For the first time in the 2024 Stanley Cup playoffs, the New York Rangers trail in a series. The Florida Panthers skated out of Madison Square Garden on Wednesday night with a convincing, at times dominating, 3-0 victory in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals.
But Rangers coach Peter Laviolette’s confidence in his Presidents’ Trophy-winning team hasn’t wavered.
“Can we win [Game 2]? I definitely believe we can win,” he said Thursday.
Laviolette said Game 1 was “an even game” between the teams: close on the scoreboard and in the analytics. Breaking down what went wrong for the Rangers against Florida to open the conference final — and how to fix those problems — shows his confidence isn’t outlandish.
Here are five things the Rangers could seek to change for Game 2 on Friday night (8 p.m. ET, ESPN/ESPN+):
“Take responsibility” with execution
From 16:26 of the first period until 16:12 of the third period, the Panthers led Game 1 by a single goal. It was a tenuous lead that was threatened in multiple ways by the Rangers.
“We had a lot of chances to score. We hit the post three times. A lot of point-blank chances. Two breakaways,” Laviolette said. “There’s opportunities where we could have scored that one goal and it didn’t go.”
One Rangers goal in that time span obviously changes everything. It energizes the crowd. It allows New York to relax a bit. It might even mean a trip to overtime, where the Rangers won twice last round. Comeback wins are what this team does: The Rangers have 33 come-from-behind wins between the regular season and the playoffs, tied with the 2006 Hurricanes and 1984 Oilers for the most in NHL history.
But they didn’t get that bounce. They did get some chances, and Laviolette said his team has to “take responsibility with our execution” in Game 2.
When Laviolette discusses Game 1, he does so without a hint of panic, despite his team trailing in a series for the first time this postseason. Even as the numbers show the Panthers got the better of play at 5-on-5, the Rangers coach didn’t see his team getting dominated at even strength.
“I don’t feel like we were under siege. I don’t feel like we were real vulnerable at times defensively,” he said.
Laviolette isn’t averse to making changes to his team’s approach if necessary. He just doesn’t see that necessity yet.
“There were adjustments that we made in the Carolina series, systematically, because I didn’t like what I was seeing. I didn’t like how it was coming at us. So we changed big parts of our game to try and make up for that,” he said. “But I didn’t feel like it was that [in Game 1].”
Pressure on the D corps
If there’s one group on the Rangers that needs to step up, it’s the defensemen — on both ends of the ice.
New York doesn’t have a player in the top 20 for playoff scoring or shots on goal by a defenseman. Its blue line has generated just two goals. Adam Fox and Jacob Trouba are tied for the team lead for D-men with four points. The Panthers’ leaders — Gustav Forsling and Brandon Montour — have double that output. No one’s even in the same conversation as Evan Bouchard and Miro Heiskanen in the Western Conference finals as far as offensive output.
The Rangers struggled to generate shots on goal in Game 1, going 14:25 between shots in the second period. Getting more from the D corps would certainly help.
Laviolette said there are opportunities for the Rangers’ defensemen to get more involved offensively after being “a big part of our success in the regular season.”
Fox agreed with his coach.
“We want to produce. Getting up in the rush, joining late … we want to jump in when the opportunity presents itself,” he said.
But New York needs its defensemen to be sharper in their own zone, too. Specifically, finding more success in breaking out the puck so the big, physical Panthers can’t get their forecheck cranked up like they did in Game 1.
“They have a lot of speed on their team,” K’Andre Miller said. “I think limiting their speed throughout the neutral zone, trying to get hold-ups and trying to give us a little bit more time breaking the puck out of the D zone [are key].”
“Obviously, when teams are coming that hard and pressuring you with that type of energy, I think [it’s about] breaking down their forecheck with talking, puck moving and just trying to be a little bit firmer,” he added. “Our execution can be a little bit better coming out of the D zone.”
The Panarin line must produce
The trio of Vincent Trocheck, Artemi Panarin and Alexis Lafreniere were on the ice for a goal in Game 1. Unfortunately it was one for the Panthers, as a turnover by Rangers goalie Igor Shesterkin led to a puck going off Lafrenière’s stick into New York’s net in the third period.
(Panarin and Lafrenière were also on the ice for Matthew Tkachuk‘s game-opening goal.)
Their line didn’t score, but it wasn’t for a lack of trying. Yet again, the Panarin line was New York’s best at 5-on-5 with a plus-6 in shot attempts and a plus-4 in scoring chances. It was the only Rangers line with its head above water in shot attempts; the Chris Kreider–Mika Zibanejad–Jack Roslovic trio was the only other line in the positive on scoring chances, and it was only a plus-1.
The Rangers’ challenges at 5-on-5 have been well documented. The Panarin line has been the exception all season and all postseason: Plus-38 in shot attempts, plus-19 in scoring chances and plus-6 in high-danger chances in the playoffs. Yet that’s added up to sveen goals for and seven goals against in 11 games.
In Game 1, it was Zibanejad who saw Selke Trophy-winning center Aleksander Barkov the most. Trocheck played the majority of his minutes against Anton Lundell. While that’s not an easy matchup, it’s an easier matchup than the Barkov line. The Rangers need their best trio to take advantage of that in Game 2.
Panthers goalie Sergei Bobrovsky pitched a 24-save shutout in Game 1, the second playoff blanking of his career. He was good when Florida needed him to be, including three high-danger saves and seven stops on rebound attempts. But the Rangers didn’t get nearly enough traffic in front of him, and they know it.
“Making it harder on Bobrovsky [is critical],” forward Barclay Goodrow said. “Obviously, he’s a good goalie. If he sees pucks, life is easy. He’s going to make most of those saves, so just making life more difficult on him.”
“Playoff Bob” has faced more high-danger shots against (66) and has the highest high-danger save percentage (.879) in the playoffs. It’s the midrange stuff that’s tripped him up — seven goals on 43 shots at even strength. For goalies with at least eight appearances in the 2024 playoffs, Bobrovsky is seventh of eight netminders in save percentage on shots through traffic (.902). The Rangers need to create more of it.
As the Rangers were struggling to generate excitement in front of a quiet crowd in Game 1, ESPN analyst Mark Messier wondered if “maybe they should think about putting Rempe in the lineup” to spark the team.
The sentiment has been echoed by fans and pundits since Game 1: Should it be Rempe Time in Game 2?
The 6-foot-8 rookie is an automatic crowd pop when he steps in the ice, and those cheers grow louder when he pops an opponent with a big check. The Panthers were the more physical team in Game 1. Perhaps Rempe could respond to that.
Of course, responding is the issue. The Panthers have shown a remarkable discipline in this postseason on not getting goaded into after-the-whistle shenanigans. And Rempe is clearly on the referees’ radar, having gotten his share of reputation penalties this season.
Getting Rempe in the lineup at home would seem essential. But is it worth dedicating a forward spot to a player who averages 6:19 of ice time per game in the playoffs just for an energy boost?
If not Rempe, the Rangers could play another card that could energize the crowd and the team. Blake Wheeler, 37, hasn’t played since Feb. 15 after a gruesome leg injury. He has worked hard to get back in the lineup, and told ESPN that he’s “an option and available” for the Eastern Conference finals if Laviolette needs him.
Whether it’s the lineup or the execution, something has to change for the Rangers in Game 2 if they want to change their results against the Panthers.
Dan Wetzel is a senior writer focused on investigative reporting, news analysis and feature storytelling.
It once seemed improbable that the most compelling figure of the college football offseason would be Bill Belichick’s 24-year-old girlfriend, but somehow, here we are.
Jordon Hudson’s spot in Belichick’s life has always been a public talking point. After all, they started dating two years ago, when Belichick was 71. Of late, though, she’s become an obsession.
Belichick is arguably the greatest coach in the history of the sport, winner of six Super Bowls leading the New England Patriots. His jump to the college ranks and the University of North Carolina is, for purely football reasons, of great intrigue.
Would this work? Could this work?
Currently though, the focus is on Hudson, who takes an active role in managing Belichick’s affairs, including running point on publicity for his new book, “The Art of Winning: Lessons from My Life in Football.”
That includes a viral clip from a “CBS Sunday Morning” interview when Hudson shut down a question about how the two met and was deemed a “constant presence.” That led to all sorts of attention on the relationship, not to mention Belichick’s acuity and Hudson’s recent real estate holdings. Former Patriots great Ted Johnson even told WEEI radio in Boston that “the Tar Heels should consider firing Bill Belichick.”
A few days into this modern controversy, where a social media clip redefines someone with decades in the public eye, can we all settle down for a moment?
As with any relationship, only Belichick and Hudson are privy to what is transpiring between them. But as sensationalistic as all the TikTok comments and website stories currently are, when it comes to actually coaching a football team, let’s settle back on one undeniable truth.
This is Bill Belichick.
Sure, the current attention can be fairly labeled as the kind of “distraction” that might personally crush and professionally derail most people. Belichick is not most people.
“Never been too worried about what everyone else thinks,” Belichick told CBS.
If you allow his history — a lesson from his life in football, if you will — to inform, then you would know that there has rarely, if ever, been any personal feud, situation, tabloid headline or bit of accusational strife that has derailed the man’s single-minded focus on winning.
Belichick doesn’t just thrive in the briar patch of controversy — he seems to prefer it. The more external noise, the better.
A former player standing trial for murder? Win the Super Bowl.
Accused of illegally videotaping opponents? Post a 16-0 season.
A star quarterback alleged to have cheated to win the AFC Championship Game by deflating footballs? Name-drop “My Cousin Vinny” in a news conference, then win the Super Bowl.
Have the team get fined and stripped of a first-round draft pick and the quarterback suspended for the start of the season? Win another Super Bowl.
Maybe this isn’t what he was expecting from the book release, but let’s be clear, he was expecting to create a major media stir.
Belichick is famously passive-aggressive. When he never once mentioned Patriots owner Robert Kraft in his memoir — not even in the acknowledgments — he did so expecting a commotion. This was likely to make it clear that Belichick believed the Patriots’ success during their 24 years together was more based on the coaches and players than the very front-facing owner who, depending whose version you believe, fired Belichick in January 2024.
This was throwing red meat to the sports media machine. It just turned out that the Hudson situation represented even more red meat to the far larger American pop culture/social media machine.
Belichick might not have seen this coming, but this is how he has always operated. He welcomes speculation and even being painted as the villain. Even his closest confidants, from Bill Parcells to Tom Brady, often wind up in prolonged, public ice-outs. There are the endless scraps with the media, the league office, officials or other coaches.
The public questioning his actions and motivation? Please.
Consider that back nearly two decades ago, the NFL made a deal with Reebok for its coaches to wear approved clothes. Belichick bristled at being told what to wear. In an act of fashion defiance, both Patriots and Belichick sources say, he took a plain gray sweatshirt and cut off the sleeves to make it ugly. (It inadvertently became a huge seller, labeled the “BB Hoodie” in the Patriots Pro Shop.)
Or when, in an effort to protest the NFL making teams categorize player injuries — doubtful, questionable, etc. — Belichick began listing Brady as “probable” on the report with a shoulder injury week after week for years despite there being no known injury. Brady would just laugh when asked about it.
Or when he thought the NFL was getting too commercialized, so he refused to have his name used by EA Sports in the Madden video game — “NE Coach” was all that was listed — even though he would make money for literally doing nothing.
Or maybe consider in 2000, when he reversed course on accepting the head coaching job with the New York Jets. Rather than get all apologetic, he handwrote a note that read: “I resign as HC of the NYJ.”
He loves this stuff. Like many highly competitive people, finding an enemy, or some doubt, or some negative opinion about him seemingly feeds him. It certainly doesn’t cause him to wilt.
The current kerfuffle isn’t much different from past ones. He’s been through divorce, and his dating life was even fodder for the New York tabloids. It didn’t matter. He just kept winning.
All of that makes it unlikely that Hudson is somehow bossing Belichick around — or that she would even want to. This is just BB.
Whatever happens with the couple — we wish them the best — is one thing, but anyone who thinks Belichick is somehow incapable of weathering some gossip or jokes, or won’t be laser-focused on coaching, teaching and preparing his players, hasn’t been paying attention.
Here’s guessing Belichick will be fine. He always has been.
For months, Clemson football coach Dabo Swinney had joked with Ian Schieffelin that the 6-foot-8 power forward for the Tigers‘ men’s basketball team would make an excellent tight end, but Schieffelin assumed it was all in good fun. Two weeks ago, however, he got a call from Swinney with a serious offer: spend the next six months with the Tigers football team and see what happens.
Schieffelin announced on Instagram on Friday that he is taking Swinney up on the offer, forgoing any pro basketball prospects for now in favor of one last season in a Clemson jersey — this time on the gridiron instead of the hardwood.
“I’ve been just training for basketball, getting ready for the next level,” Schieffelin told ESPN. “Dabo just walked me through the opportunity he was willing to give me, and it all sounded great, something I wanted to jump on. It really just sparked my interest in wanting to try, and being able to put on a Clemson jersey again was very enticing to me. To be able to be coached by Dabo and [tight ends coach Kyle] Richardson is just a huge opportunity I couldn’t pass up.”
Schieffelin blossomed into one of the key cogs for the Tigers’ hoops team the past two years. He averaged 12.4 points and 9.4 rebounds per game last season as Clemson earned a 5-seed in the NCAA tournament, losing to McNeese in the first round.
He had entered the transfer portal last month hoping for a fifth year of eligibility amid several ongoing lawsuits against the NCAA, though Schieffelin said the likelihood of an outcome in time for him to play basketball in 2025-26 was slim. He had been preparing for a crack at the pros — likely overseas or in the G League — when Swinney called with the offer.
“I’d never rule out me going back to basketball,” Schieffelin said. “I’ll see how these next six months go, see how development goes, see if I really like playing football. But I think this is a good opportunity for the next six months.”
Clemson lost starting tight end Jake Briningstool after last season. Briningstool, who signed as an undrafted free agent with the Kansas City Chiefs last week, played in 48 games and made 127 catches over four years at Clemson. The Tigers’ depth chart at the position is thin on experience, with Josh Sapp (13 catches), Olsen Patt-Henry (12 catches) and Banks Pope (1 catch) the only tight ends on the team to have recorded a reception.
In October, Swinney teased his interest in adding Schieffelin to his roster, suggesting he would fit in nearly anywhere on the field for the Tigers.
“He could play tight end, D-end. He could play whatever he wanted to play. He’d be an unbelievable left tackle,” Swinney said. “I’ll definitely have a spot. We have a lot of rev share ready too if he wants to pass up wherever he’s going [after basketball].”
Schieffelin said he hadn’t taken Swinney’s suggestions seriously during basketball season, assuming the coach was just teasing, but when the opportunity became real, he quickly understood the vision Swinney had for him.
“The call two weeks ago was very serious,” Schieffelin said, “and I thought, maybe it’s an opportunity to stay around a little longer and join a national championship contender.”
Schieffelin said he is not expecting to earn serious NIL money but does think his body type could allow him to blossom into a potential NFL prospect.
He played quarterback as a ninth grader before opting to focus on basketball the following year. Schieffelin said he will spend the next few months working on conditioning and strength gains to prepare for the rigors of football as well as working to build relationships with his new teammates, but he said he doesn’t have any set expectations for the season.
“Playing college basketball for four years, I’m used to the grind and used to work,” Schieffelin said. “But it looks different on the football side, so just getting in the weight room and learning everything.”
Before making his decision, Schieffelin said he spoke with Colts tight end Mo Alie-Cox, who was a four-year starter in basketball for VCU before signing with Indianapolis. Alie-Cox hadn’t played football since his freshman year of high school but is now entering his eighth NFL season.
“We talked about what went into his decision to go the football route,” Schieffelin said. “He helped me just knowing why he decided, and it made me decide to just give it a chance and see where I could take it.”
Alie-Cox is one of a handful of basketball players who have made a successful transition to football. Greg Paulus played hoops at Duke before becoming the starting quarterback at Syracuse in 2009. Jimmy Graham and Julius Peppers played both sports in college before becoming All-Pro NFL players. Antonio Gates played basketball at Kent State before giving football a try. He was announced as a Pro Football Hall of Fame inductee in February.
“Just being able to compete with these guys and impact the team any way I can,” Schieffelin said of his goals. “I’m going into this very optimistic and ready to learn. Being able to compete every day is something I enjoy. To learn football and have fun.
“Maybe I’ll be really good, maybe I’ll be really bad. It’s something that was worth a shot. And being able to put a Clemson jersey on again is really special to me, and to do it this time in Death Valley is going to be amazing.”
ESPN baseball reporter. Covered the Washington Wizards from 2014 to 2016 and the Washington Nationals from 2016 to 2018 for The Washington Post before covering the Los Angeles Dodgers and MLB for the Los Angeles Times from 2018 to 2024.
Chisholm had been scheduled to undergo an MRI in New York on Thursday, an off day for the Yankees. The move is retroactive to April 30. Infielder Jorbit Vivas was recalled from Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre to replace Chisholm on the active roster.
Chisholm, 27, is batting .181 with seven home runs and a .714 OPS in 30 games; 10 of his 19 hits have been for extra bases. He has been a plus defender in his return to second base this season, his original position in the majors, after primarily playing center field for the Miami Marlins and third base for the Yankees last season.
Vivas, 24, has yet to make his major league debut. The Yankees called him up in late April, but he was sent back to Triple A three days later without appearing in a game.
Vivas is batting .319 with two home runs, an .862 OPS and 15 walks to eight strikeouts splitting time between second base and third base in the minors this season. The Yankees acquired him, alongside left-hander Victor Gonzalez, from the Los Angeles Dodgers for prospect Trey Sweeney in December 2023.