The Bank of Russia put forward a policy proposal that would allow non-qualified investors to buy certain cryptocurrencies.
According to a Tuesday announcement, the central bank’s proposal would allow both qualified and non-qualified investors to buy most crypto, but with limitations.
Non-qualified investors would be limited to a yet-to-be-defined set of liquid crypto after passing a knowledge test, capped at 300,000 rubles ($3,834) a year. Qualified investors would gain broad market access excluding privacy coins, also subject to a knowledge test.
Russian residents will also be able to acquire crypto on foreign platforms, pay with foreign accounts, and transfer the resulting assets through Russian intermediaries. In such cases, they will be required to notify the tax service of those transactions.
The report follows a recent statement from the central bank’s first deputy governor, Vladimir Chistyukhin, who recently said that Russia was considering easing crypto rules.
He hinted at the potential removal of the requirement to meet the “super-qualified investor” criteria for buying and selling crypto with actual delivery.
The “super-qualified investor” category was introduced in late April, when Russia’s finance ministry and central bank launched a crypto exchange. This classification is defined by wealth and income thresholds of over 100 million rubles ($1.3 million) or an annual income of at least 50 million rubles.
The central bank said that it “continues to consider cryptocurrencies a high-risk instrument.”
The announcement also reiterates that — while stablecoins and cryptocurrencies are recognized as monetary assets that can be bought and sold — they cannot be used for domestic payments.
Under the proposal, crypto transactions will be available through exchanges, brokers and trustees operating through their existing licenses. Specialized depositories and exchanges that work with cryptocurrencies will be subject to separate requirements.
Bhutan is using surplus, carbon-free hydropower to mine Bitcoin, converting excess electricity into a liquid digital export rather than curtailing generation.
Mining and custody are handled by the sovereign investment arm, Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), and confined to designated jurisdictions, limiting retail exposure.
Officials describe mined Bitcoin as a foreign-currency liquidity buffer that has already supported government finances.
The central bank permits crypto activity only under a phased, sandbox-style framework linked to Gelephu Mindfulness City, with an emphasis on risk control and transparency.
Bhutan’s pitch to the crypto world is simple: If a country has abundant renewable power and limited domestic demand, it can turn electrons into digital assets.
In practice, the Himalayan kingdom has been quietly doing exactly that: using hydropower to run industrial-scale Bitcoin (BTC) mining and to build a state-backed, values-driven “green digital assets” strategy that officials say can generate hard-currency liquidity, support public spending and help develop a domestic tech workforce.
Step 1: Start with the only natural resource that scales
Bhutan’s energy system is dominated by hydropower, and electricity exports, especially to India, are a core pillar of the economy. Reportedly, Bhutan’s leadership views expanded hydropower capacity as a prerequisite for scaling its “green” crypto ambitions.
The government’s own energy planning documents frame this expansion in large numbers. Bhutan’s National Energy Policy 2025 cites a “techno-economically viable hydropower potential” of 33,000 megawatts (MW), based on the Power System Master Plan 2040, and positions hydropower alongside solar, wind and storage as central to long-term growth.
A World Bank report similarly places Bhutan’s feasible hydropower potential at roughly 33 gigawatts and notes the macroeconomic impact of recent imports of IT equipment linked to crypto mining expansion.
Recent cross-border project announcements underline how tangible the buildout has become. In November 2025, India inaugurated the 1,020-MW Punatsangchhu-II hydropower project and extended a new credit line tied to deeper energy cooperation. Officials also noted that Bhutan’s domestic power demand is around 1,000 MW, with surplus electricity exported.
Step 2: Use surplus hydropower as “computing fuel”
Bhutan’s crypto strategy is spearheaded by Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), the commercial investment arm of the royal government.
In an April 2025 interview with Reuters, DHI CEO Ujjwal Deep Dahal said Bhutan began adding cryptocurrencies to DHI’s portfolio in 2019. He framed Bitcoin mining as a way to increase access to foreign-currency liquidity and create value from surplus hydropower.
Bhutan has used some crypto-related profits to help pay government salaries for the past two years, according to senior officials in Thimphu.
A key industrial lever is the Bitdeer and DHI partnership, announced in May 2023. Bitdeer said the parties planned to launch a closed-end fund of up to $500 million to develop carbon-free digital asset mining operations in Bhutan, leveraging the country’s renewable power and Bitdeer’s mining expertise.
Step 3: Treat Bitcoin like a financial buffer for a seasonal grid
Hydropower systems often face a timing problem: Generation can surge when rivers run high and shrink when flows drop.
In January 2025, Bhutan’s Gelephu Mindfulness City (GMC) project described the country’s approach as a way to monetize surplus summer hydropower via “green Bitcoin,” then convert that value back into electricity or imports when power is tighter. The project quoted DHI’s Dahal as describing Bitcoin “strategically as a battery.”
That “battery” framing matters because it is one of Bhutan’s most consistent arguments for why mining is not merely speculation. Instead, it is positioned as infrastructure-adjacent, turning otherwise curtailed renewable generation into a liquid reserve asset.
Step 4: Keep it sovereign and increasingly regulated
Bhutan’s mining and reserve-building efforts have attracted attention because they are state-linked rather than purely private. In September 2024, blockchain analytics firm Arkham disclosed that it had identified Bhutan government-linked Bitcoin holdings on its platform and characterized those holdings as originating from mining rather than seizures. However, onchain estimates fluctuate with price movements and wallet attribution and should not be treated as audited public accounts.
On the regulatory front, Bhutan’s central bank, the Royal Monetary Authority (RMA), has publicly signaled a controlled approach. In an April 30, 2025, notice titled “RMA’s Regulatory Stance on Cryptocurrency,” the RMA said it would adopt a phased and focused strategy.
The notice stated that crypto mining and exchanges would be permitted only for entities registered with GMC. Participation would also be limited to business partners operating under the GMC framework.
This sandbox-like containment aligns with how GMC is being positioned as a special jurisdiction with its own policy toolkit and a prominent finance and digital assets pillar. That framework includes a proposed blockchain-linked currency concept, “ter,” and a planned fully reserved digital bank, Oro Bank.
Step 5: The “green coin” narrative and the risks involved
Bhutan’s officials explicitly emphasize the climate angle. For example, Dahal has argued that coins mined using Bhutan’s hydropower offset coins mined with fossil energy elsewhere and contribute to the green economy.
But even in a renewables-heavy system, these risks do not disappear:
Volatility and fiscal risk: Bitcoin’s price can swing sharply, and using volatile assets in public finance introduces budgeting risk, even if holdings are built from surplus power rather than taxes.
Transparency: Onchain tracking is not the same as official disclosure. Audited reporting and clear governance matter when reserves are state-linked.
Financial crime and consumer protection: The RMA’s phased stance and the restriction of permitted activity to GMC-registered entities reflect a preference for controlled participation rather than open retail speculation.
Testing a green Bitcoin model
Bhutan’s green Bitcoin economy is not a meme trade; it is a state-directed effort to bolt a new export, digital assets, onto the country’s existing comparative advantage in renewable power. The strategy uses a special jurisdiction, Gelephu Mindfulness City, alongside central bank guardrails to limit spillover risk.
Whether it becomes a durable model will depend less on slogans and more on hydropower expansion, disciplined reserve management and how transparently the state accounts for what it mines, holds and sells.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
South Korean payments processor BC Card has completed a pilot project that enabled foreign users to pay local merchants using stablecoins.
BC Card’s pilot project was announced Tuesday and was conducted with blockchain company Wavebridge, wallet provider Aaron group and cross-border remittance provider Global Money Express. The companies had foreign users convert their stablecoins held in overseas wallets, which were partnered with BC Card, into digital prepaid cards.
The company said this pilot was not a short-term project, but part of preparations to implement a stablecoin payment structure. The change is a response to the evolution of South Korean stablecoin regulations, it said.
BC Card is one of South Korea’s largest payment companies, which reportedly processes over 20% of South Korea’s card transactions and covers 3.4 million domestic merchants. Its majority owner is KT Corp, one of the country’s three major telecom companies.
Shehram Khattak, general counsel at Trust Wallet, told Cointelegraph:
Ultimately, banks will have to deal with legacy operations but not only from an operations perspective but also processes; the entire department will have to change how they function.”
In late July, local media reported that credit card companies were scrambling to respond to perceived threats from stablecoins. The nation’s credit card industry reportedly formed a joint task force as local regulators opened discussions regarding the introduction of won-based stablecoins.
BC Card reportedly launched an internal team dedicated to tracking trends in both the domestic and international stablecoin markets. Still, local stablecoin regulations are taking longer to take shape than anticipated.
The crux of the debate appears to be the BOK’s desire to require banks to own at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking regulatory approval. Other regulators appear to be pushing towards a more diverse ecosystem.
Stablecoins are increasingly discussed as an alternative or complementary payment method to traditional solutions such as payment cards or bank wire transfers.
In a massive Christmas U-turn by Sir Keir Starmer, the government has announced a huge climbdown on inheritance tax on farmers.
The tax relief on family farms handed down between families is to increase from £1m to £2.5m, meaning only farms worth more than £5m will pay.
The climbdown, overturning bitterly unpopular proposals in Rachel Reeves’s budget last year, follows a personal intervention by the prime minister.
The National Farmers Union (NFU) president Tom Bradshaw revealed the government backed down after he had two “very constructive meetings” with the PM.
Responding to the climbdown, Mr Bradshaw – who led a high-profile campaign which included tractors blocking Whitehall – said it would come as a huge relief.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch claimed it was a “huge U-turn” by the government and a big win for her party’s campaign against Labour’s “family farms tax”.
But the shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins claimed it was only a partial U-turn on the “vindictive family farm tax” and was too late for some farmers. Businesses and lives had been lost, she said.
Farmers defy ban in budget day protest
Image: A skull hangs on a sign, as British farmers took part in a protest at Whitehall, calling on the chancellor to change course.
Announcing the climbdown, Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds said: “We have listened closely to farmers across the country, and we are making changes today to protect more ordinary family farms.
“We are increasing the individual threshold from £1m to £2.5m which means couples with estates of up to £5m will now pay no inheritance tax on their estates.
“It’s only right that larger estates contribute more, while we back the farms and trading businesses that are the backbone of Britain’s rural communities.”
Dozens of tractors descend on Westminster
The U-turn was given a warm welcome by the NFU, which has led the relentless protests in Westminster and around the UK.
Mr Bradshaw said Tuesday’s announcement would “greatly” reduce that tax burden for many family farms
He said: “Changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) announced in last year’s budget came as a huge shock to the farming community.
“Until that moment, the best tax planning advice was to hold on to your farm until death and pass it on to the next generation who could continue to run a viable farming, food-producing business.
“The original changes to APR and BPR, contained within the Finance Bill, resulted in a pernicious and cruel tax, trapping the most elderly and vulnerable people and their families in the eye of the storm. The NFU and its members have stood strong for what we believed in.
“I am thankful common sense has prevailed and government has listened.”
Farmers descend on London in protest
The climbdown also follows a mini-rebellion in the Commons in early December in a vote on the inheritance tax proposal, when around 30 Labour MPs representing rural areas abstained and one, Markus Campbell-Savours, voted against and had the Labour whip withdrawn.
‘A big win for the Conservatives against a cruel and immoral tax’
Ms Badenoch, who has campaigned against the tax during several farm visits, said: “This is a huge U-turn by the government and a big win for the Conservative Party’s campaign against Labour’s family farm tax.
“The family farm tax is cruel, immoral and will not raise any money because farmers will stop farming. It would have pushed farms to the brink, damaged our food supply, and hurt the people who work long hours to feed the country.
“This fight isn’t finished. Other family businesses are still affected by Labour’s tax raid, and we will keep pushing until the tax is lifted from them too. But today is an important win, and proof that standing up for what’s fair, even when the odds are against us can make a real difference.”
Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrats spokesperson, urged the government to scrap the “unfair tax in full” as “many family farms will still find themselves financially crippled and barely making the minimum wage”.
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said: “This cynical climbdown – whilst better than nothing – does little to address the year of anxiety that farmers have faced in planning to protect their livelihoods.
“With British agriculture hanging by a thread, the government must go further and abolish this callous farms tax.”