Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has condemned Lee Anderson’s attack on London mayor Sadiq Khan as unacceptable and “wrong” – as the suspended MP said his words were “borne out of sheer frustration”.

Mr Anderson, the former deputy party chair of the Conservative Party, was suspended at the weekend after he refused to apologise for claiming “Islamists” had achieved “control” over London and that Mr Khan had “given our capital city away to his mates”.

On Monday, the now independent MP for Ashfield stood by his position and refused to apologise – while also describing his words as “clumsy”.

Politics latest: Tories label MP’s suspension ‘final nail in the party’s coffin’

Speaking on BBC Radio York, the prime minister denied the Tory party has “Islamophobic tendencies” and said: “Lee’s comments weren’t acceptable, they were wrong. That’s why he’s had the whip suspended.”

He added: “Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high. I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully.”

But speaking to reporters later on Monday, the prime minister repeatedly refused to call Mr Anderson’s remarks Islamophobic.

‘Clearly racist’

Mr Khan said he was “bewildered why Rishi Sunak and the cabinet are refusing to call this out”.

The London mayor added: “They should say what the problem is. The problem is you have a senior Conservative saying things that are clearly racist, anti-Muslim and Islamophobic.

“That is leading to an environment where anti-Muslim crime is spiralling and what they are doing is pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Khan: ‘Pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia’

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer also attacked Mr Sunak for being “too weak” on the issue.

He told broadcasters: “This is really basic. Islamophobia is something which should be called out by every political leader and the prime minister isn’t calling it out because he’s too weak.

“I don’t think anybody can make excuses for this prime minister and say it’s all too difficult. It’s very straightforward.

“He lacks the backbone to call this out for what it is, because he’s leading a divided party, a chaotic party, and it’s no wonder people have just had enough of this after 14 years and desperately want change.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Lee Anderson be a Tory candidate again?

Mr Sunak’s statement to local radio was the first time he has directly addressed the comments made by Mr Anderson.

The MP told GB News last week: “I don’t actually believe that the Islamists have got control of our country, but what I do believe is they’ve got control of Khan and they’ve got control of London…

“He’s actually given our capital city away to his mates.”

Mr Anderson’s comments sparked condemnation from across the political divide, including from Tory peer Baroness Warsi, who said she was “really disturbed by where the Conservative Party has gone” and that “anti-Muslim racism is being used as an electoral campaign tool”.

‘My words were clumsy’

In a fresh statement published by GB News on Monday, Mr Anderson said his words were “clumsy” and “borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city”.

However, he doubled down on his refusal to apologise, saying: “If you are wrong, apologising is not a sign of weakness but a sign of strength.

“But when you think you are right you should never apologise because to do so would be a sign of weakness.”

He said: “Seeing the words ‘From the river to the sea’ on [the] Elizabeth Tower made me feel sick to the pit of my stomach.”

Read more from Sky News:
US airman dies after setting himself ablaze in ‘genocide’ protest

Everton Football Club’s 10-point deduction reduced
Cruise ship blocked from docking over ‘health risks’

Repeating his opposition to the mayor, Mr Anderson said: “Khan has stood by and allowed our police to turn a blind eye to the disgusting scenes around parliament.

“It is not my intention to upset anyone, I believe in free speech and have 100% respect for people of all backgrounds.

“The vast majority of Muslims are not Islamists in the same way the vast majority of Christians are not conservatives or socialists.

“My words may have been clumsy but my words were borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city.

“We’ve got to get Khan out at the elections in May.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Anti-Muslim racism being used as an electoral campaign tool’

He added: “Sadiq Khan is failing London across the board. On transport with ULEZ and the strikes which he pledged to end. On knife crime and violence against women and girls. The list is endless.

“He’s more interested in virtue signalling to his trendy lefty mates by renaming train lines and street signs at a cost of millions of pounds rather than in delivering for our capital city which should be the greatest city on Earth.”

Mr Anderson’s statement, published by GB News, was drawn up on Saturday, shortly after he made his provocative comments to the channel.

? Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts?

However, it was not released because of Mr Anderson’s refusal to apologise to the London mayor as requested by Tory chief whip Simon Hart.

Mr Sunak said it was “incumbent on all of us, especially those elected to parliament, not to inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

“Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high and I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully, he said.

Elsewhere in his interview with local radio, Mr Sunak rejected suggestions his party had a problem with Islamophobia.

Rishi Sunk has tried to draw a line under Lee Anderson – but the row could run on


Tamara Cohen

Tamara Cohen

Political correspondent

@tamcohen

Rishi Sunak this morning tried to close down a row over suspended Tory MP Lee Anderson, describing his comments as “wrong” and saying MPs shouldn’t “inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

Mr Anderson – the often controversial MP, who was a surprise pick as the party’s deputy chairman last year – claimed on GB News last week that “Islamists” had “got control” of Labour mayor Sadiq Khan.

The prime minister today went further than his deputy, Oliver Dowden, over the weekend – but would not say whether he thought the remarks were racist, as Mr Khan himself and some Tories have.

It’s an attempt to draw a line under the row, allowing his colleagues to claim Mr Sunak acted “decisively”.

But there are several reasons this could run and run.

One is that Mr Sunak has touched on one of his party’s fault lines, with some 2019 MPs defending Mr Anderson in their WhatsApp groups – although other senior figures are horrified.

Mr Anderson himself, who could have avoided suspension by apologising, could stoke it further – he is already tweeting about people’s support for him, and has a TV platform to make further noise.

Mr Sunak has been trying in recent days to make a point about protests that are “hijacked by extremists” who he says are undermining democracy by intimidation.

Tory sources admit Mr Anderson’s comments are particularly unhelpful in this context. With another vote on Gaza on the cards, tensions will be running high on all sides.

The prime minister said it was “not a fair characterisation at all” to argue he had taken a tough stance on antisemitism but had overlooked Islamophobia in his party – saying racism or prejudice “any kind” was “completely unacceptable” and “not British”.

Earlier today, a cabinet minister appeared to leave the door open to Mr Anderson regaining the Tory whip, which allows him to sit as a Conservative MP in the Commons.

‘Reflection needed’

Asked what Mr Anderson needed to say to be welcomed back, Transport Secretary Mark Harper told Kay Burley on Sky News he should “reflect on what he said” and “retract those comments and apologise”.

“He’s contributed a lot in the past. I’d like to see him be able to contribute to the Conservative Party in the future,” he said.

Read more:
More than 40% of public ‘think Labour still has antisemitism problem’

Anderson row blunts Sunak’s moral authority on racism
Speaker retracts offer for emergency ceasefire debate

While a number of senior Tories have criticised Mr Anderson for his comments, Mr Harper was the second cabinet minister to refuse to say whether the remarks were “racist”.

Yesterday, Mr Dowden backed the decision to suspend the Ashfield MP but refused to say whether he was racist.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘It was wrong’

WhatsApp messages leaked to Sky News reveal some Tory MPs regard Mr Anderson’s suspension as a mistake.

The WhatsApp forum is called the “109 group” of Tory MPs elected in 2019.

Jill Mortimer, the Conservative MP for Hartlepool, shared messages from constituents saying they would not vote Tory again and that “Lee Anderson’s suspension is the final nail in the party’s coffin”.

Continue Reading

UK

Budget 2025: Reeves urged to ‘make the case’ for income tax freeze – as PM hits out at defenders of ‘failed’ policy

Published

on

By

Budget 2025: Reeves urged to 'make the case' for income tax freeze - as PM hits out at defenders of 'failed' policy

Rachel Reeves needs to “make the case” to voters that extending the freeze on personal income thresholds was the “fairest” way to increase taxes, Baroness Harriet Harman has said.

Speaking to Sky News political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the Labour peer said the chancellor needed to explain that her decision would “protect people’s cost of living if they’re on low incomes”.

In her budget on Wednesday, Ms Reeves extended the freeze on income tax thresholds – introduced by the Conservatives in 2021 and due to expire in 2028 – by three years.

The move – described by critics as a “stealth tax” – is estimated to raise £8bn for the exchequer in 2029-2030 by dragging some 1.7 million people into a higher tax band as their pay goes up.

Rachel Reeves, pictured the day after delivering the budget. Pic: PA
Image:
Rachel Reeves, pictured the day after delivering the budget. Pic: PA

The chancellor previously said she would not freeze thresholds as it would “hurt working people” – prompting accusations she has broken the trust of voters.

During the general election campaign, Labour promised not to increase VAT, national insurance or income tax rates.

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted there’s been no manifesto breach, but acknowledged people were being asked to “contribute” to protect public services.

He has also launched a staunch defence of the government’s decision to scrap the two-child benefit cap, with its estimated cost of around £3bn by the end of this parliament.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Prime minister defends budget

‘A moral failure’

The prime minister condemned the Conservative policy as a “failed social experiment” and said those who defend it stand for “a moral failure and an economic disaster”.

“The record highs of child poverty in this country aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet – they mean millions of children are going to bed hungry, falling behind at school, and growing up believing that a better future is out of reach despite their parents doing everything right,” he said.

The two-child limit restricts child tax credit and universal credit to the first two children in most households.

The government believes lifting the limit will pull 450,000 children out of poverty, which it argues will ultimately help reduce costs by preventing knock-on issues like dependency on welfare – and help people find jobs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Budget winners and losers

Speaking to Rigby, Baroness Harman said Ms Reeves now needed to convince “the woman on the doorstep” of why she’s raised taxes in the way that she has.

“I think Rachel really answered it very, very clearly when she said, ‘well, actually, we haven’t broken the manifesto because the manifesto was about rates’.

“And you remember there was a big kerfuffle before the budget about whether they would increase the rate of income tax or the rate of national insurance, and they backed off that because that would have been a breach of the manifesto.

“But she has had to increase the tax take, and she’s done it by increasing by freezing the thresholds, which she says she didn’t want to do. But she’s tried to do it with the fairest possible way, with counterbalancing support for people on low incomes.”

Read more:
Labour’s credibility might not be recoverable
Budget 2025 is a big risk for Labour’s election plans

She added: “And that is the argument that’s now got to be had with the public. The Labour members of parliament are happy about it. The markets essentially are happy about it. But she needs to make the case, and everybody in the government is going to need to make the case about it.

“This was a difficult thing to do, but it’s been done in the fairest possible way, and it’s for the good, because it will protect people’s cost of living if they’re on low incomes.”

Continue Reading

UK

Twenty two stadiums and 4.5 million tickets – home nations submit bid for 2035 Women’s World Cup

Published

on

By

Twenty two stadiums and 4.5 million tickets - home nations submit bid for 2035 Women's World Cup

The football associations of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales have officially launched and released more details about their joint bid for the 2035 Women’s World Cup.

If the bid is successful, it would be the first football World Cup hosted in the UK since 1966, and the largest single-sport event ever staged in the country.

The bid includes 22 proposed stadiums – 16 in England, three in Wales, two in Scotland and one in Northern Ireland – across 16 host cities.

Organisers claim it would be the most accessible tournament ever, with 63 million people living within two hours of a proposed venue.

They predict the tournament would generate 4.5 million ticket sales and have a projected global TV audience of 3.5 billion.

The tournament would involve 104 matches contested by 48 teams over 39 days, with 48 team base camp training sites, 82 venue-specific training sites and 32 FIFA Fan Festival Sites proposed.

In April, FIFA president Gianni Infantino revealed that the home nations had submitted the only valid bid for tournament.

More on Football

In a joint statement, the CEOs of the various football associations, said: “We are proud of the growth that we’ve driven in recent years across the women’s and girls’ game.”

They added that: “A Women’s World Cup in the UK has the power to turbo charge the women’s and girls’ game both in the UK and globally.”

Where would the matches be played?

The bid details the host cities and stadiums as follow:

• Belfast – The Clearer Twist National Stadium at Windsor Park

• Birmingham – The Sports Quarter Stadium and Villa Park

• Brighton & Hove – The American Express Stadium

• Bristol – Ashton Gate

• Cardiff – Cardiff City Stadium and Principality Stadium

• Edinburgh – Easter Road

• Glasgow – Hampden Park

• Leeds – Elland Road

• Liverpool – The Hill Dickinson Stadium

• London – Chelsea FC Stadium, Emirates Stadium, Selhurst Park, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and Wembley Stadium connected by EE

• Manchester – Etihad Stadium

• Trafford – Old Trafford

• Newcastle – St James’ Park

• Nottingham – The City Ground

• Sunderland – Stadium of Light

• Wrexham – STōK Racecourse

However, some of the stadiums mentioned above were merely the ones put forward in the official bid and are likely to change after the construction of new stadiums are completed.

Continue Reading

UK

Have you seen this nutcracker? CCTV shows thief stealing festive statue in Edinburgh

Published

on

By

Have you seen this nutcracker? CCTV shows thief stealing festive statue in Edinburgh

The manager of an Edinburgh cocktail bar will speak to police today over the “catastrophic” theft of an eight-foot tall nutcracker figure from outside his venue.

In what can only be described as a total nightmare before Christmas, a person riding an e-bike guaranteed a place on the naughty list by stealing the Copper Blossom’s festive statue on Monday.

They are seen on CCTV placing the soldier across their lap and riding off into the night down George Street towards St Andrew Square.

The thief was wearing a dark hoodie
Image:
The thief was wearing a dark hoodie

Speaking to The UK Tonight on Sky News, manager Paul Paxton said it was a massive financial blow for his bar.

“The individual nutcrackers are about £900 each,” he revealed.

The stolen one is named Nolan, while his “brother” Nelson remains “safe and sound”.

They were part of the Copper Blossom’s outdoor Christmas display, and Nelson has now been moved into the foyer.

Mr Paxton said he would be speaking to police about their investigation, with sightings having been reported “around Edinburgh” later on the night of the incident.

Nolan, who the owner described as “massive”, was taken at around 10.10pm. The CCTV footage shows the thief removing the statue and dragging it on to their bike.

You can see Nolan being taken away in this shot
Image:
You can see Nolan being taken away in this shot

As if losing a £900 nutcracker wasn’t bad enough, a table costing hundreds of pounds was also broken.

“It’s pretty catastrophic,” said Mr Paxton.

The bar had originally put out an appeal that said “if you return it, we’re all good” – but he admitted he doesn’t expect Nolan’s return any time soon.

Paul Paxton is dwarfed by his nutcracker soldiers
Image:
Paul Paxton is dwarfed by his nutcracker soldiers

And while he’d “never want someone to go into harm’s way”, he told Jayne Secker he was a little disappointed no witnesses alerted him or his staff to the theft.

“There were about 12 or 13 people who walked past,” he said.

“Even if someone had run in, that could have helped. It wasn’t a quick process – he fell off his bike.

“A heads-up would have been lovely.”

Continue Reading

Trending