Connect with us

Published

on

The government’s Rwanda plan, devised to tackle illegal migration, has been dismissed by the Supreme Court, ending over 18 months of legal battles in the UK.

Lord Reed announced the “unanimous” judgment from the court’s justices on Wednesday, saying those sent to the country would be at “real risk” of being returned home, whether their grounds to claim asylum were justified or not – breaching international law.

Follow political reaction live here

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the judgment was “not the outcome we wanted”, but insisted the government remained “completely committed to stopping the boats” and would now “consider next steps”.

Downing Street also confirmed Mr Sunak would hold a press conference at 4.45pm over the issue – following a statement in the Commons from the new Home Secretary James Cleverly.

Charities celebrated the decision as “a victory for humanity”, while opposition parties attacked the government for wasting time and money on the “immoral, unworkable” policy.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rwanda ruling ‘massive blow’ to PM

The Rwanda scheme, which would see those arriving in the UK illegally – including via small boats – deported to the east African nation, was first put forward by Boris Johnson in April 2022.

More on Rishi Sunak

Successive prime ministers all claimed the policy would act as a deterrent to those seeking to cross the Channel, as well as help to break up people-smuggling gangs.

But critics consistently called the proposal “inhumane”, and the plan was dubbed a “gimmick” by political opponents.

An injunction from the European Court of Human Rights stopped the first flight to Rwanda from taking off in June last year and the scheme has been embroiled in litigation ever since, meaning no asylum seekers have yet been deported to the country.

Explainer: Everything you need to know about the Rwanda plan

Delivering the Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday, Lord Reed said there were “serious and systematic defects in Rwanda’s procedures and institutions for processing asylum claims”.

Those issues led to “concerns about the asylum process itself, such as the lack of legal representation, the risk that judges and lawyers will not act independently of the government in politically sensitive cases, and a completely untested right of appeal to the High Court”.

The justice also said there was a “surprisingly high rate of rejection of asylum claims from certain countries in known conflict zones”, including Syria and Yemen, which many people coming to the UK may originate from.

And he pointed to an “apparent inadequacy of the Rwandan government’s understanding of the requirements of the Refugee Convention”, specifically that under the United Nations agreement, asylum seekers had to be protected from “refoulement” – being sent back to their country of origin – and there was evidence the country had failed to comply with this when it signed a similar deal with Israel.

“The Supreme Court accepts that the Rwandan government entered into the [deal with the UK] in good faith, that it has incentives to ensure that it is adhered to, and that monitoring arrangements provide a further safeguard,” said Lord Reed.

“Nevertheless, the evidence shows that there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk that asylum claims will not be determined properly, and that asylum seekers will therefore be at risk of being returned directly or indirectly to their country of origin.

“The changes and capacity-building needed to eliminate that risk may be delivered in the future, but they were not shown to be in place when the lawfulness of the Rwanda policy had to be considered in these proceedings.”

Lord Reed underlined that the Supreme Court’s decision was a “legal question” based on international law – including the European Convention on Human Rights and various UN treaties – and the court was “not concerned with the political debate” about the scheme.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the ruling was “not the outcome we wanted”, but added: “We have spent the last few months planning for all eventualities and we remain completely committed to stopping the boats.”

Rishi Sunak speaks as he holds a Cabinet meeting inside 10 Downing Street
Pic:AP
Image:
Rishi Sunak will hold a press conference this afternoon following the ruling. Pic: AP

Mr Sunak continued: “Crucially, the Supreme Court – like the Court of Appeal and the High Court before it – has confirmed that the principle of sending illegal migrants to a safe third country for processing is lawful. This confirms the government’s clear view from the outset.

“Illegal migration destroys lives and costs British taxpayers millions of pounds a year. We need to end it and we will do whatever it takes to do so.

“Because when people know that if they come here illegally, they won’t get to stay then they will stop coming altogether, and we will stop the boats.”

Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo accepted it was “ultimately a decision for the UK’s judicial system”, but added: “We do take issue with the ruling that Rwanda is not a safe third country for asylum seekers and refugees, in terms of refoulement.

“Rwanda is committed to its international obligations, and we have been recognized by the UNHCR and other international institutions for our exemplary treatment of refugees.” .

But the CEO of the Refugee Council, Enver Solomon, called it “a victory for the rights of men, women and children who simply want to be safe”.

He added: “The plan goes against who we are as a country that stands up for those less fortunate than us and for the values of compassion, fairness and humanity.

“The government should be focusing on creating a functioning asylum system that allows people who seek safety in the UK a fair hearing on our soil and provides safe routes so they don’t have to take dangerous journeys.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Ruling is reminder no one is above the law’

Labour called it a “damning” judgement, with shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper saying the prime minister’s “flagship policy has completely failed”.

She added: “[It] exposes Rishi Sunak’s failure to get any grip or have any serious plan to tackle dangerous boat crossings, which are undermining border security and putting lives at risk.

“Labour argued from the start this plan is unworkable and extortionately expensive, now it has been confirmed as unlawful because the government failed to ensure they had a robust and workable policy.

“Ministers knew about the weaknesses in this scheme from the start and yet they insisted on making it their flagship policy.”

Liberal Democrat spokesperson and MP Alistair Carmichael said: “It was clear from the get-go that the Conservatives’ Rwanda scheme was destined to fail. Not only is it immoral, unworkable and incredibly costly for taxpayers – but the Supreme Court has confirmed that it’s unlawful too.

“So much time and money has already been wasted. It’s time for [Home Secretary] James Cleverly to get serious and get on with fixing the broken asylum system.”

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

The ruling is now likely to reignite a row in the Conservatives over the UK’s future as a signatory of international human rights agreements – something the now ex-home secretary Suella Braverman has railed against.

MPs on the right of the party have been calling on the UK to exit or attempt to work around the European Human Rights Convention (EHRC), arguing the final say on government policy should be made in the British parliament rather than abroad.

One faction, called the New Conservatives, have been meeting this morning to discuss their next steps.

In her blistering letter to Mr Sunak after she was sacked earlier this week, Ms Braverman pre-emptively pinned the blame on the prime minister for the Rwanda plan falling in the courts, accusing him of not having a “plan B” to push forward.

However, many in the party believe it is right to remain part of the agreements that protect human rights, standing alongside international allies.

Mr Sunak will face questions from across the Commons at midday when he takes part in this week’s Prime Minister’s Questions.

Continue Reading

UK

Police chiefs warn of crime surge if Labour’s plans pass – as hunt for mistakenly released prisoners continues

Published

on

By

Police chiefs warn of crime surge if Labour's plans pass - as hunt for mistakenly released prisoners continues

Police are preparing for a surge in crime if the government’s plans to overhaul prison sentences go ahead – with hundreds of thousands more offences expected in a year.

Measures proposed under the Sentencing Bill, intended to ease overcrowding in prisons, include limiting the use of short sentences and releasing some criminals earlier.

However, police chiefs are warning such measures could see up to a 6% rise in crime in the immediate aftermath, should the plans become law.

It comes as a manhunt is under way for two prisoners mistakenly released from HMP Wandsworth, including Brahim Kaddour-Cherif, a 24-year-old Algerian man and registered sex offender, and 35-year-old William Smith.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Manhunt underway: what do we know so far?

‘It has to be properly funded’

Assistant Chief Constable Jason Devonport, who spent 18 months on secondment as a governor at HMP Berwyn, said forces are planning for an increase in all types of offences.

While he said community programmes to support rehabilitation “are being ramped up,” he warned officers “expect, certainly in the short term, there will be an increase of offending in the community”.

“I believe in the Sentencing Bill and I believe in rehabilitation,” he added, “but it has to be properly funded.”

ACC Devonport said the probation service is trying to recruit 1,500 officers a year for the next three years to manage demand, and that the rise in police-recorded crime in one year is expected to be between 4% and 6%.

In the year to June 2025, police in England and Wales recorded 6.6 million offences. A rise of 6% would then equal around 396,000 additional recorded crimes.

Gavin Stephens, chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, added that officers have “all been in policing long enough to know that some of the things that help people stop offending or desist from offending are not going to be resolved by short sentences in particular”.

However, he added: “Our issue is in the short-term period of the implementation, there is a shift of demand on to policing, and we want that shift of demand on to us to be properly recognised and properly modelled… so we can have the right and appropriate resource in there to mitigate the risk to communities.”

Feeble and inept – prison release fiasco is yet another political crisis


John Craig

Jon Craig

Chief political correspondent

@joncraig

The charitable view of the latest prison release blunder that has plunged the government into another political crisis is that it’s extremely bad luck rather than an act of incompetence by ministers.

But the more we learn about the shocking details of what happened and what looks like a cynical attempt at a cover-up by the hapless David Lammy, the more the blame can be laid at the government’s door.

Tap here to read more

More mistaken releases inevitable, MP warns

In a further warning about the state of law and order in the UK, the chair of the Justice Committee has said the prison system is at “breaking point”.

Labour MP Andy Slaughter called the latest mistaken releases “extremely concerning,” adding: “While the day to day running of prison security and public safety are paramount, the current spate of releases in error will be repeated until the underlying failures are addressed.”

He also said evidence taken by the committee “laid bare a crisis-hit prison system, starved of investment over many years which is facing multi-faceted pressures”.

What do we know about the manhunt?

HMP Wandsworth admitted on Wednesday that Kaddour-Cherif, sentenced for trespass with an intent to steal, was accidentally released on 29 October.

His release came just five days after the high-profile release of migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu from HMP Chelmsford in Essex.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lammy refuses to say if more prisoners mistakenly released

Hours after Kaddour-Cherif’s accidental release was confirmed by the Met, Surrey Police announced it was also searching for Smith after another error by prison staff.

The 35-year-old, who was sentenced to 45 months for multiple fraud offences and goes by the name Billy, had apparently been released on Monday.

It is not yet clear why it was nearly a week between the first release at Wandsworth and the police being informed that an offender was at large.

Both mistakes follow vows by Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy that enhanced checks on prisoner releases would be introduced.

He came under fire while standing in for Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs, but sought to blame the Conservatives, saying: “In 25 years in this House, I have not witnessed a more shameful spectacle frankly than what the party opposite left in our justice system.”

News of Kaddour-Cherif’s release broke as PMQs was ending, and a comment released on Mr Lammy’s behalf said he was “absolutely outraged” about it.

He had been repeatedly asked whether any more asylum seekers had been mistakenly released from jail since the Kebatu case, and refused to answer.

Read more from Sky News:
Nearly 40,000 freed early to tackle prison overcrowding
How many prisoners are released by mistake?
Driver hits several people on holiday island

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lammy has ‘egg on his face’, former prison governor says

In response to concerns of a spike in crime should the Sentencing Bill become law, a Ministry of Justice spokesperson said the government “inherited a prison system in crisis, days away from running out of space”.

“Public safety will always be our top priority, and we are building 14,000 more prison places to keep dangerous offenders locked up,” they added.

“Offenders released face strict licence conditions, and we are increasing the probation budget by an extra £700 million over the next three years and investing in new technology to reduce admin, so staff can focus on work that reduces reoffending.”

And in response to the manhunt for the two released convicts, a spokesperson said: “Releases in error have been increasing for several years and are another symptom of a justice system crisis inherited by this government.”

They added: “We are clear that these mistakes must not continue to happen.”

Continue Reading

UK

Prince William hails ‘world’s true action heroes’ at Earthshot awards – and gets praise himself from Kylie

Published

on

By

Prince William hails 'world's true action heroes' at Earthshot awards - and gets praise himself from Kylie

Prince William has praised environmental innovators as the “world’s true action heroes”, describing them as the role models we need “in these uncertain times” at his Earthshot awards in Rio.

Joined on stage by four young people from Brazil at his annual ceremony, William explained his motivation to set up the prize, saying of the finalists: “Their stories are the inspiration that gives us courage.”

“And there’s a great deal we can learn from their determination and their vision for scale,” he added.

“As well as their unyielding belief that we can create a better world. It’s no exaggeration to say that they are the world’s true action heroes.”

Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons
Image:
Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons

For the fifth year of his environmental prize, which sees five innovators or entrepreneurs awarded £1m each, he was joined by singers Kylie Minogue and Shawn Mendes performing at the ceremony.

Speaking to Sky News ahead of her performance, Kylie hailed the awards as an “incredible initiative”.

“I’m really excited to see everyone,” she told Sky News. “There’s amazing people doing incredible things, so it’s good to be here.”

The Prince of Wales with Kylie Minogue on the green carpet. Pic: Reuters
Image:
The Prince of Wales with Kylie Minogue on the green carpet. Pic: Reuters

Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons
Image:
Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons

‘When we unite, we are unstoppable’

While the awards have been his focus for the first three days of his trip to Brazil, he will travel to Belem tomorrow for COP30, the UN’s climate conference.

Acknowledging the sense of pessimism around the climate debate, exacerbated by recent global turbulence he said: “I understand some might feel discouraged in these uncertain times.

“I understand there is still so much to be done. But this is no time for complacency, and the optimism I felt in 2020 remains ardent today.”

In a call to action, he added: “The issues that continue to face our world are a threat to all of us, but when we unite, our momentum is unstoppable.”

Sir Keir Starmer was also at the ceremony before heading to COP30. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer was also at the ceremony before heading to COP30. Pic: Reuters

He then called on the young people, part of the Mini COP programme, to tell the audience their hopes for the future.

Earlier in the day, the prince had spoken at another Earthshot event about how he does everything he can to reassure his own children that the planet will be looked after.

Pics: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons
Image:
Pics: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons

The spectacular show, also featuring some of Brazil’s biggest stars, was designed to hook in a global and multigenerational audience.

 Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons
Image:
Pic: Kensington Palace / Andrew Parsons

Fortunately for Prince William and his team, it also hasn’t been overshadowed this week by any significant new developments or revelations about his uncle Andrew, who only a week ago was stripped of his remaining honours and titles, and it was announced he would also be moving out of his home Royal Lodge on the Windsor estate.

Continue Reading

UK

Expensive, noisy and delayed – but is the Army’s new fighting vehicle any good?

Published

on

By

Expensive, noisy and delayed - but is the Army's new fighting vehicle any good?

Expensive, noisy and eight years late, but the British Army finally has a new armoured fighting vehicle that troops could deploy to Ukraine in the event of any peace deal.

The nearly £10m Ajax – weighing more than 40 tonnes – is as heavy as a Russian tank and potentially vulnerable to cheap Russian drones.

Yet it is being billed by the UK as a “next generation” fighting machine, equipped with cameras, protective armour and a 40mm gun, with bullets that can rip through concrete.

Luke Pollard, the defence procurement minister, talked up the fleet’s potential while acknowledging that the £5.5bn procurement has had its issues.

This includes excessive noise and vibrations coming from the vehicles that left 17 soldiers requiring treatment for hearing loss.

“It is an incredible platform. It has got the ability to perform tasks that its predecessors could not,” the minister said, having just gone for a spin in an Ajax during a visit to a General Dynamics factory in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales, where the vehicles are being assembled.

“After all the problems it may have had in the past, we have put those to bed now.”

Luke Pollard says issues with the Ajax have been 'put to bed'
Image:
Luke Pollard says issues with the Ajax have been ‘put to bed’

The Ministry of Defence on Thursday declared what is known as initial operating capability for Ajax has been met.

It defined this as the ability to deploy a squadron of 27 vehicles on operations from a pool of 50. The total number of delivered Ajax vehicles is 165.

They come in six variants, with the main type designed for reconnaissance and fighting.

The army has ordered a total of 589 of the various models, which it expects to receive by 2030.

The Ajax was demonstrated during this year's British Army Expo. Pic: PA
Image:
The Ajax was demonstrated during this year’s British Army Expo. Pic: PA

Launched more than a decade and a half ago, the Ajax programme was meant to achieve its initial operating milestone in 2017, but this date has been repeatedly pushed back.

The most serious delay occurred when testing was paused after soldiers suffered hearing and other injuries because of loud noise and vibrations coming from the vehicles.

It is why anyone who uses Ajax today must wear specially secured hearing protection.

Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
Pic: Ministry of Defence

So, what’s it like?

Sky News was among a group of journalists that were invited to ride around on one of the vehicles at a test track on the factory grounds.

The vehicle is very loud – though soldiers said this would not impact its ability to conduct its primary mission of reconnaissance.

They said Ajax is fitted with clever cameras and sensors that can spot a target up to five miles (eight kilometres) away.

However, there is clearly the potential for enemy drones to detect the Ajax in return if it were pushing towards enemy territory in a warzone like Ukraine.

The vehicle’s armour is designed to protect against such a threat. But officials said the fleet has yet to be fitted with electronic countermeasures, even though this kind of equipment is fundamental for any operation in Ukraine to help jam enemy drones.

Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
Pic: Ministry of Defence

When could it be deployed to Ukraine?

The UK, France and a coalition of more than 30 allies have pledged to deploy to Ukraine to help secure the peace if Kyiv and Moscow agree to some kind of ceasefire – a goal Donald Trump has been trying to achieve, but one that seems vanishingly unlikely for now.

However, Mr Pollard signalled that Ajax could be in the mix of any British offering to the mission.

“We’re not yet setting out precisely what capabilities we would deploy to Ukraine in the event of peace, largely because we don’t know when that peace will come, and we keep our military units at a state of readiness, and we rotate through them,” he told Sky News.

“But when we have the ability to deploy incredibly capable platforms like Ajax and the brilliant men and women trained to use it to its fullest effect.

“There’s a clear opportunity for us to be able to enhance NATO’s capabilities on the eastern flank and any coalition of the willing deployment potentially in the future.”

Read more from Deborah Haynes:
Damning report into UK’s fast jets programme

UK military to be given powers to shoot down drones

Lance Corporal of Horse Andrew Rawlinson, 32, of the Household Cavalry Regiment, who is an Ajax commander, said he would be happy to deploy to Ukraine if asked.

“The squadron that I work in, they’re all good to go,” he said.

Lance Corporal Andrew Rawlinson says his squadron are 'all good to go' with the Ajax
Image:
Lance Corporal Andrew Rawlinson says his squadron are ‘all good to go’ with the Ajax

“We’ve been training on it now non-stop pretty much for a good two years to get to the IOC [initial operating capability] level and I think everyone’s content, knows their jobs and would be happy to roll out.”

Asked whether Russia should be worried, he said: “Yeah, sure.”

Continue Reading

Trending