Connect with us

Published

on

Shares in Reddit will make their market debut later on Thursday after a sale valuing the social media platform at $6.4bn (£5bn).

The company’s initial public offering (IPO) was priced at the top of its targeted range of $31 to $34 per share on Wednesday night, raising $748m.

Reddit and its existing shareholders sold 22 million shares at $34 each.

Trading will begin on the New York Stock Exchange when it opens for business later in the day.

Money latest: Is an interest rate cut by Bank of England likely today?

Market analysts said the IPO was a major test of the market given a dearth of flotations over the past three years, suggesting it had been sensibly priced.

Reddit was previously valued at $10bn following a private fundraising round in 2021.

More on Reddit

Earlier this year, the stock market launches of other big names including BrightSpring and Amer Sports received a lukewarm reception from investors.

Tech-related stocks have done better than most this year but, as is always the case with such companies, they represent a bet on the future at the start of their stock market journey.

Reddit has never achieved an annual profit since its launch in 2005, lagging the commercial success of peers including Meta and even X.

Advertisers have proved hard to come by due to concerns over content moderation on the platform’s forums, known as Subreddits, which rely on volunteers.

However, it has a loyal user base. Reddit’s IPO filing put the number of daily active users at an average of 73.1 million.

Its communities have influence too.

Members of the “wallstreetbets” forum collaborated in 2021 to buy shares of heavily shorted companies including GameStop in what became known as the ‘meme stock saga’.

Reddit’s revenue streams include a contract to provide artificial intelligence training data to Alphabet’s Google.

Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, expected plenty of interest when share trading began.

She said of the flotation: “The IPO is believed to have been oversubscribed multiple times, even though the company is still loss making and a steady path to profitability is far from clear.

“Reddit has no problem getting eyes on screen, but it has had a challenge so far in working out how to monetise its large and growing fanbase who are obsessed with using its message boards.

“It is increasing ad presence which should provide relatively steady income streams though won’t shoot the lights out.

“The real potential is likely to come from making the most of its vast store of data in the form of a deep well of conversations on the site.”

Continue Reading

Business

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves’s spending review

Published

on

By

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves's spending review

“It’s a big deal for this government,” says Simon Case.

“It’s the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto.

“This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: ‘This is what we’re about’.”

As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021.

On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government’s priorities for the next three years. But it’s unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it’s really about.

Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments.

Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash – setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire.

This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government’s priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called “challenge panels” of independent experts.

It’s clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS – with a boost of up to £30bn expected – and to increase defence spending.

On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding “£86bn boost” to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What will be in spending review?

We’re told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return.

But the headline figure is misleading. It’s not £86bn in new funding. That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it’s a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated.

Read More:
Reeves turning around UK finances ‘like Steve Jobs did for Apple’

Government struggles to slash foreign aid spent on asylum hotels

Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for “the most we’ve ever spent per pupil in our school system”.

I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift – but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of extending free school meals, and the promised uplift in teachers’ pay.

In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners.

We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions – but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze.

We’ve heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government’s crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils.

The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she’s sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day spending.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

But the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects.

That’s why we’ve seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she’s spending on regional transport projects.

The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we’ll hear more in the coming days.

But there’s a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out – and the promises which could slip as a result.

Continue Reading

Business

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Published

on

By

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Nigel Farage will pledge to reopen Port Talbot’s steel blast furnaces if in power in Wales, as his Reform UK party sets its sights on being the government in the Senedd next year.

In a speech in Port Talbot later, Mr Farage will outline how next year’s Welsh parliament elections will be the primary focus of his party.

The MP for Clacton has already ruled out standing at the Senedd elections next year. It is unclear who will lead the Reform party in Wales.

Reindustrialising Wales will be at the centre of his speech. Acknowledging the task at hand won’t be quick or easy, Mr Farage is also expected to suggest a return to coal mining, if suitable, as part of Reform’s “long-term ambition to reopen Port Talbot steel”.

Tata Steel's Port Talbot steelworks in South Wales. File pic: PA
Image:
The steelworks in Port Talbot. File pic: PA

A Reform source told Sky News: “We have said and say again that we think it’s better to use British coal for British steel than imported coal.”

Port Talbot was the largest steelmaking plant in the UK until the two blast furnaces were switched off in September 2024, which saw the loss of 2,800 jobs as part of the transition to greener production methods. Electric arc furnaces are replacing both blast furnaces and are set to be operational by early 2028.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage could ‘definitely’ become next PM, says Dominic Cummings

Read more:
How the end of coal and closure of Port Talbot steelworks are related
UK becomes first G7 nation to exit coal-fired power

More on Nigel Farage

Wales is set to head to the polls in May next year and Reform hopes to end the 26-year Labour government reign in Wales.

The Reform source said Mr Farage’s speech “will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour”.

Recent polling by Barn Cymru saw the Labour vote share in Wales collapse to 18%, with Reform second in the polls on 25% behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, whereas the Conservatives who are currently the opposition in the Senedd are on 13%.

Reform believes the performance of their party in Scotland confirms they can win in Wales next year. The source told Sky News: “We are the main challenger to Labour in Wales. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour.”

Continue Reading

Business

Buyout firms circle corporate intelligence firm G3

Published

on

By

Buyout firms circle corporate intelligence firm G3

A corporate intelligence firm which employs Sir John Sawers, the former head of MI6, is closing in on a deal to sell a big stake to a buyout firm.

Sky News has learnt that G3, which was founded in 2004 and advises clients on a range of risks affecting their businesses, has been in detailed talks in recent weeks with private equity suitors including Oakley Capital and KKR.

Precise details of a transaction were unclear on Sunday, although one source suggested that a deal was likely in the coming days, and could value the business at between £200m and £250m.

They said that Oakley Capital – founded by the entrepreneur Peter Dubens – had emerged as the most likely investor, although a deal had yet to be agreed.

Bridgepoint, another London-based private equity firm, had also expressed an interest in G3, the source added.

G3 already has some external investment, having struck a deal with All Seas Capital in 2022, according to the latter’s website.

The firm – which files accounts under the name G3 Good Governance Group – advises companies, private equity firms, sovereign wealth funds and pension funds on areas of commercial risk such as cybersecurity, reported a 27% rise in revenue in 2023.

More from Money

During that year, the latest for which accounts are available, it recorded earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of nearly £9m.

Sir John, who stepped down as the head of MI6 in 2014, was named chairman of G3’s advisory board last year.

Oakley Capital declined to comment, while G3 could not be reached for comment this weekend.

Continue Reading

Trending