The government plans to ban foreign governments from owning British newspapers and magazines – effectively blocking an Abu Dhabi-led takeover of the Daily and Sunday Telegraph.
The commitment was set out in the House of Lords this afternoon in an amendment to the third reading of the Digital Markets Act, currently making its way through Parliament.
Culture minister Lord Parkinson said: “We will amend the media merger regime explicitly to rule out newspaper and periodical news magazine mergers involving ownership, influence or control by foreign states.”
He added: “Under the new measures the secretary of state would be obliged to refer media merger cases to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) through a new foreign state intervention notice.”
The secretary of state, the peer said, would be obliged to block deals found to contravene the CMA’s tests.
The move was revealed as the House debated an amendment, brought by Baroness Stowell but withdrawn on confirmation of the government’s plans, that had called for the banning of foreign state ownership in response to the proposed takeover of the Telegraph titles, as well as the Spectator magazine, by Redbird-IMI.
The US-Abu Dhabi joint venture is 75% owned by Sheikh Mansour, vice president of the United Arab Emirates(UAE).
The future of the Telegraph titles has been the subject of fierce debate in Conservative circles since Redbird-IMI circumvented a formal auction by repaying money owed to Lloyds Bank by former owners the Barclay family, who had put the newspapers up as security.
Former Tory leaders Lord Hague and Iain Duncan Smith opposed the takeover arguing that it was inappropriate for significant media assets to be effectively owned by a foreign state.
Advertisement
WHO IS SHEIKH MANSOUR?
An Emirati royal who serves as the UAE’s vice president and deputy prime minister, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan has an estimated net worth of £13.2bn – and he’s already invested millions in British businesses.
His family, the House of Nahyan, is one of the United Arab Emirates’s six ruling families and regarded as the richest in the world, with a fortune of £150bn.
The Al Nahyan dynasty has ruled Abu Dhabi since the 1700s and Sheikh Mansour’s brother, Mohamed, is the current president.
The Sheikh heads up numerous UAE funds – including the one bidding to buy out the Telegraph titles – with stakes in businesses around the world.
In 2008, through his private equity company the Abu Dhabi United Group, Sheikh Mansour bought Manchester City football club for £200m. He has since invested a further £1.4bn, according to reports.
Many would argue the 53-year-old’s spending has paid off, as not only has the men’s first team gone from mid-table finishes to Champions League winners but the club is also now valued at an eye-watering £4bn.
Sheikh Mansour also owns a 32% stake in Sir Richard Branson’s space exploration company Virgin Galactic and the Abu Dhabi Media Investment Corporation, which includes English-language newspaper The National and Sky News Arabia, a joint-venture with UK-based Sky, the owner of Sky News.
Scores of MPs have backed that opposition.
Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer referred the takeover to Ofcomand the CMA earlier this year on public interest grounds, effectively freezing the deal and leaving the Telegraph in limbo, the shares formally sitting with the Barclay family.
Image: Lucy Frazer, the culture secretary, is currently reviewing reports on the takeover by the CMA and Ofcom
She is currently considering whether to ask the CMA to carry out a more in-depth “phase two” investigation that could take up to six months.
Redbird-IMI fronted by former CNN executive Jeff Zucker has consistently argued that Sheikh Mansour is investing in a personal capacity and pledged an independent editorial structure to prevent influence over content.
The government will not spell out the details of the legislation at this stage and it remains unclear what level of state investment might be permitted.
While the government’s amendment would block the 75% stake proposed in the Redbird-IMI deal, smaller minority stakes that do not grant control may be permitted.
That may leave the way clear for Redbird-IMI to restructure its deal, with Redbird Capital taking a larger stake or inviting in other investors.
Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail, and Rupert Murdoch’s News UK, owner of the The Times, The Sun and Sunday Times, remain interested in a stake in the Telegraph having been outmanoeuvred in the original auction.
If Redbird-IMI is blocked or cannot restructure the deal they insist they control the shares and retain the right to manage the onward sale of the titles. They are likely to face opposition from the Barclay family, who may try and retain control by raising fresh funding.
The proposed legislation may send a mixed message to overseas investors, particularly the UAE, which the government has enthusiastically courted as a partner in key industries.
The UAE has pumped money into numerous high-profile projects as part of a £10bn five-year investment programme, including wind farms and life sciences, and has been approached about a potential stake in the Sizewell C nuclear power station.
The ripping up of the trade rule book caused by President Trump’s tariffs will slow economic growth in some countries, but not cause a global recession, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said.
There will be “notable” markdowns to growth forecasts, according to the financial organisation’s managing director Kristalina Georgieva in her curtain raiser speech at the IMF’s spring meeting in Washington.
Some nations will also see higher inflation as a result of the taxes Mr Trump has placed on imports to the US. At the same time, the European Central Bank said it anticipated less inflation from tariffs.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:42
Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know
Earlier this month, a flat rate of 10% was placed on all imports, while additional levies from certain countries were paused for 90 days. Car parts, steel and aluminium are, however, still subject to a 25% tax when they arrive in the US.
This has meant the “reboot of the global trading system”, Ms Georgieva said. “Trade policy uncertainty is literally off the charts.”
The confusion over why nations were slapped with their specific tariffs, the stop-start nature of the taxes, and the rapid escalation of the tit-for-tat levies between the US and China sparked uncertainty and financial market turbulence.
More on Tariffs
Related Topics:
“The longer uncertainty persists, the larger the cost,” Ms Georgieva cautioned.
“Unusual” activity in currency and government debt markets – as investors sold off dollars and US government debt – “should be taken as a warning”, she added.
“Everyone suffers if financial conditions worsen.”
These challenges are being borne out from a “weaker starting position” as public debt levels are much higher in recent years due to spending during the COVID-19 pandemic and higher interest rates, which increased the cost of borrowing.
The trade tensions are “to a large extent” a result of “an erosion of trust”, Ms Georgieva said.
This erosion, coupled with jobs moving overseas, and concerns over national security and domestic production, has left us in a world where “industry gets more attention than the service sector” and “where national interests tower over global concerns,” she added.
But the high profits are not expected to increase, according to Sainsbury’s, which warned of heightened competition as a supermarket price war heats up.
Sainsbury’s said it had spent £1bn lowering prices, leading to a “record-breaking year in grocery”, its highest market share gain in more than a decade, as more people chose Sainsbury’s for their main shop.
It’s the second most popular supermarket with market share of ahead of Asda but below Tesco, according to latest industry figures from market research company Kantar.
In the same year, the supermarket announced plans to cut more than 3,000 jobs and the closure of its remaining 61 in-store cafes as well as hot food, patisserie, and pizza counters, to save money in a “challenging cost environment”.
This financial year, profits are forecast to be around £1bn again, in line with the £1.036bn in retail underlying operating profit announced today for the year ended in March.
The grocer has been a vocal critic of the government’s increase in employer national insurance contributions and said in January it would incur an additional £140m as a result of the hike.
Higher national insurance bills are not captured by the annual results published on Thursday, as they only took effect in April, outside of the 2024 to 2025 financial year.
Supermarkets gearing up for a price war and not bulking profits further could be good news for prices of shelves, according to online investment planner AJ Bell’s investment director Russ Mould.
“The main winners in a price war would ultimately be shoppers”, he said.
“Like Tesco, Sainsbury’s wants to equip itself to protect its competitive position, hence its guidance for flat profit in the coming year as it looks to offer customers value for money.”
There has been, however, a warning from Sainsbury’s that higher national insurance contributions will bring costs up for consumers.
News shops are planned in “key target locations”, Sainsbury’s results said, which, along with further openings, “provides a unique opportunity to drive further market share gains”.
US stock markets suffered more significant losses on Wednesday, with stocks in leading AI chipmakers slumping after firms said new restrictions on exports to China would cost them billions.
Nvidia fell 6.87% – and was at one point down 10% – after revealing it would now need a US government licence to sell its H20 chip.
Rival chipmaker AMD slumped 7.35% after it predicted a $800m (£604m) charge due to its MI308 also needing a licence.
Dutch firm ASML, which makes hardware essential to chip manufacturing, fell more than 5% after it missed order expectations and said US tariffs created uncertainty.
The losses filtered into the tech-dominated Nasdaq index, which recovered slightly to end 3% down, while the larger S&P 500 fell 2.2%.
Image: Pic: AP
Such losses would have been among the worst in years were it not for the turmoil over recent weeks.
It comes as China remains the focus of Donald Trump’s tariff regime, with both countries imposing tit-for-tat charges of over 100% on imports.
The US commerce department said in a statement it was “committed to acting on the president’s directive to safeguard our national and economic security”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
13:27
Could Trump make a trade deal with UK?
Nvidia’s bespoke China chip is already deliberately less powerful than products sold elsewhere after intervention from the previous Biden administration.
However, the Trump government is worried the H20 and others could still be used to build a supercomputer in China, threatening national security and US dominance in AI.
Nvidia said the move would cost it around $5.5bn (£4.1bn) and the licensing requirement would be in place for the “indefinite future”.
Nvidia’s recently announced a $500bn (£378bn) investment to build infrastructure in America – something Mr Trump heralded as a victory in his mission to boost US manufacturing.
However, it appears to have been too little to stave off the new restrictions.
Pressure has also come from the Democrats, with senator Elizabeth Warren writing to the commerce secretary and urging him to limit chip sales to China.
Meanwhile, the head of US central bank also warned on Wednesday that US tariffs could slow the economy and raise inflation more than expected.
Jerome Powell said the bank would need more time to decide on lowering interest rates.
“The level of the tariff increases announced so far is significantly larger than anticipated,” he said.
“The same is likely to be true of the economic effects, which will include higher inflation and slower growth.”
Predictions of a recession in the US have risen significantly since the president revealed details of the import taxes a few weeks ago.
However, he subsequently paused the higher rates for 90 days to allow for negotiations.