It’s been a whirlwind of a presidential election campaign, consisting of an assassination attempt (and another alleged one), changing candidates and some bizarre claims on the campaign trail.
With days to go before Americans head to their polling stations, here’s a recap of some of the biggest moments…
Trump shot at rally
On 13 July, Donald Trumpbecame the first president or candidate to be shot since Ronald Reagan in 1981.
The former president escaped with a bullet wound to his ear in the attack as he was giving a speech to supporters in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Image: Donald Trump held up his fist after the gunshot grazed his ear. Pic: AP
Eight shots had been fired by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, who was positioned on the roof of a nearby building, before he was killed by a Secret Service counter sniper.
Corey Comperatore, a former volunteer fire chief, was shot dead in the crowd as he tried to shield his family from the bullets.
As Mr Trump was mobbed by Secret Service agents seeking to shield him, he took a moment to pump his fist and shout “fight” to his cheering admirers in the audience.
Musk endorses Trump
On the night of the shooting, billionaire Tesla boss Elon Musk post on X saying: “I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery.”
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
This proved significant for Mr Trump, not just for the X owner’s immense social media presence and general clout – but also for his wallet.
Between July and September, Musk donated $75m (£58m) to a campaign group he set up to support Mr Trump’s presidential bid, and gave about $44m (£34m) in the first half of October, financial disclosures show.
He’s also spoken at a number of Mr Trump’s rallies.
The 81-year-old’s frequent blunders during speeches, particularly during a disastrous debate with Mr Trump a month prior, threw cold water over his push for a second term.
He instantly threw his support behind his vice president Kamala Harris, urging Democrats to donate to her campaign as he pulled out.
Harris runs for office
She got the president’s backing instantly, but Ms Harris still needed to be formally chosen as the Democrats’ new presidential nominee.
The 60-year-old had a couple of potential challengers just after Mr Biden dropped out, but it never looked in doubt once former president Barack Obama endorsed her.
In her first speech after accepting the nomination, she called for unity, saying this was “a chance to chart a new way forward”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:40
Harris addresses Democratic National Convention after nomination
‘Kamala IS brat’
Yes, Ms Harris needed her party’s backing to become its nominee, but she also needed to get potential Democratic voters on her side, fast.
A branding opportunity seemingly fell right into her lap when British pop star Charli XCX endorsed her, writing in a post on X: “Kamala IS brat”.
Out of context, it sounds like a peculiar insult.
But Charli XCX had just released her smash hit album Brat, leading to a social media trend for something known as a “brat summer”.
Instead of its typical meaning – a badly behaved or ill-mannered child – the singer had helped redefine brat as a lifestyle “characterised by a confident, independent, and hedonistic attitude”.
Ms Harris and her campaign pounced on the trend, creating artwork for her HQ campaign account which mirrored that of the Brat album.
Image: The branding on Harris’s account. Pic:@KamalaHQ/X
Image: The Brat album cover. Pic: Charli XCX
‘Childless cat ladies’
Now-infamous comments made by Mr Trump’s running mate JD Vance in 2021 resurfaced shortly after the brat endorsement.
Mr Vance, speaking to Fox News at the time, had said Ms Harris and other Democrats were “a bunch of childless cat ladies… miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made”.
“The entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children,” he said, despite the fact Ms Harris co-parents two stepchildren – Ella and Cole – with her husband Doug Emhoff.
Image: JD Vance’s comments about ‘childless cat ladies’ faced criticism. Pic: AP
Friends star Jennifer Aniston criticised Mr Vance’s remarks as she shared the clip on Instagram, writing in the caption: “I truly can’t believe this is coming from a potential VP of The United States.”
The Ohio senator said he stood by the sentiment but that his remarks weren’t a criticism of people who decide not to have children.
“This is not about criticising people who, for various reasons, didn’t have kids,” he said. “This is about criticising the Democratic Party for becoming anti-family and anti-child.”
The Harris campaign hit back at Mr Vance’s comments, saying “every single American has a stake in this country’s future”.
Trump questions Harris’s racial identity
In a move that drew gasps from the audience at a convention hosted by the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago, Mr Trump questioned the racial identity of Ms Harris, asking: “Is she Indian or is she black?”
He said: “I’ve known her a long time, indirectly not directly… and she was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage.
“I didn’t know she was black, until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black, and now she wants to be known as black, so I don’t know, is she Indian or is she black?”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:56
‘Is she Indian or is she black?’
Ms Harris is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, both immigrants to the US.
In response, Ms Harris said the comments were “the same old show” and that “America deserves better”.
But he truly made his mark with a landmark speech at the Democratic National Convention a couple of weeks later, telling his party’s faithful it was “time to turn the page” on Donald Trump.
It was the sort of speech you’d fully expect from a former American football coach like Mr Walz, as he urged his comrades to “leave it all out on the field” until election day.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:37
Tim Walz’s son leads the applause
There was seemingly no one more inspired by Mr Walz than his son Gus, who stood up midway through his speech and, through tears, proudly exclaimed: “That’s my dad!”
‘They’re eating the pets…’
You’d be forgiven for assuming cats would only play a key part in the election campaign once.
But the “childless cat lady” comments were in fact overshadowed by completely unsubstantiated claims repeated by Mr Trump and Mr Vance about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, eating residents’ household pets.
In a presidential debate between him and Ms Harris, Mr Trump said: “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats… They’re eating… they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.
“And this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:53
‘They’re eating pets in Springfield’
Ms Harris, who could be seen laughing and saying “this is unbelievable”, responded when it was her turn: “Talk about extreme.”
It was the headline-grabber in what has proved to be the only debate between the candidates, but they also clashed over issues including abortion, the economy and illegal immigration.
Almost straight after the debate, Taylor Swift told her 283 million Instagram followers she would be voting for Ms Harris.
The singer urged them to “do your research” – but said AI-generated images of her supporting Mr Trump made her realise “I need to be very transparent about my actual plans”.
The post was accompanied by a photo of the singer holding her cat Benjamin Button, and she signed off with “Taylor Swift – Childless Cat Lady”.
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
Mr Trump initially dismissed Swift’s endorsement of his rival for the presidency by simply saying he was “not a Taylor fan“.
But days later, as public opinion polls showed Ms Harris gaining significant ground on him, the former president took to his Truth Social media account to add: “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!”
‘Assassination attempt’ on Trump at golf course
A second apparent attempt on Mr Trump’s life was thwarted by the Secret Service on 15 September as the former president played golf at his course in West Palm Beach in Florida.
Ryan Routh was arrested after a rifle was seen poking through bushes near where Mr Trump was playing.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:23
The footage shows moment suspect is arrested
He had allegedly been staking out for around 12 hours before an agent spotted him and opened fire. He was detained less than an hour later, having fled the scene.
Mr Trump used the incident to demonstrate his resilience.
“Nothing will slow me down,” he wrote in a statement. “I will NEVER SURRENDER! I will always love you for supporting me.
“Unity. Peace. Make America Great Again. May God bless you.”
As a result, well over a billion dollars is said to have been spent on presidential ads targeted at the more than 60 million people living in them.
Musk has thrown his wealth behind Mr Trump in a way that’s never been seen before: by promising to give away $1m (£772,000) each day until 5 November to registered voters in swing states.
All the voters have to do to become eligible is sign his online free speech and gun rights petition.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:39
Musk hands out $1m cheques
The first $1m was awarded to a man named John Dreher during a campaign event in Pennsylvania on 19 October.
The X owner was subsequently summoned to an emergency court hearing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, accused of operating an illegal lottery and trying to influence voters.
But the lawsuit has been placed on hold while a federal court considers whether to take up the case, meaning Musk is free to continue the giveaway.
Campaigning almost over – but more drama to come
The candidates will be trying to win over voters right up until voting closes on the evening of Tuesday 5 November.
There will be live coverage on Sky News throughout election night, led by chief presenter Mark Austin, world news presenter Yalda Hakim and US correspondent Mark Stone.
Fellow correspondents James Matthews and Martha Kelner will be reporting on the ground in the candidates’ home states of Florida and California as the results come in.
As it becomes clearer who will become the next president, chief presenter Anna Botting and presenter Gillian Joseph will join Austin, Stone and Hakim for both the build-up and aftermath of the election.
On the night, Sky News will have access to the most comprehensive exit poll and vote-counting results from every state, county and demographic across America through its US partner network NBC.
You can find out more about Sky News’ coverage here.
Donald Trump has agreed to send “top of the line weapons” to NATO to support Ukraine – and threatened Russia with “severe” tariffs if it doesn’t agree to end the war.
Speaking with NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte during a meeting at the White House, the US president said: “We’ve made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons, and they’re going to be paying for them.
“This is billions of dollars worth of military equipment which is going to be purchased from the United States, going to NATO, and that’s going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield.”
Weapons being sent include surface-to-air Patriot missile systems and batteries, which Ukrainehas asked for to defend itself from Russian air strikes.
Mr Trump also said he was “very unhappy” with Russia, and threatened “severe tariffs” of “about 100%” if there isn’t a deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days.
The White House added that the US would put “secondary sanctions” on countries that buy oil from Russia if an agreement was not reached.
Later on Monday, Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Mr Trump and said he was “grateful” for the US president’s “readiness to help protect our people’s lives”.
Analysis: Will Trump’s shift in tone make a difference?
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump’s announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant.
His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge.
After criticising Vladimir Putin’s “desire to drag it out”, he said he appreciated “preparing a new decision on Patriots for Ukraine” – and added Kyiv is “working on major defence agreements with America”.
It comes after weeks of frustration from Mr Trump over Mr Putin’s refusal to agree to an end to the conflict, with the Russian leader telling the US president he would “not back down”from Moscow’s goals in Ukraine at the start of the month.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:28
Trump threatens Russia with ‘severe’ tariffs’
During the briefing on Monday, Mr Trump said he had held calls with Mr Putin where he would think “that was a nice phone call”, but then “missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city, and that happens three or four times”.
“I don’t want to say he’s an assassin, but he’s a tough guy,” he added.
After Mr Trump’s briefing, Russian senator Konstantin Kosachev said on Telegram: “If this is all that Trump had in mind to say about Ukraine today, then all the steam has gone out.”
Meanwhile, Mr Zelenskyy met with US special envoy Keith Kellogg in Kyiv, where they “discussed the path to peace” by “strengthening Ukraine’s air defence, joint production, and procurement of defence weapons in collaboration with Europe”.
He thanked both the envoy for the visit and Mr Trump “for the important signals of support and the positive decisions for both our countries”.
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump’s announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant.
His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge.
Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion.
He has variously blamed Ukraine for the invasion and blamed Joe Biden for the invasion, but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Ukraine has a legitimate right to defend itself.
Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv.
Image: Pic: Reuters
But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist “America-First” base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar “deal” in which America gains financially.
American weapons are to be “sold” to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv.
“We’ve made a deal today,” the president said in the Oval Office. “We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful… these are wealthy nations.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:27
What will Trump’s weapons deal mean for Ukraine?
This appears to be a clever framing of the “deal”. Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains.
While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance.
The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling.
However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying.
NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News.
It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:49
Will Trump’s deal make a difference?
A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe.
Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons.
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% “secondary tariffs”. It’s thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil.
This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia.
But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:00
‘Trump sides with the Ukrainian cause’
Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: “How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?”
“Don’t ask me questions like that…”
Mr Trump doesn’t really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride.
Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting.
If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win.
But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.
An X account for the Sesame Street character Elmo has been targeted by an unknown hacker who posted antisemitic and racist messages.
The profile is followed by more than 650,000 users on the social network – and usually posts upbeat and motivational updates.
Sunday’s messages, which have since been deleted, called for violence against Jews, insulted Donald Trump, and referred to alleged files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
In a statement, Sesame Workshop said the X account has now been secured – and described the posts uploaded to Elmo’s page as “disgusting”.
This is the latest controversy to befall Elon Musk’s platform in recent days.
Last week, X’s AI chatbot Grok also produced content with antisemitic tropes, which were later removed and denounced as “inappropriate”.
Musk purchased the website, formerly known as Twitter, back in 2022 – with extremist content increasing against a backdrop of less moderation.
More from Science, Climate & Tech
The Anti-Defamation League, a US organisation that fights antisemitism, said: “It’s appalling that Elmo’s official account, known for spreading kindness, was hacked solely to spread violent antisemitism.”
“Antisemitism on social media fosters the normalisation of anti-Jewish hate online and offline – and contributes to an increasingly threatening environment for Jewish people everywhere.”