Connect with us

Published

on

Explosions have erupted in the Lebanese capital Beirut after Israel threatened “imminent strikes” on Hezbollah’s financial sites.

The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said on Sunday evening it was planning to attack a “large number” of locations used by the group’s al Qard al Hassan unit, which is used to pay its operatives and help buy arms.

The first warnings affected southern Beirut and the eastern Bekaa valley but according to a senior Israeli intelligence official, strikes are likely “all over Lebanon”. One was seen near the city’s Rafic Al Hariri International Airport.

Images released by the IDF – and verified by Sky News – show a building collapsing after being hit by an Israeli strike.

This same building was one of a number identified by Israeli forces as a target just hours earlier.

The same building was identified by the IDF in a warning posted online asking for civilians to evacuate the area. Pic: IDF
Image:
The same building was identified by the IDF in a warning posted online asking for civilians to evacuate the area. Pic: IDF

IDF spokesman Daniel Hagari warned civilians: “Anyone who will be near the sites used to finance Hezbollah’s terrorist activity is required to stay away from them immediately.”

It came just hours after Israel claimed it struck Hezbollah’s intelligence quarters in Beirut.

More on Hamas

“The IAF (Israeli Air Force) conducted an intelligence-based strike on a command centre of Hezbollah’s intelligence headquarters and an underground weapons workshop in Beirut,” the IDF said earlier on Sunday.

Flames and smoke rise form Israeli airstrikes on Dahiyeh, in the southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, Oct. 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)
Image:
Flames and smoke rise after airstrikes on Dahiyeh, in the southern suburb of Beirut. Pic: AP Photo/Hussein Malla

“Additionally, the IAF… struck and eliminated the terrorist Al-Haj Abbas Salama in the area of Tebnine, a senior commander in Hezbollah’s southern front, and terrorists Rada Abbas Awada and Ahmad Ali Hussein.”

The IDF claimed it took “numerous steps” to “mitigate the risk of harming civilians” in both instances.

Smoke rises near Beirut's Rafic Al Hariri International Airport after an explosion on Sunday. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Smoke rises near Beirut’s Rafic Al Hariri International Airport after an explosion on Sunday. Pic: Reuters

In response 160 rockets were fired over the Lebanese border into the north of Israel over the course of Sunday, the Israeli military added.

There have been tensions at the border – between the Israeli military and Iranian-backed Hezbollah forces – since the 7 October Hamas attacks last year.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Northern Gaza hospitals under Israeli siege

The conflict escalated earlier this month when Iran sent missiles directly into Israel, with the region still awaiting Israel’s response.

US officials are now investigating a possible leak of two top-secret intelligence documents around Israel’s response.

According to Sky’s partner network NBC News, the alleged leak revealed US intelligence agencies tracking possible retaliation options by Israel.

Smoke billows over the Israeli-Lebanese border. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Smoke billows over the Israeli-Lebanese border on Sunday. Pic: Reuters

Read more
UK faces increased Islamist threats
Arrest over ‘Islamic State plot on Berlin embassy’

Separately over the weekend, the Lebanese army said three of its soldiers were killed by Israeli strikes in the south of the country.

The army is not affiliated with Hezbollah, which is considered a proscribed terrorist group by most Western nations.

Israel did not comment on the reports but has previously said its fight is with Hezbollah – and not the Lebanese state – despite repeated skirmishes between the two sets of soldiers at the border over the past year.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Moment IDF blow ‘Hezbollah tunnels’ with explosives

Sunday also saw UN forces in Lebanon accuse Israel of “deliberately demolishing” an observation tower and perimeter fence of one of its positions in the border town of Marwahin.

It warned: “Yet again, we remind the IDF and all actors of their obligations to ensure the safety and security of UN personnel and property and to respect the inviolability of UN premises at all times.”

‘At least 87’ killed in single Gaza attack

Meanwhile in Gaza, at least 87 people are reported to have been killed in one of the deadliest attacks on the territory in months, according to Hamas-run health authorities there.

The airstrikes on the northern town of Beit Lahiya late on Saturday also left 40 others injured, the Hamas-controlled Gaza health ministry said.

Aftermath of Israeli strikes in Beit Lahiya. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Aftermath of Israeli strikes in Beit Lahiya. Pic: Reuters

Beit Lahiya was one of the first parts of Gaza to be targeted following the 7 October massacre last year.

Israel disputed the figures when they first emerged, which increased from 10 to 60, 73, and then 87. The Gaza health ministry does not differentiate between civilians and Hamas fighters in its death and injury numbers.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Israeli military objectives ‘switching’ in Gaza

Israel ‘switching objectives’ in Gaza

The assault on Beit Lahiya comes around two weeks on from a major strike nearby in Jabalia – home to one of Gaza’s largest refugee camps.

The IDF says it has ordered people to evacuate the area and the rest of Gaza’s north – including staff and patients in hospitals where it claims Hamas fighters are hiding – something the group denies.

An Israeli airstrike hit several houses and killed at least 73 people, according to Hamas-run media outlets.
Image:
Medics working in Beit Lahiya over the weekend


More than 5,000 people have now left Jabalia via formal routes but hospital medics are refusing to heed evacuation orders there – with many warning they are designed so Israel can control northern Gaza when the current conflict ends. Israel denies this and claims to be trying to protect civilians.

According to Sky’s military analyst Sean Bell, Israel’s renewed focus on the north of Gaza – where it began its campaign in 2023 – suggests it has “switched its objectives” to “destroying Hamas’s ability to fight entirely”.

Continue Reading

World

Zelenskyy confirms for first time Ukraine forces active in Russia’s Belgorod region

Published

on

By

Zelenskyy confirms for first time Ukraine forces active in Russia's Belgorod region

Ukraine has confirmed for the first time that its troops have entered the neighbouring Russian region of Belgorod.

Ukrainian forces have also been fighting in parts of Russia’s Kursk region, eight months after a cross-border incursion, although Russia has recaptured lost territory there.

On Tuesday, Russia’s defence ministry said it intercepted and destroyed 23 Ukrainian drones overnight over the Kursk and Belgorod regions.

Ukraine latest: Putin’s questions over ceasefire

In his nightly video address, posted on X, Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed for the first time his troops have been active in Russia’s Belgorod region as they seek to protect Ukrainian towns near the border.

He said Ukraine’s top commander, Oleksandr Syrskyi, had reported “on the situation at the front, including our presence in the Kursk and Belgorod regions”.

“We continue to carry out active operations in the border areas on enemy territory, and this is just – war must return to where it came from,” he said.

“The main objective remains the same: to protect our land and our communities in Sumy and Kharkiv regions as much as possible from the Russian occupier.”

Last month he referred to “certain steps” undertaken by Ukraine’s military in Russia “a little below the Kursk region” – suggesting a presence in the Belgorod region.

While it is the first official confirmation by Ukraine of its troops in Belgorod, Russian military bloggers had reported battles there in recent days.

Mr Zelenskyy also said that despite Russia’s recapture of areas of Kursk in recent weeks, the operation had a specific purpose.

“Thanks to the entire Kursk operation – we have managed to ease the pressure on other parts of the front, particularly in Donetsk region. It is absolutely crucial to keep destroying Russian equipment and all logistics used by the occupiers,” he said.

Map for 08/04/25 of east Kursk region of Ukraine / Russia border region
Image:
Ukraine now says its troops are operating in Russia’s Belgorod region, as well as Kursk

On Monday, Mr Zelenskyy’s hometown held funerals for some of the 20 people, including nine children, killed by a Russian missile which hit apartment buildings and a playground.

More than 70 people were also wounded in the attack on Friday night on Kryvyi Rih.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Children killed in Russian missile strike

Read more from Sky News:
Defence chiefs meet in Kyiv
Trump issues warning to Russia

Russian forces mounted several attacks on villages around the eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk, according to Ukrainian military officials posting on Telegram on Monday.

They have for months been attempting to encircle the city, an important logistics hub, but Ukrainian resistance has slowed the Russian advances in the area.

Donald Trump is trying to broker a temporary ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.

But the fighting has continued, and it remains unclear whether the US will maintain its military support for Ukraine.

Continue Reading

World

Iran denies ‘direct talks’ with US over its nuclear programme

Published

on

By

Iran denies 'direct talks' with US over its nuclear programme

Donald Trump has said the US is having direct talks with Iran over its nuclear programme – stating Iran will be in “great danger” if the negotiations fail.

The president has insisted Tehran cannot get nuclear weapons.

But Iran almost immediately contradicted the president insisting the talks due to take place in Oman on Saturday would be conducted through an intermediary.

Iran had pushed back against the US president’s demand that it enter negotiations over its nuclear programme or be bombed, but speaking at the White House on Monday, Mr Trump said: “We’re having direct talks with Iran, and they’ve started.

“It’ll go on Saturday,” he continued. “We have a very big meeting, and we’ll see what can happen. And I think everybody agrees that doing a deal would be preferable.”

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei visits nuclear centrifuges in Tehran. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei visits nuclear centrifuges in Tehran. Pic: Reuters

When pressed for more details on the talks, the US president said they are taking place “at almost the highest level”, without specifying who would take part or where they would be held.

“Hopefully those talks will be successful, it would be in Iran’s best interests if they are successful,” he said. “We hope that’s going to happen.

Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Mr Trump said Iran “cannot have a nuclear weapon, and if the talks aren’t successful, I actually think it will be a very bad day for Iran”.

However, Mr Trump’s bullish comments were not matched by Tehran. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X that indirect high-level talks would be held in Oman, adding: “It is as much an opportunity as it is a test. The ball is in America’s court.”

U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt
Image:
Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Pic: Reuters

On Tuesday, Iran’s state media said the talks would be led by Mr Araghchi and US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, with Oman’s foreign minister, Badr al Busaidi, acting as intermediary.

Mr Trump’s previous warnings of possible military action against Iran heightened already tense nerves across the Middle East.

He has said he would prefer a deal over military confrontation and in March wrote to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to suggest talks. Iranian officials at the time said Tehran would not be bullied into negotiations.

Mr Netanyahu had to sit there, listen and accept it

It now seems clear why the Israelis were summoned to the White House at short notice.

The US and Iran will sit down together to directly negotiate a nuclear deal in a matter of days.

Mr Trump didn’t say who would be taking part in the talks but said it would be “almost at the highest level”.

He wouldn’t reveal the location, and he didn’t put a timeline on it, but Washington and Tehran in close dialogue is a major development in Middle East geopolitics.

Benjamin Netanyahu had to sit there, listen and accept it.

By doing it publicly, in the Oval Office, Mr Trump has asserted his power and effectively forced the Israeli prime minister to accept the outcome.

Iran is yet to respond publicly, and it’s not clear what role Britain and France might play, as nuclear states and permanent members of the UN Security Council. Maybe none at all.

Mr Trump said Iran would be “in great danger” if the talks failed, but stopped short of explicitly saying he would order military action.

Mr Trump wants a deal, Israel will not be at the table and Mr Netanyahu’s ability to influence the talks, if he doesn’t like the way they are going, will be limited.

Some in Israeli media are describing the meeting as a humiliation for the prime minister and I suspect Mr Netanyahu will have left the White House concerned and possibly angry by what he heard.

But Mr Netanyahu has long shown an ability to force himself into the conversation – he won’t sit by and watch the talks progress without finding a way to have his say.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands outside the White House. Pic: AP
Image:
Mr Trump welcoming Mr Netanyahu to the White House. Pic: AP

Direct talks would not occur without the explicit approval of Iran’s supreme leader, who said in February that negotiations with the US were “not smart, wise, or honourable”.

During his first White House term, Mr Trump withdrew the US from a deal between Iran and world powers designed to curb Iran’s nuclear work in exchange for sanctions relief.

He also reimposed US sanctions.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Iran has since far surpassed that deal’s limits on uranium enrichment.

Tehran insists its nuclear programme is wholly for civilian energy purposes but Western powers accuse it of having a clandestine agenda.

Read more from Sky News:
Social media rumour sparks markets upturn
Two charged over Trump golf resort damage

Benjamin Netanyahu’s White House visit – his second in just over two months – was also due to include a news conference but this was cancelled earlier on Monday.

Officials said the decision was made because the Israeli prime minister and Mr Trump had “two back-to-back media availabilities (the greeting in the Oval Office and the formal news conference), and they wanted to streamline things”.

Continue Reading

World

‘Atrocious’ killing of 15 aid workers by Israel must be independently investigated, Palestine Red Crescent says

Published

on

By

'Atrocious' killing of 15 aid workers by Israel must be independently investigated, Palestine Red Crescent says

The Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) has demanded an independent investigation into the “atrocious” deaths of 15 aid workers killed by Israeli troops in Gaza in March.

The group’s president, Dr Younis al Khatib, said he had asked the UN Security Council to form an investigation committee into the “intentional killing of the medics”.

In response to Sky’s Alistair Bunkall, spokesman David Mencer claimed the killings were the result of Hamas hiding among civilians and using them as human shields.

But speaking in Ramallah, Dr al Khatib said those responsible must be held “accountable for these crimes” via international humanitarian law and the Geneva Convention.

“It’s not enough to comfort us with condolences and nice words of investigation and accountability. There has to be action taken,” he added.

He urged an “independent and thorough investigation of this atrocious crime” and that “no one should be above the law”.

“So many questions being asked of the Israelis,” he said.

More on Gaza

“Why were they killed? Why did you destroy the ambulances after killing them? Why did you try to dig deep and hide the ambulances? They have to answer for that.”

The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said on Monday that a preliminary inquiry into the shooting “indicated the troops opened fire due to a perceived threat following a previous encounter in the area”.

The IDF added that “six of the individuals killed in the incident were identified as Hamas terrorists”.

It comes after footage at the weekend showed the moment the aid workers were killed, with ambulances and fire insignia clearly visible and red lights flashing.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Phone footage contradicts Israeli claims of killing of Gaza medics

The paramedic filming, later found with a bullet in his head, is heard saying there are Israelis present and reciting a declaration of faith often used before someone dies.

He adds: “Forgive me, mother, this is the path I chose mother, to help people, forgive me, mother, I swear I chose this path only to help people.”

The Israeli military originally claimed the vehicles – which were travelling north of Rafah on 23 March – didn’t have headlights or emergency signals on and were targeted as they looked “suspicious”.

An IDF investigation is ongoing, but an Israeli government spokesman claimed on Monday that “six Hamas terrorists” were among those killed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Demands’ for medic death investigation

Still many unanswered questions

It’s now more than two weeks since 15 medics were shot dead by Israeli forces in southern Gaza and there are still many unanswered questions.

Israel initially said that the medics had been fired upon because they were behaving suspiciously and travelling without lights on.

When footage emerged at the weekend contradicting that, and showing that the vehicles were clearly marked as ambulances, the IDF released a new statement admitting that their soldiers made a mistake.

For the first time since that video was made public, Sky News was able to put a series of questions to Israeli government spokesman David Mencer about the incident.

We asked what evidence the IDF have that six of the medics killed were in fact Hamas operatives, whether they will put any of their evidence into the public domain, and whether any of the soldiers involved in the incident had been withdrawn from operational duties in Gaza until their investigation is complete.

Mr Mencer did not answer those important questions directly but told an online briefing that Hamas use ambulances to travel around Gaza, and insisted six of those killed were Hamas terrorists, without providing any new evidence, and accused the international media of readily accepting Hamas’ version of events.

However, this version of events in fact came from United Nations bodies and the Palestinian Red Crescent, reputed organisations with people on the ground in Gaza itself.

The fact that Israel has already had to dramatically change its story once is why questions will remain until they provide the evidence to back up their latest version of what happened near Rafah around dawn on 23 March.

Mr Mencer said: “IDF soldiers opened fire at a distance at vehicles moving suspiciously in their direction.

“Among the dead were six Hamas terrorists – what were Hamas terrorists doing in ambulances? The incident was reported in real time to UN officials.”

He claimed there were “many documented occasions” when Hamas had used ambulances as cover.

An evacuation order was also in place at the time, which meant moving vehicles were prohibited, according to Israel.

The head of the UN’s humanitarian affairs office, Jonathan Whittall, said the 15 people were found in a “mass grave” in the sand.

He said those killed comprised eight members of the PRCS, six civil defence members and one UN employee.

Dylan Winder, from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), said it was “outraged at the deaths” and that “even in the most complex conflict zones, there are rules”.

“They were humanitarians. They wore emblems that should have been protected. Their ambulances were clearly marked, and they should have returned to their families. They did not,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending