Connect with us

Published

on

1.2K

Scope details that can make – or break – a crossbow system. New-school crossbow technology: Ravin’s ultra-compact R-26. Cocked with a crank, its potent limbs can drive bolts to 400 fps. Still, the resulting trajectories are loopy enough to warrant a range-compensating scope – along with the know how to use it effectively.

Crossbow scopes are quickly becoming a standard addition to modern crossbows. The longstanding taboo associated with crossbows seems to be rapidly disappearing as a number of state wildlife management agencies attempt to control their burgeoning deer populations. Beyond the negative effects of over-populated herds upon the animals, for humans, the concerns extend to deer-vehicle collisions, the spread of tick-borne diseases (Lyme and several other strains) and the destruction of crops or ornamental shrubs.

Striking a positive chord, for both new and experienced deer hunters, this situation has provided new crossbow opportunities. And since many of us experienced hunters are no longer spring chickens the timing is fortuitous. A further win: The resulting increased demand is driving real equipment improvements. These extend to their aiming systems; some type of trajectory-compensating scope.

But my state was late to the gate. Until 2020, I was one of a small group of hunters who could legally use a crossbow during our archery deer season – but only through a special disability permit. Its issuance was far from assured (mine, granted due to an old injury, required documentation from the VA) so, for most archers crossbow technology was more of a nebulous thought. If your area is crossbow legal, and youre thinking of taking the plunge, you could be in the same boat. In that case, read my overview article on crossbow deer hunting.

Experienced vertical bow hunters could be presumed to have a leg up. Also, beyond all-important hunting skills, the rifle-type configuration of a crossbow should shorten the physical learning curve. Valid points yes but, as I discovered, horizontal bows can also introduce a number of new issues. The Crossbow Connection

My first crossbow, purchased back in 2013, was a Parker Terminator, sold with a lifetime warranty (so much for that; theyve since gone out of business). No complaints regarding its downrange performance though, even to this day. Despite subsequent developments, it was easy to master, and also quite accurate. However, it did introduce a few unexpected headaches.

For starters, the loading process was relatively complicated, requiring the aid of a rope & pulley system. And it was a true PETA to maneuver through thick woods. With game at hand, the critical timing related to the drawing a conventional bow was eliminated, but the actual shot was loud as in closer to a subsonic .22 LR! On a positive note, its 20-inch bolts departed with more speed than my vertical bows 28 arrows, although the difference was less than expected.

Trajectory was flatter but still parabolic, posing similar range and overhanging brush concerns.  And, if no action transpired, uncocking required shooting the bow (I used a special bolt and portable capture target). Also, its basic fixed-power 4X trajectory-compensating scope was nothing special. Accuracy & Velocity vs Range

Todays crossbow market is more competitive, so some of these issues have been addressed (such as built-in uncocking systems). Velocities are trending upward too, although physics are still involved.

An example: Despite my Terminators s 175-pound draw weight, its shorter 13-inch power stroke was less efficient than that of my 28-inch, 65-lb. compound bow. Still, its velocity was quicker, reaching 340 fps. Some recent introductions are considerably faster but, because the entire archery industry has been busy, others arent that far ahead of todays vertical evolutions.

How about accuracy? Even from 40 yards, shooting more than one bolt at the same bullseye assured their rapid destruction. Encouraged, I stretched the range, successfully launching bolts to 70 yards well beyond the 50-yard range-compensating capabilities of its included scope. The accuracy was there, but the loopy flight of the bolts was disconcerting. Several recent model Ive since shot were as accurate, and some were 60 fps faster but, advertising hype to the contrary, trajectory is still a concern.  A pair of “old school” Parker crossbows (neither more than ten years old). But both the Terminator (L) and Thunder Hawk can still perform. It takes a tough target like The Block to stop their bolts (arrows) – along with aiming systems that can deliver hits!

Range? Particularly at further distances, precise yardage is essential (bolts can also be affected by wind). In the woods, overhanging branches can cause further problems so, even with a good rangefinder, my hunting distances remained conservative. Sale Leupold RX-FullDraw 5 Rangefinder with DNA with Black/Green OLED Model #182444 – RX-FullDraw 5 RangefinderArcher’s Advantage bow ballistics uses your arrow weight, arrow velocity, and peep height to calculate more accurate ranges for steep angle and long distance shots. $399.99 Buy on Amazon

Flight time entered into this decision, too. The shot itself was loud so, given enough distance, an alert deer could jump the string. For these reasons, although my comfortable shooting distance did increase somewhat, 30 yards became a prudent outer limit.

That said, in suitable conditions, with some of todays fastest crossbows, the right scope can stretch that distance. Thats true to some extent for nearly any hunting-legal crossbow. Eventually, I upgraded mine to an illuminated 30mm, range-compensating variable that could be calibrated to specific velocities. Crossbow Scopes 101

A friend plunked down good money for a hi-tech crossbow rated to hit 400 fps. Depicted in videos accurately slinging bolts at 100 yards, it shipped with a decent scope that was similar to the one I purchased. Its special reticle could accommodate such ranges but, being an experienced hunter, he intended to hunt in thicker deer havens. Thus, after following the sighting-in procedure, he established a 40-yard max.

Once in the woods, he also followed a common rifle hunter practice, dialing the scopes magnification to a lower setting (to gain a wider a field of view). No excitement during the first few outings, but a subsequent zero check on a 3-D deer target quickly spiked his blood pressure. Somehow, his bolts were way off the mark at 30 and 40 yards begging the question, what the #$%^ is up?  Ravin’s crossbows are known for their high speeds so their scopes are designed accordingly. The speed settings on this version cover velocities from 300 – 450 fps. The same adjustment ring also displays magnifications – a potential source of trouble for the uninformed. The newest iteration omits them, and the ring now has a locking feature. Details Matter

Answer: The scope was fine; the problem was operator error. As it should be to optimize the crossbows performance – like most sporting-type rifle variables – its a second focal plane design. As such, the size of its reticle (along with its trajectory compensating hold-over points) remains constant regardless of the scopes magnification setting.

But, of course, these adjustments change the apparent size of the target. And this expansion or contraction of the image against the reticle alters the relationship of its hold-points to change their ballistic values – which could be bad, or good thing, depending on how the system is used. We were able to easily sort these details out because my syste works the same way. The Basics

My present crossbow scope fits the above description. But apparently, its been designed to minimize shooter-induced errors. Devoid of magnification inscriptions, its rotating power ring displays just the velocity-settings, common to many crossbows (see photo). Excalibur’s Tact-Zone variable scope (top) substitutes velocities for magnification settings. Because the crossbow scope below it is a basic fixed 4x version, although both have trajectory-compensating reticles, such a feature would be moot. Note the protective lens caps, worthwhile accessories (he strings near the scopes are indispensable cocking-aids).

For this reason, unlike 2nd FP range-compensating rifle scopes, its reticle isnt optimized for use at a specific magnification – typically the maximum. Instead, it utilizes more or less magnification to accommodate a diverse range of trajectories. Summarizing the process, the normal power settings are replaced by speeds (in fps), a trick that alters the values of the trajectory-compensating reticle. Ill use my scope to illustrate how they work. Setting Up a Crossbow Scope

My replacement scope is an Excaliber Tact Zone. As noted above, this 30mm scope features an illuminated reticle with range-compensating hold-over points that can be calibrated to the specific velocity of the crossbow. Its speed-settings run 300 400 fps. The latest but nearly identical model is the Tact-100.

The main difference, reflecting the performance of some recent bows, appears to be extra settings to cover 450 fps. But the mounting process is identical and follows standard rifle procedures. A video in this link covers the details: Sale Excalibur Tact-100 Durable Lightweight Waterproof Fogproof Adjustable 30mm Tube Crossbow Scope with Illuminated Red/Green Reticle GREAT PERFORMANCE – The Tact-100 Crossbow scope is perfect for target shooting or long-range practice so when you shoot at sensible hunting distances, it will give you the confidence to make the shot when it countsMULTI-COATED LENSES – The Tact-100 Crossbow scope lenses incorporate multi coatings that provide crisp, clear viewing; Tact-100 Illuminated Hunting Scope is a superior optical system for ultimate accuracy; Flip-up lens caps and 30mm scope rings included $234.99 Buy on Amazon

The scopes 30mm Picatinny-type rings (included) easily mounted to the crossbows rail with enough a latitude for proper eye-relief. But I did take pains to ensure the scope was level! Otherwise, windage errors would appear while using the reticles longer-range aiming points. Velocity Calibration

Having chronographed my crossbow, I knew it did an honest 342 fps, so I adjusted the scope accordingly. Interestingly, its velocity settings were at oddball intervals of 300, 320, 350, 380 and 400 fps. Why? The scope is actually a lower-power 2-6X, so Im guessing the velocities correspond with normal magnification settings. I chose a spot just below 350 and aligned it with the reference dot. The next step involved sighting in the scope via its central crosshairs. Top view of the scope with its elevation turret cap removed to reveal its bold adjustments: 1/2″ per click – at 20 yards! The scope’s velocity scale has been set to match the speed of the crossbow; 342 fps. Establishing a Baseline Zero 

The actual zero process, similar to a standard rifle scope, involves elevation and windage turret adjustments, although their click values may differ. My basic 4X offered fairly common MOA clicks, the equivalent of a half-inch at 100 yards. However, each click of the scope were discussing was worth -inches at 20 yards: 2 -MOA per click! Actually, this makes sense with a 20-yard baseline zero a familiar distance for many archers. 

Of course, bore-sighting is out with a crossbow so its worth starting out closer, preferably with a generous backstop. The first bolt I shot was near enough to the mark from 10 yards for a move to 20 yards, where the turrets easily put bolts on the money (if not, a prime suspect wouldve been incompatible bolts). Zeroed at 20 yards and ready to stretch the range. The scope has been set to the crossbow’s velocity. If the reticle is properly calibrated, bolts should hit the same white circle from 30 yards through the use of the corresponding hold-point. Stretching the Range

With the 20-yard zero established, at the scopes proper speed setting, my average-weight bolts should strike close to reticles 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-yard hold-points if the manufacturer did its part. To find out, I set up a target stout enough to capture the bolts (sometimes a challenge in itself). Then, using a rangefinder, I shot several from each distance, steadied by a set of shooting sticks (accuracy was preestablished). Better to use a bench rest and reset the target but be sure to keep your fingers clear of the string! Wrinkles?

Judging by the spot-on groups, Excaliber had done its homework. But, what if your impact points differ?  In that case, play with the velocity settings while shooting more bolts.

This process can be further simplified with a steady rest. Say your bolts strike 3-inches below your bullseye at 40 yards. Leave a bolt in the target, realign the reticles 40-yard mark with the bullseye and note where your central crosshairs (the 20-yard baseline) are aiming. Then, while carefully maintaining their position, adjust the scopes speed dial until the 40-yard mark coincides with your bolt. Good chance that setting will cover the other yardages, too. Reticle calibration check, beginning at 30-yards. The bolt (dead-center in the square insert of the 3-D deer target) was shot off a set of two-legged sticks. Tip: Wipe the bolts with silicone before shooting to ease their removal. The next stop is 40 yards.

Either way, shoot enough bolts to confirm. Fixed-power Crossbow Scopes and Others

Starting with fixed-power crossbow scopes, since most have similar reticles, if yours doesn’t provide close hits, you could try a few bolts at modified distances until scoring a close match (be sure to record this data). That was the fix for my spare crossbow, sold with another basic 4X scope. Its reticle was close but not exact. But it does jibe at slightly modified yardages; 38 instead of 40-yards, etc.

Actually, you could use nearly any scope, although compensating for steep bolt trajectories would be difficult. You could dial come-ups via the elevation turret – although reality will likely dictate otherwise. See my article on bullet drop compensation for more information.

What about first focal plane scopes? Popular among long-range rifle shooters, they eliminate magnification-induced hold-over concerns because both the targets image and the reticle shift in harmony. However, at lower magnifications the reticle grows finer, making it harder to resolve in low light.

Most also feature complex grids and target turrets. Like a standard rifle scope, you could conscript one for a crossbow duty, but the result would be a fiddly system.

Dot sights fall somewhere in between. Most are spinoffs of firearms models. The few versions built for crossbows often feature multiple dots, but some are generic regarding trajectory compensation. That said, theyre small, intuitive and eye-grabbing, especially in low light. Then again, so is an illuminated crossbow scope. Parting Shots A tom turkey taken with a Ravin R-26. The scope’s reticle will cover 100 yards. The range here was 30 yards, a pretty good poke in the woods.

Most of us archers are wired to think range in 10-yard increments (frequently off a 20-yard starting point). Thus, the archery industry follows uit.

Having used all of the above optics, I much prefer a purpose-built crossbow scope, an illuminated version with a provision to match its reticle to the velocity of the bow. And the better crossbow packages have this base covered to include the right bolts, another key component of the system! Most will easily cover 50 yards; more than enough range for most of us.

An average-sized doe from 2015 is still among my more memorable archery events. If a trophy is the standard, we (the few hunters in my circle) have certainly tagged much better deer. Ranked by distance though, that 42-yard shot topped my archery list. Others particularly Western hunters will probably find this laughable. But for many Eastern archers its a pretty good poke. And for all, there are ways to muff a shot – the reason I doublechecked my scopes velocity setting before taking the shot.

My two closest compatriots hunt with fast Ravin crossbows, an R-20 (420 fps), and R-26 (400 fps). Their bows were purchased as packages with Ravin-branded scopes. Checking the latest versions, I noticed the scopes (which can cover 450 fps), now incorporate speed locks good insurance!

Still, like me, they both prefer to stick with closer distances. And we all take pains to ensure our crossbow-rated hunting broadheads fly true!

In closing, if youre looking for crossbow scope recommendations, the Internet is a better source for up-to-date reviews. The list of decent picks is growing, a good indicator of demand.

Continue Reading

Sports

If college football’s playoff system ain’t broke, why fix it?

Published

on

By

If college football's playoff system ain't broke, why fix it?

During college football’s Bowl Championship Series era, the sport’s opposition to an expanded, let alone expansive, playoff could be summarized in one colorful quote by then-Ohio State president E. Gordon Gee.

“They will wrench a playoff system out of my cold, dead hands,” Gee said in 2007.

We are happy to report that while college football does, indeed, have a playoff, Gee is still very much alive. The 81-year-old retired just this week after a second stint leading West Virginia University.

What is dead and buried, though, is college football’s staunch resistance to extending its postseason field. After decades of ignoring complaints and the promise of additional revenue to claim that just two teams was more than enough, plans to move from 12 participants to 16 were underway before last season’s inaugural 12-teamer even took place.

A once-static sport now moves at light speed, future implications be damned.

Fire. Ready. Aim.

So maybe the best bit of current news is that college football’s two ruling parties — the SEC and Big Ten — can’t agree on how the new 16-team field would be selected. It has led to a pause on playoff expansion.

Maybe, just maybe, it means no expansion will occur by 2026, as first planned, and college football can let the 12-team model cook a little to accurately assess what changes — if any — are even needed.

“We have a 12-team playoff, five conference champions,” SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said this week. “That could stay if we can’t agree.”

Good. After all, what’s the rush?

The 2025 season will play out with a 12-team format featuring automatic bids for five conference champions and seven at-large spots. Gone is last year’s clunky requirement that the top four seeds could go only to conference champs — elevating Boise State and Arizona State and unbalancing the field.

That alone was progress built on real-world experience. It should be instructive.

The SEC wants a 16-team model but with, as is currently the case, automatic bids going to the champions in the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, SEC and the best of the so-called Group of 6. The rest of the field would be at-large selections.

The Big Ten says it will not back such a proposal until the SEC agrees to play nine conference games (up from its current eight). Instead, it wants a 16-team system that gives four automatic bids apiece to the Big Ten and SEC, two each to the ACC and Big 12, one to the Group of 6 and then three at-large spots.

It’s been dubbed the “4-4-2-2-1-3” because college athletic leaders love ridiculous parlances almost as much as they love money.

While the ACC, Big 12 and others have offered opinions — mostly siding with the SEC — legislatively, the decision rests with the sport’s two big-dog conferences.

Right now, neither side is budging. A compromise might still be made, of course. The supposed deadline to set the 2026 system is Nov. 30. And Sankey actually says he prefers the nine-game SEC schedule, even if his coaches oppose it.

However, the possibility of the status quo standing for a bit longer remains.

What the Big Ten has proposed is a dramatic shift for a sport that has been bombarded with dramatic shifts — conference realignment, the transfer portal, NIL, revenue sharing, etc.

The league wants to stage multiple “play-in” games on conference championship weekend. The top two teams in the league would meet for the league title (as is currently the case), but the third- and fourth-place teams would play the fifth- and sixth-place teams to determine the other automatic bids.

Extend this out among all the conferences and you have up to a 26-team College Football Playoff (with 22 teams in a play-in situation). This would dramatically change the way the sport works — devaluing the stakes for nonconference games, for example. And some mediocre teams would essentially get a playoff bid — in the Big Ten’s case, the sixth seed last year was an Iowa team that finished 8-5.

Each conference would have more high-value inventory to sell to broadcast partners, but it’s not some enormous windfall. Likewise, four more first-round playoff games would need to find television slots and relevance.

Is anyone sure this is necessary? Do we need 16 at all, let alone with multibids?

In the 12-team format, the first round wasn’t particularly competitive — with a 19.3-point average margin of victory. It’s much like the first round of the NFL playoffs, designed mostly to make sure no true contender is left out.

Perhaps last year was an outlier. And maybe future games will be close. Or maybe they’ll be even more lopsided. Wouldn’t it be prudent to find out?

While there were complaints about the selection committee picking SMU and/or Indiana over Alabama, it wasn’t some egregious slight. Arguments will happen no matter how big the field. Besides, the Crimson Tide lost to two 6-6 teams last year. Expansion means a team with a similar résumé can cruise in.

Is that a good thing?

Whatever the decision, it is being made with little to no real-world data — pro or con. Letting a few 12-team fields play out, providing context and potentially unexpected consequences, sure wouldn’t hurt.

You don’t have to be Gordon Gee circa 2007 to favor letting this simmer and be studied before leaping toward another round of expansion.

Continue Reading

Sports

Arch to victory? Texas preseason pick to win SEC

Published

on

By

Arch to victory? Texas preseason pick to win SEC

Texas, with Heisman Trophy candidate Arch Manning set to take over as starting quarterback, is the preseason pick to win the Southeastern Conference championship.

The Longhorns received 96 of the 204 votes cast from media members covering the SEC media days this week to be crowned SEC champion on Dec. 6 in Atlanta at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Georgia, with 44 votes, received the second-most votes.

If that scenario plays out, it would mean a rematch of the 2024 SEC championship game, which Georgia won in an overtime thriller. The SEC championship game pits the two teams with the best regular-season conference record against one another.

Alabama was third with 29 votes, while LSU got 20. South Carolina was next with five, while Oklahoma received three and Vanderbilt and Florida each got two votes. Tennessee, Ole Miss and Auburn each received one vote.

Since 1992, only 10 times has the predicted champion in the preseason poll gone on to win the SEC championship.

The 2024 SEC title game averaged 16.6 million viewers across ABC and ESPN, the fourth-largest audience on record for the game. The overtime win for Georgia, which peaked with 19.7 million viewers, delivered the largest audience of the college football season.

Continue Reading

World

Every shop and home burned or ransacked: The Syrian city engulfed in tribal violence

Published

on

By

Every shop and home burned or ransacked: The Syrian city engulfed in tribal violence

The Syrian presidency has announced it’s assembling a special taskforce to try to stop nearly a week of sectarian clashes in the southern Druze city of Sweida.

The presidency called for restraint on all sides and said it is making strenuous efforts to “stop the fighting and curb the violations that threaten the security of the citizens and the safety of society”.

By early Saturday morning, a ceasefire had been confirmed by the US special envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack, who posted on X that Syrian President Ahmed al Sharaa and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had agreed to a ceasefire supported by US secretary of state Marco Rubio.

The post went on to state that this agreement had the support of “Turkey, Jordan and its neighbours” and called upon the Druze, Bedouins, and Sunni factions to put down their arms.

Sky News special correspondent Alex Crawford reports from the road leading to Sweida, the city that has become the epicentre of Syria’s sectarian violence.

For the past 24 hours, we’ve watched as Syria‘s multiple Arab tribes began mobilising in the Sweida province to help defend their Bedouin brethren.

A fighter aims a gun
A body is wrapped in a blanket

Thousands travelled from multiple different Syrian areas and had reached the edge of Sweida city by Friday nightfall after a day of almost non-stop violent clashes and killings.

More on Syria

“We have come to protect the [Arab] Bedouin women and children who are being terrorised by the Druze,” they told us.

A fighter in Syria
Image:
Arab fighters said they had come to protect the Bedouin women and children

Fighters at a gas station
Image:
Fighters at a petrol station

Every shop and every home in the streets leading up to Sweida city has been burned or ransacked, the contents destroyed or looted.

We saw tribal fighters loading the back of pickup trucks and driving away from the city with vehicles packed with looted goods from Druze homes.

A burning building
Image:
Shops and homes leading up to Sweida city have been burned or ransacked

A burned out car

Several videos posted online showed violence against the Druze, including one where tribal fighters force three men to throw themselves off a high-rise balcony and are seen being shot as they do so.

Doctors at the nearby community hospital in Buser al Harir said there had been a constant stream of casualties being brought in. As we watched, another dead fighter was carried out of an ambulance.

The medics estimated there had been more than 600 dead in their area alone. “The youngest child who was killed was a one-and-a-half-year-old baby,” one doctor told us.

A doctor talks to Sky's Alex Crawford
Image:
Doctors said there had been a constant stream of casualties due to violence

The violence is the most dangerous outbreak of sectarian clashes since the fall of the Bashar al Assad regime last December – and the most serious challenge for the new leader to navigate.

The newly brokered deal is aimed at ending the sectarian killings and restoring some sort of stability in a country which is emerging from more than a decade of civil war.

Continue Reading

Trending