Connect with us

Published

on

A dad who suffered a brain injury just days after receiving a British-developed COVID vaccine has told Sky News he would never have had the jab if he had known of the risk of rare but serious side effects.

Jamie Scott, who has two young boys and is now unable to work, is suing AstraZeneca for what he says is damage caused by the jab in April 2021.

He alleges the pharmaceutical giant exaggerated the vaccine’s effectiveness and downplayed its risks.

AstraZeneca denies the claims made against them.

In his first TV interview, Mr Scott told Sky News: “I took it to protect the elderly people around me.

“AstraZeneca and the government need to explain the risk whenever you take medicine. If there’s a risk – I’ve got a young family – I would never have taken it.”

Ten days after having his first dose of the vaccine, Mr Scott woke up with a severe headache, started vomiting and had trouble speaking.

More on Covid

He was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with a clot that was stopping blood draining from his brain, as well as a haemorrhage in the brain itself.

He had surgery and was in a coma for just over a month. His wife Kate was told that if he survived he would never be the same again.

Kate Scott
Image:
Kate Scott

Mr Scott now has a poor memory, has trouble reading, writing, listening and speaking, is partially blind in both eyes and suffers from pain and fatigue.

He says he can’t drive or play an active part in his boys’ lives.

“Everything about me has changed. Everything is difficult,” he said.

“I am happy to be alive. But I’m a shadow of what I was and every day is difficult.”

There are 51 cases lodged with the High Court with people claiming damage as a result of vaccination. Some are bereaved relatives.

Vials of the Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine. File pic: PA
Image:
Vials of the Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine. File pic: PA

Mr Scott was given a payout of £120,000 from the government’s Vaccine Damage Payment (VDP) scheme.

But that comes nowhere near to replacing the career income he would have received as an IT professional.

“If Jamie was in a car crash there would have been insurance to cover the injuries and loss of income,” said Mrs Scott.

“We should not have to lose our house, or not be able to afford to fix our cooker when it breaks down or not be able to take the kids on holiday.

“If VDP was reformed, we would not have to litigate.”

To be given the full £120,000 payout from the vaccine damage scheme claimants have to be assessed as at least 60% disabled. Those with a lower degree of disability – which can still be life-changing – don’t qualify.

The AstraZeneca vaccine was developed by scientists at the University of Oxford. It went through accelerated testing and licensing because of the urgency of the pandemic and was authorised for emergency supply in December 2020.

Jamie Scott
Image:
Jamie Scott

The government and many doctors assured the public that the vaccine was safe and urged people to take the jab.

But in the spring of 2021, there were reports around Europe of people suffering unusual blood clotting several days after vaccination.

Sarah Moore, a lawyer at Leigh Day Solicitors who is representing Mr Scott and the other claimants, told Sky News: “As early as the beginning of March in 2021, other European countries had withdrawn or suspended this product from the market because they had seen this problem.

“Our argument is that on the date upon which Jamie’s vaccine was applied, there was no warning.

“Now, if you are going to take a healthy person and give them any medical product, then generally most people would accept that has to be a warning within the product literature that specifies that risk, particularly when we’re talking about the gravity of risk in this context.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

AstraZeneca says it updated product information for the vaccine in April 2021 to reflect the possibility in very rare cases that it could be a trigger for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

In a statement, it said: “Our sympathy goes out to anyone who has lost loved ones or reported health problems. Patient safety is our highest priority and regulatory authorities have clear and stringent standards to ensure the safe use of all medicines, including vaccines.

“From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.”

Read more from Sky News:
Man admits killing mobility scooter rider

Humza Yousaf resigns as Scotland’s first minister

This is not anti-vax – it’s about being honest about medicines

There’s no question that what happened to Jamie Scott is an utter tragedy.

He had a great career, two boys and a loving wife. And when his invitation came for the COVID jab he seized the chance to protect his elderly relatives and do his bit to bring the pandemic to an end.

But that was the day that his life was up-ended, suffering what his lawyers say was a catastrophic reaction to the AstraZeneca vaccine.

He has been unable to work since, and probably never will. His wife Kate has given up her job to be his carer.

The Scotts argue that had he been in a car accident the insurers would have settled on a sum that reflected his likely career earnings and the amount of care he needed.

But he has been given just £120,000 from the government’s vaccine damage payment scheme. That’s the maximum payout.

It is a paltry sum when you are 44 – as he was at the time – with no other source of income and decades of life ahead of you.

Read Thomas Moore’s full analysis here

The Department of Health and Social Care said it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation or specific cases.

It added that the AstraZeneca jab hasn’t been used in the UK since the start of the booster programme in the autumn of 2021 because alternative mRNA vaccines were shown to be more effective.

However, the vaccine has been widely used around the world. In the first year of use, more than two billion doses were given, saving an estimated six million lives.

At the time of the rollout – and since – there has been a vocal minority of people who campaigned against COVID vaccines.

But Mr and Mrs Scott say they are not anti-vaxxers.

Mrs Scott said: “I would say we are vaccine-hesitant now because if it goes wrong you are left out in the cold.

“There has to be protection for those people who did the right thing when the government said it was safe and effective, time and time again.

“Even now if you try and question that narrative you’re shut down and told that’s anti-vax – and it just can’t be.”

Continue Reading

UK

Starmer and Reeves hint at tax rises to come ahead of unusual pre-budget speech today

Published

on

By

Starmer and Reeves hint at tax rises to come ahead of unusual pre-budget speech today

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have hinted at tax rises to come when the chancellor delivers the budget later this month.

In a Downing Street speech this morning, Ms Reeves will address “speculation” that an increase in income tax will be announced during the highly-anticipated statement on 26 November.

Politics Hub: Follow chancellor’s speech live

Sky News political editor Beth Rigby said it was “highly unusual” for the chancellor to make such a speech, but the Treasury believes she must “try to prepare the ground and make the argument for another big tax-raising budget”.

“I will make the choices necessary to deliver strong foundations for our economy – for this year, and years to come,” Ms Reeves will say.

Last night, Sir Keir gave Labour MPs a taste of what’s to come by warning of the need for “tough but fair” decisions.

Speaking at a party meeting in Westminster, he said the budget “takes place against a difficult economic backdrop”.

“It’s becoming clearer the long-term impact of Tory austerity, their botched Brexit deal and the pandemic on Britain’s productivity is worse than even we feared,” the prime minister said.

“Faced with that, we will make the tough but fair decisions to renew our country and build it for the long term.”

Starmer and Reeves know how hard this is going to be

I don’t need to tell you how difficult and contested this is going to be.

Only a year ago, the chancellor unveiled the biggest tax-raising budget since 1993 and said it was a “once in a parliament event”.

MPs will be fearing a massive backlash should manifesto promises on not raising income tax (and VAT and national insurance) for working people be broken.

Government figures know how hard it’s going to be but argue the chancellor has to level with the public about the hard choices ahead and what is driving her decision-making.

It comes after Sir Keir refused to confirm at Prime Minister’s Questions last week that the budget would honour his party’s manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT.

Having raised taxes in last year’s budget, notably national insurance on employers, Ms Reeves has also previously promised not to “come back for more” during this parliament.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will Labour raise taxes?

The PM and chancellor’s warnings come after reports suggested the Office for Budget Responsibility is expected to downgrade its productivity growth forecast for the UK by about 0.3 percentage points.

That would leave Ms Reeves with a larger than expected fiscal black hole to fill, possibly up to £30bn.

She is said to be considering a proposal from The Resolution Foundation, a left-leaning thinktank close to the government, to raise income tax by 2p but cut national insurance by the same amount.

The thinktank, which used to be headed by Torsten Bell, a Labour MP who is now a key aide to Ms Reeves and a pensions minister, said the move would raise vital cash while protecting working people.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

A promise-breaking budget?

Reeves to prioritise NHS and cost of living

Giving a further flavour of what to expect, Ms Reeves will this morning vow to make “important choices that will shape our economy for years to come”.

“It is important that people understand the circumstances we are facing, the principles guiding my choices – and why I believe they will be the right choices for the country,” she will add.

Ms Reeves will say her priorities are cutting national debt, easing the cost of living and protecting the NHS.

“It will be a budget led by this government’s values,” she’s set to say.

“Of fairness and opportunity and focused squarely on the priorities of the British people: protecting our NHS, reducing our national debt and improving the cost of living.”

Continue Reading

UK

Man charged with 11 counts of attempted murder over mass train stabbing and another attack at station hours earlier

Published

on

By

Man charged with 11 counts of attempted murder over mass train stabbing and another attack at station hours earlier

A 32-year-old man has been charged with 10 counts of attempted murder after a mass stabbing on a high-speed train.

Anthony Williams, 32, from Peterborough, was arrested on Saturday evening following an attack on the Doncaster to London King’s Cross LNER service.

He has been charged with 10 counts of attempted murder, one count of actual bodily harm and one count of possession of a bladed article following a knife attack on a train in Cambridgeshire on Saturday, British Transport Police (BTP) said.

BTP said he has also been charged with another count of attempted murder and possession of a bladed article in connection with an incident on a London train in the early hours of 1 November.

Police said a victim suffered facial injuries after being attacked at 12.46am with a knife on a train at Pontoon Dock station on the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) in east London.

In a statement to Sky News, BTP said the suspect had left the location before police arrived and officers subsequently identified Williams as a suspect.

Williams will appear at Peterborough Magistrates on Monday morning, police said.

Armed police were deployed to Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, where the train was stopped and made the arrest within eight minutes of the first 999 call.

Forensic teams gathering evidence at Huntingdon train station on Sunday, after a mass train stabbing. Pic: PA
Image:
Forensic teams gathering evidence at Huntingdon train station on Sunday, after a mass train stabbing. Pic: PA

Footage of the arrest has emerged, showing a man on the ground surrounded by officers and a barking police dog, with the sound of a Taser being deployed.

Another man, 35, from London, who was also detained, was later released after officers established he was not involved.

On Monday, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told Sky News that one man, originally suffering life-threatening injuries, was now in a critical but stable condition in hospital.

She told Mornings with Ridge and Frost programme: “He went in to do his job, and he left work a hero. And there are people who are alive today because of his actions and his bravery.”

On Sunday, British Transport Police (BTP) confirmed he was a member of LNER rail staff who tried to stop the attacker.

“Having viewed the CCTV from the train, the actions of the member of rail staff were nothing short of heroic and undoubtedly saved people’s lives,” said BTP Deputy Chief Constable (DCC) Stuart Cundy.

The train driver, named as Andrew Johnson, has also been hailed as “courageous” for his actions during the stabbings.

Read more from Sky News:
Major incident declared in Cumbria
British teen sentenced over drugs charges
Air India survivor says trauma ‘broke’ him

Following the announcement about the charges on Monday, DCC Cundy warned against anyone interfering with their ongoing investigation.

“Our investigation is also looking at other possible linked offences. Following the charges authorised by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) I would stress the importance of not saying or publishing anything which might jeopardise or prejudice ongoing criminal proceedings, or the integrity of the investigation.”

Ms Alexander also told Sky News that BTP would be “increasing the visible patrols at stations” over the next few days.

“But generally, our trains are some of the most safest forms of public transport anywhere in the world,” she added.

Armed police officers on patrol at St Pancras International station on Monday morning. Pic: PA
Image:
Armed police officers on patrol at St Pancras International station on Monday morning. Pic: PA

Tracy Easton, chief crown prosecutor for CPS Direct, said: “Our team of out-of-hours prosecutors worked to establish that there is sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial and it is in the public interest to pursue criminal proceedings.

“We worked closely with British Transport Police to review a huge volume of evidence including CCTV. The number of charges will be kept under review as this continues to progress.

“We know the devastating impact the events on Saturday’s train has had and how the incident shocked the entire country. Our thoughts remain with all those affected.”

Continue Reading

UK

Pregnant British teenager held on drugs charges freed from Georgian jail

Published

on

By

Pregnant British teenager held on drugs charges freed from Georgian jail

A pregnant British teenager has been released from jail in Georgia after being held on drug smuggling charges.

Bella May Culley, 19, of Billingham, County Durham, was arrested in May at Tbilisi Airport and accused of attempting to smuggle 12kg of marijuana and 2kg of hashish into the country.

She was found guilty by a Georgian court on Monday and sentenced to five months and 25 days in prison, the total time she had already spent in custody. Her family also paid a 500,000 lari (about £138,000) as part of a plea deal aimed at reducing her sentence.

Culley and her mother, Lyanne Kennedy, both cried as the verdict was read.

Wearing a cream blazer, the teenager looked overwhelmed as she was released from custody on Monday.

Asked how she felt, she said she was “happy” and told reporters she did not expect to be freed.

Bella Culley at an earlier court hearing in May. Pic: RUSTAVI 2/AP
Image:
Bella Culley at an earlier court hearing in May. Pic: RUSTAVI 2/AP

Culley’s mother held her daughter’s hand as she was released.

Georgian prosecutors were considering a two-year sentence, but “decided to consider the time she has already served,” case prosecutor Vakhtang Tsalughelashvili told The Associated Press.

Culley’s lawyer, Malkhaz Salakhaia, said she would be given her passport and would be free to leave the country on Monday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Police footage released in May showed Culley in handcuffs as she made an initial court appearance. Pic: AP

The teenager pleaded not guilty to the charges after her arrest, saying she was tortured in Thailand and forced to carry the drugs.

Culley initially pleaded not guilty at a hearing in July to possession and trafficking illegal drugs.

She initially faced a maximum penalty of up to 15 years or life imprisonment, but was in talks with prosecutors about a potential plea bargain.

Bella Culley walks with her mother, Lyanne Kennedy, following her release. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Bella Culley walks with her mother, Lyanne Kennedy, following her release. Pic: Reuters

Read more from Sky News:
Mexican mayor killed during Day Of The Dead festivities
At least 20 dead after magnitude 6.3 earthquake in Afghanistan

In Georgia, a nation of 3.7 million in the South Caucasus, the law allows for financial plea agreements that can be reached to reduce or eliminate a prison sentence in certain cases.

Such plea agreements are often obtained in drug-related cases.

Culley was reported missing in Thailand before her arrest at Tbilisi Airport on May 10.

Continue Reading

Trending