The word “lead” is important. It suggests other nations will be involved.
Cyprus will be the coordination point for this mission and for the sea bridge of aid once it’s flowing.
The island, more than 200 miles northwest of Gaza, has a significant British military presence so perhaps there will be UK involvement in the aid operation.
“Port” is a somewhat misleading word to describe what the Americans intend to construct.
It will take the form of a temporary pier or causeway that will allow aid to be offloaded from ships to trucks for distribution.
We are told it will take “a number of weeks to plan and execute” and that the forces required to complete the mission are either already in the region or will be moved there soon.
Importantly, American officials tell us that US boots will not be on the ground in Gaza.
A senior White House official said: “We’re not planning for this to be an operation that would require US boots on the ground but issues in terms of the dates – the timelines, etc – those are all things that we’re working through.
“The concept that’s been planned involves the presence of US military personnel on military vessels offshore but does not require US military personnel to go ashore to install the pier or causeway facility that will allow the transportation of humanitarian assistance ashore.”
All of this leaves plenty of unanswered questions and exposes deep failures in diplomatic leverage the US has over Israel.
On that second point first, the Israeli government agency responsible for the flow of aid across the borders into Gaza, COGAT, has told Sky News that it could open up more land crossings but “that needs to be a decision made by the government and if they were to make such a decision then we would find a way to facilitate their decision”.
It added: “If the directive came from the [Israeli] government, then COGAT would find a way to fulfil that mission.”
That statement alone shows what the Israeli government could do but is unwilling to do, despite US pressure.
A US official said today that Israel has now agreed for a crossing into northern Gaza to be opened.
That said, there has been pressure for many weeks without success. It is not clear when this crossing will open.
It’s worth adding that Israel has been using numerous crossings to move its military in and out of Gaza.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:02
Gaza on brink of ‘desperate situation’
On the first point – the unanswered questions – there are plenty.
Who will build the infrastructure that will be needed on the land end of the pier?
Who will distribute the aid once it is offloaded?
Who will manage crowd control and prevent stampedes (which will be inevitable without considerable policing of a mass of desperate people)?
As I mentioned at the start, there is a political dimension to all this, too.
President Biden will announce this emergency mission at his annual State of the Union address in Washington tonight.
It’s being billed as a make-or-break moment for him as he tries to counter significant criticism of his suitability to run for president again.
His polling is terrible. Gaza is a key challenge for him. He needs to show that he has got a grip on it.
Like the airdrop announcement last week, the port announcement represents a desperate policy decision that President Biden hoped never to have to make.
The affected area is less than 200 metres from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency’s compound in the north of Rafah.
Geolocated footage and satellite imagery shows the strike destroyed buildings immediately adjacent to a sign identifying Kuwaiti Al-Salam Camp 1.
While it is unclear whether the buildings are part of the camp, Kuwaiti Al-Salam Camp 1 is known to house Palestinians displaced by the ongoing conflict.
Over much of the conflict, the surrounding area has been occupied by tents and sheds housing displaced people. In recent weeks, the number of these structures has decreased as Palestinians fled in advance of Israel‘s ground offensive in Rafah.
Verifying footage
To build a picture of what happened immediately after the strike, Sky News verified numerous videos and photographs captured by those present.
A sign and other distinctive features visible in footage recorded in the immediate aftermath allowed it to be matched to a daytime recording from the same scene.
Landmarks visible in the daylight made it possible to determine the exact location of the strike, and verify pieces of footage recorded at night in the same place.
The footage ultimately verified by Sky News shows numerous bodies being pulled from the wreckage of destroyed buildings. In one video, a man can be seen carrying the body of a decapitated child.
Satellite imagery captured by Planet Labs PBC on 27 May shows four buildings were destroyed in this strike.
The Israeli account
In a statement given on 28 May, a senior Israeli military official claimed the deaths of civilians were the result of an attempt to kill two senior members of Hamas, and that the site is close to an area used to launch rockets.
According to Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, two 17kg (37lb) munitions were used. Claiming that much of the destruction was caused by a subsequent fire that could not have been solely ignited by munitions of this size, Hagari stated that this was being investigated.
The weaponry used in this strike
Footage filmed by Palestinian journalist Alamuddin Sadiq at the scene of the strike appears to indicate which specific munition was used.
Recorded the day after the strike, the fragments resemble the tail section of a GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb (SDB).
According to Rahul Udoshi, a weapons specialist at the defence intelligence company Janes, the fragment “appears to be tail section of GBU-39 SDB (of Israeli Air Force stock).” Noting the similarity, Udoshi pointed out “the screw and cut section next to that”, which he described as an “exact match”.
Reviewing the same image, Chris Cobb-Smith, a former British army artillery officer and director of Chiron Resources, also concluded that it matched a GBU-39 SDB, describing the munition as “an advanced, state-of-the-art weapon”.
According to Sipri Arms Transfers Database, Israel received 1,000 of these munitions from the US as recently as 2023. Bloomberg, reporting at the time, states that this delivery was accelerated following the 7 October Hamas attack.
Aerial footage
During his statement, Rear Admiral Hagari shared a video showing the strike filmed from above. Highlighting the specific buildings that were targeted, the video shows that out of the four destroyed, these were the second furthest east and the structure immediately to its west.
On the loss of innocent life, Hagari said “our aerial surveillance was filming prior to the strike in order to minimise civilian harm”.
In the footage shared by the Israeli military, Sky News identified four people moving in the immediate vicinity of the targeted building in the seconds before it was hit.
Humanitarian zone
Prior to its ground offensive in Rafah, Israel produced a map marking an evacuation area and humanitarian zone.
The area targeted lies between these two zones, in the neighbourhood numbered by the Israeli government as 2372.
More than 20 people have been killed in Israeli tank shelling on a tent camp in Gaza, according to Palestinian health officials.
It comes amid widespread outrage over Israel’s bombing two days earlier of another camp where at least 45 lives were lost.
On Tuesday, four tank shells hit a cluster of tents for displaced families in a designated humanitarian zone in al Mawasi, western Rafah, killing 21 people, emergency services told Reuters.
At least 12 of the victims were women, medical officials said.
The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said it did not strike in the humanitarian area of al Mawasi.
Israel had launched an airstrike on the Tel al Sultan area of western Rafah on Sunday night that ignited a fire in a camp for displaced Palestinians. At least 45 people, around half of them women and children, were killed, according to local health officials.
More on Gaza
Related Topics:
The deadly bombing sparked global condemnation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a “tragic mistake”.
The Israeli military on Tuesday claimed its initial investigation into the strike indicated the fire was caused by a secondary explosion.
Advertisement
Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, the chief military spokesman, claimed Israel’s military fired two 17kg munitions that targeted two senior Hamas militants.
He claimed the munitions would have been too small to ignite a fire on their own, and that the military was looking into the possibility that weapons were stored in the area.
It has not been possible to independently verify his claims.
The fire triggered by the bombing also could have ignited fuel, cooking gas canisters or other materials in the densely populated tent camp housing displaced people.
Israel’s closest allies have been among those who have strongly condemned the killings.
Nearly a million have been forced to flee Rafah since Israel launched an incursion there in early May. Most of the people had already been displaced by Israeli attacks.
They now seek refuge in squalid tent camps and other war-ravaged areas.
The US and other close allies of Israel have warned against a fully-fledged offensive in the city, with the Biden administration saying that would cross a red line and refusing to provide offensive arms for such an operation.
On Friday, the International Court of Justice – the UN’s top court – ordered Israel to halt its Rafah offensive – although Israel looks set to ignore the demand.
Israel claims it is carrying out limited operations in eastern Rafah along the Gaza-Egypt border, although residents also reported heavy bombardment overnight in western parts of Rafah.
Sayed al Masri, a Rafah resident, said many families had been forced to flee their homes and shelters, with most heading for the crowded area of al Mawasi, where giant tent camps have been set up on a barren coastline, or to Khan Younis, a southern city that suffered heavy damage during months of fighting.
Gaza’s health ministry said two medical facilities in Tel al Sultan were out of service because of intense bombing nearby.
Medical Aid for Palestinians, a charity operating throughout the territory, said the Tel al Sultan medical centre and the Indonesian Field Hospital were under lockdown, with medics, patients and displaced people trapped inside.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Most of Gaza’s hospitals are no longer functioning. The Kuwait Hospital in Rafah shut down on Monday after a strike near its entrance killed two health workers.
A spokesperson for the World Health Organisation said the casualties from Sunday’s strike and fire “absolutely overwhelmed” field hospitals in the area, which were already running short on supplies to treat severe burns.
The Israeli offensive began after Hamas and other militants burst into southern Israel in a surprise attack on 7 October, killing around 1,200 people and abducting around 250 others. More than 100 were released during a ceasefire in November in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.
Israel responded to the attack with a huge air and land offensive that has killed at least 36,096 Palestinians in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
Around 80% of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million has been displaced and United Nations officials say parts of the territory are experiencing famine.
The Pope used a highly offensive word towards gay men as he reaffirmed his stance that they should not be priests, Italian media has reported.
Pope Francis is believed to have made the remark in a closed-door meeting with bishops, according to the country’s largest daily newspapers La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera.
Both quoted the Pope as describing priesthood colleges as already too full of “frociaggine” – a highly offensive Italian slur.
The Vatican has not commented on the reports.
The incident is said to have happened on 20 May, as first reported by political gossip website Dagospia, when the Italian Bishops Conference held a private meeting with the Pope.
La Repubblica based its story on several unspecified sources, while Corriere cited unnamed bishops, who suggested the Pope, an Argentinian, might have not realised the Italian term is offensive.
“It’s all the fault of some bishop who broke his mandate of silence to report the gaffe that occurred last week,” reported Il Messaggero, a national paper based in Rome.
According to the paper, the Pope’s comments came during an informal Q&A session at the annual bishops’ meeting which was attended by over 200 members of the clergy.
Advertisement
The Pope, 87, has been credited with leading the Roman Catholic Church into taking a more welcoming approach towards the LGBT+ community.
Fears Pope’s good work undone
When he became Pope, back in 2013, Francis signalled a more tolerant, welcoming attitude to the LGBT+ community, saying: “If a person is gay and seeks God, and has goodwill, who am I to judge?”
He sparked a furious response among some conservative followers by allowing priests to bless same-sex couples last year.
There were whispers that he might be thinking of allowing gay men to become priests, as long as they remained celibate.
Now, that idea has been dismissed, and the Pope’s crude language has reverberated.
Make no mistake – the term allegedly used by Pope Francis is extremely – and obviously – offensive. It seems hard to believe he could have used it by accident.
We are told there is now embarrassment within the Vatican and fear that good work has been undone.
But, a week after he was reported to have used this crude term, the Pope has not issued a statement, much less an apology.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:40
April: Pope swaps Popemobile for boat
In a 2005 document, during Benedict XVI’s papacy, the Vatican said the church could admit into the priesthood those who had overcome gay tendencies for at least three years.
The document said those with “deep-seated” gay tendencies and those who “support the so-called gay culture” should be barred.