Connect with us

Published

on

David Lammy has downplayed calling Donald Trump a “neo-nazi” and insisted he can find common ground with the new president-elect.

The foreign secretary said the remarks he made in 2018 were “old news” and at the time most politicians “had some pretty ripe things to say” about the then leader of the US.

Mr Lammy was speaking to the BBC’s newscast podcast a day after Mr Trump won the 2024 election with a monumental political comeback.

He revealed he recently had a meal with the incoming president and “he was a very gracious host”.

Mr Lammy said: “He did offer me a second portion of chicken. He was very generous, very gracious, very keen to make sure that we felt relaxed and comfortable in his surroundings.

“He was funny. He was warm about the UK, very warm about the Royal Family. I’ve got to tell you, he loves Scotland.”

The cabinet minister added that Mr Trump “did not even vaguely” bring up his past comments.

More on David Lammy

This includes Mr Lammy saying: “Trump is not only a woman-hating, neo-Nazi-sympathising sociopath. He is also a profound threat to the international order that has been the foundation of Western progress for so long.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Badenoch calls out Lammy at PMQs

Mr Lammy was a backbench MP in the opposition at the time, but now that he is in government with the job of foreign secretary he will have to work closely with Mr Trump – posing awkward questions for him.

Pressed on the consequences of his remarks, Mr Lammy said: “You don’t get to be a senior politician in our country unless you can find common ground.

“I’m well known in Westminster. I get along with folk. I just do.”

Read more:
Trump’s main pledges for second term
What Trump’s win means for Starmer and UK
Should we be worried about a Trump presidency?

👉 Listen to Politics At Jack And Sam’s on your podcast app👈

He added: “What you say as a backbencher and what you do wearing the real duty of public office are two different things. And I am foreign secretary. There are things I know now that I didn’t know back then, and that’s the truth of it.”

Mr Lammy was also asked about the potential impact of Mr Trump’s policies on UK trade.

Some experts have downplayed their forecasts for growth, citing concern over his proposals to put up tariffs.

Asked if the UK could seek a special trade arrangement with the US that exempts us from that plan, Mr Lammy said: “We will seek to ensure and to get across to the United States, and I believe that they would understand this, that hurting your closest allies cannot be in your medium or long-term interests.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Three US crypto bills revived after initial failure in House vote

Published

on

By

Three US crypto bills revived after initial failure in House vote

Three US crypto bills revived after initial failure in House vote

Though the House of Representatives may soon be able to consider the three bills, President Donald Trump didn’t get all Republicans to fall in line to support the legislation.

Continue Reading

Politics

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

Published

on

By

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

The EU has sanctioned multiple entities for using cryptocurrencies to evade restrictions, channel funds, and propagate pro‑Russian disinformation and election interference.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer says former Tory ministers have ‘serious questions to answer’ over Afghan data breach

Published

on

By

Starmer says former Tory ministers have 'serious questions to answer' over Afghan data breach

Sir Keir Starmer has said former Tory ministers have “serious questions to answer” about how the names of Afghans who worked with UK forces were exposed.

Nearly 7,000 Afghan nationals are being relocated to the UK after their names were accidentally sent in an email in February 2022, when Boris Johnson was prime minister, but the leak was only discovered by the British military in August 2023, when Rishi Sunak was PM.

A super-injunction, preventing the reporting of the mistake, was imposed that year in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak.

The Conservative government at the time then started transporting thousands of Afghans to the UK in secret as they were in danger.

On Tuesday, the injunction was lifted.

Politics latest: Starmer hammered over unexpected inflation rise

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Victim of Afghan data breach speaks to Sky

Kicking off Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir said: “Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen.

“The chair of the defence committee has indicated that he intends to hold further inquiries.

“I welcome that and hope that those who are in office at the time will welcome that scrutiny.”

The data breach saw a defence official accidentally release details of almost 19,000 people seeking to flee Afghanistan after the return of the Taliban.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch avoided mentioning the data breach, but Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey said it was “shocking” how it had been kept secret for three years.

Sir Ed said the prime minister will have the Lib Dems’ support if he decides to pursue a public inquiry.

Mr Healey’s Tory predecessor, Sir Ben Wallace, said he makes “no apology” for applying for the initial four-month injunction and insisted it was “not a cover-up”.

The scheme, which had been kept under wraps until yesterday, has so far cost hundreds of millions of pounds.

However, the total cost to the taxpayer of existing schemes to assist Afghans who are deemed eligible for British support, as well as the additional cost from the breach, will come to at least £6bn.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Afghans being relocated after data breach

Earlier, Defence Secretary John Healey told Sky News he is “deeply uncomfortable” with the government using a super-injunction to keep the massive data breach hidden.

He said: “I’m really deeply uncomfortable with the idea that a government applies for a super-injunction.

“If there are any [other] super-injunctions in place, I just have to tell you – I don’t know about them. I haven’t been read into them.

“The important thing here now is that we’ve closed the scheme.”

Mr Healey was informed of the breach while in opposition, and earlier this year he commissioned a review that led to the injunction being lifted.

He said “accountability starts now” and added Labour had to deal with the risks, court papers, intelligence assessments and different schemes when they came to power last summer before they could lift the injunction.

Continue Reading

Trending