It’s a mess, they know it, some regret it and it’s Sir Keir Starmer’s fault.
That’s the view of some at the top of government watching, dismayed, as the red-on-red conflict drags on over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, aggravating a sore which crosses party lines, dominates the airwaves for the foreseeable and creates problems which bear some of the characteristics of the Brexit days.
Whatever way you look at it, there’s a feeling there’s been a miscalculation over their handling of the assisted dying issue, and some at the top of government are quite open about this to me.
As some now acknowledge, the politics were always going to be fraught but they failed to spot this early enough, with the consequence the issue is now taking up more bandwidth than was assumed.
It has become a distraction from the main priorities of the Labour government – improving people’s living standards and securing the borders.
As a result, there will be few tears shed in influential parts of Downing Street, including by chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, if a week on Friday the assisted dying bill fails its first Commons test and ends its journey there.
More on Assisted Dying
Related Topics:
If MPs do not kill it then, the issue will hang over the government for at least the whole first half of next year, and quite possibly to the point of implementation in early 2026.
The sheer amount of parliamentary time it will take up has unnerved the whips’ office. The public don’t distinguish between government and parliamentary priorities.
Advertisement
The Labour leader’s ‘mistake’
The mistake was made in March. Sir Keir promised broadcaster and campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen to “make time” “…early in the next parliament”.
At that point they thought they were being smart – not to commit a possible future Labour government on the issue one way or another ahead of an election and leave it to MPs’ consciences – and inside Labour HQ this must have sounded like a pain-free promise ahead of polling day by a party not wanting to annoy any section of the electorate.
But they appear not to have gamed the consequences.
Social liberals v Blue Labour social conservatives
This issue pits social liberals against Blue Labour social conservatives, with each side digging in and Sir Keir (previously on record in favour) now set to vote in the opposite side of the chamber to his deputy Angela Rayner.
Wes Streeting will be set against his own fellow health ministers, and symbolically – a Labour prime minister against a Tory leader of the opposition.
Image: Health Secretary Wes Streeting
That there are two sides to this isn’t a surprise, even if the volume of complaining is now unnerving them.
Ministers can’t sidestep debate
A bigger issue for the government is they underestimated how ministers are being dragged into the centre of the debate, even though they are meant to be remaining neutral.
Ministers are finding they cannot simply sidestep this debate, as happened in previous votes of conscience such as gay marriage and abortion.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
This is because of the active and complex involvement of the government legal and health systems if the legislation passes and assisted dying is permitted in law.
This may be a private members’ bill, but it will be for the government to determine which doctors perform the assessments, and who carries out the end-of-life service for those that qualify.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:43
What is assisted dying?
Take one question that has been left hanging: whether a newly formed part of the NHS provides the end of life drugs, or whether it is something that can be done by the private sector.
According to allies of Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP fronting the legislation, it is up to the secretary of state for health to decide whether this is done publicly or privately.
I’m told there’s a presumption this is done in the public sector, yet other countries have private services like Dignitas carrying out the procedure for a fee, and in an era of constrained resources, could this be an option?
This part of the debate seems largely to have been passed over – yet there are huge cost benefits should the government allow the private, not public sector, to carry out the service.
Overall I’m told there will be no impact assessment – which sets out the costs of assisted dying legislation – until and unless the legislation passes second reading.
At that point it will be done by government, not parliament. This means MPs will be engaging in one of their most totemic votes of this parliament without access to all the facts – and being asked to commit on partial information. This has left some unhappy, unsurprisingly.
This was an easy promise – but it’s proving much harder to deliver than expected.
British Palestinians have called on Sir Keir Starmer to take “immediate, concrete” steps on Gaza instead of “focusing on a symbolic gesture” of recognising it as a state ahead of an emergency cabinet meeting.
The prime minister has recalled his cabinet ministers from parliamentary recess for a meeting at 2pm, when they will discuss what the UK’s next steps should be, after Sir Keir held meetings with Donald Trump yesterday.
Ahead of the cabinet meeting, the British Palestinian Committee (BPC), which represents the experiences of Palestinians in the UK, has sent Sir Keir a letter urging him to take actions they say could make a real difference to people in Gaza.
The war has now been going on for 21 months after it was sparked by Hamas militants killing 1,200 Israelis and taking 250 hostages on 7 October 2023. The militant group still holds 50 hostages, of whom only 20 are believed to be alive.
The BPC said recognising Palestine as a state is now “symbolic” as it “will not end the genocide and must not be used to deflect from accountability”.
Sir Keir has been under pressure from his own MPs and other UK political parties, notably since France said it will recognise Palestine as a state, but has so far resisted – saying recognition needs to be part of a wider peace plan.
He has so far refused to say whether “genocide” is taking place in Gaza – a claim Israel has vehemently denied.
Israel has paused fighting in three areas for another 10 hours today to help aid distribution, the third day it has done so amid mounting international condemnation of the scenes of hunger unfolding in Gaza.
David Mencer, a spokesperson for the Israeli government, said: “There is no intent, (which is) key for the charge of genocide… it simply doesn’t make sense for a country to send in 1.9 million tonnes of aid, most of that being food, if there is an intent of genocide.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:39
Sky News on board Gaza aid plane
The BPC, an independent group, said the government has “not only a political and moral obligation, but a legal obligation” to take three steps.
They are:
• Preventing and punishing Israel’s “genocide” in Gaza and to end “all complicity in it”
• Apply “immediate and comprehensive sanctions on Israel”
• Safeguard the rights to freedom of expression and assembly in the UK
More specifically, the group has called on Sir Keir to end “all forms of military collaboration, urgently review all public contracts to ensure they are not aiding unlawful occupation or genocidal acts, and support universal jurisdiction mandates”.
Image: The BPC said the UK could take immediate steps to help starving Gazans. Pic: Reuters
The group said these steps would help towards ending the starvation crisis in Gaza, which it said had been made possible “due to the impunity granted to” Israel and “compounded by the active military, economic and diplomatic support from states such as the UK”.
The group also accused the UK government of introducing “draconian legislation to limit the rights” of British citizens campaigning to end the atrocities “and British complicity in those atrocities” – in reference to Palestine Action being designated as a terrorist organisation.
‘Immediate steps’ Britain can take
Dr Sara Husseini, director of the BPC, said: “We wrote to the prime minister to remind the UK cabinet of their legal obligations towards the Palestinian people.”
She said there are a “number of immediate steps” the British government “can and should be taking”, as outlined in the letter.
Dr Husseini said 147 countries have already recognised Palestine as a state, and instead of “focusing on a symbolic gesture” it is essential the UK severs diplomatic ties with Israel, institutes a full arms embargo, applies comprehensive sanctions and cuts trade.
“Anything short of this amounts to complicity,” she added.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
22:05
Has Trump broken from Netanyahu over Gaza?
Ahead of the cabinet meeting, senior minister Peter Kyle told Sky News the PM had decided to call an emergency meeting “to discuss all of the actions that Britain can and should be taking at a time like this”.
He said recognising Palestine as a state is a manifesto commitment but the “real priority” right now is to try to get aid into Gaza.
Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana’s new party will offer “unapologetically socialist” policies, with the pair to embark on a nationwide tour to listen to ideas, Sky News understands.
The former Labour MPs are aiming to hold the party’s first conference in the autumn to help decide what it stands for and models of leadership.
Ms Sultana told Sky News its policies will include “democratic public ownership of key industries, universal free childcare, rent controls, free public transport and much more”.
Mr Corbyn, the ex-Labour leader, added there is “huge appetite for the policies that are needed to fix society”, including “wealth redistribution, housing justice, and a foreign policy based on peace and human rights”.
The autumn conference will be for paid members rather than those who have simply signed up to the party’s website.
How to translate signups into membership, and exactly how members will have their say on policies, will be discussed as part of a “founding process” over the next few months.
This will involve local engagement with communities up and down the country, including rallies and meetings fronted by Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana, as well as “other public figures”, a source close to the party told Sky News.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
Corbyn’s new party shakes the left
Election goals
While there are many details to be fleshed out, including the name, the pair’s “primary aim” is to make gains at the local elections next May, it is understood.
Insiders have claimed they are attracting support from a wide geographical area, the strongest bases being in London, the North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber.
It remains to be seen whether those who have expressed an interest will go on to join the party.
However, there is a risk it could eat into Labour’s vote share by attracting those on the left unhappy with the direction of the Starmer government, particularly on issues like Gaza and welfare.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:51
Corbyn open to ideas on new party name
Mr Corbyn led the Labour Party from 2015 to 2020 before being suspended following a row over a report into antisemitism. He retained his seat in Islington North after standing in last year’s general election as an independent.
Polling by More in Common before the new outfit was officially announced suggested it could take 10% of the vote at a general election, mainly from Labour and the Greens.
This has raised the prospect of Mr Corbyn striking a deal with the Greens, where both sides would agree to stand down in seats where the other has a stronger chance of winning
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
The Islington North MP has suggested he is open to collaboration with progressive parties, but it is understood that electoral strategy will be informed by conference. It is also not clear if the Greens would agree to any such pact.
Some MPs are worried the split in the left vote could make it easier for Nigel Farage, already ahead in the polls, to enter Downing Street.
Patrick Hurley, the Labour MP for Southport, told Sky News: “The thing I’m worried about with regard to the unnamed but already chaotic Corbyn Party is that they let Reform through the middle by taking votes off a progressive centre left party like Labour.
“They won’t be a threat electorally, but they may well let the radical right wing into power by splitting the vote.”
However, Labour was dismissive of the threat the party posed, with a source saying: “The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn-led party.”
Corporations have accumulated 1% of all Ether since June, with Standard Chartered forecasting 10% ownership as institutional appetite for ETH continues to grow.