Connect with us

Published

on

The day after former President Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felonies, I sat down for a focus group with nine voters from across the country who voted for him twice and dont want to vote for him again. They are not, however, all committed to voting for President Joe Biden instead.

Quinta Jurecic: Trump, defeated

These are the double haters: the chunk of voters who are dissatisfied with both candidates, and are trying to decide which one is less bad. Although many of them are out on Trump, theyre struggling to get there on Biden. If Biden is going to win in November, these are the voters he must persuade to hold their noses and vote for him.

And theres reason to believe that Trumps recent felony conviction just made it a little bit easier for them to do it.

Many of the voters in this group had familiar stories: They supported Trump in the past as the lesser evil. They couldnt stomach Hillary Clinton in 2016. They were lifelong Republicans who couldnt imagine voting for a Democrat. Some of them remember watching The Apprentice and admiring Trump for his perceived business savvy.

But the events of January 6 and general fatigue with Trumps antics have made these voters not very likely or not at all likely to vote for him again in 2024.

I made my mind up quite a while ago that I wouldnt vote for him, Alex from Illinois said. I just said, I cant bring myself to do it.

Chuck from Ohio agreed: Theres no change in my desire to vote for Mr. Trump. He continued: Im not voting for the man, period, end of discussion.

For many of these people, Trump had already crossed a red line. His conviction is just more evidence of his deficient character and his unfitness for high office.

And his lack of remorse was another log on the fire. Theres no ownership whatsoever. Its always someone elses fault, Eileen from Illinois said.

Michele from Florida said, I want criminals to go to jail. That extends not just to Trump, but to Democrats like Senator Bob Menendez, she said.

Many talked about being repelled by Trumps disrespect for institutions. Some said they believed the trial was politicized, a con job brought by Bidens DOJ. And yet, most had faith in the process. While allowing for some political bias in the system, by and large they accepted the legitimacy of the guilty verdict.

I thought the trial was highly politicized, but in the hands of the jury, both sides had the chance to present their case, Ryan from Colorado said. And thats ultimately how it should have been done.

Michele agreed: Im tired of the nonsense, and I believed the testimony. And that is why I am happy that the jury found him guilty. And I think now that he is a convicted felon, hes completely unfit.

They may not be Trump voters anymore, but many of them are not fans of Biden.

When asked to grade Bidens performance, three gave Cs, three gave Ds, and three gave Fs. Only one admitted to ever voting for a Democrat, and Alex, the Illinoisian, said flatly: I will never vote for, probably, a Democrat in my life.

Read: How Donald Trump became unbeatable

Their complaints with Biden ran the spectrum: Stop giving away free money, Ryan said. Chuck wants to see Kamala Harris replaced as vice presidenthe thinks Liz Cheney would be better. One said Hunter Bidens conduct speaks poorly to Bidens parenting skills.

Some of them are third-party curious, but theyre wary because, as one said, I view any third-party candidate as kind of a vote for Trump. When asked how they would vote if the election were held today, only two said they would vote third-party. One said they would abstain, and another would write in a candidate.

The remaining five plan on voting for Biden. This isnt because they are fans of the president. Few had positive things to say about Bidens policy agenda. But they view him as the more palatable of two bad options.

As Chuck put it: I dont like Mr. Biden because Im concerned about his age. He may die in office and I think his vice president is not someone I want in the Oval Office either. But between the president and vice president, theyre still both better than Mr. Trump.

Spending 90 minutes with this group helps explain how the double haters are thinking about this race. Theyre not all united ideologically, but theyre united in trusting the judicial system over Trumpat least for now.

These voters dont speak for the majority; as swing voters, theyre marginal. But the margins will decide this race. The conviction confirmed what many of them already knew: Trump is unfit for office.

Whether or not voters like this go home to Trump or choose to support Biden over the next five months will be a big factor in deciding the election. A lot of variables are involved: whether Trumps daily chaos starts to make more of an impression; Bidens performance in the debates; prices and interest rates; the salience of issues such as immigration and abortion; and what Trumps sentence ends up being.

For now, Bidens team should capitalize on the verdict by trying to come across as the sane, pro-rule-of-law candidate. And the conviction fits well with the presidents message of dont compare me to the Almighty; compare me to the alternative. He can now stand on the debate stage and say, America isnt the kind of country that will put a convicted felon in the White House.

If, in our present political climate, nothing is dispositive, Bidens ability to make such a clear statement is certainly a plus.

Continue Reading

World

90% of Port-au-Prince controlled by gangs as thousands forced into heaving displacement camps

Published

on

By

90% of Port-au-Prince controlled by gangs as thousands forced into heaving displacement camps

A group of school children in their smart uniforms skip past us, overseen by their mums and dads.

In front of us, the highway is empty of all cars except for two armoured police vehicles slowly making their way up a hill.

The children and their parents are on “Airport Road”, which leads into the centre of Port-au-Prince, the capital of Haiti. The airport is a few miles away to the north.

The parents are leading the children to an intersection where they will turn right towards their homes.

Police patrolling in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Image:
Police use heavily-armoured vehicles to patrol in Port-au-Prince


Everything beyond that intersection is gang territory, and nobody ventures past it but the police, who appear to be probing the gangs’ defences.

This part of the Airport Road, beyond the intersection and stretching for miles, is an area controlled by the gangster Jimmy Cherizier, known here and abroad as “Barbecue”.

The security forces are desperate to capture Barbecue, himself a former policeman, and to dismantle his gang.

Boy in displacement camp Port-au-Prince, Haiti 
pic sent by Ramsay team for Haiti story 1
Image:
A boy sleeps at the bottom of a staircase inside a displacement camp

As the families near the intersection, automatic gunfire bursts from the turret of one of the armoured police vehicles. Instantly the children and their parents run for safety, hugging a wall – they know what is about to happen.

Within seconds the police are being attacked with volleys of machine gun fire. We watch holding our breaths, and thankfully all the children make it round the corner to the relative safety of a side street.

They live on the edge of what’s called the “red zone” where the gangs control the streets.

Security forces want to take it back.

Tyre falls off police car being fired at, Port-au-Prince, Haiti 
pic sent by Ramsay team for Haiti story 1
Image:
Getting out of the cars would be suicide for police officers

The first armoured police vehicle makes it into Barbecue’s territory unscathed, but the second vehicle is hit.

One of its tyres is punctured, so they have no choice but to turn back.

The firing intensifies as the police vehicle makes its way down the hill, and we can hear the crack of bullets as the gangs target the police.

Stuart Ramsay in Port-au-Prince

My team and I are travelling in two separate armoured 4x4s. The police are the targets, and we are filming their exchanges with gang members hidden up the hill and in side streets, firing from multiple positions.

As the police vehicle nears the intersection once again, it comes under sustained fire.

At this point the streets and the intersection are completely empty of people and traffic, anyone in the vicinity has taken cover.

A stray round passes uncomfortably close by our team still outside the vehicles, so we decide it’s time to go, and reverse as the armoured police vehicle loses its tyre, rolling forward on its rim.

Children caught in crossfire, Port-au-Prince, Haiti 
pic sent by Ramsay team for Haiti story 1
Image:
Children caught in the crossfire in Port-au-Prince

Getting out would be suicidal for the police. The vehicle limps towards another crossroads to get away from the firing.

This, I’m told, is just an ordinary day in Port-au-Prince.

Nobody can fully agree on a number, but by most estimates, the gangs control around 90% of Port-au-Prince now. People don’t venture into their areas, and cars turn away from the boundaries to avoid being hit by sniper fire from inside or being caught in the crossfire.

Barbara Gashwi and baby Jenna in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Image:
Barbara Gashiwi and baby Jenna

Hundreds of thousands of Haitians have lost their homes, and many now find themselves in heaving makeshift displacement camps. They huddle for protection, but in reality there really isn’t much on offer.

In a narrow alleyway in a camp set up in the grounds of a church, I meet Barbara Gashiwi, a new mum. She gave birth to her daughter Jenna a month ago, beneath the plastic sheets where she still sits.

Barbara was forced out of her home by the gangs days before she was due to give birth.

Stuart Ramsay meets Barbara Gashwi Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Image:
Barbara Gashiwi tells Sky News she doesn’t think she’ll ever be able to go home

“They pulled guns on us and told us to give up the house, after that we ran outside on to the street and took off,” she told me.

She says she doesn’t think she will ever go back to her home again. Very few of the 10,500 people living in this one displacement camp believe they will ever go home.

Deserted street Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Image:
The gang warfare has left some Port-au-Prince streets completely derelict

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

A year ago, we visited displaced Haitians living inside the government’s communication ministry.

At the time we walked in off the street, but this time we could barely move for the crowds – the forecourt is now a camp too, and the difference is stark.

The government has abandoned this and other ministries, moving higher up to safer ground, leaving whole communities on their own.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

March 2024: Thousands flee Haiti violence

The gangs’ lawless, and often murderous, activity means that the roughly 10% of Port-au-Prince still free is packed with people and traffic.

Just a few districts in Port-au-Prince are left, and they’re completed surrounded, leaving the people who live in this city squeezed into the only places that haven’t fallen.

Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Image:
The few free districts in the capital are packed with people and traffic

It’s hard to describe the claustrophobia and tension that pervades life here.

And with everything else happening in the world right now, the people of Haiti feel they’ve been abandoned, and are condemned to live their lives under the rule of the gun.

Stuart Ramsay reports from Haiti with camera operator Toby Nash, senior foreign producer Dominique Van Heerden, and producers Brunelie Joseph and David Montgomery.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC’s Crenshaw says agency playing ‘regulatory Jenga’ with crypto

Published

on

By

SEC’s Crenshaw says agency playing ‘regulatory Jenga’ with crypto

SEC’s Crenshaw says agency playing ‘regulatory Jenga’ with crypto

The US Securities and Exchange Commission’s sole Democratic Commissioner has said the agency is “playing a game of regulatory Jenga” with its approach to the crypto industry and market regulation under the Trump administration.

In May 19 remarks at the SEC Speaks event, Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw cautioned against what she described as a dangerous dismantling of “discrete but interrelated rules” on crypto and the wider market.

She likened market stability to a “Jenga tower” that the agency’s rules had “carefully developed over the years,” which could topple if some rules were removed.

In addition to a lamentable loss of staff, Crenshaw said the SEC has used staff guidance to effectively reverse rules without proper analysis or public comment, particularly around crypto

“Our statements on these crypto-related issues are the equivalent of a wink and nod intended to convey that we do not plan to rigorously apply our laws in certain, specific situations.”

She added that the regulator has abandoned enforcement actions, especially in crypto markets, creating what she calls “regulation by non-enforcement.”

“I am deeply troubled by the Commission’s abandonment of swaths of our enforcement program,” she said. 

SEC’s Crenshaw says agency playing ‘regulatory Jenga’ with crypto
SEC Commissioner Crenshaw. Source: SEC

Crenshaw, the SEC’s last remaining Democrat commissioner, said the agency’s “about-face” is problematic for a host of reasons, such as corroding its reputation in court, undermining its credibility, and casting doubt on the state of “longstanding and fundamental case law.”

Related: SEC is scaling back its crypto enforcement unit: Report

Crenshaw, who had also opposed the SEC’s settlement with Ripple, said in her latest remarks that the 2022 FTX collapse was an example of what a “large-scale crypto crisis” can look like. 

“Those risks have not gone away, but the calls for serious regulatory scrutiny are a lot quieter these days,” she said.

“Failing to appreciate and address these risks and complexities destines us to repeat hard lessons with high stakes as crypto becomes increasingly entangled with traditional finance.”

In comparison, remarks from the SEC’s Republican commissioners welcomed the agency’s embrace of the crypto sector. 

Crypto was “languishing in SEC limbo”

SEC chair Paul Atkins said at the SEC Speaks event that “crypto markets have been languishing in SEC limbo for years,” adding that the agency should not be in the business of stifling innovation of crypto companies.

Commissioner Hester Peirce, who heads the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, said in remarks that the agency’s approach under the Biden administration has “evaded sound regulatory practice and must be corrected.”

She also claimed that crypto did not come under the purview of securities laws because “most currently existing crypto assets in the market” are not securities. 

“Even if a broad swath of the crypto assets trading in secondary markets today were initially offered and sold subject to an investment contract, they clearly are no longer bought and sold in securities transactions. Many of these crypto assets are functional.”

Commissioner Mark Uyeda echoed the sentiment of his peers, stating that the SEC “should undertake efforts to provide assurances that regulation by enforcement will not be a tool used for future policymaking.”

Magazine: Arthur Hayes $1M Bitcoin tip, altcoins ‘powerful rally’ looms: Hodler’s Digest

Continue Reading

Politics

US Senate moves forward with GENIUS stablecoin bill

Published

on

By

US Senate moves forward with GENIUS stablecoin bill

US Senate moves forward with GENIUS stablecoin bill

The US Senate has voted to advance a key stablecoin-regulating bill after Democrat Senators blocked an attempt to move the bill forward earlier in May over concerns about President Donald Trump’s sprawling crypto empire.

A key procedural vote on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, or GENIUS Act, passed in a 66-32 vote on May 20.

Several Democrats changed their votes to pass the motion to invoke cloture, which will now set the bill up for debate on the Senate floor.

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the bill’s key backers, said on May 15 that she thinks it’s a “fair target” to have the GENIUS Act passed by May 26 — Memorial Day in the US.

Government, United States, Stablecoin
The US Senate voted 66-32 to advance debate on the GENIUS stablecoin bill. Source: US Senate

The GENIUS Act was introduced on Feb. 4 by US Senator Bill Hagerty and seeks to regulate the nearly $250 billion stablecoin market — currently dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC (USDC).

The bill requires stablecoins be fully backed, have regular security audits and approval from federal or state regulators. Only licensed entities can issue stablecoins, while algorithmic stablecoins are restricted.

Several Democratic senators withdrew support for the bill on May 8, blocking a motion to move it forward, citing concerns over potential conflicts of interest involving Trump’s crypto ventures and anti-money laundering provisions.

Related: Circle plans IPO but talks with Ripple, Coinbase could lead to sale: Report

The bill was revised soon after to receive enough bipartisan support to proceed to a vote.

Hagerty’s stablecoin bill builds on the discussion draft he submitted for former Representative Patrick McHenry’s Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act in October.

Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight

Continue Reading

Trending