Connect with us

Published

on

In a church hall in Hull, groups of asylum seekers queue for tea and toast and advice from immigration experts.

The room is busy, the busiest it’s been since the riots.

The volunteers who run the weekly event say many people were initially too scared to come out following the violence.

As in other towns and cities, a hotel housing migrants became a target for the rioters.

Wahag, 24, describes watching the attack from a window on the third floor of the hotel.

Riot police protected the hotel
Image:
Riot police stood guard outside the hotel

Image:
Wahag watched from a window as people gathered outside

Speaking in Arabic via a translator, he recalls: “I felt scared. I saw the people throwing stones and rocks at the hotel.”

He says he and the other migrants were advised not to go out.

Concerned there could be further riots, he says: “I’m worried that if it does happen again, it would be very bad.”

Wahag says he arrived in the UK by small boat just a few months ago after making the journey across Europe from Yemen.

The riots have left him with mixed views on Britain, where he thought he would be safe.

“There are some bad people and some good people,” he reflects, but he says the UK has a “good government”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bodycam: Police attacked in Hull riots

Aftermath of protests in Hull
Image:
Shops were attacked and looted in Hull city centre

Wahag reveals that the Home Office has now granted him leave to remain in Britain.

The decision came much more quickly than he expected. His is one of many asylum claims processed since Labour won the election, as it begins to tackle a backlog of applications.

He says he is “happy” Labour is now in power.

“The previous government, they wanted to deport us but now they are making the procedure easier for us,” he says.

It means he will have to move out of the hotel, but is now free to make a life in Britain.

Many of the migrants we spoke to remain more wary about going out.

William, from Kenya, believes asylum seekers were targeted because people think “we came here to seek money or their jobs”.

But he says it’s unfair migrants are blamed for the accommodation and support they are given.

William
Image:
William hid in a community centre as cars and tyres were set alight nearby

“It’s the Home Office and the government,” says William.

“If we were given the right to work we cannot be living in hotels, living for free.”

‘It’s not our fault they put me in that hotel’

Mustafa, who came to the UK on the back of a lorry nine years ago, was also in the hotel as rioters attacked it.

“We hear they are shouting ‘we need to burn the hotel, we need to burn the people in the hotel’,” he recalls, praising the police for keeping him and others safe.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Earlier this year Mustafa, from Iraq, was destitute.

His asylum claim had been rejected and he was sleeping on a park bench.

But he has since put in a fresh claim, which meant the Home Office gave him a room in the hotel while he awaits a decision.

Asked if he understands why some people find it frustrating he gets a hotel room, an option not available to people born in Britain who find themselves destitute, he says “of course, of course”.

But he says: “You know the procedure of the Home Office. It’s not our fault they put me in that hotel.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Inside the simmering anger after UK riots

Read more from Sky News:
Ex-Met officer Carrick charged with eight sexual offences
Disguised GP admits plot to kill mum’s partner with poison

A Home Office spokesperson said it is “determined to restore order to the asylum system after it has been put under unprecedented pressure, so that it operates swiftly, firmly and fairly”.

They added: “We have taken necessary action to restart asylum processing and clear the backlog of cases which will save an estimated £7bn for the taxpayer over the next 10 years.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer warns of ‘lost decade of kids’ – as he launches 10-year youth plan

Published

on

By

Starmer warns of 'lost decade of kids' - as he launches 10-year youth plan

Sir Keir Starmer has declared it his “moral mission” to “turn the tide on the lost decade of young kids left as collateral damage”.

The government launches its 10-year youth plan today, which has pledged £500m to reviving youth services.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has also warned that young people are now “the most isolated in generations” and face challenges that are “urgent and demand a major change in direction”.

But despite the strong language, the Conservatives have warned that “under Labour, the outlook for the next generation is increasingly bleak”.

Lisa Nandy is on Sky News from 7am – follow live

Launching the 10-year strategy, Sir Keir said: “As a dad and as prime minister, I believe it is our generation’s greatest responsibility to turn the tide on the lost decade of young kids left as collateral damage. It is our moral mission.

“Today, my government sets out a clear, ambitious and deliverable plan – investing in the next generation so that every child has the chance to see their talents take them as far as their ability can.”

What’s in the government’s strategy?

Under the plans, the government will seek to give 500,000 more young people across England access to a trusted adult outside their homes – who are assigned through a formal programme – and online resources about staying safe.

The prime minister said the plans will also “ensure” that those who choose to do apprenticeships rather than go to university “will have the same respect and opportunity as everyone else”.

OTHER MEASURES INCLUDE

  • Creating 70 “young futures” hubs by March 2029, as part of a £70m programme to provide access to youth workers – the first eight of these will open by March next year;
  • Establishing a £60m Richer Young Lives fund to support organisations in “underserved” areas to deliver high-quality youth work and activities;
  • Improving wellbeing, personal development and life skills through a new £22.5m programme of support around the school day – which will operate in up to 400 schools;
  • Investing £15m to recruit and train youth workers, volunteers and “trusted adults”;
  • Improving youth services by putting £5m into local partnerships, information-sharing and digital tech.

The plan comes following a so-called “state of the nation” survey commissioned by Ms Nandy, which heard from more than 14,000 young people across England.

Launching the strategy, she said: “Young people have been crystal clear in speaking up in our consultation: they need support for their mental health, spaces to meet with people in their communities and real opportunities to thrive. We will give them what they want.”

Read more:
Child poverty strategy launched
Young people may lose benefits

Lisa Nandy will speak about the plan on Sky News on Wednesday morning. Pic: PA
Image:
Lisa Nandy will speak about the plan on Sky News on Wednesday morning. Pic: PA

But the Conservatives have criticised the government for scrapping the National Citizen Service (NCS), which ended in March this year.

Shadow culture secretary Nigel Huddlestone said “any renewed investment in youth services is of course welcome”, but said Labour’s “economic mismanagement and tax hikes are forcing businesses to close, shrinking opportunities while inflation continues to climb”.

Continue Reading

Politics

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

Published

on

By

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has affirmed that national banks can intermediate cryptocurrency trades as riskless principals without holding the assets on their balance sheets, a move that brings traditional banks a step closer to offering regulated crypto brokerage services.

In an interpretive letter released on Tuesday, the regulator said banks may act as principals in a crypto trade with one customer while simultaneously entering an offsetting trade with another, a structure that mirrors riskless principal activity in traditional markets. 

“Several applicants have discussed how conducting riskless principal crypto-asset transactions would benefit their proposed bank’s customers and business, including by offering additional services in a growing market,” notes the document.

According to the OCC, the move would allow customers “to transact crypto-assets through a regulated bank, as compared to non-regulated or less regulated options.”

Banks, United States, Donald Trump
The OCC’s interpretive letter affirms that riskless principal crypto transactions fall within the “business of banking.” Source: US OCC

The letter also reiterates that banks must confirm the legal permissibility of any crypto activity and ensure it aligns with their chartered powers. Institutions are expected to maintain procedures for monitoring operational, compliance and market risks.

“The main risk in riskless principal transactions is counterparty credit risk (in particular, settlement risk),” reads the letter, adding that “managing counterparty credit risk is integral to the business of banking, and banks are experienced in managing this risk.”

The agency’s guidance cites 12 U.S.C. § 24, which permits national banks to conduct riskless principal transactions as part of the “business of banking.” The letter also draws a distinction between crypto assets that qualify as securities, noting that riskless principal transactions involving securities were already clearly permissible under existing law.

The OCC’s interpretive letter — a nonbinding guidance that outlines the agency’s view of which activities national banks may conduct under existing law — was issued a day after the head of the OCC, Jonathan Gould, said crypto firms seeking a federal bank charter should be treated the same as traditional financial institutions.

According to Gould, the banking system has the “capacity to evolve,” and there is “no justification for considering digital assets differently” than traditional banks, which have offered custody services “electronically for decades.”

Related: Trump’s national security strategy is silent on crypto, blockchain

From ‘Choke Point 2.0’ to pro-crypto policy

Under the Biden administration, some industry groups and lawmakers accused US regulators of pursuing an “Operation Choke Point 2.0” approach that increased supervisory pressure on banks and firms interacting with crypto.

Since President Trump took office in January after pledging to support the sector, the federal government has moved in the opposite direction, adopting a more permissive posture toward digital asset activity.

Magazine: Quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time: Kevin O’Leary