Connect with us

Published

on

Tougher punishments outside prison are being considered as part of a government review into sentencing.

The review will be launched on Tuesday by Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood in a bid to ease overcrowding in the prison system.

Led by former Conservative justice secretary David Gauke, the review will be activated on the same day that around 1,100 inmates are set to be released early as part of the government’s policy to free up prison space.

Latest figures show there are just over 2,000 free spaces in prisons across England and Wales – and they are expected to reach critical capacity again by July.

Politics latest: ‘Irresponsible’ Tory leadership contender criticised for remarks

Mr Gauke will explore tougher punishments outside of prison while ensuring there remains enough capacity in the system to incarcerate the most dangerous offenders, the government has said.

Among the alternatives that will be examined are community sentences and fines.

Methods used by other countries are being assessed for inspiration, including the US, where Texas has used good behaviour credits to reduce sentences.

Nudge technology, sobriety tags and home detention curfews will also be looked at in the review, with watches and apps used to encourage offenders to comply with certain conditions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘There wasn’t one space on the prison wing’

Mr Gauke, who argued there was a “very strong case” for abolishing jail terms of six months or less when he was justice secretary in 2019, said it was clear “our prisons are not working”.

“This review will explore what punishment and rehabilitation should look like in the 21st century, and how we can move our justice system out of crisis and towards a long-term, sustainable future,” he added.

Analysis: Rescuing prison system will take much more than a review


Liz Bates is a political correspondent

Liz Bates

Political correspondent

@wizbates

Bringing in former Conservative justice secretary David Gauke to review prison sentencing seems like a shrewd move from Labour.

UK prisons are full and the new government’s initial attempts to deal with that by releasing some prisoners early was met with hostility from the opposition benches.

If a Tory, with expertise in the brief, makes recommendations on how to reduce the prison population, it buys some much-needed political cover for a policy that could be tricky to sell to the public and the papers.

But what Mr Gauke’s appointment can’t cover up is that the broken UK justice system needs cash and at the forthcoming budget it may get cuts instead.

The current justice secretary Shabana Mahmood has been making the case behind the scenes and even wrote a letter to the prime minister arguing for more money.

That’s because getting back from the brink of full prisons will take much more than a sentencing review.

It will require change across every dysfunctional aspect of the justice system, from the overwhelmed probation service to the court backlogs to the slow progress of prison building.

Departmental cuts will make that necessary reform almost impossible to achieve.

So while Mr Gauke may bring answers and cross-party support, plans without money behind them are unlikely to make much impact, and it will still be Labour that gets the blame.

The review will also specifically consider whether current sentencing for crimes committed against women and girls fits the severity of the act and ask whether more can be done to tackle prolific offending.

Alongside the sentencing review, the government has also committed to creating 14,000 extra prison places and outlining a 10-year capacity strategy later this year.

Mr Gauke is stepping down as a trustee of the Prison Reform Trust while carrying out the review.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Early prisoner release sparks homelessness fears

Ms Mahmood has already taken steps to try to reduce the prison population in England and Wales, announcing plans in July to temporarily reduce how much of their sentences inmates must serve behind bars from 50% to 40%.

About 1,700 prisoners were released from jails across the two countries from 10 September in a bid to cut overcrowding.

The latest inmates to be freed early will be released from Tuesday, with expanded eligibility to include those serving sentences of five years or more.

Read more:
‘Ultimate ambition’ to close women’s prisons, says minister

Why some prisons on early release are reoffending

Ms Mahmood, who is also the Lord Chancellor, said Labour “inherited prisons in crisis, within days of collapse”.

“This review, along with our prison building programme, will ensure we never again have more prisoners than prison spaces,” she added.

Mark Day, deputy director of the Prison Reform Trust, said the “current capacity crisis has bought our criminal justice system close to collapse” and emergency measures “are not a long-term solution”.

“We urgently need to get to grips with runaway sentence inflation which has contributed to chronic levels of overcrowding and driven prison numbers and our use of imprisonment up to an unsustainable level,” he added.

The findings of the sentencing review will be submitted by next spring, while the results are expected to take effect by March 2026 at the earliest.

Continue Reading

Politics

Twenty warnings for Sir Keir Starmer from new deputy leader Lucy Powell

Published

on

By

Twenty warnings for Sir Keir Starmer from new deputy leader Lucy Powell

Labour’s new deputy leader Lucy Powell promised to be Sir Keir Starmer’s ally.

Yet in her victory speech she criticised his government and its record no fewer than 20 times. And told him to raise his game, or else.

Politics live: Follow for updates as Labour names new deputy leader

Here’s what she said – and what she meant:

  1. “Division and hate are on the rise. Discontent and disillusionment widespread.” What she meant: The Labour government has been a huge disappointment.
  2. “The desire for change is impatient and palpable.” What she meant: You’ve had 16 months to deliver change – voters are saying, “Get on with it”.
  3. “We have to offer hope, to offer the big change the country’s crying out for.” What she meant: Stop tinkering. Get more radical. You’ve got a huge Commons majority, after all.
  4. “We must give a stronger sense of purpose, whose side we’re on and of our Labour values and beliefs.” What she meant: We’re not doing enough for working people or tackling inequality.
  5. “People feel that this government is not being bold enough in delivering the kind of change we promised.” What she meant: Our voters are deserting us because they don’t see change.
  6. “I’ll be a champion for all Labour values and boldness in everything we do.” What she meant: Watch out! I’m going to hound you and hold your feet to the fire!
  7. “We won’t win by trying to out-Reform Reform, but by building a broad progressive consensus.” What she meant: Stop the lurch to the Right on immigration. We’re better than that.
  8. “It starts with wrestling back the political megaphone and setting the agenda more strongly.” What she meant: We need to sharpen up our communication and selling our message.
  9. “We’ve let Farage and his ilk run away with it.” What she meant: The Reform UK leader is running rings round us in communicating and campaigning. We’re too sluggish and flat-footed.
  10. “For too long the country and the economy has worked in the interests of the few and not the many.” What she meant: Winter fuel payment cuts were a disaster and the two-child benefit cap has to go.
  11. “Trickle down economics hasn’t worked.” What she meant: No more tax cuts for the rich. It’s time for a wealth tax, for example, to redistribute wealth.
  12. “Life has just got harder and harder, less and less secure in work, in housing, in making ends meet.” What she meant: We’re failing to tackle the cost of living crisis and housing shortages.
  13. “The deep-seated inequalities that have widened in wealth in regions in class in health need fundamentally redressing.” What she meant: We’re failing to look after our “red wall” voters.
  14. “Re-unite our voter coalition and re-unite the country.” What she meant: Start governing for everyone, urban and rural, rich and poor, North and South. Stop neglecting poorer regions.
  15. “We need to step up.” What she meant: For goodness sake, sort out the chaos in 10 Downing. Stop blaming aides and civil servants and sacking them. Get a grip!
  16. Members and affiliates “don’t feel part of the conversation or party of the movement right now. And we have to change that.” What she meant: Stop ignoring and alienating activists, MPs and unions.
  17. “Unity and loyalty comes from collective purpose, not from command and control.” What she meant: Stop the control freakery in parliament and party management. It’ll backfire.
  18. “Debating, listening and hearing is not dissent. It’s all strength.” What she meant: Listen to your backbenchers and stop suspending them when they vote against policies like welfare cuts.
  19. “As your deputy, my commitment is to change the culture.” What she meant: I’m going to stand up for rebels and critics and force you to ditch the control freakery and bad decisions.
  20. “At the election 16 months ago the British people voted for change. I’m here to do everything I can to make that change a reality.” What she meant: Raise your game, or else!

Read more from Sky News:
The one thing Farage and Polanski have in common
China ‘enemy’ reference removed from witness statement

She said it all with a smile, but there was menace there.

As deputy leader, Lucy Powell was always going to be a critical friend. So there you go, prime minister. Here’s 20 things you need to do for her to be more friend than critic.

Continue Reading

Politics

Who is Labour’s new deputy leader Lucy Powell and what does she stand for?

Published

on

By

Who is Labour's new deputy leader Lucy Powell and what does she stand for?

Lucy Powell has been elected as the deputy leader of the Labour Party.

But who is she and what does she stand for?

Powell began her career in politics working for Labour MPs Glenda Jackson and Beverley Hughes.

She then worked for a pro-EU campaign group.

After that, she ran Ed Miliband’s successful Labour leadership campaign and was his deputy chief of staff until she was elected as the MP for Manchester Central in 2012.

She has been at the forefront of Labour politics for over a decade, serving under Ed Miliband, Jeremy Corbyn and Keir Starmer.

After Labour won the last general election, she was appointed as the leader of the House of Commons in Starmer’s cabinet.

But last month she was sacked in the cabinet reshuffle and came to be seen as the anti-Starmer candidate.

During the deputy leadership campaign, Powell promised to “provide a stronger, more independent voice” for members of the Labour Party.

And in her acceptance speech, she said the government hadn’t been bold enough, and that it needed to step up.

So how much of a problem is she going to be for Keir Starmer?

Her new role – and being outside the cabinet – means she will be free to criticise the government, which could make life more difficult for the prime minister.

Read More:
Lucy Powell named Labour’s new deputy leader
Powell will take a ‘submarine approach’ – for now

Powell has been outspoken about her desire for the government to lift the two child benefit cap – and also called for the country to work for the many and not the few – a Corbyn-era slogan – and that Labour must stop handing the megaphone over to Reform and letting them run away with it.

Starmer will be conscious that an MP he sacked not long ago is now in a powerful role able to speak freely and attack his decisions.

But Powell is not free from her own controversies.

In May, Lucy Powell called grooming gangs a dog whistle issue – something she later had to clarify after it caused outrage among campaigners and opposition parties.

She also vocally defended Labour’s unpopular cut to winter fuel allowance while in cabinet, before the government then U-turned on the policy – she then criticised the proposed welfare cuts after she was sacked from government.

Powell insists she wants to help Keir Starmer, providing constructive criticism and a voice for Labour members.

But will Keir Starmer see it that way?

Continue Reading

Politics

Tax hike could lead to higher food prices, supermarkets warn

Published

on

By

Tax hike could lead to higher food prices, supermarkets warn

The UK’s largest supermarkets are calling on the chancellor to exclude stores from a new business rates surtax, warning that shoppers will bear the brunt of higher prices.

Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Marks & Spencer, Waitrose, Morrisons, Asda, Aldi and Lidl are among the stores that have signed a letter addressed to Rachel Reeves, arguing that easing taxes on grocers would help curb food inflation.

Industry group the British Retail Consortium (BRC), which organised the letter, said large shops could face higher business rates if included in the government’s proposed surtax on properties valued at more than £500,000.

Smaller high street firms are expected to benefit from reduced business rates under the government’s plans.

“If the industry faces higher taxes in the coming Budget – such as being included in the new surtax on business rates – our ability to deliver value for our customers will become even more challenging, and it will be households who inevitably feel the impact,” the letter reads.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor faces tough budget choices

“Large retail premises are a tiny proportion of all stores, yet account for a third of retail’s total business rates bill – meaning another significant rise could push food inflation even higher.”

The supermarkets are asking Ms Reeves to “address retail’s disproportionate tax burden”, saying that doing so would “send a strong signal of support for the industry and of the government’s commitment to tackling food inflation”.

More on Rachel Reeves

The chancellor is widely expected to raise taxes after bleak economic forecasts and a string of reversals on welfare cuts, which have made it harder for her to stick to her borrowing limits.

Read more from Sky News:
Retail sales the highest in three years in a surprise to economists
Oilfield services group Petrofac board on standby to handle collapse

Helen Dickinson, the BRC’s chief executive, said: “Supermarkets are doing everything possible to keep food prices affordable, but it’s an uphill battle, with over £7 billion in additional costs in 2025 alone.

“From higher national insurance contributions to new packaging taxes, the financial strain on the industry is immense.”

The Treasury has been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Trending