Connect with us

Published

on

A leading group of City figures are urging the chancellor to accelerate pensions reform, hand a competitiveness objective to the audit watchdog and incentivise retail investors to back British companies “at a critical pivot point… [for] the economy”.

Sky News has seen a letter from the Capital Markets Industry Taskforce (CMIT), an influential panel chaired by Julia Hoggett, the London Stock Exchange chief executive, which calls on Jeremy Hunt to advance his financial services programme in next week’s autumn statement.

In the wide-ranging letter, CMIT warned that British companies were being starved of domestic investment, saying: “The UK has remarkable companies and remarkable potential, but we do not invest in ourselves.”

CMIT, which was established last year to strengthen the competitive position of Britain’s capital markets amid concerns that fast-growing companies are increasingly being tempted to list overseas, includes the chairman of GlaxoSmithKline and chief executives of Phoenix Group and Schroders among its members.

In its letter to Mr Hunt, the taskforce said that Britain now saw far lower domestic investment by UK-based pension funds in domestic capital markets than other G7 countries.

“Capital markets exist to finance the economy, they are founded in many jurisdictions across the world on a strong domestic investor base that invests in its own economy and is incentivised to do so,” the letter said.

While countries such as Canada, Japan and France were significantly overweight when comparing their allocation to equities to the size of their own stock markets, the UK is now substantially underweight, CMIT said.

More from Business

It added that the issue was not restricted to public markets, telling the chancellor that in 2021, a Canadian pension fund invested more in one UK private company than the entire UK pensions industry invested in all UK private companies in the same year.

One member of CMIT told Sky News that the situation had become “urgent” and required immediate attention from the Treasury to build on pension reforms unveiled in Mr Hunt’s Mansion House speech earlier this year.

The issue has acquired greater impetus as a consequence of companies such as Flutter Entertainment, the FTSE-100 gambling group, announcing that it would move its primary listing to the US.

Meanwhile, ARM Holdings, the chip designer, has floated in New York rather than London, despite being a British technology champion.

The CMIT letter warned Mr Hunt that this trend was likely to continue without “proactive policy” attempting to halt it.

“The withdrawal of domestic capital starves our companies of financing, diverts UK tax-payer support to investments in non-domestic companies and ultimately impacts the efficacy of our markets,” it said.

“It also disproportionately impacts smaller and medium sized companies listed on our markets.”

CMIT argued that the Financial Reporting Council should be handed a formal competitiveness objective, complementing those of the City and banking watchdogs.

“This will ensure that the future design of our corporate governance and stewardship regimes takes into account not just good governance and stewardship, but also the attractiveness of the UK capital markets for both existing and potential domestic and international issuers, as well as domestic and international investors,” it added.

The taskforce encouraged Mr Hunt to complete his Mansion House reforms in the autumn statement by facilitating the consolidation of defined contribution pension schemes, and establishing a ‘British ISA’ that would incentivise retail savers to invest in UK-based companies.

It said an independent expert should be asked to compile a report monitoring the extent of UK pension fund investment in domestic companies.

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour’s dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

Published

on

By

Labour's dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

The two-child benefit cap: To scrap or not to scrap?

There is an ongoing row in the Labour Party about welfare spending and how to cut it while maintaining protections for the most vulnerable.

Those on the left are suspicious of anything that may look or smell like balancing the books on the backs of the poorest in society.

Those on the other side point to an unsustainable welfare bill that has been allowed to balloon under the Conservatives and looks set to continue under Labour.

Rachel Reeves will have to weigh up finding between £3bn and £4bn to scrap the cap, or face the wrath of Labour MPs on small majorities who believe they were elected to deliver on ‘Labour values’ like lifting this very cap.

But perhaps there is a compromise the chancellor could opt for, which may placate the left of her party while needing less cash.

For example, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lifting the cap from two to three children would cost £2.6bn; or a tapered system, where parents got the full amount for the first two kids and then half the amount for any subsequent children, would cost around £1.8bn.

But Labour big beast David Blunkett – the only senior Labour figure against lifting the cap – wants to see a more nuanced approach.

Blunkett believes the cap ought to remain, but he wants there to be exemptions for disabled children and parents who have been widowed, and he would prefer the government to focus on anti-child poverty measures and improving pathways to work for parents, all paid for by a tax on gambling – something former prime minister Gordon Brown has been agitating for.

Read more:
What is the two-child benefit cap?
What tax rises could Rachel Reeves announce?

At a time when the government perpetually reminds us of how little money it has and how much strain public finances are under due to austerity, finding several billion to scrap a policy that is broadly popular with the public may seem like an unwise move.

According to the latest polling from YouGov, 59% of the public are in favour of keeping the cap in place, and only 26% thought it should be abolished.

But politically, the chancellor is aware of the strength of feeling within her party about reducing child poverty as soon as possible, and her colleague, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, has stressed the party has a “moral mission” to tackle child poverty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Labour delay their child poverty strategy?

Irrespective of what Reeves chooses, her political woes do not end there.

Taxes are set to go up in the budget later this month, and Reeves has refused to rule out breaking her manifesto promise of not raising taxes on working people.

This combined with persistently disappointing voter intention polling for Labour, could spell deep dissatisfaction among the public.

A decision to lift the two-child benefit cap may boost morale among Labour MPs, but if it’s not enough to prevent the loss of hundreds of political foot soldiers in May’s local elections, Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer will need to find more red meat to throw to their party before too long.

Continue Reading

Politics

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Published

on

By

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

As deliberations entered their second day in a criminal trial over a $25 million exploit, jurors asked for clarification on previous testimony and the definition of “good faith.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Published

on

By

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

While Coinbase insists that the US Treasury cannot override Congress’s intent on the GENIUS Act, banks continue to press for a blanket ban on stablecoin interest.

Continue Reading

Trending