Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has condemned Lee Anderson’s attack on London mayor Sadiq Khan as unacceptable and “wrong” – as the suspended MP said his words were “borne out of sheer frustration”.

Mr Anderson, the former deputy party chair of the Conservative Party, was suspended at the weekend after he refused to apologise for claiming “Islamists” had achieved “control” over London and that Mr Khan had “given our capital city away to his mates”.

On Monday, the now independent MP for Ashfield stood by his position and refused to apologise – while also describing his words as “clumsy”.

Politics latest: Tories label MP’s suspension ‘final nail in the party’s coffin’

Speaking on BBC Radio York, the prime minister denied the Tory party has “Islamophobic tendencies” and said: “Lee’s comments weren’t acceptable, they were wrong. That’s why he’s had the whip suspended.”

He added: “Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high. I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully.”

But speaking to reporters later on Monday, the prime minister repeatedly refused to call Mr Anderson’s remarks Islamophobic.

‘Clearly racist’

Mr Khan said he was “bewildered why Rishi Sunak and the cabinet are refusing to call this out”.

The London mayor added: “They should say what the problem is. The problem is you have a senior Conservative saying things that are clearly racist, anti-Muslim and Islamophobic.

“That is leading to an environment where anti-Muslim crime is spiralling and what they are doing is pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Khan: ‘Pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia’

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer also attacked Mr Sunak for being “too weak” on the issue.

He told broadcasters: “This is really basic. Islamophobia is something which should be called out by every political leader and the prime minister isn’t calling it out because he’s too weak.

“I don’t think anybody can make excuses for this prime minister and say it’s all too difficult. It’s very straightforward.

“He lacks the backbone to call this out for what it is, because he’s leading a divided party, a chaotic party, and it’s no wonder people have just had enough of this after 14 years and desperately want change.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Lee Anderson be a Tory candidate again?

Mr Sunak’s statement to local radio was the first time he has directly addressed the comments made by Mr Anderson.

The MP told GB News last week: “I don’t actually believe that the Islamists have got control of our country, but what I do believe is they’ve got control of Khan and they’ve got control of London…

“He’s actually given our capital city away to his mates.”

Mr Anderson’s comments sparked condemnation from across the political divide, including from Tory peer Baroness Warsi, who said she was “really disturbed by where the Conservative Party has gone” and that “anti-Muslim racism is being used as an electoral campaign tool”.

‘My words were clumsy’

In a fresh statement published by GB News on Monday, Mr Anderson said his words were “clumsy” and “borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city”.

However, he doubled down on his refusal to apologise, saying: “If you are wrong, apologising is not a sign of weakness but a sign of strength.

“But when you think you are right you should never apologise because to do so would be a sign of weakness.”

He said: “Seeing the words ‘From the river to the sea’ on [the] Elizabeth Tower made me feel sick to the pit of my stomach.”

Read more from Sky News:
US airman dies after setting himself ablaze in ‘genocide’ protest

Everton Football Club’s 10-point deduction reduced
Cruise ship blocked from docking over ‘health risks’

Repeating his opposition to the mayor, Mr Anderson said: “Khan has stood by and allowed our police to turn a blind eye to the disgusting scenes around parliament.

“It is not my intention to upset anyone, I believe in free speech and have 100% respect for people of all backgrounds.

“The vast majority of Muslims are not Islamists in the same way the vast majority of Christians are not conservatives or socialists.

“My words may have been clumsy but my words were borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city.

“We’ve got to get Khan out at the elections in May.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Anti-Muslim racism being used as an electoral campaign tool’

He added: “Sadiq Khan is failing London across the board. On transport with ULEZ and the strikes which he pledged to end. On knife crime and violence against women and girls. The list is endless.

“He’s more interested in virtue signalling to his trendy lefty mates by renaming train lines and street signs at a cost of millions of pounds rather than in delivering for our capital city which should be the greatest city on Earth.”

Mr Anderson’s statement, published by GB News, was drawn up on Saturday, shortly after he made his provocative comments to the channel.

? Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts?

However, it was not released because of Mr Anderson’s refusal to apologise to the London mayor as requested by Tory chief whip Simon Hart.

Mr Sunak said it was “incumbent on all of us, especially those elected to parliament, not to inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

“Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high and I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully, he said.

Elsewhere in his interview with local radio, Mr Sunak rejected suggestions his party had a problem with Islamophobia.

Rishi Sunk has tried to draw a line under Lee Anderson – but the row could run on


Tamara Cohen

Tamara Cohen

Political correspondent

@tamcohen

Rishi Sunak this morning tried to close down a row over suspended Tory MP Lee Anderson, describing his comments as “wrong” and saying MPs shouldn’t “inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

Mr Anderson – the often controversial MP, who was a surprise pick as the party’s deputy chairman last year – claimed on GB News last week that “Islamists” had “got control” of Labour mayor Sadiq Khan.

The prime minister today went further than his deputy, Oliver Dowden, over the weekend – but would not say whether he thought the remarks were racist, as Mr Khan himself and some Tories have.

It’s an attempt to draw a line under the row, allowing his colleagues to claim Mr Sunak acted “decisively”.

But there are several reasons this could run and run.

One is that Mr Sunak has touched on one of his party’s fault lines, with some 2019 MPs defending Mr Anderson in their WhatsApp groups – although other senior figures are horrified.

Mr Anderson himself, who could have avoided suspension by apologising, could stoke it further – he is already tweeting about people’s support for him, and has a TV platform to make further noise.

Mr Sunak has been trying in recent days to make a point about protests that are “hijacked by extremists” who he says are undermining democracy by intimidation.

Tory sources admit Mr Anderson’s comments are particularly unhelpful in this context. With another vote on Gaza on the cards, tensions will be running high on all sides.

The prime minister said it was “not a fair characterisation at all” to argue he had taken a tough stance on antisemitism but had overlooked Islamophobia in his party – saying racism or prejudice “any kind” was “completely unacceptable” and “not British”.

Earlier today, a cabinet minister appeared to leave the door open to Mr Anderson regaining the Tory whip, which allows him to sit as a Conservative MP in the Commons.

‘Reflection needed’

Asked what Mr Anderson needed to say to be welcomed back, Transport Secretary Mark Harper told Kay Burley on Sky News he should “reflect on what he said” and “retract those comments and apologise”.

“He’s contributed a lot in the past. I’d like to see him be able to contribute to the Conservative Party in the future,” he said.

Read more:
More than 40% of public ‘think Labour still has antisemitism problem’

Anderson row blunts Sunak’s moral authority on racism
Speaker retracts offer for emergency ceasefire debate

While a number of senior Tories have criticised Mr Anderson for his comments, Mr Harper was the second cabinet minister to refuse to say whether the remarks were “racist”.

Yesterday, Mr Dowden backed the decision to suspend the Ashfield MP but refused to say whether he was racist.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘It was wrong’

WhatsApp messages leaked to Sky News reveal some Tory MPs regard Mr Anderson’s suspension as a mistake.

The WhatsApp forum is called the “109 group” of Tory MPs elected in 2019.

Jill Mortimer, the Conservative MP for Hartlepool, shared messages from constituents saying they would not vote Tory again and that “Lee Anderson’s suspension is the final nail in the party’s coffin”.

Continue Reading

UK

Grooming gang victims being denied compensation because of criminal records

Published

on

By

Grooming gang victims being denied compensation because of criminal records

Victims of grooming gangs and modern slavery are being denied compensation by a government scheme because of their criminal records, Sky News has learned.

Analysis of official figures by Sky News’ Data & Forensics team shows more than 11,000 victims of crime over the last decade have been denied payouts because of their unspent convictions, including children.

The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority can award money to victims of violent crime, including sexual abuse.

It is the only government compensation scheme for victims – for those unable to work due to injuries, the money can be vital.

But, if an applicant has a criminal record, they are automatically refused compensation with limited exceptions.

Those with unspent convictions sometimes receive reduced sums.

Sky News has found that at least 130 children with criminal records have received reduced awards over the last 10 years, including 50 victims of sex abuse, four victims of brain damage, and one child who lost sight in an eye.

This rule on unspent convictions is based on the idea that public funds should only compensate blameless victims of crime and not, for example, a gang member who was injured in a fight.

But many argue the policy punishes those who have been forced to offend by exploiters, as well as victims of child sexual abuse.

‘I was frustrated that I wasn’t being believed’

Arthur Sherry, 43, from Perranporth in Cornwall was regularly abused by his babysitter from the age of five, including suffering rape.

In 2008, he reported it to Devon and Cornwall Police, alongside two other victims. He alleges the police did not believe him, and charges were not brought against his abuser.

Arthur Sherry, who was abused as a child, says he was denied compensation because of his criminal record
Image:
Arthur Sherry, who was abused as a child, says he was denied compensation because of his criminal record

Arthur became angry and descended into addiction as a “coping mechanism”, becoming suicidal, and was repeatedly arrested for minor offences, such as making false calls to the emergency services.

“I wasn’t getting support from any agencies, and no one asked me, ‘Why is this man ringing the emergency services all the time?'”

“It was a cry for help. I was frustrated that I wasn’t being believed.”

Eventually, Arthur’s abuser, Shaun Burton, was convicted of multiple offences against children, including 11 counts of indecency with a child in relation to Mr Sherry.

But when Arthur, who suffers from complex PTSD, subsequently tried to make a claim through the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in 2013, it was rejected because of his criminal record and because he submitted his application beyond CICA’s time limit.

He was not allowed to appeal the decision.

Arthur, aged 12 in the picture, was regularly abused by his babysitter, Shaun Burton, from the age of five
Image:
Arthur, aged 12 in the picture, was regularly abused by his babysitter, Shaun Burton, from the age of five

Many survivors of grooming gangs have criminal records due to being exploited and coerced.

While the government recently announced plans to disregard child prostitution convictions for these victims, many are urging authorities to go further and pardon all related offences.

Former victims’ commissioner Dame Vera Baird said: “They were not exercising their own free will and voluntarily committing crime, so there should be a discretion to look at that and say, ‘No, that wasn’t their fault’.

“They should get compensation for all the evil that was done to them by that gang.”

In 2022, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recommended that the government amend the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme so that “applicants with unspent convictions are not automatically excluded where offences are likely to be linked to the circumstances of their sexual abuse as a child”.

The government has refused to act on this recommendation.

However, Labour MP Sarah Champion has tabled an amendment to the upcoming Victims and Courts Bill, hoping to implement it, as well as widen eligibility to the scheme.

“Victims are seen as running a cannabis farm and get a conviction, before it actually turns out that they were a victim of modern slavery.

“These people, who are very clearly recognised as victims and survivors, aren’t getting the money that’s owed to them. The system is broken and the ministers need to get rid of it.”

'I was frustrated that I wasn't being believed,' Arthur tells Sky News' Alice Porter
Image:
‘I was frustrated that I wasn’t being believed,’ Arthur tells Sky News’ Alice Porter

Read more from Sky News:
Wintry blast ‘could be a dry run for a cold December’
What does Trump’s Gaza peace plan look like?

A government spokesperson said: “Last year, more than £164m was paid out under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme to victims, and we are going further by removing the time limit for civil personal injury claims and doubling Home Office funding for services supporting adult victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.

“Changes to the way we compensate victims have been considered by successive governments, and our priority must always be to treat all victims of violence equally.”

Devon and Cornwall Police said: “Tackling sexual offending is a key priority for Devon & Cornwall Police and we are working hard to bring offenders to justice.

“We take reports of all sexual offences seriously and will carry out thorough investigations into reports, looking at all viable lines of enquiry.”

Continue Reading

UK

From ‘Xmas gifts’ to piles of cash: How ex-Reform MEP was caught doing Russia’s bidding

Published

on

By

From 'Xmas gifts' to piles of cash: How ex-Reform MEP was caught doing Russia's bidding

Nathan Gill was at Manchester airport, about to board a flight to Russia, when accepting bribes finally caught up with him.

Gill, the former leader of Reform UK Wales and a one-time member of the European Parliament, who on Friday was jailed for 10-a-half-years, was stopped by police before boarding and had his phone seized in 2021.

While they interrogated him, his home in Anglesey was raided, with detectives discovering more electronics and cash piles of €5,000 (£4,400) and $5,000 (£3,800) respectively.

Nathan Gill being questioned. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Nathan Gill being questioned. Pic: Met Police


The evidence on Gill’s phone would damn him – he was in contact with a pro-Russian politician in Ukraine, Oleg Voloshyn, and had agreed to boost pro-Russia viewpoints in exchange for money.

Voloshyn would dictate the statement, and Gill would repeat it – in some cases, almost word for word – in the media or the European Parliament.

In one instance, Gill appeared on the now-banned Ukrainian TV channel, 112 Ukraine, which was known for its pro-Russian stance.

In the interview, he was critical of the Ukrainian decision to open criminal proceedings against Viktor Medvedchuk, the owner of the television channel and a personal friend of Vladimir Putin.

Nathan Gill. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Nathan Gill. Pic: Met Police

Speaking to the outlet, he said he was “very concerned” about the investigation, and wondered whether it was meant to silence “opposition politicians”.

Prosecutors said messages on Gill’s phone showed that this was at his paymaster’s instruction, with Voloshyn offering a “reward” if he would say that it was unacceptable to persecute a person for their political convictions.

Read more:
Reform UK’s former Wales leader jailed
Trump’s 28-point Ukraine peace plan in full

Voloshyn also offered the MEP €2,000 (£1,750) if he would express concern that Mr Medvedchuk could no longer mediate with Russia on Ukraine’s behalf, the court heard.

He added that “V” – understood to be Mr Medvedchuk – did not believe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had “true intentions to pursue a peace agenda”, prosecutors said.

Bundles of cash were recovered from Gill's home. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Bundles of cash were recovered from Gill’s home. Pic: Met Police

Sure enough, Gill appeared on 112 Ukraine saying it was “very sad” that Mr Medvedchuk felt he no longer had Mr Zelensky’s backing to act as a mediator with Russia, and suggested that using him “would be a sensible thing to do”.

The messages traded in innuendo, referring to the exchange of “Xmas gifts” or “postcards” instead of money.

But as the pair grew more comfortable with each other, they bargained more explicitly, with the sum of “£5k” quoted for Gill’s work.

Dominic Murphy, head of Counter Terrorism Command at the Met Police, said Gill had also offered access to other MEPs.

“This is where we get into that slightly odd situation where it feels very much like a real effort to undermine democracy here,” he said.

“This is Nathan Gill reaching out to individuals that he knows, who are Brits, who might be willing to be paid to go and make speeches.”

Commander Murphy declined to name names, but said there was an ongoing investigation and that other people had been spoken to.

None of the pro-Brexit MEPs Gill allegedly approached have been interviewed under caution.

Pic: Met Police
Image:
Pic: Met Police

Police confirmed there was no evidence to suggest Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was involved.

Gill was stopped at Manchester Airport on 13 September 2021, under schedule 3 of the Counter Terrorism and Borders Security Act 2019.

He offered police no explanation for his actions and answered no comment in a March 2022 police interview.

But the 52-year-old is believed to have had financial problems.

Mr Murphy added that while Gill appeared to have pro-Russian sympathies, he was primarily motivated by money.

The ex-MEP has been jailed for 10-and-a-half years after pleading guilty to eight counts of bribery between December 2018 and July 2019.

Following an investigation by counter-terrorism police, officers said they believe Gill likely took a minimum of £40,000 in cash and was offering to introduce other British MEPs so they could be bribed.

Voloshyn was picked up by the authorities on a trip to the US in 2021, which enabled the FBI to discover his end of the conversation.

He is now believed to be in Russia, but has been sanctioned by the UK government over allegations of trying to destabilise Ukraine.

Nathan Gill pleaded guilty to eight counts of bribery over pro-Russian statements. Including to media outlet 112 Ukraine. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Nathan Gill pleaded guilty to eight counts of bribery over pro-Russian statements. Including to media outlet 112 Ukraine. Pic: Met Police

He remains wanted in both Britain and Ukraine.

A Reform UK spokesman said: “Mr Gill’s actions were reprehensible, treasonous and unforgivable.

“We are glad that justice has been served and fully welcome the sentence Nathan Gill has received.”

Mr Farage, the Reform UK leader, said: “An investigation into Russian and Chinese influence over British politics would be welcome.”

The MP for Clacton previously described his former colleague as a “bad apple” and said he was “shocked” after Gill pleaded guilty to eight counts of bribery.

He said: “Any political party can find in their midst all sorts of terrible people.

“You can never, ever guarantee 100% that everyone you meet in your life, you shake hands with in the pub, is a good person.”

Continue Reading

UK

BBC board member resigns – and criticises ‘governance issues’ at top of corporation

Published

on

By

BBC board member resigns - and criticises 'governance issues' at top of corporation

A BBC board member has resigned after criticising “governance issues” at the top of the corporation.

Shumeet Banerji confirmed the news in a letter on Friday, according to BBC News.

It comes after the corporation’s director-general Tim Davie and chief executive of BBC News Deborah Turness resigned earlier this month after a row over the editing of a Panorama documentary on Donald Trump.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

Trending