David Cameron walking up Downing Street to be appointed foreign secretary was the twist no one expected – the character from the end of season one brought back for the finale.
The news eclipsed the departure of Suella Braverman – who pushed the limits of collective responsibility and was blamed by her own colleagues for inflaming protests over the weekend.
You can see the argument that Rishi Sunak is bringing back a “big beast” to bolster his administration as it heads towards a difficult election. David Cameron has long experience in government, pulled off a surprise election victory in 2015 and has clout on the world stage at a time of global instability.
But this also looks like a shift in political direction – a swerve away from right-wing populism associated with the former home secretary and towards a traditional centre-right Toryism.
It has certainly cheered the party’s One Nation MPs, the often-sidelined remaining Cameroons who felt out in the cold during the Boris Johnson years. Damian Green, a leading member of this group, called his appointment a move to the “centre-right”.
More on Conservatives
Related Topics:
Other MPs in what could be called “blue wall” seats – those facing a challenge from the Liberal Democrats, and broadly not enamoured with Brexit or the Rwanda policy – also welcomed the appointment. Another former minister told me “the grown-ups are back in charge, Cameron is a class act”.
They added that what the home secretary was doing last week in taking on the Met police was “pure populism”. His appointment is likely to reflect concern about shoring up these blue wall seats.
Image: David Cameron walks outside 10 Downing Street
But for that reason, it’s a move likely to infuriate the right of his party and its supporters. It could also raise questions about some of Sunak’s own instincts, given the prime minister has promised to “stop the boats”, has socially conservative views on gender, crime and migration, and still hopes to make his Rwanda scheme a reality.
One of Sunak’s supporters described it as a sign of “professionalism” after an all-too-obvious tug of war within the cabinet. Sunak is now not thought to be at risk of a leadership challenge, with an election on the horizon, and can choose the cabinet he wants after a period of having to placate parts of the party who backed him in the leadership contest.
Image: Suella Braverman leaves her home this morning
But the unelected Cameron comes with baggage. Most obviously, there is Brexit – having campaigned for Remain, he brought about our EU exit with all the messy consequences that dogged his successors. Those tensions have eased within the Conservative Party but have by no means disappeared.
Increasing suspicion of him on the right of the party will be his record on China, and the “golden age” he championed – now seen by many in government as a mistake, as China is regarded as presenting a major geo-political challenge for the UK.
Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge
Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.
Theresa Villiers, a Brexiteer who served in David Cameron’s cabinet and is a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee, which recently published a highly critical report on the government’s China policy, told me MPs would have questions for him, saying: “I welcome David Cameron’s return. He is hugely talented and has much to offer government.
“The political landscape has changed dramatically since he resigned and MPs will want the assurance that his approach on issues such as Brexit and China will reflect where we are now, not where we were during the Cameron era in Downing Street. I’m sure he will be able to give that reassurance.”
This reshuffle is likely to be the last significant one before the general election. Previous prime ministers facing difficult electoral tests have brought back big beasts from the past – Gordon Brown with Lord Mandelson in 2008, before going on to lose the 2010 election 18 months later.
Sunak used his recent party conference speech to portray himself as the candidate of change – after 30 years of what he called 30 years of broken politics. He’s now relying on a key figure from the past to try and secure his survival.
Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe execs once ruled out adopting crypto over concerns of volatility and risk, and the banking giant also blocked customer crypto transactions back in 2015.
Sir Keir Starmer continues to face the threat of a major rebellion during a key vote on welfare reforms later – despite making last-minute concessions to disgruntled Labour MPs.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has confirmed that all existing claimants of the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability benefit, will be protected from changes to eligibility.
The combined value of the standard Universal Credit allowance and the health top-up will rise “at least in line with inflation” every year of this parliament.
And an additional £300m for employment support for sick and disabled people in 2026 has been announced, which will rise every year after.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:54
Welfare cuts ‘needed to be made’
Ms Kendall has also promised that a consultation into PIP – “co-produced” with disabled people – will be published next autumn.
She said the U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers about £2.5bn by 2030 – less than half the £4.8bn the government had expected to save with its initial proposals.
But after announcing the U-turns, Labour MPs were still publicly saying they could not back the plans as they do not go far enough to allay their concerns.
Disabilities minister Stephen Timms would not say he was “confident” the proposals would pass the Commons when asked on Sky News’ Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge.
“We’ve got a very strong package, I certainly hope it passes,” he replied.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:49
‘Disabled people thrown under the bus’
A total of 86 charities united yesterday to call on MPs to reject the reforms, saying they will harm disabled people and calling it “a political choice”.
The likes of Oxfam, Child Action Poverty Group, Mind and Shelter said the bill has been brought to a vote without consulting disabled people and without any assessment “of its impact on health and employment outcomes”.
When asked to name “a single” disability organisation in favour of the reforms, Ms Kendall declined to do so.
Several Labour MPs indicated they would still vote against the changes, leaving the government in the dark over how big a rebellion it still may face.
Ms Kendall tried to allay their fears, telling MPs: “I believe we have a fair package, a package that protects existing claimants because they’ve come to rely on that support.”
Richard Burgon presented a petition to parliament yesterday evening against the cuts, signed by more than 77,000 people.
Several Labour MPs questioned why the vote was going ahead before the review into PIP is published – including Rachael Maskell, who said she could not “countenance sick and disabled people being denied support” and added: “It is a matter of conscience.”
Connor Naismith said the concessions “undoubtedly improve efforts to secure welfare reform which is fair”, but added: “Unfortunately, I do not believe these concessions yet go far enough.”
Image: Labour rebel Nadia Whittome said the government was ‘ignoring’ disabled people
Nadia Whittome accused the government of “ignoring” disabled people and urged ministers to go “back to the drawing board”.
Ian Byrne told the Commons he will vote against the “cruel cuts” to disability benefits because the “so-called concessions go nowhere near far enough”.
The vote will take place this evening, with coverage on Sky News’ Politics Hub live blog and on TV.