Share on Pinterest Taking daily walks could increase your life span by up to 11 years, new research finds. Fertnig/Getty ImagesA new study says that regular walking could help you live longer.Those who were most active moved the equivalent of 160 minutes of walking per day.People who are not very active could gain as much as 11 years of life by walking more.Walking increases life span by improving cardiometabolic health.Its important to start slow and build up to your walking goal.
According to a study published online on November 14, 2024, in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, getting less physical activity is linked with premature death.
However, the researchers found that increasing physical activity for example, taking daily walks could extend how long people live.
If people were as active as the top one-quarter of Americans, they could live around 5 years longer.
Additionally, if people who are among the least active brought their activity up to this level, they might add an additional 11 years to their lives.
The authors further speculated that infrastructure changes like walkable neighborhoods and green spaces, which help promote activities like biking and walking, could lead to greater longevity within the general population. Greater physical activity linked to living longer
To conduct their study, the researchers gathered data from people older than age 40, which was collected via activity trackers for the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
They also used 2019 U.S. Census data as well as 2017 death data gleaned from the National Center for Health Statistics.
The team then created a mathematical model to predict how different levels of physical activity could influence how long people lived.
They found that the 25% of individuals who were most active engaged in activity levels equivalent to walking 160 minutes every day at a pace of 3 mph.
Based on this, they estimated that if all people boosted their activity to this level, they could increase their life expectancy from 78.6 to 84 years an increase of over 5 years.
However, being in the lowest 25% of activity was associated with a decrease in life expectancy of around 6 years.
If these less active individuals logged an additional 111 minutes of walking each day, though, they could conceivably experience even greater benefits, living nearly 11 years longer. How walking might increase longevity
John Lowe, MD, a physician at Restore Care specializing in preventive health and lifestyle medicine, who was not involved in the study, explained that regular walking has several beneficial effects that contribute to a longer life.
It can help you decrease your resting heart rate, manage cholesterol, and reduce your chances of heart attack or stroke.
Walking can be useful for glucose metabolism, he added, because [it is] known to enhance insulin actions, which would enable better blood sugar management and reduce the chances of type 2 diabetes. A walk after meals is particularly effective for blood glucose control.
Regular walking can also protect the body from systemic inflammation, according to Lowe. Systemic inflammation has been associated with several chronic diseases in epidemiological studies.
Maintaining a walking routine helps downregulate inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), which helps improve immune system responsiveness and maintain cellular health, he concluded. How to get started walking more daily steps
Dr. Sean Ormond, a pain management doctor with Atlas Pain Specialists, who was also not a part of the study, said that walking doesnt have to take a large commitment to make a difference for you.
Start with small, doable changes that fit into your daily life, he said. For example, instead of finding the closest parking spot, park farther away and enjoy the walk. Swap the elevator for the stairs when you can. Take five- or ten-minute walking breaks during your workday maybe a quick lap around your house, office, or even your yard.
Ormond added that taking a gentle walk after meals can be beneficial because it helps you digest your food and doesnt feel like exercise.
If you have kids or pets, make walking a family affair, he suggested. [I]ts a great way to bond while staying active.
If youd like to take a more structured approach, Ormond said step-counting apps and fitness trackers can make walking more fun. Set small, realistic goals, like an extra 500 steps a day, and build from there, he said.
Also, he said that people shouldnt become discouraged if the 160 minutes of activity mentioned in the study seems like a daunting goal.
Every step you take is a step toward better health, said Ormond. What matters most is consistency.
So, lace up your shoes and see where a walk can take you physically, mentally, and emotionally. Its one of the easiest ways to nurture your body and mind for years to come, he said. Takeaway
A new study has found that greater amounts of physical activity are associated with living longer.
Setting a goal to walk 160 minutes per day could increase peoples lifespan by around 5 years.
Also, those people who are least active could increase their longevity by as much as 11 years.
Walking helps you live longer because it has beneficial effects on your cardiometabolic health.
To get started with walking, make small, realistic changes, keep things fun, and build up slowly.
Former Labour deputy prime minister John Prescott has died aged 86, following a battle with Alzheimer’s, his family has announced.
The former trade union activist and ex-merchant seaman served as MP for Kingston upon Hull East for 40 years and was a key part of New Labour under Sir Tony Blair.
His family said he had “spent his life trying to improve the lives of others, fighting for social justice and protecting the environment”.
Lord Prescott died peacefully, surrounded by relatives at his care home on 20 November.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:52
The John Prescott ‘punch’ moment from 2001
In a statement released after his death, his wife Pauline and sons Johnathan and David said that representing the people of Hull had been his “greatest honour”.
They said: “We are deeply saddened to inform you that our beloved husband, father and grandfather, John Prescott, passed away peacefully yesterday at the age of 86.
More on John Prescott
Related Topics:
“He did so surrounded by the love of his family and the jazz music of Marian Montgomery.
“John spent his life trying to improve the lives of others, fighting for social justice and protecting the environment, doing so from his time as a waiter on the cruise liners to becoming Britain’s longest-serving deputy prime minister.
Advertisement
“John dearly loved his home of Hull and representing its people in Parliament for 40 years was his greatest honour.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:00
Former deputy PM John Prescott dies
They continued: “We would like to thank the amazing NHS doctors and nurses who cared for him after his stroke in 2019 and the dedicated staff at the care home where he passed away after latterly living with Alzheimer’s.
“In lieu of flowers and if you wish to do so, you can donate to Alzheimer’s Research UK.
“As you can imagine, our family needs to process our grief so we respectfully request time and space to mourn in private.
The death of John Prescott – the longest-serving deputy prime minister in British history – has sent shockwaves through British politics.
Serving in Neil Kinnock’s shadow cabinet before becoming Tony Blair’s deputy, Prescott was a political giant and an incredibly influential working-class voice in the Labour movement.
The son of a railway signalman and the grandson of a miner, Prescott offered a fresh working-class perspective in stark contrast to Tony Blair’s wealthy Oxbridge background: something that Blair has said undoubtedly contributed to Labour’s electoral success.
Current deputy prime minister Angela Rayner has been compared to John Prescott for providing Starmer with a working-class teammate with a trade union background, but Prescott’s colourful life and authenticity – even when that meant punching a protester for throwing an egg at him – can never be emulated.
Whatever he’s remembered for – from the Kyoto Protocol, being a mediator between Blair and Brown, or perhaps his personal issues – there is no doubt that his career will go down in history as a consequential contribution to the Labour movement.
‘A great man and great servant of country and party’
Lord Prescott served as deputy leader under Sir Tony and was seen by many as a key link to the party’s traditional working-class values amid the modernising push.
The two of them became known as “the odd couple”.
Paying tribute, Sir Tony said he was “devastated” by news of Lord Prescott’s death.
Sir Tony described him as “one of the most talented people I ever encountered in politics” who could “talk in the bluntest and sometimes bluest language”.
He added: “He was from proud traditional working-class stock yet understood instinctively and completely the aspirations of that class and their desire to better themselves.
“It is no exaggeration to say the Labour Party could never have won three consecutive full terms without John.”
Sir Tony continued: “Underneath what could be a fierce exterior, and a manner some undoubtedly found intimidating, beat a loving, kind and compassionate human heart.
“John was as good a friend as you could ever hope to have, with a deep sensitivity, even vulnerability.
“He will deservedly occupy a special place in the pantheon of the Labour leadership; he will be mourned by his many friends and fans around the world and for me personally, today is a day of profound sadness but also immense pride in having known him and worked with him: a great man and great servant of country and Party.”
King tribute to ‘unique character’
The King also paid his respects to Lord Prescott’s achievements and praised his “indomitable character”.
“I am deeply saddened to learn of the death of Lord Prescott,” he said. “I remember with great fondness his unique and indomitable character, as well as his infectious sense of humour.
“My thoughts and greatest sympathy are with Lord Prescott’s wife, family and loved ones at such a difficult time, and I am sure that very many people will recognize and greatly appreciate Lord Prescott’s decades of public service in front-line politics.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Lord Prescott famously punched a protester who threw an egg at him during an election campaign visit in North Wales in 2001.
During much of his time in office, Lord Prescott acted as a mediator between Sir Tony and then-chancellor Gordon Brown.
Mr Brown said: “Few achieve something akin to heroic status in their own lifetime, particularly when having to deal with the compromises of being in government, but John Prescott became – and will remain – a legend of the Labour Party”.
He added: “John Lennon said the working class hero is a difficult thing to be, but I think John would be just fine with being remembered that way.”
Baroness (Harriet) Harman told Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast Mr Prescott was “instrumental in reassuring traditional old Labour voters” who may have been put off by Tony Blair’s New Labour project.
Once in government, “he fought to make sure” the party delivered for “those people who felt left behind”, she added.
“People talk about the Red Wall – John Prescott was the Red Wall.”
He also served as secretary of state for the environment, transport and regions and helped negotiate the international climate change treaty the Kyoto Protocol.
Former US vice president Al Gore worked with Lord Prescott on the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.
He said he had “never worked with anyone in politics – on my side of the pond or his – quite like John Prescott”.
He added: “He possessed an inherent ability to connect with people about the issues that mattered to them – a talent that others spend years studying and cultivating, but that was second nature to him.”
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was “deeply saddened” to hear the news of Lord Prescott’s death.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
While a loyal supporter of Sir Tony in office, Lord Prescott subsequently became critical of parts of the legacy left behind by New Labour.
This included denouncing Britain’s involvement in the Iraq War.
He also defended Jeremy Corbyn during his time as party leader in the face of fierce criticism.
He was ennobled in 2010 but ceased to be a member of the upper House in July after facing health difficulties.
He had only spoken once in the chamber since suffering a stroke in 2019, and had not voted since February 2023.
Born in Prestatyn, Wales, on 31 May 1938, the son of a railwayman left school aged 15 to work as a trainee chef, then as a steward on the Cunard Line before entering politics in a career that spanned decades.
Long-awaited legislation to abolish England’s “feudal” leasehold property system will be published in the second half of next year, the government has confirmed in a major update for the millions of people affected.
In a Written Ministerial Statement (WMS), housing minister Matthew Pennycook gave the first details of how quickly Labour intend to axe the controversial form of homeownership, as promised in their manifesto.
The minister said there will be a consultation and white paper early next year to get the plan in motion, with the aim to make commonhold “the default tenure” by the end of parliament in 2029.
The news has drawn a mixed reaction from those caught up in the system, with some hailing an end in sight and others saying it is too little too late.
What is leasehold?
Leasehold is a centuries-old form of tenure that is unique to England and Wales. People who buy their home with a lease buy the right to live there for a given number of years but don’t own the land itself, regardless of whether it is a house, or a flat in a building.
More from Politics
That is the preserve of the freeholder, who can charge expensive ground rents simply for owning the land, as well as service charges for the maintenance and insurance of the properties.
There have long been concerns around leaseholders being exploited, especially by unregulated managing agents who are typically contracted to oversee the day-to-day running of buildings and can charge large fees on any works they arrange.
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:44
Michael Gove in 2023: Leasehold ‘unfair form of property ownership’.
Criticism intensified after the building safety scandal that emerged post-Grenfell with many homeowners facing crippling bills for remediation, leaving them stuck in worthless properties they cannot sell.
That’s the case for leaseholder Peter Batt, who has not been able to live in his “once lovely” flat in Kent for the past nine months because the roof of the building has “completely failed and is disintegrating”.
This has caused damp, black mould and leaks so severe his neighbour’s ceiling below him has collapsed
The problems were raised to the building’s managing agents in February but no remediation has occurred.
Last week he was told he’d need to cough up £18,000 for his share of the works before any repairs can go ahead – money the 60-year-old doesn’t have.
“I genuinely see no way out unless I win the lottery, it’s been an utter nightmare”, he told Sky News.
Mr Batt and his neighbours want a temporary tin hat cover to be prioritised, given this was recommended by surveyors back in April to stop the situation deteriorating – which they say it now has.
But they have “no say over this despite shouldering all the costs”, Mr Batt added.
“The government need to look at root-and-branch reform because, in my experience, all the parties currently charged with maintaining building such as my own are incentivised almost solely around maintaining their revenue stream.
“Under the current system, no one is on the leaseholders’ side and that has to change.”
‘Death knell of leasehold’
In his WMS, Mr Pennycook said the government will introduce a “comprehensive new legal framework” on commonhold, including banning the sale of leasehold flats and converting existing leasehold tenures to the new model.
Proponents of commonhold say it would drive up safety standards, as it would give flat owners more control of the maintenance of a building while removing the cash incentive for developers to build homes on the cheap – knowing leaseholders can pick up the costs.
Sebastian O’Kelly, of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, welcomed today’s announcement as the “death knell of leasehold”.
He advised people not to buy leasehold properties as “the market will force pace on this”, pointing out that some developers have recently come out in support of commonhold while others “whose reputations have been shredded by the Grenfell findings will follow”.
He told Sky News: “With this momentum the reforms to improve the blighted lives of existing leaseholders will be eased. Government may think this process will be slow, but house builders will know that the leasehold game they have played so assiduously is busted.”
Delay in implementing Tories’ ‘half-baked’ reforms
But there was a more muted response from the National Leasehold Campaign, which has spent six years trying to dismantle the system.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
‘Exorbitant’ ground rents for ‘no service’
As well as announcing a roadmap for abolishing leasehold, Mr Pennycook set out a timeline for implementing reforms in the Tories’ Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act (LFRA), which just about made wash-up when Rishi Sunak called the July election, after being watered down by then housing secretary Michael Gove.
The LFRA promised to abolish leaseholds on new houses but not new flats, which make up 70% of the estimated 5 million leasehold properties in England.
It also aimed to give leaseholders more rights and protections, but Mr Pennycook said the act was “half baked” so there would be delays in implementing some of its measures.
Crucially, that includes rules around new valuations, which will be consulted on next summer, he said.
‘Endless cash cow continues’
The NLC called this “very disappointing” as the mechanism was designed to make it quicker and cheaper for people to buy their freehold or extend their lease “enabling them to sell their properties and move on with their lives”.
“Our main concern now is the fate of existing leaseholders who are currently suffering at the mercy of unregulated managing agents and unscrupulous freeholders,” it added.
“The government’s published intention to ‘act as quickly as possible’ will not be quick enough and we are already seeing the despair from some NLC members who are facing bankruptcy due to escalating service charges.
“Since 2018, leaseholders have heard time and time again from former government ministers that they will end the abuses but in reality nothing has changed for existing leaseholders. Using our homes as an endless cash cow continues and millions remain trapped.”
Some hospitals in England were within “six or seven hours” of running out of personal protective equipment in the early stages of the COVID pandemic, a former health secretary has admitted.
Matt Hancock, who is no longer an MP, told the COVID public inquiry that some hospitals came “extremely close” to running out of stock in the first wave of the pandemic in spring 2020.
Mr Hancock, who was health secretary between 2018 to 2021, was giving evidence at the latest session of the UK COVID-19 Inquiry, looking at the impact the pandemic had on healthcare systems, patients and health care workers.
This morning he was booed by a protester as he arrived to give evidence at the inquiry.
Lead counsel to the inquiry Jacqueline Carey KC asked the ex-cabinet minister: “Do you accept that entering the coronavirus pandemic as we did, without a single gown, severely hampered the ability to provide safe and appropriate PPE for healthcare workers?”
He replied: “The stockpile that we had was not as good as it needs to be in the future, absolutely.”
More on Covid-19
Related Topics:
Pressed on whether England ever ran out of personal protective equipment (PPE), Mr Hancock said: “As a whole? No, but individual locations did.
Referring to the supply of gowns in April 2020 – in light of reports that some nurses at hospital in London had been forced to wear bin bags as protection – Mr Hancock said: “Gowns, I think, at one point, we got to within six or seven hours of running out.”
Advertisement
“We were working incredibly hard to make sure that we didn’t have a stock out. We nearly did.”
The inquiry, which has also heard other government figures including Boris Johnson and former prime minister Rishi Sunak, is examining the government’s response to the pandemic.
Mr Hancock also admitted during the inquiry session he believed the government “got wrong” the way funeral guidance was “applied” across the country during the pandemic.
During the early days of the COVID crisis, the number of people who could attend funerals was limited, with mourners told to keep two metres apart and only the closest relatives advised to attend.
“Where I think we got it wrong was how the funeral guidance was applied on the ground. It wasn’t as had been intended,” he told the inquiry.
“But of course funerals were places where people gather and are deeply emotional, and people come together, and that was also the thing that was driving the spread of the virus.
“These were very difficult considerations.
“Broadly, on balance, I think they were about right, but we can go through every single decision, and you can easily make an argument one way or the other.”