Michael Gove is poised to unveil a new definition of extremism amid jitters in government at his plan.
The Politics at Jack and Sam’s podcast discusses the big announcement by Rishi Sunak‘s government this week – designed to update and increase the number of organisations that are classed as “extremist” and put new limits on their activities.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The plan, due to be launched on Thursday – subject to cross-government sign-off – will see a change in the definition.
The 9-year-old definition defines extremism as “vocal or active opposition to British values”.
The updated definition is going to, according to a source, be the “promotion or advancement of ideology based on hatred, intolerance or violence or undermining or overturning the rights or freedoms of others, or of undermining democracy itself”.
Government sources confirm this is the intent of the new wording but the exact phraseology has not been published.
More from Politics
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:56
Health secretary defends new definition of extremism
Other ministers are cautious about the plan, suggesting that it is unclear who the definition will and won’t cover, amid fears that other groups – such as trans rights activists, gender critical organisations and even anti-House of Lords campaigners – could be caught by this new wider definition.
It will be for the government, in the first instance, to say who is and isn’t on the list.
Advertisement
Mr Gove will reject these fears, saying that the anti-democratic clauses mean that organisations such as trans rights groups will be fine.
The government is intending to release lists of organisations classed as “extremist”, and these groups will then be banned from meeting with ministers or other elected officials, receiving public money or seeing individuals appointed to government boards.
However, the guidance is non-statutory, meaning it will not give police or other law enforcement powers to deal with this issue. This is separate from proscription, the process of banning organisations that promote terror.
There are also fears that the government will use the new lists of extremists to try and embarrass Labour, pointing out links between Labour figures and the names on the government-determined lists. One government minister said Mr Gove was pursuing a “culture war” through this approach.
Further police powers to deal with behaviour on marches and other protests are likely to come at a later date.
The Australian Securities and Exchange Commission claims that John Louis Anthony Bigatton promoted the crypto lending platform at four seminars and via two social media posts.
The U.S. Congress bipartisan vote has overwhelmingly demonstrated its rejection of the SEC’s SAB 121. President Biden threatened to veto the overruling. Will the executive branch overthrow Congress’s decision?