Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has promised change as he outlined his government’s “milestones” – but bringing migration down failed to make the list.

The prime minister revealed the government’s six milestones he said would be reached by the end of this parliament.

He said they would “drive forward” his party’s missions and allow the public to “hold our feet to the fire”.

Politics latest: Starmer says milestones are ‘really risky’ for Labour

Billed as a “Plan for Change”, which he insisted was not a reset, migration was not on the list of milestones despite Labour previously saying borders and the economy were their two top priorities.

Quizzed on why it was not, Sir Keir told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby that migration needs to come down – something he has said before.

Sir Keir said: “It is our duty to do it [bring migration down]. And we will do it.”

More from Politics

He refused to set a target or timeline.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Where is immigration in PM’s milestones?

The milestones Sir Keir announced are:

• Raising living standards in every part of the UK – aim to deliver highest sustained growth in the G7

• Rebuilding Britain – build 1.5m homes in England and fast track planning decisions on at least 150 major infrastructure projects

• Ending hospital backlogs – 92% of patients will wait no longer than 18 months

• Putting police back on the beat – with 13,000 additional officers and a named police officer for every neighbourhood

• Giving children the best start in life – getting 75% of five-year-olds in England ready to learn when they start school

• Securing home grown energy – putting the UK on track to at least 95% clean power by 2030.

Ed Miliband arriving ahead of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer welcoming the Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani to 10 Downing Street.
Pic: PA
Image:
Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband said the official definition of net zero was 95% clean energy. Pic: PA

Sir Keir admitted Labour’s target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029 may be “a little too ambitious” but denied he was going to change it.

He said the government faces an “almighty challenge” to hit these milestones by the end of this parliament as he denied the goals are not ambitious, saying they are “really risky” for Labour.

The PM was also questioned by journalists over the government’s net zero target because the Plan for Change document said the milestone of securing home grown energy would put the UK “on track to have at least 95% clean power by 2030”.

He insisted it was not a revision of Labour’s original target to get to 100% net zero by 2030.

Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband said after the speech the Climate Change Committee’s original definition of “clean power…is 95% low-carbon, zero-carbon energy and that’s the definition we’re using”.

Sir Keir also used his speech to accuse Whitehall of becoming “comfortable with failure” and promised “a profound cultural shift away from a declinist mentality”, as well as honesty about the “trade-offs” required to achieve his aims.

Alex Burghart
Image:
Conservative Alex Burghart said the speech showed Labour had lost their way. File Pic: PA

Senior Conservative Alex Burghart said he thought the speech was “probably the first reset of many” and accused Labour of having “clearly lost their way”.

“It is very difficult to believe anything that this government says,” he said.

“And this is a government that broke its promise to pensioners, broke its promises to businesses, to working people, to farmers. You know, the list goes on.

“So, it’s all very well them coming up with a bunch of pledges today but they’ve got a track record of not doing what they say they are going to do. So why should we listen to them now?”

Continue Reading

Politics

What’s behind Starmer’s reset?

Published

on

By

What's behind Starmer's reset?

👉Listen to Politics At Sam And Anne’s on your podcast app👈       

As MPs return to Westminster for a packed autumn term, will the prime minister be back with a bang?

Sky News’ Sam Coates and Politico’s Anne McElvoy discuss Keir Starmer’s priorities as the so-called “reset week” begins.

There’s chatter around No 10 of a staffing restructure but could this impact the government’s message and delivery of its missions?

Back in the Commons, the home secretary will lay out the government’s plans to restrict family members from joining asylum seekers.

Continue Reading

Politics

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

Published

on

By

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

According to some Republican lawmakers, the first crypto-related priority in the Senate will be to pass legislation for market structure.

Continue Reading

Politics

Sir Keir Starmer’s ‘Mr Fixit’ is likely to be a recipe for conflict

Published

on

By

Sir Keir Starmer's 'Mr Fixit' is likely to be a recipe for conflict

After a torrid time before the summer break, Sir Keir Starmer has reshuffled his inner circle again on the first day back. 

This has become something of a habit.

Politics latest: Cooper pledges to end use of asylum hotels ‘for good’

Although none of the Number 10 team are household names or public figures, the tally of those cycling through the top jobs is worth noting.

As of now, he’s had four chiefs of staff – the incumbent returning to the job, two cabinet secretaries with a third rumoured to be on the way and five directors of communications – a job that routinely fails to last a year these days.

The lesson this tells us is that when there’s blame to go around, Sir Keir is happy to apportion it to his closest aides.

In an interview today, the prime minister was clear that these changes are about moving to a new phase of government, more focused on delivery.

More on Keir Starmer

A delivery phase implies legislation completed and a focus on implementation. Bluntly, this is not the case or an accurate assessment of the job that now needs to be done.

The autumn term is not about implementation.

It’s about filling the £20bn to £40bn black hole we expect to emerge in the autumn budget, as well as continuing to deal with an uncertain world globally, and deciding on massively tricky domestic issues like reform of special educational needs and whether to revisit welfare reform.

We are still at the “big choices” section of this parliament, not the delivery phase.

The big choice in Sir Keir’s reset on Monday has been to bring in his own Mr Fixit into Downing Street.

He chose a mid-level cabinet minister, Darren Jones – until today the number two in the Treasury – and has parachuted him into his office to oversee policy.

This is an appointment, I’m told, that was pushed and encouraged by Rachel Reeves because of Mr Jones’ role in the spending review.

As chief secretary, Mr Jones is meant to have gone item by item through every department’s budget. He knows where the financial bodies are buried and will be a major alternate source of advice for Sir Keir to individual cabinet ministers.

Read more:
Angela Rayner a ‘great British success story’, says PM
Reform deputy hits back after Archbishop’s intervention

This is undoubtedly a recipe for conflict. There are already some around the cabinet table who found Mr Jones’ style a touch brusque. His fans say this is part of why he is effective: he is prepared to challenge what he’s told, is an independent thinker and unafraid to challenge big beasts.

He will now play this role permanently, on behalf of the prime minister, and structurally, this means he is bound to be disliked by several of these colleagues who will no doubt, in time, seek to undermine him, just as he will challenge them and have the last word with Sir Keir.

No matter that some might be surprised at the choice, as a fiscal and reforming hawk, since few would put him on the same ideological wing of the party as the prime minister. He is also a late joiner to the Starmer project, although joining in opposition spent years longer than some as chair of the business select committee rather than taking more junior roles.

This is now immaterial. He is responsible for making Sir Keir’s government work in practice. His colleagues could do worse than to sincerely wish him good luck and leave him to it, as there is a great deal to be done.

Continue Reading

Trending