Connect with us

Published

on

Teachers in England have been told they do not have to address pupils in their chosen pronouns under new government guidance on how best to support transgender students.

The draft document, released by the Department of Education, was meant to be published before the summer holidays, but was delayed to ensure it met the “high expectations” of teachers and parents.

It states that children, teachers or staff at a school should “not be required to adopt the use of preferred pronouns”.

In the absence of preferred pronouns, the child’s preferred name should be used, with schools having a duty to ensure bullying is never tolerated.

The guidance also states that schools and colleges do not have to, and should not, accept all requests for social transition.

Social transitioning relates to a pupil requesting to change pronouns, names and uniform.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I socially transitioned at school’

“Proper use of this guidance means social transition, in practice, should be extremely rare when the appropriate safeguards are put in place and the child’s best interest taken into account,” the draft states.

Where a school considers a request, the draft states a “cautious approach” should be taken, including ensuring parents are fully consulted before any decision is taken.

Other main points from the draft guidance include:
• Schools should make sure competitive sport is fair for all students, which will almost always mean separate sports for boys and girls;
• Schools must provide sex-separated toilets for students aged eight and over and suitable changing accommodation and showers for pupils aged 11 and over;
• Single-sex schools can refuse to admit pupils of the opposite biological sex, regardless of whether they are questioning their gender;
• A gender questioning child should wear the same uniform standard as other children of their sex;
• Sleeping arrangements like dormitories, tents and shared rooms should be sex separated.

The draft is non-statutory, with parents and teachers now urged to have their say in a 12-week consultation.

New guidance could leave educators with more questions than they have answers

By Mollie Malone, news correspondent

The language on gender identity in schools is fairly tough, but it doesn’t massively change the status quo.

Much of the draft guidance issued by government, for schools and colleges in England, will still be down to the interpretation of individual teachers.

At the crux of this is how children who are questioning or wanting to change their gender, or express themselves differently by using different pronouns, uniforms, or appearances – known as socially transitioning – are supported and treated at school.

The advice to schools is that there is “no general duty” to allow them to permit social transitioning, that schools can “decline” an older child’s request to use a different pronoun.

“Schools and colleges should only agree to a change of pronouns… if they are confident that the benefit to the individual child outweighs the impact on the school community.”

Again – the decision is down to the discretion of the individual teacher.

Can, not should. No ‘general’ duty.

The guidance places heavy emphasis on parental involvement in any decision.

“Parents should not be excluded,” it says. This was to be expected. But the line between when and where a parent should be consulted is a slightly blurred one.

“Where a child requests action from a school or college in relation to any degree of social transition, schools and colleges should engage parents as a matter of priority… other than in the exceptionally rare circumstances where involving parents would constitute a significant risk of harm to the child.”

Who decides the ‘degree’ and harm? Many of these circumstances are ‘rare’ anyway. The transgender pupil population, while definitively unknown, is small.

For many schools and colleges, this will be welcome guiding principles which they’ve waited a long time for.

For politicians, among them former prime minister Liz Truss, who wants social transitioning in schools to be banned altogether – this won’t be anywhere as near as stringent as they think it should be.

Either way – this guidance, which is only guidance and not statutory – could end up leaving educators with more questions than they have answers.

On Tuesday, Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said the draft puts the “best interests of all children first, removing any confusion about the protections that must be in place for biological sex and single-sex spaces”.

She said it makes clear that safety and safeguarding for all children must always be schools’ primary concern.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Issue of gender has gone in our school’

Speaking to reporters, Kemi Badenoch, minister for women and equalities, added: “This is comprehensive guidance. It can’t be the case that teachers have a lot of leeway, and we’re also forcing them to tell parents.

“What we are doing is making sure that for those schools who are very confused about what to do, and are getting very bad advice from organisations like Stonewall among others, understand what the government believes should be done.”

Read more UK news:
Dame Esther Rantzen says she has joined assisted dying clinic

Police Scotland search for missing woman
Sculptor produces tiny three wise men in the eye of a needle

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT said on initial look, the draft proposals “leave a lot of questions unanswered”, leaving school leaders in “incredibly difficult” positions.

He said the union will be reviewing the draft proposals and will submit a response to the government’s consultation on behalf of members.

Confederation of School Trusts chief executive Leora Cruddas, concerned at the timing of the release of the document, said: “This will make it very challenging to respond to any concerns felt by pupils, parents and staff until schools return in the new year.”

A spokesperson for Mermaids, a transgender youth support charity, said the guidance was “unworkable, out of touch and absurd”.

The spokesperson said: “Rather than listening to trans young people and reflecting best practice of inclusive educators across the UK, the Government has created more confusion for schools and is putting young people at risk.”

What do teachers think?

Teacher Tapp, a daily survey app, asked more than 7,000 teachers their view of the guidance before it was officially published.

The results were split into primary school and secondary school responses:

• 41% of secondary school teachers were concerned guidance could be more divisive than helpful;

• 10% said they would prefer to rely on their own current policy;

• 34% of secondary school teachers said they would appreciate the clarification it could bring;

• 15% were open to whatever is recommended.

Teachers were then asked to what extent the political conversation affected their work.

• 62% of secondary teachers and 76% of primary teachers said it has had no effect.

Teachers were allowed to answer more than one option in the first poll.

‘Does not go far enough’

But in an early indication of potential unease about the measures on the right of the Conservative party, former prime minister Liz Truss said the guidance “does not go far enough”.

She called for a change in the law rather than non-statutory guidance.

Ms Truss said: “I fear that activists and others will be able to exploit loopholes in the guidance and the existing legal framework to pursue their agenda, leaving children at risk of making irreversible changes and with single-sex spaces not sufficiently protected.”

The former prime minister called on government to back her Health and Equality Acts (Amendment) Bill, which she first put to parliament on 6 December.

Under the proposed bill, social transitioning would not be recognised by schools or the state in children, and puberty blockers and hormone treatment for gender dysphoria would be banned for under-18s.

Speaking ahead of the publication of the draft, the prime minister’s spokesperson said it was a “complex area” and it was right to “take the time to get this right”.

Continue Reading

UK

Wrongly-released migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu claims he was ‘ignored’ by police while trying to hand himself in

Published

on

By

Wrongly-released migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu claims he was 'ignored' by police while trying to hand himself in

Migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu, who was wrongly freed from prison, has claimed in an interview with Sky News that he tried to hand himself in to police a day before he was arrested, but was ignored by officers.

The Home Office said Kebatu, 38, was deported from the UK on Tuesday night.

Speaking to Sky News after he arrived back in Ethiopia on Wednesday morning, Kebatu shared details of his accidental release from HMP Chelmsford on 24 October and the two-day manhunt that followed.

The convicted sex offender was repeatedly questioned on his crimes, but Sky News has chosen not to broadcast this part of the interview.

‘Ignored’ by police

The morning after he was released from prison, Kebatu claimed he tried to hand himself into police, but was ignored.

He said: “I [told] police, look here, police I am wanted man, I am arrested, I will give you my hand, please help where is police station? He ignored me, he drove [off].”

He added that he told the officer his name and that he was mistakenly released from prison.

“I am not unknown. The police station, where is the place? But also I go to police, I will give you my hand please help me where is the police station, take me, I am wanted.

“You know me, or my image, my name is Hadush Kabatu, nationality Ethiopia. Please, I was the mistake release from Chelmsford prison. Please help me.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Moment Hadush Kebatu put on deportation flight

Responding to Kebatu’s claims, the Metropolitan Police told Sky News: “The Met is not aware of any evidence to support the claims that Kebatu approached officers on Saturday morning.

“The actions of officers who responded to the sighting of him on Sunday morning show how seriously they were taking the manhunt. Kebatu’s actions on the morning of his arrest were more like those of someone trying to avoid officers, not trying to hand himself in.”

Release from prison

Kebatu was released by HMP Chelmsford a month into his 12-month sentence on the expectation he would be picked up by immigration enforcement.

He said after he was released he waited more than three hours outside the prison, for what he described as someone who was “responsible” for him.

He said: “At that time I am waiting more than three hours… who [is] responsible for me? Where is Home Office, where is [immigration]?

“I was told there was a bus. Also, all the experts, they all ignored me.”

In another Sky News story, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu outside Chelmsford prison said he looked “confused”.

The driver said he was approached by the prisoner, who had no idea where he was supposed to go. He said Kebatu waited outside the prison for roughly “an hour and a half” before leaving.

Kebatu said after he left the prison, he asked a passerby where the train station was. He claimed someone helped him, and bought him a train ticket for £18.

Kebatu then travelled to London. He was spotted later that evening in Stratford, east London, and then the Dalston area of Hackney.

Kebatu's movements the day he was released from prison
Image:
Kebatu’s movements the day he was released from prison

The Ethiopian national arrived in the UK on a small boat on 29 June. Days after his arrival, he sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl and a woman in Epping, Essex, where he was staying.

He was found guilty of two counts of sexual assault, one count of attempted sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence.

He was jailed on 23 September.

When approached by Sky News, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) pointed to a statement made by Justice Secretary David Lammy upon Kebatu’s deportation: “Kebatu has been returned to Ethiopia where he belongs.

“I am grateful to Home Office colleagues for acting swiftly to secure his deportation. I have been clear from the outset that a mistake of this nature is unacceptable, and we must get to the bottom of what happened.

“I have established an independent investigation chaired by Dame Lynne Owens into last Friday’s events to get the public the answers they rightly deserve, and we have introduced the strictest checks ever seen in our prison system to stop similar unacceptable errors in future.”

Essex Police, who arrested Kebatu after the assaults in July, told Sky News: “Our officers responded quickly to the reports of the sexual assaults committed in Epping and arrested Hadush Kebatu on the same day the offences were reported to us.

“Kebatu was then immediately remanded in custody, while officers acted diligently and professionally securing charges and building a case which saw Kebatu convicted following a trial. Protecting women and girls is a priority for Essex Police and our swift and thorough actions highlight our commitment to this.”

Continue Reading

UK

Deported migrant sex offender given £500 to leave country

Published

on

By

Deported migrant sex offender given £500 to leave country

Migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu was given £500 to be deported to Ethiopia following his mistaken release from prison, Sky News understands.

The government, who confirmed he was escorted on to a plane at Heathrow Airport on Tuesday night, said he has no right to return to the UK.

But Sky News understands Kebatu was handed a discretionary payment of £500 as part of efforts to avoid a lengthy legal challenge after he made threats to disrupt his removal.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she “pulled every lever” to deport Kebatu, although it is thought the decision about the payment was made by removal teams, not ministers.

“I am pleased to confirm this vile child sex offender has been deported. Our streets are safer because of it,” she said.

Hadush Kebatu seen on the plane during his deportation flight
Image:
Hadush Kebatu seen on the plane during his deportation flight

Kebatu was found and arrested by the Metropolitan Police in the Finsbury Park area of north London at around 8.30am on Sunday following a manhunt.

Last month, he was found guilty of sexually assaulting a schoolgirl and a woman in Epping, Essex, just over a week after arriving in the UK on a small boat.

Hadush Kebatu was arrested on Sunday after his mistaken release
Image:
Hadush Kebatu was arrested on Sunday after his mistaken release

He was expected to be deported, but instead of being handed over to immigration officials, he was released in error from HMP Chelmsford on Friday.

He spent just under 48 hours at large before he was apprehended.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Prisoner releases: ‘A problem on the rise’

The accidental release sparked widespread alarm and questions over how a man whose crimes sparked protests in Epping over the use of asylum hotels was able to be freed.

Ms Mahmood said: “Last week’s blunder should never have happened – and I share the public’s anger that it did.”

Anti-asylum demonstrators in Epping, Essex. Pic: PA
Image:
Anti-asylum demonstrators in Epping, Essex. Pic: PA

Read more from Sky News:
Military barracks to be used to house asylum seekers
Lammy blames ‘human error’ for release of migrant sex offender

On Sunday, Justice Secretary David Lammy said an exclusive Sky News interview will be used as part of an independent inquiry into the mistaken release.

Speaking to Sky’s national correspondent Tom Parmenter, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu at HMP Chelmsford described him as being “confused” as he was being guided to the railway station by prison staff.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Local council reads family statement: ‘My family feels massively let down’

The migrant is said to have returned to the prison reception four or five times before leaving the area on a train heading to London.

Mr Lammy, who put Kebatu’s release down to human error, said he has ordered an “urgent review” into the checks that take place when an offender is released from prison, and new safeguards have been added that amount to the “strongest release checks that have ever been in place”.

From Monday, new checks include five pages of instructions and demands that more senior prison staff sign off on a release, according to documents obtained by Sky News.

“I have been clear from the outset that a mistake of this nature is unacceptable, and we must get to the bottom of what happened,” said Mr Lammy.

Continue Reading

UK

Academic who sued Steve Coogan over Richard III film says he hasn’t received an apology

Published

on

By

Academic who sued Steve Coogan over Richard III film says he hasn't received an apology

A university academic who is receiving “substantial damages” for how he was portrayed in a film has told Sky News he hasn’t received an apology from star Steve Coogan – nor the two companies involved in its production.

Richard Taylor said he was “shell-shocked” after seeing The Lost King for the first time, a film about how Richard III’s skeleton was discovered below a car park in Leicester.

He told The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee: “I wasn’t consulted or even knew I was in the film. The first I hear is I get a phone call while I’m on holiday – and eventually, after press previews, I persuade the producers to let me see a preview.”

Richard III
Image:
Richard III

Last year, a judge ruled that Mr Taylor was depicted as “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising” – with the plot suggesting he “knowingly” misled the public.

“I’m portrayed by someone on screen who looks like me, who sounds like me, who dresses like me – but behaves in a way that falls so far short of the standards I set for myself and what others might reasonably expect of me,” the academic explained.

Mr Taylor revealed he received emails at work telling him to “rot in hell”, while others described him as a “disgrace”.

He added: “Something that was a collaborative effort that showcased the best of British universities in my view was turned into this farce – where I was the villain and portrayed in a way that was completely inconsistent with the reality and the truth.”

Now chief operating officer at Loughborough University, Mr Taylor said “none of the facts” in the 2022 film were ever checked – and the Alan Partridge star, his company Baby Cow and Pathe Productions did not reach out to him before its release.

“The producers just went ahead, filmed it, produced it, stuck it out there and left me to deal with all the flack and all the fallout from it. Grossly unfair and I feel vindicated from the result we’ve achieved,” he told Sky News.

Steve Coogan and two production companies have agreed to pay 'substantial damages'. Pic: PA
Image:
Steve Coogan and two production companies have agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’. Pic: PA

‘The film’s going to look pretty silly’

As part of the settlement, an on-screen clarification will now be added to the start of the film, but no scenes will be removed.

When asked whether he was satisfied with this outcome, Mr Taylor replied: “I’d have liked them to re-edit the film, but one’s got to be realistic about what one can achieve.

“The insertion of the card will say that the person on screen is a fictitious portrayal – and the real Richard Taylor didn’t behave like that … so the film’s going to look pretty silly.”

Read more UK news:
Community plagued by 25,000 tonnes of illegal waste
What tax rises could be announced in the budget?

The statue of Richard III outside Leicester Cathedral. Pic: Shropshire Matt/PA
Image:
The statue of Richard III outside Leicester Cathedral. Pic: Shropshire Matt/PA

The case was due to proceed to trial, but a High Court hearing on Monday heard that the parties had settled the claim.

In a statement afterwards, Coogan had said: “If it wasn’t for Philippa Langley, Richard III would still be lying under a car park in Leicester. It is her name that will be remembered in relation to the discovery of the lost king, long after Richard Taylor has faded into obscurity.”

He went on to add: “That is the story I wanted to tell, and I am happy I did.”

Reacting to the statement, Mr Taylor argued “it’s a pretty strange definition of happy when you’ve had to settle a defamation claim for seven figures in costs”.

He said: “Steve is never anything other than certain in himself and of his own position, but I think he’s got it wrong – basic facts were not checked.”

Continue Reading

Trending