Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted his relationship with Donald Trump has not been jeopardised after the Republican candidate’s team accused Labour of “blatant foreign interference” in the US election.

The prime minister said on Tuesday he had “established a good relationship” with Mr Trump despite the Trump campaign filing a legal complaint against Labour officials travelling to the US to volunteer for Kamala Harris in the tightly fought presidential race.

The complaint, filed with the independent Federal Election Commission, alleged that the volunteering by Labour Party members, coupled with reports of contact between senior Labour operatives and the Harris campaign, amounted to “illegal foreign campaign contributions and interference” to help Mr Trump’s Democrat rival in the US presidential election.

Sir Keir sought to downplay the row and role Labour Party activists were playing in the US election as he travelled to Samoa for the annual Commonwealth heads of government summit.

Speaking to reporters on the 28-hour flight over, the PM stressed Labour Party members were going over as volunteers rather than on the Labour Party books.

“The Labour Party has volunteers, who have gone over pretty much every election,” he said.

“They’re doing it in their spare time, they’re doing it as volunteers, they’re staying, I think, with other volunteers over there. That’s what they’ve done in previous elections, that’s what they’re doing in this election and that’s really straightforward.”

Donald Trump. Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

The Labour Party has insisted it is not funding the travel or accommodation for activists. Federal election rules stipulate foreign volunteers can’t spend more than $1,000 (£770) helping candidates.

However, in filing the complaint, Mr Trump’s legal team cited media reports that Labour Party officials, including the prime minister’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and Matthew Doyle, Downing Street’s director of communications, had travelled to the US in recent months to advise the Harris campaign.

The Trump team also cited a now-deleted LinkedIn post by Sofia Patel, director of operations for Labour, that suggested the party could be paying accommodation costs for activists, with the post stating “we will sort out your housing”.

“Those searching for foreign interference in our elections need to look no further than [the] LinkedIn post,” said the letter from Trump campaign lawyer Gary Lawkowski. “The interference is occurring in plain sight.”

Mr Trump’s lawyers say such support breaches US campaign finance laws, as they count as contributions from foreign actors, and they demanded an “immediate investigation” into what they called “blatant foreign interference” in the election.

Read more:
Harris prepared to challenge Trump if he prematurely declares victory
Trump hits out at ‘jerk’ Obama

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer’s first 100 days explained

Starmer and Trump ‘established a good relationship’

The prime minister argued the row would not jeopardise his relationship with Mr Trump should the Republican candidate win the election, insisting the pair had “established a good relationship” when they dined at Trump Tower together last month.

Sir Keir said: “I spent time in New York with President Trump, had dinner with him, and my purpose in doing that was to make sure that between the two of us we established a good relationship, which we did, and we’re grateful for him for making the time for that dinner.

“We had a good, constructive discussion and of course, as prime minister of the United Kingdom I will work with whoever the American people return as their president in their elections, which are very close now.”

The tensions between the ruling Labour Party and possible next US president come as the prime minister travels to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) on the Pacific island of Samoa this week, where he hopes to discuss trade opportunities ahead of next week’s historic budget.

His team back in Downing Street and the Treasury are putting the finishing touches on, in the words of one insider, an “unprecedented” budget that looks to bridge a shortfall of £40bn.

To plug the gap, the prime minister and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who insisted ahead of the election they had “no plans” to raise taxes beyond what was laid out in the manifesto, are now rolling the pitch for a mix of big tax increases and spending cuts.

With such big stakes back home, coupled with a difficult run for a prime minister beset by rows over freebies and dysfunction in Number 10, one former adviser wondered aloud to me this week whether Sir Keir was spending too much time overseas when he should be focused on the domestic agenda back home and resetting his missions more clearly with the public.

However, he and his team defended the prime minister’s decision to travel to CHOGM a week before the budget, arguing these summits help to reset Britain’s relations in the world and drive trade.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Difficult choices’ in Reeves’ budget

One of his staffers noted the 56 Commonwealth nations’ economies are set to be worth $19.5trn (£15trn) by 2027 and these are markets worth tapping into.

But it is true too the leaders of the biggest Commonwealth economies are not in attendance.

Fellow G7 leader Justin Trudeau of Canada is not making the long trip to Samoa, while India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa are in Kazan as Russian President Vladimir Putin plays host to 36 world leaders at a BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) summit.

Pressure over question of reparations

Meanwhile, the prime minister is also under pressure from some Labour MPs and Caribbean governments over reparations for countries affected by slavery and colonialism.

While Sir Keir is clear he doesn’t plan to engage in this discussion at the summit, it is nevertheless rising up the agenda.

This week, the Commonwealth will select a new secretary general and all three candidates vying to replace Patricia Scotland, the former Labour cabinet minister who’s been in post since 2016, have called for reparations for countries affected by slavery and colonialism.

But as the first sitting British prime minister to visit a Pacific island in a formal capacity, the prime minister will want to make the case his is, to quote one staffer, a “once in a generation opportunity” to harness the Commonwealth.

With tensions back home over the budget and the man who could be the next president of the United States, unity this week with old allies is what he needs.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage dismisses school racism claims as ‘banter in a playground’

Published

on

By

Nigel Farage dismisses school racism claims as 'banter in a playground'

Nigel Farage has said he did not racially abuse fellow pupils while at school in a “hurtful or insulting way”.

The Reform UK leader said he had never been part of “an extremist organisation or engaged in direct, unpleasant personal abuse” but added: “Can I remember everything that happened at school? No, I can’t.”

Tories ‘scraping the barrel’ by comparing Reform and Nazi badges

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Mr Farage said there was a “strong political element” to the allegations, which were first published in The Guardian.

The newspaper reported that the former UKIP leader allegedly made racist and antisemitic comments while he was a pupil at Dulwich College, an independent school in south London.

But asked whether he racially abused fellow pupils when he was at school, Mr Farage said:No.

“And this is 49 years ago, by the way. 49 years ago. Have I ever tried to take it out on any individual on the basis of where they’re from? No.”

More on Nigel Farage

Pressed on the same question again, he replied: “I would never, ever do it in a hurtful or insulting way.”

He added: “I just entered my teens. Can I remember everything that happened at school? No, I can’t. Have I ever been part of an extremist organisation or engaged in direct, unpleasant personal abuse, genuine abuse, on that basis? No.”

Challenged on what was described as a “very caveated” answer – and that he was “not quite ruling this out”, the Reform UK leader responded: “I’ve never directly really tried to go and hurt anybody.

“Have I said things 50 years ago that you could interpret as being banter in a playground that you could interpret in a modern light of day in some sort of way? Yes.

“Have I ever misspoken in my life in my younger days when I was a child? Probably.

“I would say to you, there is a strong political element to this.”

Read more:
What tax rises could Rachel Reeves announce?
David Cameron reveals he has been treated for prostate cancer

The latest accusations come after Sarah Pochin, the Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, was embroiled in a racism row after she said it “drives me mad when I see adverts full of black people, full of Asian people”, which do not “reflect our society” – comments she later apologised for.

Mr Farage told reporters that while he was “unhappy” about the “ugly” remarks, he did not think they were “racist”.

But Sir Keir Starmer has called Mr Farage “spineless” for not taking action against Ms Pochin for “obvious racism”.

He told reporters last week: “The man is spineless. If that had been someone in my party, I’d have dealt with it straight away.

“He needs to explain the latest allegations, and whilst he’s at it, he needs to explain why he’s too spineless to take action in relation to what is obvious racism in the comments of his fellow MP.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

Published

on

By

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

Luxury cars will no longer be available for Motabiltiy recipients, it has been announced, with the government saying more money will also go to British manufacturers under changes.

The announcement comes just days ahead of the budget, although it does not appear that the announcement will have any change to government finances.

Motability is a scheme whereby people getting personal independence payments (PIP) can sacrifice part of their benefits in exchange for a rental vehicle, if they are eligible.

Politics latest: Farage responds to ‘racism’ claims

Motability vehicles are eligible for tax breaks, and the scheme has come under criticism for the notable increase in recipients without visible disabilities, alongside an increase in the volume of PIP recipients.

There has also been criticism of the luxury options available, which people can pay extra money for.

Proponents argue the scheme helps people get around and allows them to keep jobs and live more independently. The scheme also pays for adaptations to vehicles if people need them.

More on Benefits

Tonight’s announcement comes from Motability Operations, the charity which operates the scheme.

It says the aim is for 50% of vehicles leased through the scheme to be built in Britain by 2035, claiming it will support UK economic growth with a demand for 150,000 vehicles every year.

However, luxury brands such as BMW and Mercedes will be removed as options, alongside the likes of Jaguar and Land Rover, “immediately”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

In the room where the budget happens.

An announcement from Motability said: “In the short term, Motability Operations will work closely with UK-based manufacturers to increase the share of British-built vehicles leased by customers, while maintaining affordability, choice and quality.

“This includes doubling the number of Nissan British-built vehicles that the scheme leases to around 40,000.

“The intention would be that 25% of cars on the scheme would be UK-built by 2030, up from 7% today.”

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “Backing British car manufacturing will support thousands of well-paid, skilled jobs and is exactly the long-term investment our Modern Industrial Strategy delivers.

“We are growing the economy to bring down debt, cut NHS waiting lists and cut the cost of living.”

Read more:
What tax rises could be announced this week?
Reeves hints at more welfare cuts

The government is tonight refusing to say if it will change the Motability eligibility criteria in the budget, with any changes in this regard likely to come about as a result of the Timms review into PIP.

Earlier this year, the government tried to reduce the swelling PIP bill, but was defeated by its own backbenchers, launching a review chaired by minister Stephen Timms to look at the system.

Mr Timms said last month that “there will be no changes to the eligibility conditions for the mobility component of the personal independence payment” until his review finishes in a year’s time.

👉Listen to Politics At Sam And Anne’s on your podcast app👈

It is widely expected the government will increase welfare spending in the budget by scrapping the two-child benefit cap.

Taxes are also expected to rise, as the government wants to find more headroom and avoid cutting budgets.

Continue Reading

Politics

Stand With Crypto to vet 2026 candidates on digital asset positions

Published

on

By

Stand With Crypto to vet 2026 candidates on digital asset positions

Update (Nov. 24 at 7:35 pm UTC): This article has been updated to include a response from Stand With Crypto.

The cryptocurrency advocacy organization backed by Coinbase has started surveying federal and state candidates on their positions on digital assets ahead of the 2026 midterm elections in the United States.

In a Monday notice shared with Cointelegraph, Stand With Crypto said it had sent a questionnaire to an unspecified number of candidates in state and federal races, asking for information related to their positions on “digital assets, crypto innovation, de-banking, crypto mining and zoning, consumer protections,” and more. The organization also requested that respondents disclose whether they had ever held crypto or used blockchain technology.

“The next Congress will have a significant impact on whether or not the US adopts the pro-crypto policies that will foster continued economic growth, innovation, and access,” said Stand With Crypto community director Mason Lynaugh. 

Stand With Crypto said it would utilize the questionnaire’s results to determine where to focus its efforts for the 2026 midterm elections, mobilizing through events and encouraging crypto-minded individuals to vote. A spokesperson for the organization told Cointelegraph that it would distribute the forms “widely,” but did not specify the number of candidates.

The organization has already turned out voters in the 2025 election for New Jersey’s governor, which could have influenced Democrat Mikie Sherrill’s victory by about 450,000 votes.

Related: How market structure votes could influence 2026 crypto voters

All 435 seats in the US House of Representatives and 33 seats in the Senate will be up for grabs in the 2026 elections, as well as many in state-level races. In 2024, Stand With Crypto reported that 274 candidates considered “pro-crypto” based on their public statements and voting records won election or reelection.

“The questionnaire will not only significantly influence the final grade that politicians receive from Stand With Crypto, but also is the main way that candidates can receive a profile on the site for voters across the country to reference as they determine how to cast their ballots,” a spokesperson for Stand With Crypto told Cointelegraph.

Market structure paused during the US holidays?

This week, members of the House and Senate are scheduled for state work periods, meaning they will return to their home districts and states ahead of the Thanksgiving holiday on Thursday.

Although Congress has continued to make progress with a bill to establish a comprehensive digital asset market structure, the holidays and the longest government shutdown in US history are likely to slow Republican lawmakers’ plans to have the bill signed into law by 2026.

The latest estimate from Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott signaled passage early next year.