.

Continue Reading

Politics

Europe’s new chat police: Chat Control legislation nudges forward in the EU

Published

on

By

Europe’s new chat police: Chat Control legislation nudges forward in the EU

Representatives of European Union member states reached an agreement on Wednesday in the Council of the EU to move forward with the controversial “Chat Control” child sexual abuse regulation, which paves the way for new rules targeting abusive child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on messaging apps and other online services.

“Every year, millions of files are shared that depict the sexual abuse of children… This is completely unacceptable. Therefore, I’m glad that the member states have finally agreed on a way forward that includes a number of obligations for providers of communication services,” commented Danish Minister for Justice, Peter Hummelgaard.

The deal, which follows years of division and deadlock among member states and privacy groups, allows the legislative file to move into final talks with the European Parliament on when and how platforms can be required to scan user content for suspected child sexual abuse and grooming.

The existing CSAM framework is set to expire on April 3, 2026, and is on track to be replaced by the new legislation, pending detailed negotiations with European Parliament lawmakers.

EU Chat Control laws: What’s in and what’s out

In its latest draft, the Council maintains the core CSAM framework but modifies how platforms are encouraged to act. Online services would still have to assess how their products can be abused and adopt mitigation measures.

Service providers would also have to cooperate with a newly-established EU Centre on Child Sexual Abuse to support the implementation of the regulation, and face oversight from national authorities if they fall short.

While the latest Council text removes the explicit obligation of mandatory scanning of all private messages, the legal basis for “voluntary” CSAM detection is extended indefinitely. There are also calls for tougher risk obligations for platforms.

Related: After Samourai, DOJ’s money-transmitter theory now looms over crypto mixers

A compromise that satisfies neither side

To end the Chat Control stalemate, a team of Danish negotiators in the Council worked to remove the most contentious element: the blanket mandatory scanning requirement. Under previous provisions, end-to-end encrypted services like Signal and WhatsApp would have been required to systematically search users’ messages for illegal material.

Yet, it’s a compromise that leaves both sides feeling shortchanged. Law enforcement officials warn that abusive content will still lurk in the corners of fully encrypted services, while digital rights groups argue that the deal still paves the way for broader monitoring of private communications and potential for mass surveillance, according to a Thusday Politico report.

Lead negotiator and Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs in the European Parliament, Javier Zarzalejos, urged both the Council and Parliament to enter negotiations at once. He stressed the importance of establishing a legislative framework to prevent and combat child sexual abuse online, while respecting encryption.

Law, Government, Europe, Privacy, European Union, Policy
Source: Javier Zarzalejosj

“I am committed to work with all political groups, the Commission, and member states in the Council in the coming months in order to agree on a legally sound and balanced legislative text that contributes to effectively prevent and combating child sexual abuse online,” he stated.

The Council celebrated the latest efforts to protect children from sexual abuse online; however, former Dutch Member of Parliament Rob Roos lambasted the Council for acting similarly to the “East German era, stripping 450 million EU citizens of their right to privacy.” He warned that Brussels was acting “behind closed doors,” and that “Europe risks sliding into digital authoritarianism.”

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov pointed out that EU officials were exempt from having their messages monitored. He commented in a post on X, “The EU weaponizes people’s strong emotions about child protection to push mass surveillance and censorship. Their surveillance law proposals conveniently exempted EU officials from having their own messages scanned.”

Related: Advocacy groups urge Trump to intervene in the Roman Storm retrial

Privacy on trial in broader global crackdown

The latest movement on Chat Control lands in the middle of a broader global crackdown on privacy tools. European regulators and law‑enforcement agencies have pushed high‑profile cases against crypto privacy projects like Tornado Cash, while US authorities have targeted developers linked to Samurai Wallet over alleged money‑laundering and sanctions violations, thrusting privacy‑preserving software into the crosshairs.

In response, Ethereum co‑founder Vitalik Buterin doubled down on the right to privacy as a core value. He donated 128 ETH each (roughly $760,000) to decentralized messaging projects Session and SimpleX Chat, arguing their importance in “preserving our digital privacy.”

Session president Alexander Linton told Cointelegraph that regulatory and technical developments are “threatening the future of private messaging,” while co-founder Chris McCabe said the challenge was now about raising global awareness.

Magazine: 2026 is the year of pragmatic privacy in crypto — Canton, Zcash and more