Connect with us

Published

on

The headline was that it happened at all.

It took Kamala Harris five weeks from the day she took the call from Joe Biden to finally sit down for an extended interview.

On one view – a common one – it’s an astonishing length of time for a public to be kept waiting for proper, independent, scrutiny of a candidate to be their president.

Up until now, we’ve had the party-packaged version rolled out through convention and teleprompted rallies.

The launch, laced with showbiz, has worked for them.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Support surging behind a pre-interviewed Ms Harris will weigh heavily in the calculations of Democratic campaign managers balancing their instinct for control with necessary exposure to media questioning.

The questions many had about Ms Harris were around her politics and how they had changed on a number of key election issues, like fracking and decriminalising illegal entry at the US border.

It feeds opposition lines of attack that, as a public servant, she lacks authenticity.

Her answer, repeated several times, was that her “values” hadn’t changed.

She will hope it flies in places like the must-win state of Pennsylvania, where fracking is a job creator and voters will ponder her new-found support for it.

Read more:
Cemetery official ‘abruptly pushed’ in altercation with Trump staff
Abba demands Trump campaign stop use of their music
Trump offers supporters ‘piece of knockout suit’ he wore at Biden debate

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘She didn’t look like a leader to me’

Harris has attempted to negotiate path to centre of political landscape

They’d be entitled to ask why, if consistency in her “values” hasn’t prevented change in her policy stance previously, why will they preclude a change in future?

It is one example of how Ms Harris has attempted to negotiate a path towards the centre of the political landscape.

In this US presidential contest, electability doesn’t lie in the progressive territory she trod as part of her effort to be the nominee in 2020.

Her recognition of the 2024 reality was clear in this interview, right down to her statement that she would entertain a Republican in her cabinet – a play for opposition voters feeling a distance from Donald Trump.

Little daylight between Biden and Harris

The interview didn’t show much daylight between Mr Biden and Ms Harris.

She anchored her economic credentials in the record of the current administration and welded herself to existing policy on the Middle East, rejecting suggestions she’d rethink arms shipments to Israel.

She did, however, acknowledge that continuity won’t wholly cut it when she spoke of a wish to “turn the page on the last decade of what I believe has been contrary to where the spirit of our country really lies”.

She is, at once, fighting on his record and fighting against it.

A schoolboy error in best presentation

By the end of the election campaign, this won’t be the most memorable screen event – we’ve probably had that with the Trump/Biden debate.

What will live in the memory, perhaps – certainly for Democratic party media managers – was how it looked.

It was already strange Ms Harris brought Tim Walz along to her big interview as a “plus one”.

To then have her sat low down, seemingly tiny and towered over by her running mate, was a schoolboy error in best presentation.

It’s not like they didn’t have time to plan.

Continue Reading

World

British survivor of Air India crash carries brother’s coffin after being discharged from hospital

Published

on

By

British survivor of Air India crash carries brother's coffin after being discharged from hospital

A British man – the sole survivor of the Air India crash in Ahmedabad – has been discharged from hospital, the airline has confirmed.

Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, has since been seen in video as a pallbearer for the coffin of his brother – one of the 241 people killed in the crash – at a funeral in western India.

At least 30 people also died on the ground as the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner struck a medical college hostel shortly after take-off from the airport in the state of Gujarat on Thursday.

In a statement, Air India said it was “in mourning for the tragic loss” of passengers and crew aboard flight AI171 and is in contact with relatives of those killed, including 52 British nationals.

It said it was working to repatriate the deceased to the UK and other parts of the world, adding: “The sole survivor of the accident, also a British national, has been discharged from hospital.”

“The investigation is ongoing,” it said. “We are cooperating with all parties involved and are committed to sharing verified information and will continue to provide updates wherever we can.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets Vishwash Kumar Ramesh.
Image:
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Vishwash Kumar Ramesh in hospital


On flight AI171 to Gatwick, there were 169 Indians, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian among the passengers, along with 12 crew.

The only survivor, Mr Ramesh, was in seat 11A, near the emergency exit. Speaking from his hospital bed on Friday, he said he “still can’t believe” he survived.

Read more:
Families ‘feel utterly abandoned’
Who are some of the victims?
Survivor’s brother describes horror

Dozens of anxious family members are waiting to collect the bodies of loved ones as doctors work to gather dental samples and perform DNA profiling to identify victims.

Air India and the Indian government are looking at issues linked to engine thrust, flaps, and why the landing gear remained extended, or in the down position, after take-off.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who is the Brit who survived the plane crash?

Both the cockpit voice and flight data recorders, also called black boxes, have been recovered. They will be crucial to the crash investigation, which includes air accident investigators from the UK and US.

India’s aviation safety watchdog has asked Air India for the training records of the pilots and dispatchers, while an inspection of Air India’s 787 fleet did not reveal any major issues.

While there has not been an update on the possible cause of the crash, Indian officials have raised concerns about recent maintenance-related issues reported by the airline and advised the carrier to “strictly adhere to regulations”.

Continue Reading

World

Donald Trump’s comments about getting involved in Israel-Iran conflict are raising alarm bells in Moscow

Published

on

By

Donald Trump's comments about getting involved in Israel-Iran conflict are raising alarm bells in Moscow

Russia is getting nervous about Donald Trump’s trigger finger, and it shows.

Comments from deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov – warning the US against joining Israel’s military campaign – betray Moscow’s growing unease that it could be about to lose its closest Middle Eastern ally.

Russia has strong ties with Iran, which have deepened since the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine.

These were formalised in a strategic partnership pact the two countries signed at the start of the year.

Israel-Iran conflict – live updates

So, at first, Russia seemed to view its ally’s conflict with Israel as an opportunity to gain leverage. The Kremlin was quick to offer its services as a potential mediator.

If Vladimir Putin could persuade Tehran to back down and return to nuclear talks with Washington, he’d potentially have a favour to cash in with the White House over its military support for Ukraine.

But the offers to mediate fell on deaf ears.

And with Mr Trump threatening to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader, Moscow has switched to crisis mode – fearful of losing its second key regional ally in six months, after the fall of the Assad regime in Syria.

So, as well as Ryabkov, other senior figures have taken to the airwaves.

Russia’s spy chief Sergei Naryshkin called the situation “critical”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Israel-Iran conflict: Your questions answered

Read more:
Who has been targeted in Iran?
How the conflict escalated

And, according to ministry of foreign affairs spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, the world is “millimetres away from catastrophe” due to Israeli strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

It’s quite the spectacle – a country that’s been waging war on its neighbour for more than three years is now urging others to show military restraint.

That’s because US involvement poses serious consequences, not just for Iran, but for Russia too.

Continue Reading

World

Trump’s words designed to stoke tension, confuse and apply intense pressure on Iran

Published

on

By

Trump's words designed to stoke tension, confuse and apply intense pressure on Iran

This is the highest stakes diplomacy via social media. 

The American president just posted on his Truth Social platform: “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding.

“He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers.

“Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Israel-Iran live: Trump says US knows where Iran’s supreme leader is ‘hiding’

It was followed minutes later by “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!”

In real-time, we are witnessing Donald Trump’s extreme version of maximum pressure diplomacy.

He’d probably call it the ‘art of the deal’, but bunker busters are the tool, and it comes with such huge consequences, intended and unintended, known and unknown.

Read more:
The bunker buster bomb which could destroy Iran’s nuclear ambitions

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nuclear sites targeted in Iran

There is intentional ambiguity in the president’s messaging. His assumption is that he can apply his ‘art of the deal’ strategy to a deeply ideological geopolitical challenge.

It’s all playing out publicly. Overnight, the New York Times, via two of its best-sourced reporters, had been told that Mr Trump is weighing whether to use B-2 aircraft to drop bunker-busting bombs on Iran’s underground nuclear facilities.

Meanwhile, Axios was reporting that a meeting is possible between Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi.

The reporting came just as Mr Trump warned “everyone in Tehran to evacuate”. The nuclear sites being threatened with bunker busters are not in Tehran, but Trump’s words are designed to stoke tension, to confuse and to apply intense pressure.

His actions are too. He left the G7 in Canada early and asked his teams to gather in the White House Situation Room.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: ‘I want an end, not a ceasefire’

This is a game of smoke, mirrors, brinkmanship and – maybe – bluff. In Tehran, what’s left of the leadership is watching and reading closely as they consider what’s next.

Maybe the Supreme Leader and his regime’s days are numbered. Things remain very unpredictable.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

From history, though, regime change, even when it comes with a plan – and there is certainly not one here, spells civil war and from that comes a refugee crisis.

These are truly tense and chaotic times.

Continue Reading

Trending