Connect with us

Published

on

Switzerland has won Eurovision, topping the leaderboard in a competition fraught with last-minute changes and backstage incidents.

The first non-binary performer to take the trophy, Nemo used their childhood opera experience to pull together an impressive performance mixing rap, rock, drum ‘n bass and classical opera, as well as balancing on a revolving disc spinning at speed as they sang.

The song – which took an early lead in the race – shares a message of self-acceptance and the freedom for each one of us to live our lives openly and without fear of judgment.

When accepting their prize, Nemo said: “I hope this contest can live up to its promise, and continue to stand up for peace.” They then performed their song to wrap up the show.

Eurovision as it happened
A wardrobe malfunction, a watermelon and nul points: Five moments you might have missed

Nemo is the first Swiss act to win the contest since Celine Dion took the prize in 1988.

Croatian act Baby Lasagne (whose real name is Marko Purisic) took second place with the anarchic rock track Rim Tim Tagi Dim.

The UK’s act, Dizzy, sung by Olly Alexander came 18th out of 25, with 46 points. He performed 13th in the running order – a number considered unlucky for some, and received a crushing “nul points” in the public vote.

The Years And Years star gave an energetic performance surrounded by his four dancers dressed in boxing shorts, writhing around a brightly lit cube decked out like a boxing ring.

Analysis: Is Eurovision broken? And can it be fixed?


New pic of Bethany Minelle, Ents reporter for CMS

Bethany Minelle

Arts and entertainment reporter

@BethanyMinelle

Fifty years ago Abba brought Waterloo to Eurovision and emerged triumphant. Today, very different battles were being fought within the competition, as it attempted – with limited success – to remain apolitical in the face of geo-politics too loud to ignore.

Critics of the war in Gaza wanted Israel to be pulled from the show, with thousands of pro-Palestine protesters taking to the streets for organised marches throughout competition week. Fans called on acts to boycott the event, with some screenings of the show cancelled in recognition of the contentious nature of the ongoing debate.

Calls of “art washing” rang out loud and clear, but as far as the show’s bosses – the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) – were concerned, it was a case of “the show must go on”.

A supplementary drama was thrown into the mix just eight hours before the show was due to start, when Dutch act Joost Klein was axed over allegations he made verbal threats to a female member of Eurovision staff. It was an unprecedented move.

Fans of his song – the painfully catchy happy hardcore number Europapa – were not impressed, venting their displeasure through boos directed at EBU boss Martin Osterdahl as he delivered the Netherlands’ scores during the show.

Following their history-making win, Switzerland’s Nemo admitted they’d broken the coveted Eurovision glass trophy within moments of being handed it. They also admitted to breaking EBU rules by bringing a non-binary flag into the venue, before calling out the “double standards” of the organisers who were reported to have forced some fans to throw away their non-binary flags before being allowed in.

Perhaps summing up the take home message of the night, the 26-year-old singer said: “I broke the code and I broke the trophy, maybe the trophy can be fixed – maybe Eurovision needs a little bit of fixing now and then too.”

With organisers clearly struggling to cope with performers who refuse to be gagged, this was certainly a difficult year for the competition. Can it weather the storm? Or will the hurricane instigated by brutal world conflict raze it to the ground?

Either way, the contest’s motto – “united by music” – must surely now be retired, as the Eurovision community steps away from the stage more divided than ever.

Ireland’s act Bambie Thug came sixth, with their self-named “Ouija pop” track Doomsday Blue.

Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden, opened the show, speaking in a short, pre-recorded video, and wishing all the contestants luck, before Sweden’s identical twins Marcus and Martinus performed the first song.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK receives ‘nul points’ at Eurovision

Performers made some tentative moves towards bringing politics to the stage, with Lithuania signing off their song with the command, “Spread love to the world”, while Portugal’s act said, “Peace will prevail”.

At the end of France’s performance by Slimane, he said: “United by music, for love and peace, thank you so much.”

During an earlier performance he had cut his act short, saying: “Every artist here wants to sing about love and sing about peace. We need to be united by music yes but with love for peace. United by music yes but with love for peace”.

Meanwhile, Ireland’s act Bambie Thug rounded off their performance by saying: “Love will always triumph hate.”

Pic: Reuters
Image:
Ireland’s Bambie Thug performing Doomsday Blue. Pic: Reuters

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The country’s participation in the Eurovision song contest in Malmo, Sweden left the event struggling to maintain its apolitical stance.

Boos and toy fruit

During a cutaway of their team, which was played after all the songs had been performed in a round-up of the acts sitting in the ‘green room’ area onstage, there was a large soft-toy watermelon clearly in the background behind Bambie.

The fruit is widely used as a symbol of Palestinian solidarity.

Earlier this week, the 31-year-old, who is non-binary, said the EBU prevented them from displaying a pro-Palestinian message during their performance during the first semi-final.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Israel receives mixed reaction at Eurovision

There was some audible booing when Israel’s Eden Golan performed, and more audible booing when Israel handed out their scores.

Ms Golan told Sky News after the contest she had ignored all the controversy.

She said: “I’ve been sending good vibes, I’ve been focusing on spreading love and spreading good energy and getting to know everyone.”

Asked if she was happy with the result, she said she was “over the moon” about it.

The loudest booing of the night was reserved for the man in charge of the Eurovision Song Contest, Martin Osterdahl, who was almost drowned out by jeering from the crowd when he first spoke, and then again when he handed out the points for Netherlands.

This year’s Eurovision contest has been embroiled in controversy over the last few months, with demonstrations and calls for Israel to be banned due to their actions in the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

Protests have bene held in Malmo this week. Pic: TT News Agency via Reuters
Image:
Protests in Malmo this week. Pic: TT News Agency via Reuters

On Thursday, between 10,000 and 12,000 people took part in a pro-Palestinian march through Malmo, the host city.

An unprecedented axing

But on Friday, drama unfolded closer to home when Dutch act Joost – who had been among the favourites to win – was axed over allegations he made verbal threats to a female Eurovision production worker after coming off stage following the second semi-final on Thursday.

It is the first time in Eurovision history that an act has been disqualified after reaching the grand final.

Joost Klein. Pic: AP
Image:
Joost Klein. Pic: AP

Then on Saturday, Irish contender Bambie Thug did not take part in the final rehearsal for the show, due to “a situation” they said needed “urgent attention” from organisers.

Several presenters scheduled to award the points of their country during the programme, withdrew from the show just hours before it was due to begin, including Finnish singer Kaarij (whose song Cha Cha Cha came second in last year’s show) and Norwegian singer Alessandra Mele.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Eurovision act suffers wardrobe malfunction

Away from the political overtones the EBU was trying so hard to avoid, Swedish supergroup Abba – the most famous band ever to come out of the contest – were shown in hologram form and performed on stage in London.

The four “Abbatars” as they’ve been dubbed sang Waterloo, accompanied from the Malmo stage by fellow former winners Conchita Wurst, Charlotte Perrelli and Carola Haggkvist.

‘Maybe Eurovision needs a little bit of fixing’

Switzerland's Nemo with The Code. Pic: Alma Bengtsson/EBU
Image:
Switzerland’s Nemo with The Code. Pic: Alma Bengtsson/EBU

Speaking to reporters after their win, Nemo admitted they had accidentally broken the glass microphone shortly after being presented with it on stage.

Nemo hit out at the EBU’s “double standards” when asked about fans reportedly not being allowed to bring non-binary flags into the auditorium, admitting: “I had to smuggle my flag in because Eurovision said no and I did it anyway. I hope some other people did that too… This is clearly like a double standard… I broke the code and I broke the trophy, maybe the trophy can be fixed – maybe Eurovision needs a little bit of fixing too”.

They said the experience of performing in Eurovision had been “intense, and not just pleasant all the way,” adding that the fact had not been “all about love and unity made them “really sad”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Loud boos for Eurovision boss

When pressed on how they felt about Dutch act Joost not being in the final, Nemo refused to be drawn, saying, “I don’t really know any specifics” so would “refrain from “saying that if I don’t have anything smart to say”.

However, on their fellow Eurovision finalists, Nemo said they had made “friends for life,” adding that they hope to collaborate with some of their fellow acts, and would “love to do a song with Bambie [Thug]”.

Next year’s contest will be held in Switzerland.

Continue Reading

UK

Grooming victim’s family ‘angry’ and ‘shocked’ prosecutors didn’t see police interview video

Published

on

By

Grooming victim's family 'angry' and 'shocked' prosecutors didn't see police interview video

The family of a grooming victim say they are “angry” and “heartbroken” that prosecutors didn’t see a video of her police interview during their investigations.

Jodie Sheeran, then 15, was allegedly taken to a hotel and raped in November 2004.

She’s believed to have been groomed by young men of Pakistani heritage for a year beforehand. Jodie’s son, Jayden, was born nine months later.

A man was charged, but the case was dropped a day before the trial was meant to start in 2005.

Her father, David, said they were told it was because Jodie had a “reckless lifestyle” and was “an unreliable witness”, but that they never received a formal reason.

In July, he told Sky’s The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee he thinks police “bottled it” because they were worried about being called racist.

Jodie died in November 2022 from an alcohol-related death.

It’s now emerged the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) didn’t view the video of Jodie’s police interview as it “was not shared with us” and they didn’t know at the time that it still existed.

Instead, they only had a transcript of what she told officers.

It’s unclear exactly why this happened, but Staffordshire Police said the footage was available in 2019, when the CPS and police reviewed the case, and in 2023, when the investigation was opened again.

Jodie Sheeran with her mother Angela
Image:
Jodie Sheeran with her mother Angela


“I don’t know if I’ve been misled [or] it was an accident,” Jodie’s mother, Angela, told Sky News’ Sarah-Jane Mee.

“To suddenly say evidence has been there all along – and I’ve got every single letter, every email to tell me they haven’t got the evidence any more… and then it’s emerged Staffordshire Police did have the evidence after all – it was shocking really.”

The CPS watched the video last month and said the transcript is an accurate representation of what Jodie says on the tape.

However, it hasn’t changed their view that there’s no realistic prospect of conviction – and won’t be taking any further action.

Jodie's father David (right, with Jayden) says it seems police and CPS 'didn't know what one another were doing'
Image:
Jodie’s father David (right, with Jayden) says it seems police and CPS ‘didn’t know what one another were doing’

Jodie’s father told Sky News he believes it shows the police and CPS “didn’t know what one another were doing – and it makes you so angry”.

“I feel like they’ve gotten away with it,” added Jodie’s son Jayden. “It’s years on now – I’m grateful they’ve found the evidence but what are they doing about it?”

‘I’ll keep fighting until I get justice’

Angela said it shows that other families in a similar situation shouldn’t “take no for an answer” from police or the CPS.

“Since losing a child, nothing else matters, so I’m not going anywhere,” she said.

“So I will keep fighting and fighting and fighting until I get justice for Jodie – and hopefully justice for probably thousands of other victims out there as well.”

Angela says she will 'keep fighting until I get justice for Jodie'
Image:
Angela says she will ‘keep fighting until I get justice for Jodie’

A national inquiry into grooming gangs was announced in June after a series of cases uncovered sexual abuse of mainly white girls by men of predominately Pakistani heritage had taken place in a number of towns and cities.

A Staffordshire Police spokesperson said their thoughts remain with Jodie’s family and that a “significant amount of work has been undertaken reviewing this case several times”.

They said the interview video was “available to the Senior Investigating Officers in 2019 and 2023” and a “comprehensive contemporaneous written record” of it was given to the CPS on both occasions.

The statement added: “In August 2025, a copy of the recording was provided to the CPS who conducted due diligence to ensure the contemporaneous written record of Jodie’s ABE interview, that they reviewed in 2019 and 2023, was an accurate account of the video recording. They have confirmed this is the case.”

Read more:
Telford child abuse victims speak out

What we know about grooming gangs, from the data
The women who blew whistle on Rotherham

Jodie died in November 2022
Image:
Jodie died in November 2022


Police said the case had been submitted for a further evidential review.

“Should any new evidence come to light, it will be referred to the CPS for their consideration,” the spokesperson added.

The CPS said: “We carried out reviews of our decision-making in this case in 2019 and 2023 using records provided by Staffordshire Police – both these reviews found that there was not enough evidence to charge the suspect with rape.

“While we requested all available records, Jodie’s video interview from 2005 was not shared with us, we were not informed that it had been retained, and it was only made available to our prosecutors recently after further requests.

“Having cross-referenced the video with detailed accounts of it previously available to us, we have determined that the conclusions we reached in our previous reviews still stand.”

:: Watch the full interview on The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee from 8pm on Tuesday

Continue Reading

UK

UK faces ‘crisis’ of child-on-child sex abuse – with ‘fundamental shift’ in offending

Published

on

By

UK faces 'crisis' of child-on-child sex abuse - with 'fundamental shift' in offending

Children sexually abusing other children has become a “crisis” in the UK, experts have told Sky News.

This report contains details you may find distressing.

The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC) says there has been a pronounced rise in child-on-child abuse – and data for group-based offending shows it is now more prevalent than incidents involving grooming gangs.

The “shocking” statistics show there has been a “fundamental shift” in offending, NAPAC chief executive Gabrielle Shaw told Sky News.

Latest child sexual abuse and exploitation crime figures from the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) for England and Wales show that, where age was recorded, 52% of all perpetrators were between the ages of 10-17.

NAPAC chief executive Gabrielle Shaw says the figures show the UK is facing a 'crisis'
Image:
NAPAC chief executive Gabrielle Shaw says the figures show the UK is facing a ‘crisis’

Some 41% of these relate to indecent images of children.

Most of these nude images are taken by teenagers of themselves before they are shared with a partner as part of “experimental” behaviour.

But at the other end of the offending scale, 17% of sexual crimes that are committed against children by other children are rape offences.

Richard Fewkes, director of NPCC’s child sexual exploitation taskforce, warns that consensual exchanging of intimate images can end up in coercion and blackmail, with easy access to violent pornography partly behind this disturbing trend in children abusing children.

“For a generation of boys, in particular, then very often they see that as normal behaviour,” he told Sky News. “They act it out, with girls.”

Teenagers sharing indecent images of each other may be recorded as crimes due to the legal age of consent, according to Richard Fewkes.

Inside the call centre on the frontline

Warning: This section contains references to child sexual abuse

There’s a shrill ring as the first call of the day comes in. “You’re through to someone you can talk to.”

We’ve been given exclusive access to NAPAC’s helpline in Stockport, where call handlers speak to victims who have suffered all types of abuse.

The man who has called the helpline was so badly beaten as a child by his father that he was left with broken bones.

The victim is now having to care for his elderly father, triggering painful memories.

“He just wanted that safe space,” says call handler Claire Tong.

“He said, ‘Thank god there’s people like you that I can talk to’.”

NAPAC’s support service hears from around 10,000 victims every year – and the organisation also works with police in responding to group-based sexual offending.

Through our day at the helpline, we get a grim snapshot into the lives of ordinary people across the UK who have suffered unimaginable pain.

Children ritually abused to ‘raise demon’

Sam Booth has worked at NAPAC for a decade, first as a volunteer and now as a supervisor.

She shows me the themes of last week’s calls written on a whiteboard and one stands out – ritual abuse.

“Satanic ritual abuse is abuse by a group of people,” Sam says.

“They have robes on with hoods. They could be a child or a teenager, they could be ritually, sexually abused ….to raise some kind of demon.”

Sam says multiple people have called, triggered by the smell of soil. As children, they had been buried to the point of death before being revived.

Victims can be signposted to other services, for example if they want to pursue legal action or therapy.

Support can mean difference between life and death

Among those to have been helped by NAPAC is Sadie, who was sexually abused by her biological father when she was a young child.

Sadie, not her real name, says her childhood memories are “the constant feeling of being dissociated from your body, always having stomach aches, feeling unclean”.

Sadie’s email to NAPAC, fully disclosing the abuse for the first time, was the crucial step towards getting direct support.

For some victims, their call could be the difference between life and death.

The rise in young people seeking help

Exclusive data shared with Sky News shows that in 2014, NAPAC received 358 calls in which callers volunteered their age.

16 of these callers were between the ages of 19 and 24 (4.4%).

Over the next decade the percentage doubled.

In 2024 there were 1,487 calls in which callers volunteered their age.

130 of these callers were aged 19-24 (8.8%).

More than half of callers of all ages say they feel anxious or experience anxiety.

Meanwhile, more than a third of callers say they feel isolated.

Holly Aisbett, who has worked for NAPAC for three years, says a conversation that stands out to her was with a suicidal woman calling from a bridge.

“We were probably on the phone for about an hour; she did eventually tell us her location,” says Holly.

“We reported it to the police, we don’t often do that, but obviously when things escalate, we do have a duty of care.”

All the NAPAC staff we spoke to admit to being impacted by challenging calls every day. But they continue to handle them with empathy.

“You get a really good feeling when you get a caller talking to you about something they’ve never told anyone,” says Sam.

“You feel privileged that they’re able to talk to you.”

Mr Fewkes said there is no easy solution to the crisis of children abusing children, but he believes better education for parents and young people is a crucial step in the right direction.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “We are taking forward a wide range of actions to help prevent child sexual abuse, bring more offenders to justice, and improve the support available to victims and survivors.

“A review is currently underway to look at how best to support school staff in handling cases of child sexual abuse. This sits alongside increased funding for the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, which works to prevent harmful sexual behaviour among children and young people.”

For NAPAC support, call 0808 801 0331 or email support@napac.org.uk

Continue Reading

UK

Davey accuses Trump of overseeing ‘biggest threat to fight against cancer’

Published

on

By

Davey accuses Trump of overseeing 'biggest threat to fight against cancer'

Sir Ed Davey will call on US experts fleeing an “anti-science agenda” to come to the UK, and pledge to make curing cancer a “top priority”.

The Liberal Democrat leader will use his keynote speech at the party’s annual conference in Bournemouth today to call for a dedicated fellowship scheme to attract American scientists.

The finale of the party’s annual meeting will see him turn his ire on Donald Trump, having spent the past few days criticising tech titan Elon Musk and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.

Sir Ed is expected to warn that “what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic” is the “biggest threat to the fight against cancer”.

“The US is by far the world’s biggest funder of cancer research – mostly through its National Cancer Institute,” the leader will say.

“But since Donald Trump returned to the White House, he has cancelled hundreds of grants for cancer research projects.

“He’s slashing billions of dollars from the National Cancer Institute’s budget.”

Sir Ed will appeal to scientists who have had projects cancelled or funding cut to “come here and finish it in the UK”.

He believes a dedicated scheme should be established to allow them to move to work at British research institutions, without having to pay large visa fees.

Sir Ed has is the only English party leader to explicitly criticise Mr Trump, and refused an invite to the state banquet with the King at Windsor Castle as part of the US president’s state visit last week.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Davey refuses to rule out deal with Starmer

‘Cast-iron guarantee’ for cancer patients

Sir Ed will also use his speech to pledge to boost healthcare and cancer research more widely.

He is expected to tell party members: “The UK should step up and say: if Trump won’t back this research, we will.

“We’ll boost funding for cancer research in the UK. We’ll rebuild a National Cancer Research Institute, after it was closed under the Conservatives, to coordinate research and drive it forward.

“We’ll pass a Cancer Survival Research Act to ensure funding for research into the deadliest cancers.”

He will announce a “cast-iron guarantee” that each patient in the UK diagnosed with cancer will start treatment within two months.

Read more politics news:
Farage plans to deport legal migrants
Sultana aims to mend ties with Corbyn

Sir Ed will also accuse Reform members of supporting the Trump administration’s move to cut millions of pounds of research into mRNA vaccines, based on “totally false conspiracy theories”.

He will say they members “enthusiastically applauded” the decision at the party’s conference earlier this month.

It follows the Liberal Democrat leader refusing to rule out making a deal with Labour after the next general election to help keep Reform out of government.

Speaking to Sky News political editor Beth Rigby, Sir Ed said he would “wait to see the result of the next election” before deciding on any agreement.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Davey stop Farage getting into No 10?

Across the conference, Sir Ed has also:

  • Accused Elon Musk of being a “criminal [for] allowing online harm to children” on his social media platform X, insisting he’s not concerned about being sued by the billionaire for saying so despite him not being charged;
  • Suggested the Lib Dems could win “way more” than 100 seats at the next general election;
  • And accused the BBC of scrutinising Reform less than other political parties.

The Liberal Democrats have already used the conference to announce plans for a windfall tax on big banks to help homeowners install solar panels and insulation, and propose cigarette-style health warnings on social media apps to protect children.

They also want to introduce a law to ban ministers from lobbying on behalf of foreign leaders.

Continue Reading

Trending