A bipartisan group of lawmakers support limiting the ability of American citizens to invest in Chinese companies. A small group of Republicans, meanwhile, is advocating a more measured approach.
On November 20, over 40 U.S. lawmakersincluding Sens. Marco Rubio (RFla.), Debbie Stabenow (DMich.), and Angus King (IMaine)signed a letter to the ranking members of both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees.
“We are deeply concerned,” the letter read, “about the potential national security threats posed by outbound capital flows and knowledge transfer to the United States’ adversaries,” namely China. “There is strong bipartisan consensus in both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives that Congress must act to address the national security threat posed by these outbound investments.”
To that end, the signers hoped the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)the annual must-pass legislation that funds the various components of the national security apparatus, from paying soldiers to maintaining the nuclear stockpilewould include a provision that addressed their concerns.
The Senate passed its version of the NDAA in July, though it seems unlikely the House will pass the same version untouched. The Senate bill included Amendment 931, which the chamber accepted by a 916 vote. Under the terms of the amendment, any U.S. citizen or company investing in sectors like semiconductors, satellites, or artificial intelligence in a “country of concern” (like China) would have to provide written notification of the transaction to the Secretary of the Treasury at least two weeks in advance.
The bipartisan letter asked that the NDAA include language that addresses outbound investments in China “and ideally strengthen the language.” It mentioned Amendment 931 as well as Executive Order 14105, issued by President Joe Biden in August, which declared “a national emergency to deal with this threat”that threat being the “advancement by countries of concern in sensitive technologies and products critical for the military, intelligence, surveillance, or cyber-enabled capabilities.”
The bipartisan letter noted, seemingly positively, that the executive order “goes beyond notification to consider prohibition of investment in some sectors.”
While the Treasury Department’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) reviews investments made in the U.S. by foreign nationals, Biden’s executive order wants regulations going in the other direction, to potentially limit Americans’ investments in foreign countries. As Reason’s Eric Boehm reported at the time, “There are only two other countriesSouth Korea and Taiwanthat have outbound investment screening systems.”
At the congressional level, the proposal is currently being held up by Rep. Patrick McHenry (RN.C.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee who briefly served as House Speaker Pro Tempore in October. As Bloomberg reported this week, “McHenry, who has long opposed broad investment restrictions in favor of an approach that targets individual companies,” is “effectively blocking” the measure’s inclusion in the House’s version of the NDAA.
In a September 27 letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, McHenry expressed relief that the “scope” of Biden’s executive order was “less broad than some had anticipated” but nevertheless felt the administration’s policy was “arbitrary, relies on baseless assumptions, and in certain places is incoherent.”
“If we oppose China’s state-run economy, we want more private investment not less,” McHenry wrote. “Of those private investors, we want more of them to be Americans not fewer.”
McHenry has a point. “We should be targeting specific companies rather than imposing blanket restrictions,” says Clark Packard, a research fellow at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies.
“Broadly speaking, I don’t think Americans should be investing in companies that make equipment used to surveil and further repress Uyghurs,” Packard added, pointing to an April Axios report that said cameras made by Chinese-owned surveillance firm Hikvision have been used to surveil Uyghurs, the Muslim minority population that has been subjected to a campaign of authoritarian repression by the Chinese government.
Outright bans on investment would be a bridge too far, even for a country like China with such a dismal human rights record, and could even backfire. Rep. Andy Barr (RKy.), who serves with McHenry on the House Financial Services Committee, tweeted that the proposed regulations “would inadvertently bolster [Chinese President] Xi Jinping’s goal to block American influence in the Chinese market.” Barr added, “It’s crucial we find the right balance in safeguarding American influence and intelligence without creating unnecessary bureaucracy. ”
Last week, Ian Allen at Just Security wrote that the proposed rules could also lead other nations, including allies and trading partners, to adopt restrictions of their own, in turn. “Overly restrictive measures risk impediments to global technological advancement, blowback for domestic industries, and high administrative costs (which are projected to reach $10 million simply to start the program),” Allen warns.
Besides, there is reason to suspect that a more measured approach is warranted. “Foreign direct investment in China turned negative during the 3rd quarter of 2023 for the first time on record,” Packard added. “In other words, more capital flowed out of China than into China in the 3rd quarter of 2023. Likewise, between 2014 and 2020, foreign direct investment from G7 countries into China fell by about half.” Industrialized nations are turning their backs on an increasingly illiberal China.
Just like targeted sanctions, Congress can designate certain companies that are particularly objectionable to be off-limits, while allowing Americans the freedom to otherwise use their money as they see fit. On the other hand, an all-encompassing ban as has been proposed by members of both major parties would be too aggressive and could even risk escalating tensions with the world’s second-largest economy.
Thousands of people are expected to attend Port Talbot this weekend as the town gears up to welcome an annual Welsh festival.
The Urdd Eisteddfod is a celebration of Welsh culture when children and young people up to the age of 25 take part in a variety of competitions.
There are 400 of them in total, including singing, reciting poetry and dancing.
The Urdd organisation itself was established more than a century ago in 1922, with the aim of giving children and young people in Wales the opportunity to learn and socialise in the Welsh language.
Its six-day Eisteddfod is held during May half-term and in a different part of Wales each year.
The Urdd Eisteddfod broke its own records last year, with more than 100,000 registrations to compete.
Image: A choir competes at the 2024 Eisteddfod yr Urdd. Pic: Urdd Gobaith Cymru
Margam Park is home to this year’s event – the first time since 2003 that it’s played host.
Among the main prizes up for grabs this year are the chair (awarded to the main poetry competition winner) and the crown (awarded to the main prose competition winner).
This year’s crown and chair have been made using some of the final pieces of steel produced at Port Talbot steelworks before the closure of the blast furnaces last year.
Image: The chair at the 2025 Eisteddfod yr Urdd was created using some of the last pieces of steel produced at the Port Talbot steelworks. Pic: Urdd Gobaith Cymru
Image: Pic: Urdd Gobaith Cymru
There are some new additions to this year’s Eisteddfod, including awards for singing, musical theatre and acting, named in honour of Sir Bryn Terfel, Callum Scott Howells and Matthew Rhys.
Another new award – the Amy Dowden award for dance – will also be awarded for the first time this week.
Speaking to Sky News, Strictly Come Dancing star Dowden said it was a “real honour” to be supporting the next generation of dancers.
“The arts and the industry is tough, and I just hope that [the young people] can see that I’ve managed to push myself through it,” she said.
“I’ve worked hard, I’ve had a few challenges along the way. Hopefully I can help inspire them as well.”
Image: Amy Dowden. File pic: PA
‘It’s like Britain’s Got Talent’
As a former competitor herself in what is one of Europe’s largest touring youth festivals, Dowden says she “couldn’t imagine [her] childhood without it”.
“I’ve loved Eisteddfods since I can remember. Every year at school I took part in everything, from the baking to the reciting poems, to the folk dancing, to the creative dancing,” she said.
“The Urdd Eisteddfod is literally like one big talent competition, it’s like Britain’s Got Talent.”
The winner of the Amy Dowden award will get one-to-one sessions with her as part of the prize, as well as masterclasses at the Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama.
They will have the opportunity to perform on an international stage and also win a cash prize.
“I know from my dance training and everything, each of those is so beneficial to getting yourself to that professional level,” Dowden added.
It’s 8.34am on a Tuesday and Vanessa Paton is taking me on a tour of Glasgow’s east end, where she has lived for almost 50 years.
Half a mile away sits the newly opened taxpayer-funded facility, named The Thistle, where drug addicts can bring their heroin and cocaine, are handed clean needles and invited to inject under NHS medical supervision.
The concept, a UK first, is controversial and costs £2.3m a year.
Authorities believe it provides a safer, cleaner area for users to do their business, away from the dirty, HIV-ridden back alleys of Glasgow city centre.
It opened in January, and around 250 people have used it so far.
But there is a growing feeling among some that a by-product of this bold project is the alleged “war zone” being created in the community around the new building.
Image: Vanessa Paton
Former council worker Ms Paton is one of an ad-hoc group of furious locals who pick up needles as part of desperate efforts to clear their streets.
She says: “It is getting worse. The new room has appeared, and the problems have escalated with it. It’s a no-go war zone every day and night.
“The area’s becoming a toilet. That is the harsh reality of it.”
Image: A drug den
‘It is disgusting’
Sky News spends the morning being shown areas where it is claimed the issues are getting out of control.
Ms Paton pulls a bloodied, faeces-covered hospital gown out of a bush as we walk along a path behind a row of houses.
We turn the corner to a street where children play and are greeted with syringes filled with blood at our feet, discarded needle packaging and dirty underwear.
Image: Angela Scott
Local resident Angela Scott says: “It’s become a lot worse. It’s heightened. I’m scared that if I am picking up my dog dirt am I going to prick a needle.
“Am I going to end up with an infection that a lot of drug addicts tend to have because they are sharing needles? I don’t want to pick up something infectious.”
Adverts installed in known drug dens
Officials have installed a new needle bin in one hotspot in recent days, with posters erected advertising the nearby consumption room.
Image: A new needle bin and poster for the nearby consumption room
Ms Paton alleges safety steps are being taken at a nearby nursery.
“There is a nursery that actually uses a metal detector in the morning to scan the sandpits before the children go out because of the concern of the needles being in it,” she claims.
This area is known as Calton and has had its troubles with drug taking and crime for many years.
Ms Paton takes us to a tucked-away, overgrown area opposite social housing and a few metres from where a new school is being built. It is a makeshift drug den.
There are hundreds of freshly used needles. It is like a minefield.
One needle is stabbed into a large tree, there is even a wooden seat which is covered in drug-taking equipment.
Once again, there is a laminated A4 piece of paper pointing users in the direction of The Thistle.
Ms Paton says: “We picked up 50 needles in one minute last week. If we were to pick up every needle that is here today, we’d be talking hundreds.
“We are struggling to find somewhere safe to stand. There are needles between my legs, you’ve got needles behind your head.
“It’s totally soul-destroying. Nobody living here expected it to be this bad.”
Officials deny it is a new problem
Glasgow City Council told Sky News there had not been an increase in reports despite the community alleging the opposite.
Councillor Allan Casey, who is responsible for drug policy in the city, said: “This has been a long-standing issue and that is one of the main reasons why The Thistle has been placed where it is because there has been decades-long discarded needles in public places.
Responding to claims of increasing problems around the new facility, Mr Casey said: “Those reports don’t back that up.
“The council has not seen a rise in reports of injecting equipment and there has not been an increase in crime reports.”
Scotland is ravaged by drugs. The country has the worst drug death rate in Europe.
Scotland’s first minister John Swinney told Sky News the new drug room required time to “see the impact”.
He said: “The Thistle is a safe consumption facility which is designed to encourage people to come off the use of drugs – that’s its purpose. We’ve got to give that venture time to see the impact.
“We need to engage with the local community… and address any concerns.”
It is understood police have logged no calls about the facility since it opened in January, despite some residents suggesting they have contacted officers with concerns.
Inspector Max Shaw from Police Scotland said: “We are aware of long-standing issues in the area and continue to work closely in partnership to address these concerns.”
While fans in Edmonton and Dallas are always singing about how they have friends in low places, only one of them has the high ground in the Western Conference finals. And that’s the Oilers after their 6-1 win Sunday in Game 3 to take a 2-1 series lead.
With the series tied heading into Sunday, the objective for Game 3 was to gain a firm grasp of the conference finals, and the Oilers did just that by having five players with multipoint performances. As for the Stars, losing Game 3 left them trailing a series for the second time this postseason, with the only other such occurrence coming after Game 1 against the Colorado Avalanche in the first round.
Now that the Oilers are in control of the series, what does it mean for them going forward? What must the Stars do differently ahead of Game 4 for them to return home tied rather than a game away from elimination? Ryan S. Clark and Greg Wyshynski examine those questions while delving into what lies ahead for two teams that not only faced each other in the conference finals last season but between them have been involved in every conference final since 2020.
Edmonton Oilers Grade: A
Much could change between now and whenever the playoffs end. But for now, the argument could be made that this was the most important playoff game the Oilers have had this postseason.
The Oilers have had numerous strong performances, such as Game 3 against the Los Angeles Kings in the first round or their final two games against the Vegas Golden Knights in the conference semifinals. But what made the Oilers’ performance in Game 3 against Dallas arguably their most important was that they found a balance between being difficult in the defensive zone while not relying on a shutout to accomplish that objective.
The Stars finished with 37 shots, 13 high-danger chances in 5-on-5 play and scored only once. Connor McDavid has repeatedly stressed that the Oilers can play defense, and that has been made clear over their past five games. But Sunday proved they didn’t need Stuart Skinner or their defensive structure to blank an opponent to win. — Ryan S. Clark
Dallas Stars Grade: C+
The final score doesn’t reflect the majority of this game, which Dallas coach Pete DeBoer can mine for positives among the many (many) negatives and some mitigating circumstances. Having Roope Hintz warm up but not be able to go because of the foot injury he suffered from a Darnell Nurse slash in Game 2? That’s deflating. Having the on-ice officials miss a delay of game call on Brett Kulak in the first period only to have Evan Bouchard open the scoring 10 seconds later? Also deflating.
So it’s to the Stars’ credit that they got to their game at 5-on-5 in Game 3 better than they have in any game of the series, at least before Edmonton ran up the score in the third. The results weren’t there and a loss is a loss — and a loss by this margin is difficult to stomach — but their second period and the performances from some of their slumbering depth players give the Stars at least a glimmer.
However, there’s no question Edmonton has this thing in well in-hand and the Stars have to find a way to solve Skinner, which is not something I thought I’d be writing at this stage of the postseason. — Greg Wyshynski
Three Stars of Game 3
Two goals and an assist for his seventh career multigoal playoff game. Hyman’s second goal was the Oilers’ fourth off the rush, the most in one game by any team this postseason. Hyman also was plus-5 Sunday.
Bouchard scored his sixth goal of the postseason and these two were on the ice for the first two Edmonton goals. At 5-on-5 this postseason, the Oilers are outscoring their opponents 7-1, and 5-0 in this series, when Bouchard and Kulak are on the ice.
play
0:48
Connor McDavid restores Oilers’ 2-goal lead
Connor McDavid finds the back of the net to restore the Oilers’ two-goal lead vs. the Stars.
3. Connor McDavid C, Oilers
For all the talk about the lack of goals from the best hockey player in the world (which was odd because he had 20 points in 13 games and was a plus-7 entering Game 3 despite having only three goals), McDavid punched out a pair of tucks for his sixth career multigoal playoff game. Also, seeing McDavid with the puck barreling toward the net on a 3-on-1 is nightmare fuel for opponents. — Arda Öcal
Players to watch in Game 4
Zach Hyman LW, Oilers
To go from 16 goals last postseason to just three goals entering Game 3 of the conference finals is one way to assess Hyman. Another is to realize that he’s been the most physical player on a team that is among the tallest and heaviest in the NHL.
Hyman came into Game 3 leading the NHL with 99 hits. He remained physical Sunday by leading the way with six hits in a game that saw the Oilers continue their punishing style with 47. But to then see Hyman score two goals and finish with three points in addition to that physicality? It once again adds to the narrative that the Oilers might not only have more dimensions than last year’s team, they could be better than the team that finished Stanley Cup runner-up in 2024. — Clark
play
0:53
Zach Hyman’s 2nd goal puts Oilers up 4
Zach Hyman taps home his second goal of the game to put the Oilers up 5-1 vs. the Stars.
This is the first two-game losing streak for the Dallas goaltender in the playoffs. A lot of what happened in Game 3 wasn’t necessarily on him — a Connor McDavid beauty and a Zach Hyman breakaway were among the Edmonton tallies — but outside of the third period of Game 1, he’s not been a difference-maker in this series. Oettinger came into the game leading the playoffs with 5.58 goals saved above expected, according to Stathletes. The Stars have been able to depend on him as a slump-breaker. But this is his third game with a save percentage south of .900 in the series. As the Stars try to build on some positives from this game, they need Otter to provide the foundation for it — and in the process, silence those “U.S. backup!” chants from the Oilers fans. — Wyshynski
Big questions for Game 4
Are the Oilers about to do to the Stars what they did to the Golden Knights?
Simply put, the Oilers are where hope goes to die. Teams in a championship window that have yet to win a title are always being judged on their evolution. What the Oilers did to the Stars a year ago in the conference finals by winning the last three games showed that they could close out a series after trailing. This postseason Edmonton has shown a calculated and methodical coldness when it comes to putting away opponents.
The Golden Knights won Game 3 on a last-second goal to create the belief they may have found an opening. They didn’t score again for the rest of the playoffs after being in the top five of goals per game throughout the regular season. Breaking out for six goals to open the series seemed to be a sign the Stars may have found an opening. Since then? They’ve scored only once in the last six periods while facing questions about what’s happened to another team that went from being in the top five in goals per game in the regular season. — Clark
Can Dallas make Edmonton uncomfortable at all?
Our colleague Mark Messier made this point between periods of Game 3: The Stars have yet to do anything to get McDavid or Leon Draisaitl off their games. That extends to the rest of the Oilers. Outside of an anomalous run of three power-play goals in the third period of Game 1, there have been precious few instances of the Stars carrying play for long stretches or putting a scare into Edmonton at 5-on-5.
They had that for a bit in Game 3 with a dominant second period: plus-14 in shot attempts, plus-11 in scoring chances and a 10-1 advantage in high-danger shot attempts. But they were digging out of a 2-0 hole, only managed to get one goal of their own on the board and then McDavid stuck a dagger in them with 19 seconds left in the second.
The Stars need a lead. They need zone time. They need to get their rush game going: Skinner had a .897 save percentage on shots off the rush entering the game. Edmonton is playing with a champion’s confidence. Dallas has to find a way to inject a little doubt into its opponent or this series is going to end quickly. — Wyshynski