Faiza Shaheen has resigned from Labour after being blocked from standing as a candidate in the election – accusing the party of a “hierarchy of racism”.
Ms Shaheen was dropped as a candidate for Chingford and Woodford Green after she allegedly liked a series of social media posts that downplayed antisemitism accusations.
In a statement on X, she said she had been “penalised for describing my experiences of Islamophobia”.
“Today, with a heavy heart, I have made a decision to resign from the Labour Party.”
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
Ms Shaheen accused Labour of conducting a “sham process initiated for spurious reasons” in order to remove her as a candidate in the northeast London seat.
At the last election in 2019, she came second to Tory heavyweight Sir Iain Duncan Smith, losing to him by just over 1,000 votes.
More on General Election 2024
Related Topics:
However, on Tuesday the party’s ruling National Executive Committee confirmed they would not be endorsing the economist and author this time around, with Brent councillor Shama Tatler chosen instead.
Ms Shaheen claimed that she has faced “a relentless campaign of unfair treatment, bullying and hostility that I have never before experienced in all my personal or professional life”.
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:01
‘I spoke to Diane 2 or 3 months ago’
She added that the person who is replacing her is “someone not known to or supported by most local members with no links to our community”.
“I have been penalised for describing my experiences of Islamophobia and been dismayed at the hierarchy of racism that exists in my own party,” she said.
She concluded by saying she was deciding on her next steps and would make a further announcement on Wednesday.
Nominations for the election close on Friday, meaning Ms Shaheen could still put herself forward as an independent candidate.
Image: Former Labour candidate Faiza Shaheen during a rally with supporters
A party spokesperson declined to be drawn on the claims in the letter, telling Sky News: “We are focused on electing a Labour government and delivering the change that people in Chingford and Woodford Green and across the country need.”
The row comes amid accusations Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is purging left-wing candidates.
Last week Lloyd Russell-Moyle, the previous MP for Brighton Kemptown, was told he cannot stand after being suspended by Labour over what he called a “vexatious and politically-motivated complaint” against him.
And veteran MP Diane Abbott had also claimed she was barred from standing in Hackney North and Stoke Newington, though Sir Keir later said that was not the case following days of confusion.
Labour has since confirmed the Jeremy Corbyn ally and the UK’s first black female MP is the chosen candidate in her constituency, which she has represented for 37 years.
But the handling of both Ms Abbott’s and Ms Shaheen’s candidacies promoted the resignation from Labour of seven of the party’s councillors in Slough, who accused Labour of racism.
Asked about the resignations earlier on Tuesday, Sir Keir Starmer said there were “brilliant Labour teams out in every constituency, fighting for votes in this general election”.
He said: “We’re in good form, we’re making a positive argument about the choice before the country.”
Sir Keir Starmer continues to face the threat of a major rebellion during a key vote on welfare reforms later – despite making last-minute concessions to disgruntled Labour MPs.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has confirmed that all existing claimants of the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability benefit, will be protected from changes to eligibility.
The combined value of the standard Universal Credit allowance and the health top-up will rise “at least in line with inflation” every year of this parliament.
And an additional £300m for employment support for sick and disabled people in 2026 has been announced, which will rise every year after.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:54
Welfare cuts ‘needed to be made’
Ms Kendall has also promised that a consultation into PIP – “co-produced” with disabled people – will be published next autumn.
She said the U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers about £2.5bn by 2030 – less than half the £4.8bn the government had expected to save with its initial proposals.
But after announcing the U-turns, Labour MPs were still publicly saying they could not back the plans as they do not go far enough to allay their concerns.
Disabilities minister Stephen Timms would not say he was “confident” the proposals would pass the Commons when asked on Sky News’ Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge.
“We’ve got a very strong package, I certainly hope it passes,” he replied.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:49
‘Disabled people thrown under the bus’
A total of 86 charities united yesterday to call on MPs to reject the reforms, saying they will harm disabled people and calling it “a political choice”.
The likes of Oxfam, Child Action Poverty Group, Mind and Shelter said the bill has been brought to a vote without consulting disabled people and without any assessment “of its impact on health and employment outcomes”.
When asked to name “a single” disability organisation in favour of the reforms, Ms Kendall declined to do so.
Several Labour MPs indicated they would still vote against the changes, leaving the government in the dark over how big a rebellion it still may face.
Ms Kendall tried to allay their fears, telling MPs: “I believe we have a fair package, a package that protects existing claimants because they’ve come to rely on that support.”
Richard Burgon presented a petition to parliament yesterday evening against the cuts, signed by more than 77,000 people.
Several Labour MPs questioned why the vote was going ahead before the review into PIP is published – including Rachael Maskell, who said she could not “countenance sick and disabled people being denied support” and added: “It is a matter of conscience.”
Connor Naismith said the concessions “undoubtedly improve efforts to secure welfare reform which is fair”, but added: “Unfortunately, I do not believe these concessions yet go far enough.”
Image: Labour rebel Nadia Whittome said the government was ‘ignoring’ disabled people
Nadia Whittome accused the government of “ignoring” disabled people and urged ministers to go “back to the drawing board”.
Ian Byrne told the Commons he will vote against the “cruel cuts” to disability benefits because the “so-called concessions go nowhere near far enough”.
The vote will take place this evening, with coverage on Sky News’ Politics Hub live blog and on TV.
Other crypto firms are also reportedly considering applying for a national bank charter, following in the footsteps of Anchorage Digital Bank, which received a license in 2021.
A lower court ruling will stand in a case involving a Coinbase user who filed a lawsuit against the IRS after the crypto exchange turned over transaction data.