Connect with us

Published

on

Former home secretary Suella Braverman has been criticised by a watchdog for publicly condemning the Metropolitan Police over its handling of pro-Palestinian protests in the capital.

The Conservative MP wrote a scathing article in the Times last November accusing the force of “double standards for allowing what she deemed a “hate march” to go ahead in London on Armistice Day, claiming right-wing protesters were “rightly met with a stern response”, while pro-Palestinian “mobs” were “largely ignored”.

The Met stood by its decision to let the march go ahead as the legal threshold for a ban had not been met, but the public furore ended in ugly scenes, with a far-right protest at the Cenotaph and a total of 140 arrests from both demonstrations.

Ms Braverman – who was later sacked by Rishi Sunak after she doubled down on her criticism – ordered a report into “activism and impartiality in the police” at the time.

But when it was published on Tuesday, it took aim at her actions, saying her criticism should have been delivered in private.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Chief inspector of constabulary Andy Cooke, who led the review, set out the scenes around the Armistice Day protests, before concluding: “Forces and politicians alike should pay close attention to the risk of any improper political interference.

“This includes the risk of actual interference or perceived interference, whether that perception is accurate or not. Usually, such an intervention, if deemed appropriate, should be done in private.”

More on Metropolitan Police

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Crowds of far-right protesters shouted “you let your country down” in a clash with police near the Cenotaph in London on Armistice Day last year

Mr Cooke said there was a “delicate balance to strike” between the operational independence of chief constables and the need of accountability and governance.

But he said senior officers had reported “improper pressure or interference from significant political figures”, and the review found “overt attempts to influence operational policing challenge the police’s impartiality and could reduce public trust”.

The chief inspector called for police chiefs, police and crime commissioners, mayors and senior politicians to “pay close attention to the risk posed by improper political interference, whether actual or perceived”.

The report also pointed to an incident involving Mr Sunak, where he said he was “appalled” by the treatment of a Jewish man by a police officer in a video from a pro-Palestinian protest, only to back the force nine days later after a longer clip came to light with further context.

The report said: “Senior politicians should take great care to make sure they are in possession of the full facts before making public statements that can have a detrimental effect on the public perception of police impartiality.”

A government spokesperson said: “Our police officers face challenges every single day and act without fear or favour to keep our streets safe, and it is vital they are supported.

“The government strongly supports operational independence, which is the bedrock of our policing model. We welcome the report and will work closely with policing to consider the recommendations.”

The Conservative Party and Ms Braverman have been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK will play its ‘full part’ in peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, says Sir Keir Starmer

Published

on

By

UK will play its 'full part' in peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, says Sir Keir Starmer

The UK will play its “full part” in peacekeeping in Ukraine, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

The prime minister told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby that the conflict with Russia was not just about “sovereignty in Ukraine” but about the impact it also had on the UK, including the cost of living crisis.

Sir Keir was speaking to Sky News while on a surprise visit to Ukraine on Thursday – his first since his party’s landslide election win six months ago.

The purpose of the trip was to discuss the next steps for Ukraine, with the situation now more uncertain following Donald Trump’s election victory in November.

Politics latest: Tories made mistake by leaving EU without growth plan, admits Badenoch

Mr Trump, whose inauguration takes place on 20 January, has said he wants a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine within 100 days.

But some European leaders fear pushing Kyiv into a deal could lead to Ukraine ceding some of its territory to Vladimir Putin.

More on Ukraine

Sir Keir said he did not want “to get ahead of ourselves” but that the UK would play its “full part” in any peace negotiations – including by deploying British troops for peacekeeping.

Asked if he would be prepared to do that, the prime minister replied: “Well, I don’t want to get ahead of ourselves, but I do have indicated that we will play our full part – because this isn’t just about sovereignty in Ukraine.

“It’s about what the impact is back in the United Kingdom and our values, our freedom, our democracy. Because if Russia succeeds in this aggression, it will impact all of us for a very, very long time.”

On arriving in Ukraine to meet President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a Russian drone was shot over the sky over the presidential palace.

Sir Keir said the drone threat was “a reminder of what Ukraine is facing every day” and that the war was brought about by “Russian aggression”.

Elsewhere in the interview, Sir Keir was asked about his views on Ukraine’s longstanding desire to join NATO – something President Putin strongly opposes.

Read more:
With Donald Trump’s inauguration imminent, the Chagos deal appears to be on ice

MP Mike Amesbury admits punching man

At a NATO summit in Washington last summer, the alliance’s members announced that Ukraine was on an “irreversible” path to NATO membership.

“We fully support Ukraine’s right to choose its own security arrangements and decide its own future, free from outside interference. Ukraine’s future is in NATO,” the declaration said.

However, Mr Zelenskyy has somewhat tempered his language around NATO membership, telling Sky News in an exclusive interview in November that a ceasefire deal could be struck if Ukrainian territory he controlled falls “under the NATO umbrella” – allowing him to negotiate the return of the rest later “in a diplomatic way”.

However, Mr Trump has acknowledged Moscow’s opposition to Ukraine joining NATO, saying: “Russia has somebody right on their doorstep, and I can understand their feeling about that.”

Watch the full interview with Beth Rigby and Sir Keir Starmer on the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge at 7pm.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s potential Treasury secretary pick ‘sees no reason’ for US CBDC

Published

on

By

Trump’s potential Treasury secretary pick ‘sees no reason’ for US CBDC

The president-elect cannot officially nominate anyone until after he is inaugurated on Jan. 20, but the US Senate has been holding hearings to question his potential picks.

Continue Reading

Politics

Solana ETFs may take until 2026: Bloomberg Intelligence

Published

on

By

Solana ETFs may take until 2026: Bloomberg Intelligence

With lawsuits still pending over Solana’s classification as a security, SOL ETFs will likely have to wait until next year for their debut.

Continue Reading

Trending