Tesla will once again allow current owners to transfer Full Self-Driving to a new vehicle purchase, even though it previously said that this program would never return after it ended for the third time 11 days ago.
Tesla has been selling its FSD system for many years now, to the point where many early owners have been through multiple vehicles without the software actually being delivered in its full working state.
Those owners are able to use Tesla’s Supervised FSD system, but no Tesla owner has yet been able to use an actual full self-driving system that lets the car drive itself with no human intervention.
And so, there has been a constant drumbeat from many of those owners, wondering why they should have to purchase the same software again, when they get a new car, if the software was never delivered from the previous vehicle.
It was seen at the time as a way to stoke demand, rather than an example of Tesla “doing the right thing” and letting owners retain eventual access to the software they paid for but were never delivered.
Then, at Tesla’s last shareholder meeting, a questioner asked if we could have FSD transfer for “one more quarter,” rather than permanent. Musk responded after some hesitation, and said “okay, one more quarter.”
Tesla later said that this scheme would only last until August 31, rather than the actual end of the quarter, but then extended it until September 30th, which does match the end of Q3. So, the program ended 11 days ago.
But now the scheme is back, once again, after being cancelled for the last time three times already.
The specifics of the program are available over on Tesla’s website, and we’ve also seen reference to the program in the Tesla app. It technically began yesterday – meaning that if you got a car between October 1 and October 9, I guess you’re out of luck.
The scheme is supposed to remain active until December 31, the last day of the fiscal quarter and year. Just in case anybody wondered whether this is nothing but another ploy to boost end-of-quarter sales (just kidding, nobody wondered about that).
Electrek’s Take
I’ve written almost this exact same article before, and I’m going to say all the same things again, because nothing has changed.
As I’ve said before: we should not have to have this discussion every quarter.
Until FSD is able to follow through on its promise, transfers should be free for anyone who has bought the software.
Any other company that pre-sold software and then refused to deliver it would not be looked kindly upon, particularly if that software was thousands of dollars and many years late, and if customers were required to re-buy it for every piece of hardware they purchase to run it on.
Yes, people can use something that Tesla calls “FSD” right now, and the system is gradually getting better.
But it does not fully drive the car, doesn’t work without intervention, can’t be summoned across country, and can’t be used as a revenue-generating robotaxi. In fact, Tesla just announced a whole new robotaxi product, leaving some to think that past vehicles would never gain autonomous capability – but at that event, Musk reiterated that current Teslas would eventually gain “unsupervised” FSD capability. And that capability will come within about a year, as he’s been saying for roughly a decade now.
It’s time to stop stringing owners along. If the problem is difficult, and more difficult than you thought, that’s one thing. But making people buy additional licenses to software you already sold them and did not yet deliver is not acceptable.
But if Tesla won’t do the right thing, maybe the law will finally force them to follow through on the promises they’ve made. There are currently several cases in court relating to Tesla’s FSD false advertising that could have sweeping effects on how Tesla sells this software and what rights its owners might have. Stay tuned for the results of those.
If you’re looking to take advantage of this “limited time offer” (lol), feel free to use our Tesla referral code for $1000 off a new Tesla.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
No, Ram is still not planning to launch the all-electric pickup we’ve been waiting for, but it is selling this mini one for $30 for Christmas.
Ram is selling a mini EV pickup for Christmas
Former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares promised Ram’s electric pickup would outperform the competition with class-leading range, charging speeds, towing, and more, but it was all just a pipe dream.
After delaying the long-awaited Ram 1500 REV several times, Stellantis made it official in September. Ram’s EV pickup was first expected to launch in 2024, then pushed back to 2025, then 2026, and now it’s canceled altogether.
Development of the all-electric Ram truck has been shut down, and the Ramcharger, a range-extended electric vehicle (REEV), will take its place in the lineup.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Although you won’t be able to get your hands on a full-size model, Ram will sell you a mini version this Christmas.
On its website, Ram is selling a 2026 Ram 1500 REV Hallmark Keepsake ornament for $29.95. It’s made with authentic details based on the all-electric pickup and even includes a 2025/2026 license plate and spinning wheels.
Ram’s range-extended pickup is equipped with dual electric motors, a 92 kWh battery, a 3.6 L V-engine, and a 27-gallon gas tank that CEO Tim Kuniskis claims delivers “unlimited” range of up to 690 miles. The REEV is Ram’s most powerful pickup, packing 647 horsepower and 610 lb-ft of torque.
Ram 1500 REV electric pickup truck (Source: Stellantis)
Crosstown rival Ford announced similar plans earlier this week. Ford ended production of the all-electric F-150 Lightning, and plans to replace it with a next-gen EREV version.
So, if Ram has no plans to offer an all-electric pickup, why is it selling a Christmas ornament? Maybe it really was planning to launch it at one point in time.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
An analysis of Tesla’s patent applications shows a slower pace of innovation in the last 2 years and a shift toward AI hardware and software as Elon Musk is betting the house on autonomous driving and robots.
We have long debated whether Tesla (TSLA) should be valued as an automotive manufacturer or a technology company. While bears point to declining car deliveries and margins, bulls point to autonomous driving and robots as the next phase of growth.
The bears are right. Car sales still account for the majority of Tesla’s revenue and profits, and they have been steadily declining over the past 2 years.
A bullish future in which Tesla’s AI bets replace its declining auto business remains hypothetical, but there is at least some data supporting Tesla’s investments in this shift.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Now, a new analysis of Tesla’s patent filings over the last decade by Electrek gives us perhaps the most objective look yet at where the company is actually putting its R&D efforts.
The data reveals a massive shift. The “car” part of Tesla is shrinking in the patent logs, first replaced by a surge in manufacturing innovations, then by patent applications linked to AI hardware and software.
Here’s a look at the data (important to note that there’s a 12-18 month lag in patent application data and therefore we are not up to 2024 for the most up-to-date data):
The ‘Twin Peaks’ of Tesla Innovation
We obtained a dataset breaking down Tesla’s ~4,200 patent applications from 2014 through 2024. When you map them out, two distinct peaks emerge, telling the story of the company’s pivot to AI.
The first peak hit in 2018, right in the middle of the “Model 3 Production Hell.” At the time, Elon Musk was supposedly sleeping on the factory floor, and the patent filings reflect that desperation. We saw a massive spike in “Industrial” patents, most of which were related to manufacturing.
Tesla was clearly trying to find ways to build vehicles in high volumes for the first time.
Then, filings dipped as Tesla focused on profitability in 2019/2020.
But look at 2022. We see a second, even larger peak. This time, the composition is entirely different. The “Industrial” slice is still there (thanks to innovations such as gigacasting), but the “Automotive” slice has become a sliver.
The new dominant category: AI hardware and software.
In this category, you have everything from new theories and processes for autonomous driving to new AI computing hardware that became Tesla’s AI4 computer inside its vehicles.
We can see that “AI” contributed to the first peak in 2018 as Tesla was expanding work on Autopilot and FSD, but only started to represent a majority of Tesla’s patent applications in the 2020s.
Tesla is Becoming Less of an Automaker
Here is the wildest stat from the research: Less than 10% of Tesla’s total patents are now classified as “Automotive.”
For comparison, if you look at legacy automakers like Toyota or VW, their portfolios are dominated by mechanical engineering patents: chassis, suspension, and combustion efficiency.
Tesla’s portfolio is now 40% AI-related. We are seeing a flood of filings related to:
This confirms what we have been saying for a while: Tesla CEO Elon Musk has completely shifted the automaker to AI at the detriment of its auto business.
The 2023 and 2024 data (which is still trickling in due to publication lags) show the next pivot.
While there are still a few patents related to the auto business, such as regarding wireless charging, they now represent a small minority.
But even then, things like wireless charging for EVs fall into the automotive category; you could argue that Tesla is doing it for the AI category, since the idea is that autonomous vehicles will need wireless charging if there are no humans to plug them in.
As you can see from the chart above, since 2023, the majority of Tesla’s patent applications have been related to AI hardware or software – even though many of them are still in mechanical and electrical engineering, they are no longer about the automotive business.
We are seeing a lot of filings for “electromechanical joints” and “linear actuators,” which are clearly related to humanoid robots.
Electrek’s Take
There’s a little something for both sides of the Tesla spectrum in this one.
Bears can feel vindicated that Tesla’s shift to AI is indeed coming with less spending on automotive R&D. We have seen Tesla’s pace of innovation in EVs slow down in the last few years, and I think we can expect that trend to continue.
Meanwhile, bulls can now visualize Tesla’s shift to AI through these patent application trends.
This reflects a bit of why I sold my Tesla shares last year. I invested in Tesla because I believed in its mission to accelerate the advent of electric transport, and I saw the company as being the most innovative in the space.
It’s no longer the case, and Musk has now unofficially shifted the mission to accelerating the advent of the “age of abundance.”
Call me a skeptic, but my spidey sense always starts tingling when billionaires who buy elections start talking about utopias.
For example, Musk recently said that charity will not be necessary because AI will “end poverty” and deliver “universal high income”:
The wealthiest man in the world, who is buying elections and trying to own AI and robotics, is telling you: no need to save money because I’ll birth AI and then give you all an allowance.
The most absurd aspect of this statement is the context: it was a criticism of a charitable donation, specifically Dell’s.
Effectively, he is discouraging billionaires from philanthropy under the pretense that AI will eventually ‘end poverty,’ rendering charity obsolete. But the mechanism for this end to poverty is missing.
If AI generates massive wealth, that capital will initially concentrate in the hands of the billionaires who own the models and the data feeding them. How does that wealth translate into ‘Universal High Income’? It won’t magically trickle down. We know that by now.
With the political landscape captured by ultra-high-net-worth individuals who consistently block higher taxation, the only path to redistribution is through the very thing he is dismissing: charity.
If it does happen, and I have serious doubts as you can probably tell, one way or the other, it will go through charity from the ultra-wealthy. Either directly or through allowing their captured political class to increase taxes on themselves or their corporations.
The argument boils down to, ‘There is no need to be generous now; wait until we have accumulated even more wealth.’ It exposes a fundamental contradiction in the promised ‘age of abundance.’
I think AI has a lot of potential to be a positive for humanity, but the risk is also insanely high – hence why it attracts insane risk takers such as Musk.
The way I see it, there are going to be a few winners in this AI race and a lot of losers, and it’s still up for debate whether Tesla will be in the former or latter category.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Dodge opened orders for the 2027 Charger Daytona Scat Pack EV, the “world’s quickest and most powerful muscle car.” The 2027 model year gains an NACS port, but is it worth the price?
2027 Dodge Charger Daytona EV price and range
After dropping the base R/T trim last year, the only electric Charger Dodge offered was the high-performance Scat Pack model.
For the 2027 model year, Dodge added a few new standard features to make it a little easier for those looking to go electric.
The 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack now comes with a standard North American Charging System (NACS) port for charging at Tesla Superchargers, unlike last year’s model, which had a CSS port. It will also include a J1772-to-NACS AC adapter.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Although it’s not the most exciting feature, the added NACS port will make it much easier to find and access Level 3 public charging stations.
Dodge and Jeep’s parent company, Stellantis, announced plans last month to adopt NACS ports for its electric vehicles in North America, starting in 2026.
The 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack (Source: Stellantis)
Don’t worry, Dodge still included a few fun features like Drift/Donut Mode, Launch Control, and PowerShot, which unlocks the vehicle’s full power for 10 seconds at the push of a button. The electric Charger also features the “World’s first Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust” system, designed to sound like a classic V-8 engine.
Aside from the added NACS port, the 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack EV remains essentially the same as last year’s model.
2026 Dodge Charger Daytona EV Scat Pack four-door (left) and two-door (right) (Source: Stellantis)
It’s powered by an all-wheel-drive (AWD) dual-motor powertrain, packing up to 630 hp. When PowerShot is activated, it delivers 670 hp and 627 lb-ft of torque for 10 seconds.
With a 0-to-60-mph sprint and instant torque, the electric Charger is the quickest of the bunch, even faster than the famed Hurricane engine.
Driving Range
Starting Price
2027 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack two-door
267 miles
$72,495
2027 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack price and range (*Excluding taxes, title, and fees)
Dodge didn’t reveal battery specs, but said the 2027 electric Charger has a maximum range of 267 miles. Last year’s model was powered by a 100.5 kWh battery, delivering an estimated EPA range of 241 miles.
The 2027 Dodge Charger Scat Pack will start at $72,495, while the four-door model will cost an extra $500. That’s considerably more than the 2026 model year, which starts at $60,690.
Dodge will share more details about NACS charger access and adapters for 2024-2026 Charger Daytona owners in Q1 2026.
To make room for the 2027 models, Dodge is offering up to $12,750 off outgoing Charger Daytona EV models or 0% APR financing for 72 months. If you’re interested in a test drive, you can use our link to find available Dodge Charger Daytona models near you today.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.