Connect with us

Published

on

A state judge in Washington granted Oregon State and Washington State sole control of the Pac-12 board of directors Tuesday, issuing the ruling at a preliminary injunction hearing in Whitman County Court.

Judge Gary Libey granted a stay of the decision until Monday — at no objection from OSU and WSU — as the 10 schools leaving the Pac-12 following the 2023-24 school year initiate the appeals process.

The decision comes roughly two months after Libey granted a temporary restraining order at the request of OSU and WSU that prevented Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff from calling any Pac-12 board meetings.

“I grew up where conduct spoke louder than words. That’s how my parents treated me and that’s how I treated my children when they were growing up,” Libey said before issuing his decision. “With that in mind, this court finds in favor that the plaintiffs are likely to prevail on their interpretation of the bylaws.”

In a small Whitman County courthouse, roughly 15 miles from WSU’s campus, Libey heard arguments from three parties: OSU/WSU, the Pac-12 and the University of Washington, which entered the case as an intervenor, working on behalf of the nine other departing schools (Arizona, Arizona State, Cal, Colorado, Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, USC and Utah).

Over the course of about two and a half hours, all three parties argued for different outcomes.

OSU and WSU argued — as they have done for weeks in written briefs — that conference bylaws were clear that when schools announced they were joining other conferences, they immediately surrendered their seat on the conference board. That, they argued, was how it worked when UCLA and USC announced they were joining the Big Ten and, again, when Colorado announced it was leaving for the Big 12.

It was not only until the other seven announced they were also leaving, OSU and WSU argued, that those schools’ interpretation of the bylaws changed and claimed that all 12 deserved a seat on the board.

“There isn’t a single document that’s been produced which shows that the University of Washington thought that this was the correct position until it provided its notice of withdrawal and now the shoe was on the other foot,” argued lawyer Eric MacMichael, for OSU and WSU. “But parties are not allowed to just blatantly flip flop on the meaning of contractual provisions just so they can have their cake and eat it too.”

The conference attempted to maintain an appearance of neutrality, lobbying for the terms of the TRO — which required a unanimous vote on any major decision — to remain in place. The conference’s attorney, Mark Lambert, was less assertive when addressing the court, acting more in a capacity of obligation.

Asked by Libey if the Pac-12 wants to continue in its business in the future, Lambert said, “Frankly, that is up to Oregon State and Washington State at this point and the conference and the commissioner are sensitive to those issues and also sensitive to the notion that without a board that makes things difficult.”

The departing schools asked Libey to rule against OSU and WSU outright, which would have essentially given them the right to govern the conference with a 10-2 supermajority.

At the heart of the dispute is forthcoming revenue. The departing schools, as they did in writing earlier this month, expressed concern that OSU and WSU could withhold revenue set to be distributed during this academic year. They also made the case that OSU/WSU’s fear that the departing schools could vote to dissolve the conference — then evenly distribute the remaining assets — was irrelevant because of their belief that process could be conducted without any board action.

“It’s simply the fact that the members could decide to dissolve that they wanted,” argued Dan Levin, for Washington. “Of course, in all this time during these proceedings and before, no member has called for such a vote.”

It’s unclear if the departing schools would attempt to act on that mechanism if they don’t win on appeals.

“We are disappointed with the decision and are immediately seeking review in the Washington Supreme Court and requesting to put on hold implementation of this decision,” the remaining 10 members said in a statement. “As members of the Pac-12, participating in ongoing and scheduled competitions, we are members of the board under the Pac-12 bylaws. We have the right to the revenue earned by our schools during the 2023-2024 academic year, which is necessary in order to operate our athletics programs and to provide mental and physical health services, academic support, and other support programs for our student-athletes.

“We remain committed to the best interests of our student-athletes, athletic departments, and university communities and will persist in our efforts to secure a fair resolution.”

Meanwhile, WSU president Kirk Schulz and athletic director Pat Chun lauded the court’s “common-sense decision.”

“It has always been our view that the future of the Pac-12 should be determined by the remaining members, not by those schools that are leaving the conference,” they said in a statement. “This position is consistent with the action the Pac-12 Board of Directors took when the first two schools announced their departure from the conference more than a year ago.

“We have always been committed to protecting the best interests of the conference, our student-athletes, coaches and fans. Today’s news allows Washington State University and Oregon State University to start that process as the controlling members of the Pac-12 Conference Board.”

Oregon State university president Jayathi Murthy and athletic director Scott Barnes offered a similar sentiment.

“We are pleased with the Court’s decision today that Oregon State and Washington State constitute the only remaining members of the Pac-12 Conference Board,” they said in a statement. “We look forward to charting a path forward for the Pac-12 that is in the best interest of the Conference and student-athletes. Our intentions are to make reasonable business decisions going forward while continuing to seek collaboration and consultation with the departing universities.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Granlund nets 3 for Stars, but ‘job is not done’

Published

on

By

Granlund nets 3 for Stars, but 'job is not done'

The Dallas Stars3-1 win in Game 4 against the Winnipeg Jets on Tuesday night was a contrast in offensive efficiency. The Jets converted just once on 72 shot attempts. Dallas center Mikael Granlund, meanwhile, needed only three shot attempts in the game to score three goals. His hat trick was all the offense the Stars needed to take a commanding 3-1 series lead, moving one win away from their third straight trip to the Western Conference finals.

“Obviously, the job is not done. We’ve got a lot of work to do. [But] that was a good win,” Granlund said.

It was the first career hat trick for Granlund, a 13-year veteran whom the Stars acquired from the San Jose Sharks in a trade back in February. Three goals on three shots, all of them sailing past Jets goalie Connor Hellebuyck, who remained winless on the road in the 2025 postseason.

Granlund’s first goal came at 8:36 on the power play, as he skated in on three Jets defensemen and fired a snap shot past Hellebuyck from the top of the slot.

“I was just shooting it somewhere and it went in,” Granlund said.

“I got a clean enough look. It was just a damn perfect shot, just above my pad and below my glove,” Hellebuyck lamented.

“Obviously, he probably wants the first one back, the wrister,” Jets coach Scott Arniel said of Hellebuyck. “At the end of the day, we’ve got to get him some run support. Get him a lead.”

Granlund’s second shot and second goal came on a play started by Mikko Rantanen, whose league-leading point total now stands at 19 for the playoffs. His outlet pass found Granlund in the neutral zone, sparking a 2-on-1 with Roope Hintz. Granlund kept the puck and roofed it to give Dallas a 2-1 lead after Nik Ehlers had tied the game for Winnipeg earlier in the second period.

“When you pass all the time, you can surprise the goalie sometimes when you shoot the puck. It’s good to shoot once in a while,” said Granlund, who had twice as many assists (44) as goals (22) in the regular season.

Granlund’s third and final shot attempt of the game was on another Dallas power play in the third period, following a double-minor penalty to defenseman Haydn Fleury for high-sticking Hintz.

Defenseman Miro Heiskanen, in the lineup for the first time since Jan. 28 after missing the last 32 regular-season games and first 10 playoff games because of a knee injury, collected the puck after Matt Duchene rang it off the post. Heiskanen slid it over to Granlund for a one-timer that brought him to his knees on the ice. After the shot beat Hellebuyck at 7:23 of the third period, waves of hats hit the ice in celebration of Granlund’s three-goal night.

It was fitting that Rantanen and Heiskanen had points on Granlund’s hat trick. This was the first game that the Stars’ so-called “Finnish Mafia” played together, as Heiskanen was injured before Granlund and Rantanen joined the team. Those three skaters joined countrymen Hintz and defenseman Esa Lindell in helping Dallas to victory.

“It was fun for sure. Fun to finally be on the ice with them,” Heiskanen said.

Goaltender Jake Oettinger did the rest with 31 saves, many of them on dangerous Winnipeg chances. But in the end, all the Stars needed were three shot attempts, while the Jets’ voluminous offensive night produced only one goal.

“Oettinger made some big stops. But we had 70 shot attempts. We have to get more than one goal,” Arniel said. “If we can’t find more than one goal, we’re not going to win hockey games, especially [against] this team.”

Dallas will attempt to close out the series on Thursday night in Winnipeg.

Continue Reading

Sports

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe Jackson

Published

on

By

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson

Pete Rose, Joe Jackson, seven other members of the 1919 Chicago “Black Sox”, six other former players, one coach and one former owner are now eligible to be voted on for the Hall of Fame after commissioner Rob Manfred removed them from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

Hall of Fame chairwoman Jane Forbes Clark said in a statement: “The National Baseball Hall of Fame has always maintained that anyone removed from Baseball’s permanently ineligible list will become eligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Major League Baseball’s decision to remove deceased individuals from the permanently ineligible list will allow for the Hall of Fame candidacy of such individuals to now be considered.”

Due to Hall of Fame voting procedures, Rose and Jackson won’t be eligible to be voted on until the Classic Era Baseball committee, which votes on individuals who made their biggest impact prior to 1980, meets in December of 2027.

Let’s dig into what all this means.


Why were these players banned?

All individuals on the banned list who were reinstated had been permanently ineligible due to accusations related to gambling related to baseball — either throwing games, accepting bribes, or like Rose, betting on baseball games.

Most of the banned players, including Jackson and his seven Chicago White Sox teammates who threw the 1919 World Series, played in the 1910s, when gambling in baseball was widespread. As historian Bill James once wrote, “Few simplifications of memory are as bizarre as the notion that the Black Sox scandal hit baseball out of the blue. … In fact, of course, the Black Sox scandal was merely the largest wart of a disease that had infested baseball at least a dozen years earlier and had grown, unchecked, to ravage the features of a generation.”

The most famous player, of course, was Jackson, one of baseball’s biggest stars alongside Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker in the 1910s. While many have tried to exonerate Jackson through the years, pointing out that he hit .375 in the 1919 World Series, baseball historians agree that Jackson was a willing participant in throwing the World Series and accepted money from the gambling ring that paid off the White Sox players.

While the White Sox players were acquitted in a criminal trial in 1921, commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis banned the eight players in a statement that began with the words “Regardless of the verdict of juries …”

If there was an innocent member in the group, it was third baseman Buck Weaver, not Jackson. Weaver had participated in meetings where the fixing of the World Series was discussed, and Landis banned him for life for guilty knowledge.

As for Rose, he was banned in 1989 by commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti for betting on games while he was manager of the Cincinnati Reds, including those involving his own team. While Rose denied the accusations for years, he eventually confessed. He died last September at age 83.


Who else is impacted?

Phillies owner William Cox was banned in 1943 and forced to sell the team for betting on games. Cox had just purchased the team earlier that season. None of the other non-White Sox players are of major significance, although Benny Kauff was the big star of the Federal League in 1914-15, winning the batting title both seasons. The Federal League was a breakoff league that attempted to challenge the National and American leagues.


When is the soonest Rose and Jackson could go into the Hall of Fame?

The Hall of Fame voting process for players not considered by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America — such as Rose and Jackson, who never appeared on the ballot due to their banned status — includes two eras: the Contemporary Baseball Era (1980 to present) and the Classic Baseball Era (pre-1980). The voting periods are already set:

December 2025: Player ballot for the Contemporary Era.

December 2026: Contemporary Era ballot for managers, executives and umpires.

December 2027: Classic Era ballot for players, managers, executives and umpires.

Each committee has an initial screening to place eight candidates on the ballot, so Rose and Jackson will first have to make the ballot. While it’s unclear how a future screening committee will proceed, it’s possible that both will make the ballot. While comparisons to players with PED allegations aren’t exactly apples to apples — since they were never placed on the ineligible list — it’s worth noting that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rafael Palmeiro were included on the eight-player Contemporary Era ballot in 2023.

Once the ballot is determined — a 16-person committee consisting of Hall of Fame players, longtime executives and media members or historians — convenes and votes. A candidate must receive 12 votes to get selected. In the most recent election in December, Dave Parker and Dick Allen were on the Classic Era ballot.


Which players have the best HOF cases?

Obviously, Rose would have been a slam-dunk Hall of Famer had he never bet on baseball and had he appeared on the BBWAA ballot after his career ended. The all-time MLB leader with 4,256 hits, Rose won three batting titles and was the 1973 NL MVP. And while he’s overrated in a sense — his 79.6 career WAR is more in line with the likes of Jeff Bagwell, Brooks Robinson and Robin Yount than all-time elite superstars — and hung on well past his prime to break Ty Cobb’s hits record, his popularity and fame would have made him an inner-circle Hall of Famer.

Whether he’ll get support now is complicated. Bonds and Clemens both received fewer than four votes in 2023. The committee usually consists of eight former players, and they may not support Rose given the one hard and fast rule that every player knows: You can’t bet on the game.

Jackson, meanwhile, was a star of the deadball era, hitting .408 in 1911 and .356 in his career, an average that ranks fourth all time behind only Cobb, Negro Leagues star Oscar Charleston and Rogers Hornsby. He finished with 62.2 WAR and 1,772 hits in a career that ended at age 32 due to the ban. Those figures would be low for a Hall of Fame selection, although the era committees did recently elect Allen and Tony Oliva, both of whom finished with fewer than 2,000 hits. And again, it is hard to say how the committee will view Jackson’s connection to gambling on the sport.

The only other reinstated player with a semblance of a chance to get on a ballot is pitcher Eddie Cicotte, who won 209 games and finished with 59.7 WAR. While his final season came at 36, the knuckleballer was still going strong, having won 29 games for the White Sox in 1919 and 21 in 1920 before Landis banned him.

For what it’s worth, the top position players in career WAR who made their mark prior to 1980 and aren’t in the Hall of Fame are Rose, Bill Dahlen (75.3), Bobby Grich (71.0), Graig Nettles (67.6), Reggie Smith (64.6), Ken Boyer (62.8), Jackson and Sal Bando (61.5).

Pitching candidates would include Luis Tiant (65.7), Tommy John (61.6) and Wes Ferrell (60.1). John was on the recent ballot and received seven votes. Others on that ballot included Steve Garvey, Boyer, Negro Leagues pitcher John Donaldson, Negro Leagues manager Vic Harris and Tiant.

Other potential pre-1980 candidates could include Thurman Munson, Bert Campaneris, Dave Concepcion and Stan Hack.

Continue Reading

Sports

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Published

on

By

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Since its inception in 1873, the Preakness Stakes has become one of the most prestigious horse races in the world. Following the Kentucky Derby and preceding the Belmont Stakes each year, the Preakness Stakes take place on the third Saturday in May at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore, Maryland.

Check out the all-time winning horses and jockeys in Preakness Stakes history.

  • 2024: Seize The Grey, Jaime Torres

  • 2023: National Treasure, John Velazquez

  • 2022: Early Voting, Jose Ortiz

  • 2021: Rombauer, Flavien Prat

  • 2020: Swiss Skydiver, Robby Albarado

  • 2019: War of Will, Tyler Gaffalione

  • 2018: Justify, Mike Smith

  • 2017: Cloud Computing, Javier Castellano

  • 2016: Exaggerator, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2015: American Pharoah, Victor Espinoza

  • 2014: California Chrome, Victor Espinoza

  • 2013: Oxbow, Gary Stevens

  • 2012: I’ll Have Another, Mario Gutierrez

  • 2011: Shackleford, Jesus Castenon

  • 2010: Lookin at Lucky, Martin Garcia

  • 2009: Rachel Alexandra, Calvin Borel

  • 2008: Big Brown, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2007: Curlin, Robby Albarado

  • 2006: Bernadini, Tom Albertrani

  • 2005: Afleet Alex, Jeremy Rose

  • 2004: Smarty Jones, Stewart Elliott

  • 2003: Funny Cide, José Santos

  • 2002: War Emblem, Victor Espinoza

  • 2001: Point Given, Gary Stevens

  • 2000: Red Bullet, Jerry Bailey

  • 1999: Charismatic, Chris Antley

  • 1998: Real Quiet, Kent Desormeaux

  • 1997: Silver Charm, Gary Stevens

  • 1996: Louis Quatorze, Pat Day

  • 1995: Timber Country, Pat Day

  • 1994: Tabasco Cat, Pat Day

  • 1993: Prairie Bayou, Matt Smith

  • 1992: Pine Bluff, Chris McCarron

  • 1991: Hansel, Jerry Bailey

  • 1990: Summer Squall, Pat Day

  • 1989: Sunday Silence, Pat Valenzuela

  • 1988: Risen Star, Eddie Delahoussaye

  • 1987: Alysheba, Chris McCarron

  • 1986: Snow Chief, Alex Solis

  • 1985: Tank’s Prospect, Pat Day

  • 1984: Gate Dancer, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1983: Deputed Testamony, Donald Miller Jr.

  • 1982: Aloma’s Ruler, Jack Kaenel

  • 1981: Pleasant Colony, Jorge Velásquez

  • 1980: Codex, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1979: Spectacular Bid, Ron Franklin

  • 1978: Affirmed, Steve Cauthen

  • 1977: Seattle Slew, Jean Cruguet

  • 1976: Elocutionist, John Lively

  • 1975: Master Derby, Darrell McHargue

  • 1974: Little Current, Miguel Rivera

  • 1973: Secretariat, Ron Turcotte

  • 1972: Bee Bee Bee, Eldon Nelson

  • 1971: Canonero II, Gustavo Avila

  • 1970: Personality, Eddie Belmonte

  • 1969: Majestic Prince, Bill Hartack

  • 1968: Forward Pass, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1967: Damascus, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1966: Kauai King, Don Brumfield

  • 1965: Tom Rolfe, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1964: Northern Dancer, Bill Hartack

  • 1963: Candy Spots, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1962: Greek Money, John Rotz

  • 1961: Carry Back, John Sellers

  • 1960: Bally Ache, Bob Ussery

  • 1959: Royal Orbit, William Harmatz

  • 1958: Tim Tam, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1957: Bold Ruler, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1956: Fabius, Bill Hartack

  • 1955: Nashua, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1954: Hasty Road, John Adams

  • 1953: Native Dancer, Eric Guerin

  • 1952: Blue Man, Conn McCreary

  • 1951: Bold, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1950: Hill Prince, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1949: Capot, Ted Atkinson

  • 1948: Citation, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1947: Faultless, Doug Dodson

  • 1946: Assault, Warren Mehrtens

  • 1945: Polynesian, W.D. Wright

  • 1944: Pensive, Conn McCreary

  • 1943: Count Fleet, Johnny Longden

  • 1942: Alsab, Basil James

  • 1941: Whirlaway, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1940: Bimelech, F.A. Smith

  • 1939: Challedon, George Seabo

  • 1938: Dauber, Maurice Peters

  • 1937: War Admiral, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1936: Bold Venture, George Woolf

  • 1935: Omaha, Willie Saunders

  • 1934: High Quest, Robert Jones

  • 1933: Head Play, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1932: Burgoo King, Eugene James

  • 1931: Mate, George Ellis

  • 1930: Gallant Fox, Earl Sande

  • 1929: Dr. Freeland, Louis Schaefer

  • 1928: Victorian, Sonny Workman

  • 1927: Bostonian, Whitey Abel

  • 1926: Display, John Maiben

  • 1925: Coventry, Clarence Kummer

  • 1924: Nellie Morse, John Merimee

  • 1923: Vigil, Benny Marinelli

  • 1922: Pillory, L. Morris

  • 1921: Broomspun, Frank Coltiletti

  • 1920: Man o’ War, Clarence Kummer

  • 1919: Sir Barton, Johnny Loftus

  • 1918: Jack Hare Jr., Charles Peak; War Cloud, Johnny Loftus

  • 1917: Kalitan, E. Haynes

  • 1916: Damrosch, Linus McAtee

  • 1915: Rhine Maiden, Douglas Hoffman

  • 1914: Holiday, Andy Shuttinger

  • 1913: Buskin, James Butwell

  • 1912: Colonel Holloway, Clarence Turner

  • 1911: Watervale, Eddie Dugan

  • 1910: Layminster, Roy Estep

  • 1909: Effendi, Willie Doyle

  • 1908: Royal Tourist, Eddie Dugan

  • 1907: Don Enrique, G. Mountain

  • 1906: Whimsical, Walter Miller

  • 1905: Cairngorm, W. Davis

  • 1904: Bryn Mawr, E. Hildebrand

  • 1903: Flocarline, W. Gannon

  • 1902: Old England, L. Jackson

  • 1901: The Parader, F. Landry

  • 1900: Hindus, H. Spencer

  • 1899: Half time, R. Clawson

  • 1898: Sly Fox, Willie Simms

  • 1897: Paul Kauvar, T. Thorpe

  • 1896: Margrave, Henry Griffin

  • 1895: Belmar, Fred Taral

  • 1894: Assignee, Fred Taral

  • 1893: No race

  • 1892: No race

  • 1891: No race

  • 1890: Montague, W. Martin

  • 1889: Buddhist, George B. Anderson

  • 1888: Refund, Fred Littlefield

  • 1887: Dunboyne, William Donohue

  • 1886: The Bard, S. Fisher

  • 1885: Tecumseh, Jim McLaughlin

  • 1884: Knight of Ellerslie, S. Fisher

  • 1883: Jacobus, George Barbee

  • 1882: Vanguard, T. Costello

  • 1881: Saunterer, T. Costello

  • 1880: Grenada, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1879: Harold, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1878: Duke of Magenta, C. Holloway

  • 1877: Cloverbrook, C. Holloway

  • 1876: Shirley, George Barbee

  • 1875: Tom Ochiltree, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1874: Culpepper, William Donohue

  • 1873: Survivor, George Barbee

  • Continue Reading

    Trending