Connect with us

Published

on

Shell has won its appeal against a climate court ruling that it must sharply reduce its carbon emissions.

The oil and gas producer went to the Court of Appeal in the Netherlands following a decision in support of environmental campaign groups in the country, including Friends Of The Earth.

That ruling, in 2021, ordered Shell to cut its carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 compared to 2019 levels in order to protect Dutch citizens.

Money latest: Queue ‘for miles’ as middle class status symbol goes on sale with 60% off

The emissions curbs included those caused by the use of Shell’s products.

The judge in the appeal dismissed all the claims against Shell.

The company, which exited its dual headquarters structure in The Hague in 2022 to reside only in the UK, had argued that the original district court decision was flawed on many grounds.

More from Money

They included that only nation states can set such sweeping demands and that such a cut to its business would only shift output towards its competitors without any benefit to the planet.

The ruling was handed down as the COP29 climate summit is staged in Azerbaijan and just months after Shell weakened a 2030 carbon reduction target and scrapped a 2035 objective, citing expectations for strong gas demand and uncertainty in the energy transition.

Tuesday’s judgment may not be the end of the matter.

The climate groups, which saw the case as a human rights issue, have the option to bring their own appeal to the Netherlands’ Supreme Court.

The only boost to their legal fight came from the court agreeing with the activists that Shell had an obligation to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to protect people from global warming.

The appeal court, in its findings, added however that the company was on its way to meet required targets for its own emissions though it was unclear if demands on it to reduce emissions caused by the use of its products would help the fight against climate change.

Shell chief executive, Wael Sawan, responded: “We are pleased with the court’s decision, which we believe is the right one for the global energy transition, the Netherlands and our company.

“Our target to become a net-zero emissions energy business by 2050 remains at the heart of Shell’s strategy and is transforming our business. This includes continuing our work to halve emissions from our operations by 2030.

“We are making good progress in our strategy to deliver more value with less emissions.”

Friends of the Earth director in the Netherlands Donald Pols said of the ruling “This hurts.

“At the same time, we see that this case has ensured that major polluters are not immune and has further stimulated the debate about their responsibility in combating dangerous climate change.

“That is why we continue to tackle major polluters, such as Shell.”

Continue Reading

Business

Trade war: UK car exports to US halved in May ahead of truce

Published

on

By

Trade war: UK car exports to US halved in May ahead of truce

The extent of the harm inflicted on UK car exporters from US tariffs has been revealed, with shipments plunging by more than half last month according to industry figures.

The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said the number of UK-made cars heading across the Atlantic fell 55.4% during May following a decline of just under 3% the previous month.

The dramatic slowdown marked a reaction to the 25% tariffs imposed on imports by the Trump administration from 3 April amid the president’s “liberation day” trade war escalation which sparked chaos in global supply chains.

The move prompted Jaguar Land Rover – the biggest exporter of cars to the US from these shores – to suspend all shipments temporarily.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

April: Jobs fears as JLR halts US shipments

The US is the most important market for UK producers, in value terms, and was worth £9bn last year with the vast majority of those sales coming from luxury brands also including Bentley, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars and Aston Martin.

Tariffs on UK-made cars imported into the US have since been reduced from 25% to 10% for up to 100,000 vehicles on an annual basis.

That was signed off by the president 10 days ago.

More from Money

While it spares UK producers from the worst, the US trade war does not represent the only challenge.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: The US-UK trade deal

The industry has been crying out for help to bolster its competitiveness and increase demand for new electric vehicles amid lacklustre interest, not just at home, but abroad too.

It has welcomed promised help with punitive energy costs through the government’s industrial strategy.

Wider SMMT figures showed car and commercial vehicle production fell for the fifth consecutive month in May.

It reported a 33% decline to just 49,810 vehicles and said it was the worst performance for May, when the COVID years were excluded, since 1949.

The industry body blamed continuing model changeovers, along with the impact of US tariffs.

The number of vehicles produced for the domestic market fell while shipments to the EU, which generally accounts for the biggest share of volumes, was down by 22.5%.

Read more:
Industrial strategy targets short-term pain for long-term gain

Mike Hawes, the SMMT’s chief executive, said: “While 2025 has proved to be an incredibly challenging year for UK automotive production, there is the beginning of some optimism for the future.

“Confirmed trade deals with crucial markets, especially the US and a more positive relationship with the EU, as well as government strategies on industry and trade that recognise the critical role the sector plays in driving economic growth, should help recovery.

“With rapid implementation, particularly on the energy costs constraining our competitiveness, the UK can deliver the jobs, growth and decarbonisation that is desperately needed.”

Continue Reading

Business

VIvergo bioethanol plant to close ‘due to UK-US trade agreement’

Published

on

By

VIvergo bioethanol plant to close 'due to UK-US trade agreement'

Despite “extensive” negotiations with the government, the UK’s largest bioethanol plant is to close due to the UK-US trade agreement, according to the firm that owns it.

Consultations have begun with the more than 160 employees at Vivergo’s Hull site, with all manufacturing to cease before 13 September if no funding is agreed with government, the business said.

Money blog: Top chef on overrated trend he doesn’t get

The wind-down of the factory is attributed to the recent agreement between the US and UK, which allowed for tariff-free US ethanol to enter the UK.

The agreement “undermined” the commercial viability of Vivergo, Primark’s parent company Associated British Foods (ABF) said regarding its bioethanol business.

“The situation has been made significantly worse by the UK’s trade deal with the US”, it said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What does the UK-US trade deal involve?

Unless the UK funds the company’s short-term losses and comes up with a longer-term solution, Vivergo will shut after the staff consultation and its contractual obligations are met.

More on Trade

‘Uncertain’ talks

The government committed to formal negotiations on a sustainable solution, ABF said in a regulatory update, but the outcome is uncertain.

As a result of that uncertainty, consulting staff on “an orderly wind down” is taking place at the same time.

“Extensive” discussions had already been under way with government in an effort to find a “financial and regulatory solution” so Vivergo can operate on a “profitable and sustainable basis”.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

It had set a deadline of Wednesday for that solution to be delivered, the update said.

Bioethanol is a renewable fuel made from plants. Vivergo manufactures the fuel from wheat.

In return for the UK agreeing to allow American ethanol to enter tariff-free, the US said it would reduce tariffs on imports of UK cars and steel.

In response to the news, a government spokesperson said: “We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday.

“We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.”

Continue Reading

Business

Miliband shuns £25bn UK-Morocco renewable energy project Xlinks

Published

on

By

Miliband shuns £25bn UK-Morocco renewable energy project Xlinks

The government is snubbing a £25bn renewable energy project which promised to import enough solar and wind power from Morocco to meet nearly a tenth of the UK’s electricity demand.

Sky News has learnt that Ed Miliband, the energy security and net zero secretary, has decided not to proceed to formal negotiations with Xlinks, a privately owned company, about a 25-year price guarantee agreement.

A ministerial statement is expected to be made confirming the decision later on Thursday.

Money blog: Top chef on overrated trend he doesn’t get

The government’s move to snub Xlinks after protracted talks with the company will come as a surprise to energy industry executives given the company’s pledge to deliver large quantities of power at a price roughly half of that to be generated by new nuclear power stations.

Xlinks, which is chaired by the former Tesco chief executive Sir Dave Lewis, had been seeking to agree a 25-year contract for difference with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ), which would have guaranteed a price for the power generated by the project.

One Whitehall insider said its decision was partly motivated by a desire to focus on “homegrown” energy supplies – an assertion queried by industry sources.

More from Money

Sir Dave told The Sunday Telegraph earlier this year that Xlinks would switch its focus to another country if the UK government did not agree to support the project.

The company is now expected to explore other commercial opportunities.

Xlinks had not been seeking taxpayer funding for it, and claimed it could help solve the “intermittency problem” of variable supply to UK households and businesses.

Reducing manufacturers’ energy costs was the centrepiece of the government’s industrial strategy launched earlier this week.

Sources said that market-testing of the financing for Xlinks’ construction of a 4,000-kilometre cable between Morocco and the Devon coast had been significantly oversubscribed.

Xlinks’ investors include Total, the French energy giant, with the company having raised about £100m in development funding so far.

The company has said it would be able to deliver energy at £70-£80-per-megawatt hour, significantly lower than that of new nuclear power stations such as the one at Sizewell C in Suffolk to which the government allocated more than £14bn of taxpayers’ money earlier this month.

It was unclear whether the growing risk of undersea cable sabotage was one of the factors behind the government’s decision not to engage further with Xlinks.

In an interview with Sky News in 2022, Sir Dave said Xlinks enjoyed low geopolitical risk because of Britain’s centuries-old trading relationship with Morocco and the north African country’s ambitions of growing the energy sector as a share of its exports.

“The Moroccan government has recognised that exporting green [energy] is a very important part of their economic plan going forward, so they have an export strategy,” he said at the time.

“The Sahara desert is probably one of the best places in the world to generate renewable energy from… so you have a very long period of generation.

“And if you’re capturing that energy and adding some battery storage, you can generate energy to cover a little bit more than 20 hours a day, which makes it a fantastic partner for the UK.”

The former Tesco chief added the quality of modern high-voltage cables meant energy could now be transported “over very long distances with very, very few losses”.

Sir Dave said the technology risks associated with the project were relatively small, citing examples of much longer cable links being planned elsewhere in the world.

“The benefit here is that it’s proven technology with a very committed reliable partner with a cost profile… that we will never [be able to] match in the UK,” he said.

A spokesperson for DESNZ said it did not comment on speculation, while Xlinks declined to comment on Thursday.

Continue Reading

Trending