Tory leadership candidate Robert Jenrick has claimed mass migration and “woke culture” have put England’s national identity at risk.
Mr Jenrick, who remains the favourite to replace Rishi Sunak, accused the “metropolitan establishment” of having a “sneering attitude” towards England’s identity.
The former immigration minister said the ties that bind the nation are beginning to “fray” due to this attitude and the “influx of migrants”.
“The public have consistently voted against all of this. Those in Westminster are underestimating the depth of anger in the country,” he wrote in the Daily Mail.
Mr Jenrick suggested a suppression of England’s identity helped lead to riots this summer following the Southport stabbings.
He blamed years of “inter-communal violence, radicalisation and diminishing trust in our communities” for the riots.
More on Conservatives
Related Topics:
However, when asked by Sky News how he would define English identity, Mr Jenrick said he would not “distil the identity and the history of England into a soundbite”.
Given seven opportunities to say what English identity is, he said it is the history and culture of England which should be celebrated, but said that is not being taught “to our children”.
Advertisement
Asked what English identity is, ge said: “I think it is something some people across our country know about.”
Image: Rishi Sunak and Robert Jenrick in 2019 when they were chief secretary to the Treasury and housing secretary
Mr Jenrick also wrote in the Daily Mail it will be impossible to “heal our divided nation if we refuse to confront complex issues about identity”.
Mr Jenrick warned the UK could fall prey to the “ugly politics” of the far-right unless the identity crisis and immigration is brought under control.
He said the English “metropolitan elite…actively disapprove” of the country’s history and culture.
And he said “high status” people in Scotland and Wales are “proud to be Scottish and Welsh” as well as British, but those in England are “far from proud to be English”.
The 42-year-old was previously seen as a centrist, becoming an MP under David Cameron who he was a staunch supporter of.
A Sunak loyalist in the early days of his premiership, Mr Jenrick then moved towards the right after becoming immigration minister, telling former Tory MP Nickie Aiken “once he got into the weeds, he realised how broken the system was and that it needed full-scale reform”.
Last year, he resigned from Mr Sunak’s government as he said legislation to allow the Rwanda policy to go ahead did “not go far enough” to ensure it would happen.
The move was seen as laying the groundwork to run for Tory leader, which he is now doing.
He has proposed limiting net immigration to below 100,000 a year and called for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights so asylum seekers could be deported to Rwanda.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
‘Wrong’ to chant Allahu Akbar ‘without being arrested’
Mr Jenrick told Sky News immigration has made England “richer” over the centuries but in the past 25 years “since Tony Blair” became prime minister, net migration has soared to 5.9 million.
“And that is just far too high and it’s made it impossible to successfully integrate people to ensure we have the sense of national togetherness and identity that I want to see,” he said.
He said putting a cap on immigration would make it “easier for us to successfully integrate people” and help with other issues such as housing, accessing public services and foreign labour undercutting British wages.
The Conservative admitted mass migration “has been a failure of both [Conservative and Labour] political parties”.
The other Tory leadership candidates are Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly and Tom Tugendhat.
They are getting ready for hustings to be held at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, which begins on 29 September.
MPs will then narrow the group to a final two, with the winner announced in November after being put to members in a vote.
Over $4 trillion worth of real estate could be tokenized on blockchain networks during the next decade, potentially offering investors greater access to property ownership opportunities, according to a new report.
The Deloitte Center for Financial Services predicts that over $4 trillion worth of real estate may be tokenized by 2035, up from less than $300 billion in 2024. The report, published April 24, estimates a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of more than 27%.
The $4 trillion of tokenized property is predicted to stem from the benefits of blockchain-based assets, as well as a structural shift across real estate and property ownership.
Global tokenized real estate value, growth predictions. Source: Deloitte
“Real estate itself is undergoing transformation. Post-pandemic work-from-home trends, climate risk, and digitization have reshaped property fundamentals,” according to Chris Yin, co-founder of Plume Network, a blockchain built for real-world assets (RWAs).
“Office buildings are being repurposed into AI data centers, logistics hubs and energy-efficient residential communities,” Yin told Cointelegraph.
“Investors want targeted access to these modern use cases, and tokenization enables programmable, customizable exposure to such evolving asset profiles,” he said.
The uncertainty triggered by US President Donald Trump’s import tariffs has boosted investor interest in the RWA tokenization sector, which involves minting financial products and tangible assets on a blockchain.
Both stablecoins and RWAs have attracted significant capital as safe-haven assets amid the global trade concerns, Juan Pellicer, senior research analyst at IntoTheBlock, told Cointelegraph.
Blockchain innovation could drive regulatory clarity
Growing RWA adoption may inspire a more welcoming stance from global regulators, Yin said.
“While regulation is a hurdle, regulation follows usage,” he explained, likening tokenization to Uber’s growth before widespread regulatory acceptance:
“Tokenization is similar — as demand increases, regulatory clarity will follow.”
He added that making tokenized products compliant with a wide range of international regulations is key to unlocking broader market access.
However, some industry watchers are skeptical about the benefits introduced by tokenized real estate.
The Truth Behind Tokenization and RWA panel. Source: Paris Blockchain Week
“I don’t think tokenization should have its eyes directly set on real estate,” said Securitize chief operating officer Michael Sonnenshein at Paris Blockchain Week 2025.
“I’m sure there are all kinds of efficiencies that can be unlocked using blockchain technology to eliminate middlemen, escrow, and all kinds of things in real estate. But I think today, what the onchain economy is demanding are more liquid assets,” he added.
United States Senator Cynthia Lummis suggests the crypto industry may be celebrating too soon over the US Federal Reserve softening its crypto guidance for banks.
“The Fed withdrawing crypto guidance is just noise, not real progress,” Lummis said in an April 25 X post. Lummis called the Fed’s April 24 announcement — withdrawing its 2022 supervisory letter that had discouraged banks from engaging with crypto and stablecoin activities — “just lip service.”
Lummis’ tone was different from the rest of the crypto industry
Lummis, a pro-crypto advocate known for introducing the Bitcoin (BTC) Strategic Reserve Bill in July 2024, pointed out several flaws in the Fed’s announcement, even as Strategy founder Michael Saylor and crypto entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano suggested it was a step forward for banks and crypto.
She argued that the Fed continues to “illegally flout the law on master accounts” and still relies on reputational risk in its bank supervision practices. It comes as the Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation (FDIC) is working on a rule to stop examiners from considering reputational risk when reviewing a bank’s operations, according to a recent Bloomberg report.
Lummis also highlighted the Fed’s policy statement in Section 9(13), which hasn’t been withdrawn, stating that Bitcoin and digital assets are considered “unsafe and unsound.”
She also reiterated many of the same staff behind Operation Chokepoint 2.0 are still involved in crypto policy today.
“We are NOT fooled. The Fed assassinated companies within the industry and hurt American interests by stifling innovation and shuttering businesses. This fight is far from over.”
“I will continue to hold the Fed accountable until the digital asset industry gets more than a life jacket, Chair Powell — they need a fair shake,” Lummis said.
However, many crypto executives praised the Fed’s announcement as a positive development for the industry. Saylor said in an April 25 X post that the Fed’s move means that “banks are now free to begin supporting Bitcoin.”
Anastasija Plotnikova, co-founder and CEO of blockchain regulatory firm Fideum, said the Fed’s decision “is a significant development, as it will simplify the path to institutional adoption.”
In one of his first appearances as the recently sworn-in chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins delivered remarks to the agency’s third roundtable discussion of crypto regulation.
In the “Know Your Custodian” roundtable event on April 25, Atkins said he expected “huge benefits” from blockchain technology through efficiency, risk mitigation, transparency, and cutting costs. He reiterated that among his goals at the SEC would be to facilitate “clear regulatory rules of the road” for digital assets, hinting that the agency under former chair Gary Gensler had contributed to market and regulatory uncertainty.
“I look forward to engaging with market participants and working with colleagues in President Trump’s administration and Congress to establish a rational fit-for-purpose framework for crypto assets,” said Atkins.
SEC chair Paul Atkins addressing the April 25 crypto roundtable. Source: SEC
Some critics of US President Donald Trump see Atkins’ nomination to lead the SEC as a nod to the crypto industry, acting on campaign promises to remove Gensler — the former chair resigned the day Trump took office — and cut back on regulation. Democratic lawmakers on the Senate Banking Committee questioned Atkins on his ties to the industry, potentially presenting conflicts of interest in his role regulating crypto.
“We’ve noticed that we don’t have to be as concerned […] about being accused of things that we’re not doing, like being broker-dealers for securities,” Exodus chief legal officer Veronica McGregor, who participated in the roundtable, told Cointelegraph on April 24.”It’s just a less scary regulatory environment in general. It is, however, still unclear what the ultimate regs are going to look like for crypto.”
The SEC crypto task force is scheduled to hold two more roundtables in May and June to discuss tokenization and decentralized finance, respectively. Commissioner Hester Peirce, who leads the task force, told Cointelegraph in March that she welcomed the opportunity to work with Atkins to “reorient the agency,” hinting at an SEC with regulations more favorable to the crypto industry.
In addition to the roundtables, the crypto task force has reported several meetings with digital asset firms to discuss various policies and considerations in developing a regulatory framework.