Connect with us

Published

on

Lord David Cameron has urged Israel to “think with head as well as heart” and not retaliate to Iran’s missile attack.

The foreign secretary said the nation needed to be “smart as well as tough” and think about the consequences of escalating violence in the region.

UN warns of ‘devastating conflict’ – Middle East latest

He told Sky News: “I totally understand those in Israel who want to see more (action), but I think this is a time to think with head as well as heart and to be smart as well tough.

“And I think the smart thing to do is actually to recognise that Iran’s attack was a failure and we want to keep the focus on that, on Iran’s malign influence and actually pivot to looking at what’s happening in Gaza.”

Iran launched over 300 drones and missiles in an assault that set off air raid sirens across Israel on Saturday night.

The attack was over by Sunday morning and Israel reopened its air space, having said it had intercepted along with its allies 99% of the projectiles launched towards its territory.

More on David Cameron

Lord Cameron echoed US President Joe Biden’s comments that Israel should “take the win” – noting that there could have been “thousands of casualties” had the attack been successful.

He said the UK, which shot down some Iranian drones, would help again if Tehran launched another attack.

But he stressed: “We’re trying to avoid escalation and the action we took alongside the Americans and others clearly has helped to stop that escalation because the Iran attack was an almost total failure.”

The plea for de-escalation comes after Israeli war cabinet minister Benny Gantz said the country would “collect a price” for Iran’s action.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will address the developments in the Middle East in the Commons later today, with the UK “absolutely” considering further sanctions on Iran, Lord Cameron told BBC Breakfast in a later interview on Monday morning.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Middle East is on the brink’

Israel ‘listening carefully to allies’

A spokeswoman for the Israeli embassy in London said Israel is “not in the business of revenge” but wants to ensure Iran is “deterred” from launching further attacks.

Orly Goldschmidt told Sky News: “We are listening very carefully to our allies, we’re taking what they’re saying into consideration but, at the end of the day, we will have to defend ourselves against this Iranian threat.”

Ms Goldschmidt said she would not comment on what Israel’s response may look like or when it might take place.

Asked if he thinks Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sound judgement, Lord Cameron said the pair have had “many arguments and disagreements, but it’s our job to work with the Israeli government”.

He went on to insist that there was a “massive degree of difference” between Israel’s strike on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria earlier this month and Saturday’s retaliatory attack by Iran.

Read More:
How Biden watched the Iranian attack – and what he told Netanyahu
Fears as Iran-Israel tensions rise – and what diplomats plan to do about it

Cameron sends clear message to Israel – but whether they will listen not certain

David Cameron, as foreign secretary, hasn’t shied away from criticising Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu during the six-month Gaza war.

He has been one of the more forthright diplomats, particularly pressing for more action to relieve the humanitarian crisis and clearly feels he is on strong ground.

Asked three times on whether he thought the Israeli prime minister had good judgement, he was initially non-committal although admitted he had had his differences with Netanyahu: “Not letting more aid into Gaza was a mistake. It was bad judgement not to open up that aid sooner,” he said, with reference to the planned opening of Ashdod port.

Addressing the events over the weekend, Lord Cameron reluctantly said Iran had a right to respond to the attack on its consulate but said that the assault on Saturday night was disproportionate.

“We would take very strong action,” he admitted when asked what Britain would have done if one of their diplomatic buildings was “flattened”.

But, the foreign secretary argued that there is a “massive degree of difference” between what Israel did in Damascus and Iran’s drone attack.

Cameron won’t be shy in delivering this message to Israel’s leaders, whether they will listen, however, is not certain.

Asked whether Israel showed good judgment by hitting Iran’s consulate in Damascus, he said: “That’s something the Israelis decided to do.

“I can completely understand the frustration Israelis feel when they look at the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and they look at the terrible things that they have done all over the world, including the support they give to Hamas.”

He added: “I would argue there is a massive degree of difference between what Israel did in Damascus and, as I said, 301 weapons being launched by the state of Iran at the state of Israel.

“For the first time a state-on-state attack, 101 ballistic missiles, 36 cruise missiles, 185 drones, that is a degree of difference and I think a reckless and dangerous thing for Iran to have done.

“And I think the whole world can see, all these countries that have somehow wondered, well, you know, what is the true nature of Iran? It’s there in black and white.”

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Not now’: Badenoch backs triple lock pension for the moment

Published

on

By

'Not now': Badenoch backs triple lock pension for the moment

Kemi Badenoch has said she does not want to scrap the triple lock “now” but said “lets see mess Labour leaves for us”.

The Tory leader told Sky News that the triple lock was a Conservative idea and that it was right to protect people who had contributed to the welfare system.

Politics latest: Number of Britons leaving the UK significantly higher than previously thought

The triple lock means the state pension must rise by whichever is highest of either average earnings, inflation or 2.5%.

However, she said she would not say she would “never” reform it or explicitly rule it out for the next parliament.

In April, the government stated that 55% of social security expenditure in 2025-26 would be spent on pensioners.

The Office for Budget Responsibility says the triple lock has pushed up the spending on the state pension by £12bn a year, compared to if it had been uprated in line with average earnings.

More on Conservatives

The problem with the triple lock, Ms Badenoch suggested, was low growth – with 0.1% in the UK.

She suggested it was also the reason why Argentinian President Javier Milei – whom she has praised as “fantastic” and “fearless” – could block pensioner entitlement rises is because they are growing at 6%.

“If we were growing a 2% to 3%, you wouldn’t have a problem with pensions,” she explained.

“Argentina is growing at 6%. What we’re seeing right now is growth at 0.1%. Growth is flatlining. We need to start with getting growth.”

But asked whether the Tories would “never” look at reforming the policy, she said: “That moment is not now. And I don’t want people to be confused about what our policy is right now. Our policy is to keep the triple lock. Let us focus on welfare, that is the picture of what we mean by right now.”

Asked how long that would be her position for, Ms Badenoch replied: “Well, let’s see what this budget leaves. Let’s see what mess Reeves leaves for us.”

Read more:
Starmer: I’ll lead Labour into next general election
MPs warned of new spying attempts from China-linked agents

The triple lock is the cause of much debate, given the economic climate, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also saying its future depended on the state of the economy.

Asked by political correspondent Tamara Cohen whether a potential Reform government would keep the triple lock, Mr Farage said the matter was one of “open debate” and that keeping the triple lock would depend “on the state of the economy”.

Pressed on when he would make a decision because pensioners were becoming concerned, he said: “Not now. Nearer the election.”

He added: “Right now they’re getting above inflation increases.

“That doesn’t mean they’re wealthy. The real worry for many pensioners will be even with modest pensions, this budget could drag them all into the tax system. That’ll worry them even more.”

Continue Reading

Politics

No ‘free tickets’ on council tax under Reform

Published

on

By

No 'free tickets' on council tax under Reform

Nigel Farage gave a press conference on Tuesday, highlighting £25bn of savings he claims Rachel Reeves can make in her budget – including slashing overseas aid and welfare for foreign citizens.

But he said the areas where the local councils are now run by Reform are experiencing “massive problems” with their finances and may have to raise council tax.

The Reform leader claimed that when campaigning in the local elections in May, he “did not make a single promise – not a single promise in that election campaign that we’d be able to freeze or cut council tax”.

“I never said it once. And you know why? Because I realised the massive debts that we were inheriting from those county councils.”

Read more: What taxes could go up now?

A turquoise tide saw Reform gain control of 10 councils and win some 600 local councillors.

Farage promised a “DOGE” unit, inspired by Elon Musk’s initiative in the US, to slash waste.

More on Council Tax

But most councils have indicated they will have to raise council tax, as they grapple with budget shortfalls and the pressures of adult social care.

I asked him why voters should believe he could easily find spending to slash in national government, if the record in local councils was anything to go by.

Mr Farage said: “There is a massive problem and this is going to need the national government to work with the local government to reduce those burdens.

“Are we determined to make changes? Yes. Will we cut debt? Yes. But can we give people a free ticket at this moment in time on council tax? No.”

Kent County Council – where a leaked phone call exposing tensions about budgets led to councillors being suspended – is expected to raise council tax by the maximum of 4.99% next year.

Durham County Council is reported to be looking at raising parking charges.

Farage added later in the press conference that he hoped councils would keep their rises to the level of inflation, 3.8% in September.

Continue Reading

Politics

Regulator clarifies US banks can handle gas fees using crypto holdings

Published

on

By

Regulator clarifies US banks can handle gas fees using crypto holdings

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued guidance to banks confirming their authority to hold specific cryptocurrencies for the purpose of paying network gas fees.

In a Tuesday notice, the OCC said US banks were allowed to hold crypto on their balance sheets to pay network, or gas fees, provided the transactions were for permissible activities. The regulator said that an authorized national bank “may hold amounts of crypto-assets as principal necessary for testing otherwise permissible crypto-asset-related platforms.”

“As with any activity, a national bank must conduct these activities in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable law,” said the OCC.

Cryptocurrencies, Government, Banks, United States
Source: OCC

The notice expanded upon a May letter informing banks that they could handle digital assets on behalf of their customers and outsource some crypto activities to third parties. Both sets of guidance came amid the OCC striking a different tone on crypto under US President Donald Trump, reducing the regulatory burden on financial institutions.

Related: UK central bank still ‘disproportionately cautious’ about stablecoins

The Tuesday letter cited the GENIUS stablecoin bill signed into law in July, which establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. According to the OCC, stablecoin transactions at authorized national banks will likely require network fees, allowing the bank to pay through assets in its custody or an agent.

Implementing GENIUS Act, looking to pass market structure

Although the stablecoin bill was signed into law in July, the legislation is still likely to be months away from implementation, as the US Treasury and Federal Reserve need to finalize the regulations.