Israel has passed a law banning UN aid agency UNRWA from operating in the country – a move which the organisation’s chief said will “deepen the suffering of Palestinians, especially in Gaza”.
It would effectively bar the relief group from working in Gaza or the West Bank where access is controlled by Israel.
The development comes as at least 60 people were killed and dozens wounded in Israeli strikes on Lebanon’s eastern Bekaa Valley, Reuters reported.
UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency), which is responsible for more than five million Palestinian refugees, has come under repeated attack by Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who says it has links to Hamas and other militant groups.
The new laws passed in the Knesset on Monday banned the agency from having any ties to Israeli officials and stripped its staff of their legal immunities.
The Israeli parliament also declared the group a terror organisation.
More from World
As well as marking a new low in UNRWA’s relations with Israel, the changes are also a serious blow to the agency and to Palestinians in Gaza who have come to rely on it for aid during more than a year of war.
The legislation will take effect 60 to 90 days after Israel’s foreign ministry notifies the UN, according to the spokesman for politician Dan Illouz, one of the co-sponsors of one of the bills.
Advertisement
UNRWA’s chief Philippe Lazzarini has warned the ban “will only deepen the suffering of Palestinians, especially in Gaza”.
Juliette Touma, UNRWA communications director, said it is “the largest humanitarian organisation in Gaza. Who can do its job?”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:42
IDF raid hospital in Gaza
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the UK is “gravely concerned” at the ban, which, he said, jeopardises “the entire international humanitarian response in Gaza and delivery of essential health and education services in the West Bank”.
Calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza “simply unacceptable”, he demanded an “immediate ceasefire, the release of the hostages, and a significant increase in aid to Gaza”.
Under its international obligations, Israel, he said, “must ensure sufficient aid reaches civilians in Gaza”.
“Only UNRWA can deliver humanitarian aid at the scale and pace needed. We urge Israeli lawmakers to ensure that UNRWA can continue to deliver its essential work,” Mr Starmer said.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the measures were “totally wrong”.
US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said they were “deeply concerned” by the legislation, as “there’s nobody that can replace them [UNRWA] right now in the middle of the crisis”.
In August, nine of the agency’s staff were sacked after an investigation found they may have been involved in Hamas’s 7 October attack on Israel.
The UN began investigating alleged links after Israel first accused the group of colluding with the attack in January.
More than 1.9 million Palestinians are displaced from their homes and Gaza faces widespread shortages of food, water and medicine.
UNRWA provides education, health care, and other basic services to millions of Palestinian refugees across the region, including in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
On Sunday, seven European foreign ministries, including the UK’s, said any move to restrict UNRWA’s work would have “devastating consequences on an already critical and rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation”.
When Israel first brought the accusations against UNRWA, it initially led top donor countries to suspend their funding for the agency.
The UK resumed its fundingof the agency in July, just weeks after the Labour Party was elected.
Some 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage when Hamas militants from Gaza stormed southern Israel on 7 October 2023.
More than 43,000 people have died in Gaza, according to the territory’s health ministry, since Israel launched its military response and invasion.
He was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to commit election fraud. As it stands, he is due to be sentenced in this case later in November.
Mr Trump, who is due to be inaugurated as president in January, has also been embroiled in other state and federal criminal cases, as well as civil cases. He has pleaded not guilty to charges against him and alleged prosecutions are politically motivated.
Experts say it is likely the federal cases at least will “go away”.
‘Hush money’ – state case
This is the case relating to Stormy Daniels, for which Trump was found guilty of covering up his then lawyer’s $130,000 (£99,000) payment for her silence before the 2016 election, about a sexual encounter she alleges they had a decade earlier.
Trump is due to be sentenced in New York on 26 November – and could face up to four years in prison. His lawyers are now expected to ask Justice Juan Merchan to delay the hearing.
Advertisement
Initially set for July, Judge Merchan has already twice postponed the sentencing. This is in part due to a US Supreme Court ruling made in July, finding that presidents have broad immunity from prosecution over their official acts.
Mr Trump argues the case should be dismissed based on this, which prosecutors dispute.
Election subversion – federal case
Donald Trump is also charged with attempting to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden.
He has pleaded not guilty to criminal charges accusing him of a conspiracy to obstruct the process to collect and certify the results.
He was accused of using “dishonesty, fraud, and deceit” and spreading “pervasive and destabilising lies about election fraud”.
Again, this case has been slowed by the US Supreme Court ruling on presidents and immunity.
While he was there, he had his mugshot and fingerprints taken before being released on bail. Speaking to media afterwards, he said: “What has taken place here is a travesty of justice. We did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong and everybody knows that. I’ve never had such support.”
The election result in Georgia was memorably close, triggering two recounts, but ultimately Mr Biden won by 11,779 votes – or 0.23% of the five million cast.
It was certified by both Georgia’s Republican governor Brian Kemp and secretary of state Brad Raffensperger. But Mr Trump did not accept the result.
Prosecutors used state racketeering laws, developed to fight organised crime, to charge him and others, including his former lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Mr Trump and eight of his 14 co-defendants in the case are appealing. They are seeking to disqualify the lead prosecutor, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, over alleged misconduct.
Misuse of classified documents – federal case
Mr Trump had also faced charges over classified documents he allegedly took from the White House, including deleting CCTV footage of his staff moving boxes at his Florida home.
Details on the US nuclear weapons programmes, potential vulnerabilities of the nation and its allies, and plans for retaliatory military attacks were in some of the documents, the federal indictment said.
Prosecutors are appealing.
Civil cases
He is also appealing several civil lawsuits totalling more than $500m (about £388m), which likely won’t be affected by his win.
These include a civil fraud case in New York state, and cases brought by writer E Jean Carroll, who sued him for allegedly sexually assaulting her in the 1990s, and defaming her while he was president the first time.
The appeals court is expected to rule in the sexual assault case first, with the ruling expected at any time, according to NBC.
Mr Trump is also facing eight pending civil suits related to the attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, following his complaints of voter fraud in the 2020 election.
No trial date has been set, but with appeals these could take months or even longer to be determined, NBC reports.
So what happens now?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:07
March 2024: Donald Trump on presidential immunity
Expertssay his election victory will essentially end the criminal cases brought against him, at least for the time he occupies the White House.
He has previously said that should he become president again, he would fire US Special Counsel Jack Smith – who led thefederal prosecutions – “within two seconds” of being sworn in.
While he will indeed have the authority to fire Mr Smith and shut down the federal cases, he will not have the same control over state cases in New York and Georgia.
However, being the US president is a unique position, and means it is unlikely he will face legal consequences in either case during his term in office.
Does that mean he gets off?
Sky News US correspondent James Matthews says this is a possibility, although he adds that the two state cases “are more complicated”.
As president, Mr Trump would have the power “to appoint officials of his choice at the Department of Justice,” Matthews added, and it is “probably fair to say their brief would include dropping the two federal cases”.
Can Trump pardon himself?
This is also a possibility, Matthews said. It falls within the power of the president, although a self-pardon has never been tested legally.
The issue of a pardon doesn’t apply in state cases – however, the conviction and prosecution are weakened by the Supreme Court ruling.
“Nor can evidence of official acts be used in evidence to support the prosecution of a crime committed out of office,” Matthews said.
“In both the New York appeal and Georgia case, expect Trump’s lawyers to point to evidence used to convict him – phone calls and behaviour whilst in the role of president – and claim it relates to official acts and, under the Supreme Court ruling, should be ruled inadmissible.”
Danny Cevallos, legal analyst for Sky News’ US partner NBC, said he could say with “a lot of confidence” that the federal cases “are going to go away”.
Mr Trump could appoint an attorney general “who will simply do his bidding and dismiss the case,” he said, or he could instruct the justice department “to not even bother with the appeal of the already dismissed federal case. Those cases are, for all intents and purposes, gone”.
Next up, the hush money case. Even if sentencing does happen on 26 November, “in all likelihood, it’s not a case that he’s going to get prison time”, Mr Cevallos said, due to a number of factors.
He added: “You have someone over 75 years old, no guns, no drugs, no violence… in the spectrum of criminals who might be able to get a probation-only or house arrest sentence, Donald Trump is in a high likelihood. That’s even if the case goes forward this month for sentencing, it might not.”
Finally, the case in Georgia is “mired in appeal”, Mr Cevallos said.
“In all likelihood, those cases will be put on pause. And four years from now, who knows what the political situation will be in Fulton County, Georgia.”
Fulton County is “not good at speedy trials in complex cases,” he added, so “Donald Trump’s case may never see the light of day in Georgia”.
Germany’s ruling coalition is on the brink of collapse, triggering potential political chaos in Europe’s largest economy.
It means Chancellor Olaf Scholz and his Social Democratic Party (SDP) face heading a minority government after sacking his finance minister Christian Lindner from the pro-business Free Democrats Party (FDP).
Mr Scholz made the decision after weeks of disputes among Germany’s coalition partners over ways to boost the country’s ailing economy.
Added to that, the government’s popularity has been sinking while far-right and far-left forces have been surging.
He said Mr Lindner “has broken my trust too often”, and claimed he was focused on the short-term survival of his own party. “This kind of selfishness is utterly incomprehensible,” he added.
The three other FDP ministers – for transport, justice, and education – all voluntarily left the government.
“Olaf Scholz refuses to recognise that our country needs a new economic model,” Mr Lindner said. “Olaf Scholz has showed he doesn’t have the strength to give his country a new boost.”
More on Germany
Related Topics:
Mr Lindner had rejected tax increases or changes to Germany’s strict self-imposed limits on running up debt.
Social Democrats and the Greens, who are also part of the coalition, want to see massive state investment. They had rejected proposals by the FDP to cut welfare programmes.
Advertisement
It’s not if, but when, the coalition collapses
The German Chancellor is a controlled man, so the uncharacteristic anger on display as he announced he had sacked his finance minister and fixed a vote of confidence for January was telling.
The fractures in Germany’s coalition government have been widening for months.
The ailing economy, dismal showing in the European parliamentary elections and rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) have led to growing questions about when the coalition will collapse, rather than if it will.
Germany’s general election is currently pencilled in for September 2025 but if Olaf Scholz loses the confidence vote on 15 January, then a snap election is likely to take place by the end of March.
Current polls put the party of the former Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), in the lead followed by the AfD.
Using today’s numbers, the most likely scenario would be another coalition government potentially with the CDU, the social democrats and maybe even the Greens.
But all this is jumping ahead.
The hammer blow to the German government coalition on the day Donald Trump was re-elected is a coincidence but it’s also very bad timing.
The return of Trump raises questions around NATO, the war in Ukraine and possible trade wars in the future.
Europe now more than ever needs to be united; a task made more difficult when the leadership of its largest economic power is in crisis.
It leaves Mr Scholz relying on parliamentary majorities to pass legislation.
He plans to hold a confidence vote in his government on 15 January. The result could trigger snap elections by the end of March.
Scholz said he would ask Friedrich Merz, leader of the conservative opposition CDU, who are far ahead in polls, for support in passing the budget and boosting military spending.
Mr Merz is due to respond to the request later on Thursday.
Across 2024, Germany’s economy is expected to shrink – or at best flatline – for the second year in a row.
The country has struggled under external shocks and home-grown problems, including red tape and a shortage of skilled labour.
Ireland’s prime minister has announced the planned date for a general election to be held this month.
Taoiseach Simon Harris said he hopes the election will take place on 29 November, formally kicking off a truncated campaign which will last mere weeks.
He will travel to Aras an Uachtarain on Friday, the official residence of the Irish president, to seek the dissolution of Ireland’s Dail parliament.
Speaking to RTE News on Wednesday, Mr Harris said: “As I would have discussed with the other coalition leaders, it’s my hope that we will have polling day on this country on November 29.”
He added: “I’m looking forward to the weeks ahead and asking the people of Ireland for a mandate.”
There’s a clear reason why this election has been called
So the worst kept secret in Irish politics is finally out, and the people look set to head to the ballot boxes on 29 November.
The taoiseach employs several lofty explanations for why he has decided upon an early election, but it’s hard to look beyond political expediency.
The Fine Gael party has been flying in the polls since Simon Harris became leader in April, while the opposition is in freefall. Sinn Fein, Ireland’s main opposition party, dropped to 16% in one recent poll – the lowest level of support since 2019.
Its leader Mary Lou McDonald – once seen as Ireland’s first female taoiseach in waiting – has been battling a serious decline in support for a year, and is bogged down in firefighting a damaging series of internal party scandals, north and south of the border.
After refusing to be drawn on the election date for weeks, Mr Harris made the announcement less than an hour after his coalition partner-turned-campaign rival Micheal Martin revealed that the election would be called on Friday.
More on Ireland
Related Topics:
Mr Harris could have waited until March when the coalition’s five-year term comes to an end to go to the polls, but he has been paving the way for an election in recent weeks, announcing 10.5bn euros (£8.75bn) in tax cuts and spending increases last month.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The election will bring to an end the historic coalition that brought together Fine Gael and Fianna Fail, who had been rivals dating back to the civil war.
It saw Mr Martin, the Fianna Fail leader, taking the taoiseach role for the first half of the lifetime of the government, later replaced by then-Fine Gael leader Mr Varadkar.
The last election was seen as a monumentally successful performance for Sinn Fein, which had the highest percentage of first-preference votes, but the party has struggled in more recent local and European elections.