
We finally got to test drive the Lucid Gravity which just nabbed an EPA range of 450 miles
More Videos
Published
6 months agoon
By
admin
It’s been a four-plus-year journey for Gravity – Lucid Motors’ second flagship SUV. Since it was first unveiled, I’ve followed Gravity’s development closely, itching to get behind the wheel of a full-fledged production version to test drive – and that day has finally come, my friends. Last week, I took a trip to Lucid’s design studio, where I had my most intimate encounter with the Gravity SUV to date, including a brief but informative test drive around the Bay Area. There, I also learned that the official range of the Lucid Gravity is an impressive 450 miles. Check out images and a video of my experience below.
As mentioned above, Gravity has been a top-of-mind discussion whenever Lucid Motors comes up, and its journey to production and soon deliveries has been exciting. Way back when Lucid shared a launch video of its flagship sedan, the Air, we caught a brief glimpse of its encore EV, Gravity, silhouetted by the sun.
Since then, I’ve been clamoring for more details about this SUV, which represents Lucid’s next step in delivering a wider range of vehicle options that will eventually become less catered to the affluent and more available to all, especially when its “Mid-size” EVs launch after Gravity.
For now, however, Gravity represents Lucid’s venture into all-electric SUVs and has delivered a level of design luxury, technological innovation, and modularity it is becoming renowned for. We caught our first public glimpse at Gravity in November of 2022 before catching some camo’d road testing the following April.
In November of 2023, Lucid officially launched Gravity, sharing some initial details, including a frunk seat and an estimated range of 440 miles. This past January, I got my first up-close look at the new SUV at Lucid’s assembly plant in Casa Grande, Arizona, when the company kicked off Phase Two of its EV production lines, which includes Gravity builds.
Gravity orders opened in October with a Grand Touring available now, followed by a Touring trim starting at under $80,000 set to arrive in late 2025. Last week, while I was with the Lucid team in California, it completed its first Gravity production build set for customer delivery.
As the early versions of the Gravity finally begin to reach reservation holders, I got the chance to test out a pre-production version and have shared my thoughts below. Additionally, we’ve learned that the official EPA range of the Lucid Gravity will be 450 miles, higher than initially promised.
The Lucid Gravity “compromises nothing,” including range
To begin my latest visit to Lucid HQ, I did a walkthrough with Gravity and senior vice president of design and brand Derek Jenkins. Derek showed me a slideshow explaining the design that went into Gravity, some of which I had seen and some entirely new to me.
Jenkins explained Lucid’s new marketing mantra, “Compromise nothing. ” After learning more about Gravity inside and out and taking it for a spin, I can honestly say that the American automaker stayed true to its new ethos on this one.
Gravity is a beautifully assembled, for lack of a better phrase, “hodge podge” of the best elements in luxury vehicles and SUVs, culminating in a modular, spacious, luxurious, tech-forward, and perhaps most importantly, efficient model.
It was here that Jenkins informed me the EPA range of the Lucid Gravity had been secured, and the Grand Touring trim it’s launching first delivers 450 miles of range on a single charge. That’s better than the 440 miles originally announced.
Whenever anyone ever questions Lucid’s success to date or its future in EV sales, I always point to the company’s technology. It’s unmatched. I’ve been a believer since I got exclusive access to Lucid’s powertrain facility in Arizona, and the public is just now starting to grasp just how ahead of everyone this automaker is.
A prime example is the RWD Air Pure, which accomplishes a world-leading efficiency of 5 miles per kWh. That same technology went into the tri-motor Air Sapphire and is a huge reason why it is able to drive so fast and so far with a significantly smaller battery pack than its competitors.
Lucid is building electric motors that are smaller, more powerful, and more efficient than anyone. As such, the company can deliver vehicles that require fewer batteries that are lighter and cost less to mass produce, which in turn helps drive down the cost for customers. I don’t think people will truly grasp this advantage until mid-size comes out, but I digress; the evidence has been right in front of everyone this entire time.
Jenkins told me that Lucid’s goal with Gravity was to out-space and out-utilize traditional SUVs and out-sport the Porsches and Lamborghinis. The pillars of that approach are design strategies common amongst all SUV manufacturers, but it’s always been a give-and-take approach, e.g., space over agility, performance over range, capability over luxury, or practicality over sustainability. By compromising nothing, Lucid has assembled a new breed of SUV that checks all of those boxes and delivers five pillars in one vehicle:
- Space: Utility, comfort, flexibility
- Efficiency: Range, charging speeds, sustainability
- Design: Sophistication, craftsmanship, again, sustainability
- Performance: On-road and off-road capabilities, handling, acceleration
- Digital experience: A cabin that is Intuitive, immersive, connected
For that reason, I’d describe the Lucid Gravity as about ten cars in one, combining the best qualities of each to create a truly impressive EV with world-class range and efficiency.
Aside from range, Lucid Gravity marvels in space utilization
A key factor many people can’t truly grasp from 2D images of the Lucid Gravity is just how spacious it is, even for an EV that is comparable or even smaller in height and length than its competitor. As many of you know, EV architecture enables OEMs to customize the floor of their vehicles to allow more interior and cargo volume. However, you still need to store all those batteries, motors, and inverters; some are better at it than others.
I’d argue that Lucid is again a leader in this design approach, using a 900V platform nonetheless. For example, the Lucid Gravity is shorter and lower than nearly all of its SUV competitors, including OEMs like Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Rivian, and Chevrolet. At the same time, the Gravity delivers significantly better cargo volume (120 cu. ft. in the five-seat layout and 114.3 cu. ft. in the seven-seater). Lucid shared that’s over 40% more cargo space than the Mercedes EQS SUV, which is quite spacious in its own right.
Let’s not forget the Gravity’s frunk, which offers an additional 8.1 cubic feet of cargo space and a bench for people who want to sit and tailgate, watch the sunset, or just flex on everyone while at a public charger. You may first be turned on by the look and range of the Lucid Gravity, but when you experience it close-up, its the little additions that make it a standout in the SUV segment.
For example, Lucid was able to utilize an additional 6.2 cu. ft. of storage in the trunk behind the rear wheels. This section is perfect for storing luggage or for hiding the third row away cleanly and flatly. Speaking of the third row, that two offers some of the most legroom in its class by only sacrificing a bit of headroom due to its low aerodynamic shape. I climbed back into the third row before my test drive and was impressed at how much room I had, even without moving the second row up, which you can do if needed. Have a look (I’m 5′ 11″):

In so many SUVs, the third row is only suitable for children because adults’ knees often end up pressed right up against the second row. You either have to sit at an angle or suck it up, counting down the minutes before you get to your destination and can stretch out. Not ideal.
Or, you can buy a massive SUV like a Chevy Tahoe, which will give you that needed space, but it is inefficient and complex to park in tight areas due to its enormous size. I want to reiterate that Lucid has utilized every square inch of Gravity’s footprint with the driver and their passengers in mind. It’s a family-friendly SUV that can stow everyone’s luggage without a roof rack and house an 8-foot surfboard. Did I mention that the Lucid Gravity Grand Touring version also offers 450 miles of EPA range?
Sure, its sleek and luxurious and has a ton of space, but how does it drive?
I’ve been asking myself that same question for over a year now, and finally, I got my chance to test out Gravity on public roads. Spoiler alert—it was awesome.
Gravity feels so much like Air, I forgot I was driving an SUV
I want to preface my driving impressions by stating that I was in a pre-production Gran Touring version of the Gravity, and some features were missing, like its awesome AR head-up display, which I was bummed I couldn’t experience yet. Still, I’m sure I’ll get a much longer drive opportunity soon, and I will follow up with a more comprehensive review.
For now, I can share my thoughts on a 20-minute drive around Newark, California. Despite the limited time behind the wheel, it was easy to grasp Gravity and how it handles. Upon first getting behind the wheel and heading off, my initial impression was based on the overall feel—not just in terms of the handling but also the interior and driver positioning.
All I could say at first was, “This drives like a Lucid.” The two techs in the SUV with me smiled at one another and told me they were happy to hear that because that’s precisely what the team was striving for when they fine-tuned it.
My second takeaway was how small and nimble it feels for a larger vehicle. If you’ve read my work, you’ll know I’ve driven every trim of every model year of the Lucid Air to date, so I’m very familiar with how those EVs drive. I immediately felt at ease and in control of Gravity and would say it drives exactly like an Air despite being significantly larger. At one point, I forgot I was in an SUV until I checked my rearview mirror and saw three rows behind me.
The dual motor was A+ in acceleration, and you know I’m a stickler for one-pedal driving. Gravity did not disappoint. The regenerative braking is stiff but not jarring and is extremely easy to master. After hitting a couple of cloverleaf exit ramps as fast as I could, we hit a service road to test out launch mode. I hit 0-60 mph in under 3.5 seconds and would have loved to keep pushing it if I hadn’t run out of road.
The Gravity Grand Touring’s 828 hp and 909 lb-ft of torque cannot be ignored and, again, contribute to my argument that this SUV drives like a sedan. To turn around, we hit a tight u-turn to demonstrate the SUV’s 38-foot curb-to-curb turning radius – another helpful slight advantage Gravity has over larger SUVs.
However, the most impressive feature I learned about Gravity is its optional air suspension package, which exemplifies the “all-in-one” design package I’ve described. The Grand Touring I drove was equipped with Lucid’s multi-chamber spring air suspension, which can not only raise the SUV to varying heights but you can also adjust its stiffness to deliver three different sensations, whether it is a plush and smooth ride in “Smooth” mode, a sportier more Porsche-like feel in “Swift” mode, or a track-friendly “Sprint” mode that rides comparable to an Aston Martin DBX 707.
With the air suspension, Lucid is also working to deliver a “Terrain Mode” that will roll out as a software update to take the Gravity off-road. Derek Jenkins told me it won’t enable you to drive up Moab, but it will offer competitive off-road capabilities in the SUV segment. Versatility is the nucleus of this EV, in my opinion.
Because I was in a pre-production model, the UX of Gravity wasn’t all there, but Lucid is looking to deliver what it called “UX 3.0,” which should (hopefully) solve many of the bugs that popped up through the production of the Air sedan. I certainly hope so because the lack of premium, dependable software feels like the only factor holding Lucid back from being the best in the business in most EV categories.
The only last little tidbit I noticed is that Gravity’s passenger doors open a full 90 degrees to help parents access car seats and furry friends more easily. This is an excellent idea that many customers will love, but probably more in the comfort of their own driveway. The rear doors are quite long and, when fully open, would definitely clang up against a vehicle in the spot next to them. It’s not ideal for parking lots, but it’s a welcomed feature nonetheless.
Overall, the Gravity SUV is a slam dunk of an EV if you have the money to buy one. Lucid continues to lead the industry in range and efficiency with Gravity and is even taking some of those design lessons and modular improvements and circling them back into future models of the Air sedan. I’m sure we will see many of these design elements in “Mid-size” as well, so I’ll repurpose my Gravity countdown clock for that next model.
In the meantime, I’m looking forward to a more extended drive experience with Gravity and will share more thoughts on my experience after that. If you live near a Lucid showroom, I recommend stopping in and seeing if they have the SUV on display yet so you can explore all the little details that went into making an SUV that seems to indeed “compromise nothing…” except maybe a second mortgage on your house, but it may be worth it.
The Lucid Gravity Grand Touring is on sale now at a starting MSRP of $94,900. Check out some video footage we shot with the Lucid Gravity below:
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
Opinion: it’s time to start recommending some Tesla alternatives
Published
15 hours agoon
May 24, 2025By
admin

For years, Tesla has been the go-to EV recommendation for “normals” looking for a painless, low-effort experience from their first electric cars. In light of questionable recalls and its CEO’s recent involvement in controversial politics, however, people are starting to distance themselves from the trailblazing company.
All that begs the question: what should we recommend to EV noobs now?
Despite early quality issues and ongoing service headaches, the groundbreaking S3XY lineup of EVs have always had a secret weapon in the form of the Tesla Supercharger network.
That network of dependable high-speed chargers, paired with solid app integration that makes it easy for Tesla drivers to find available chargers just about anywhere in the US, gave the brand a leg up – but no more. By opening up the Supercharger network to brands like Ford, Hyundai, Kia, and others, Tesla has given away its biggest competitive advantage.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Add in charging and route-planning apps like Chargeway, that make navigating the transition from CCS to NACS easier than ever with its intuitive colors and numbers and easy on/off switch for vehicles equipped with NACS adapters, and it feels like the time is right to start suggesting alternatives to the old EV industry stalwarts. As such, that’s exactly what I’m going to do.
Here, then, are my picks for the best Tesla S3XY (and Cybertruck) alternatives you can buy.
Less Model S, more Lucid Air

Developed by OG Tesla Model S engineers with tunes from Annie Get Your Gun playing continuously in their heads, the Lucid Air promises to be the car Tesla should and could have built, if only Elon had listened to the engineers.
With panel fit, material finish, and overall build quality that’s at least as good as anything else in the automotive space, the Lucid Air is a compelling alternative to the Model S at every price level – and I, for one, would take a “too f@#king fast” Lucid Air Sapphire over an “as seen on TV” Model S Plaid any day of the week. And, with Supercharger access reportedly coming later this quarter, Air buyers will have every advantage the Supercharger Network can provide.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Model 3, more Hyundai IONIQ 6

Hyundai has been absolutely killing it these days, with EVs driving record sales and new models earning rave reviews from the automotive press. Even in that company the IONIQ 6 stands out, with up to 338 miles of EPA-rated range and lickety-quick 350 kW charging available to make road tripping easy – especially now that the aerodynamically efficient IONIQ 6 has Supercharger access through a NACS adapter (the 2026 “facelift” models get a NACS port as standard).
The company’s sole electric sedan hasn’t seen the same sales success as IONIQ 5, of course – but that has more to do with America’s insatiable lust for crossovers and SUVs than any shortcoming inherent in the IONIQ 6 itself. All the same, Hyundai is helping dealers clear out its remaining 2024 and ’25 models with 0% financing for up to 48 months through June 2nd.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Model X, more Volvo EX90

Once upon a time, Mrs. Jo Borrás and I were shopping three-row SUVs and found ourselves genuinely drawn to the then-new Model X. Back then it was the only three-row EV on the market, but it wasn’t Elon’s antics or access to charging, or even the Model X’s premium pricing that squirreled the deal. It was the stupid doors.
We went with the similarly new Volvo XC90 T8 in denim blue, and followed up the big PHEV with a second, three years later, in Osmium Gray. When it’s time to replace this one, you can just about bet your house that the new 510 hp EX90 with 310 miles of all-electric range will be near the top of the shopping list.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Model Y, more Kia EV6

If half the fun of driving a Model Y is terrifying your passengers with its straight-line speed, then the Kia EV6 has to be a serious contender for a replacement.
The sporty EV6 GT made its global debut by drag racing some of the fastest ICE-powered cars of the day, including a Lamborghini, Mercedes-AMG GT, a Porsche, even a turbocharged Ferrari – and it beat the pants off ’em. Combine supercar-baiting speed with an accessible price tag, NACS accessibility, $10,000 in customer cash on remaining 2024 models ($3,000 on 2025s) and just a hint of Lancia Stratos in the styling, the EV6 is tough to beat.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Cybertruck, more therapy

It’s not bulletproof, it’s not easy to upfit, it shouldn’t be used for towing, and it won’t win in a straight fight against a vinyl picket fence. By just about every standard “truck” metric, the Tesla Cybertruck falls short against the competition from Chevrolet, Ford, and Rivian. On a more subjective front, the Cybertruck has become a symbol for a conservative movement that is (depending on your point of view) either making America great again or plunging a once-great democracy into an era of fascist oligarchy and widespread stupidity.
In short, it’s probably best to skip the CT.
If you disagree with that statement and feel like driving a new Tesla Cybertruck is the key to happiness, I’m not sure an equally ostentatious GMC Hummer EV or more subtle Rivian R1T will help you scratch that particular itch – but maybe therapy might!
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Original content from Electrek.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Republicans won’t defeat EVs – but in fighting them, may kill US auto industry
Published
19 hours agoon
May 24, 2025By
admin

Republicans launched multiple attacks against EVs, clean air and American jobs this week, at the behest of the oil industry that funds them. These attacks won’t be successful, and EVs will continue to grow regardless, and inevitably take over for outdated gasoline vehicles.
However, these republican attacks on EVs will still have some effect: they will diminish the US auto industry globally, leading to job losses and surrendering one of the jewels in the crown of American industry to China, where there is no similar effort to destroy its own domestic EV industry.
Republican attacks on clean air this week included moves to block funding that has led to a renaissance in US manufacturing and also to illegally block clean air laws. They also moved forward with a procedural step towards increasing US fuel costs by $23B, an effort which the former reality TV contestant posing as the head of the DOT announced in January.
These moves shouldn’t be a big surprise – republicans have opposed clean air and American jobs for many years now, and they’re doing it because they want to maintain the bribes they get from the oil industry.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
But they should inspire worry for Americans, because they will only harm the country’s domestic manufacturing base in the face of a changing auto industry.
Republicans keep trying to kill clean cars
The last time a republican occupied the the White House, we saw similar efforts to try to raise fuel and health costs for Americans, and to block superior EV technology from flourishing. That didn’t work in the end, and EVs continued to grow both during that period and after.
All the while, fossil fuels have maintained their privileged policy position, being allowed to pollute with impunity and costing the US $760 billion per year in externalized costs. Much of that subsidy is accounted for in the cost of pollution from gas cars, which are one of the primary uses of fossil fuels, which means that, in fact, gasoline vehicles receive much more subsidy than EVs do.
And yet, EVs still managed to grow substantially, despite these headwinds. EV sales have continued to grow, both in the US and globally, even as headlines incorrectly say otherwise. The republican party’s attempts to kill them were futile, and will continue to be.
It didn’t work, but it did delay progress
However, anti-EV actions from Mr. Trump and the republican party did manage to delay progress from where it could have been if America actually instituted smart industrial policy earlier.
What if, instead of the bumbling, idiotic nonsense we went through the last time Mr. Trump squatted in the White House, we could have had something more like President Biden’s EV policy, which created hundreds of thousands of jobs and attracted hundreds of billions of dollars of manufacturing investment?
Surely the American auto industry would be ahead of where it is now if those investments had had time to come online. But instead, republicans are currently trying to kill those jobs, which has already led to several manufacturing projects being cancelled this year, depriving Americans of the economic boost they need right now.
Meanwhile, there’s one place that this sort of stumbling isn’t happening: China.
China is taking advantage
China has spent more than a decade focusing on securing material supply, building refining capacity, developing their own battery technology, and encouraging local EV manufacturing startups.
This has paid off recently, as Chinese EVs have been rapidly scaling in production in recent years. It took a lot of the auto industry by surprise how rapidly Chinese companies have scaled, and how rapidly Chinese consumers have adopted them, after having an initially slow start.
But that adoption hasn’t just been local, it’s also global. Last year, China became the largest auto exporter in the world, taking a crown that Japan had held for decades. But the change was even more dramatic than that – as recently as 2020, China was the sixth-largest auto exporter in the world, just behind the US in 5th place.
China’s dramatic turn upward started in 2020, and now it’s in first place. Meanwhile, because of all the faffing about, the US remains exactly where it was in 2020 – still in fifth place. Well, sixth now, since China eclipsed us (and everyone else).
Tariffs won’t fix it
The reaction of the rest of the world’s automaking countries has been to put tariffs on Chinese autos, hoping to forestall the country’s dramatic rise to dominance. (Although, due to Mr. Trump’s idiotic flailing, Europe is already talking about removing these trade barriers with China)
But tariffs have been tried before, and they didn’t work. When Japan had a similarly meteoric rise to global prominence as an auto manufacturer in the 1970s and 80s, largely due to their adoption of new technology, processes, and different car styles which incumbents were ignoring, the US tried to stop it with tariffs.
All this did was make US manufacturers complacent, and Japan still managed to seize and maintain the crown of top auto exporter (occasionally trading places with Germany) from then until now.
Then as now, the true way to compete is to adapt to the changing automotive industry and take EVs seriously, rather than giving the auto industry excuses to be complacent. But instead, republicans aren’t doing that, and in fact are working to ensure the American auto industry doesn’t adapt, by actively killing the incentives that were leading to a boom in domestic manufacturing investment.
US auto industry jeopardized by republicans
Make no mistake about it: destroying EV incentives, and allowing companies to pollute more and innovate less, will not help the US auto industry catch up with a fast moving competitor.
As we at Electrek have said for years, you cannot catch up to a competitor that is both ahead of you and moving faster than you.
This applies to individual companies, which took their sweet time responding to the challenge from electric upstarts like Tesla, and have now lost market share to said upstarts and let a competitor establish itself in a big way (even though Tesla’s CEO is now trying desperately to harm his own company specifically, and the US EV industry as a whole, by being the largest funder of the party working to destroy said industry).
It also applies to nations, which could have spent the last decade doing what the Chinese auto industry has been doing, but instead non-Chinese automakers have been begging their governments for more time, even though it’s not the regulations that threaten them, it’s competition from a new and motivated rival that is moving faster and in a more determined manner towards the future.
The way that we get around this should be clear: take EVs seriously.
But that’s not what republicans are doing, and in doing so, they are signing the death warrant for an important US industry in the long term.
Another thing republicans are trying to kill is the the rooftop solar credit, which means you could have only until the end of this year to install rooftop solar on your home before the cost of doing so goes up by an average of ~$10,000. So if you want to go solar, get started now, because these things take time and the system needs to be active before you file for the credit.
To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Heavy equipment space race heats up with new Vermeer lunar excavator
Published
19 hours agoon
May 24, 2025By
admin

International equipment manufacturer Vermeer has unveiled a full-scale prototype of its Interlune excavator, a machine designed to ingest 100 metric tons of rocks and dirt per hour, extracting valuable helium as it makes its way across the surface … of the Moon.
Helium plays a critical role in the manufacturing of semiconductors, chips, optics, and all the other stuff that makes EVs, autonomy, the Internet, and the rest of twenty-first century life possible. The problem is that, despite being the second-most common element in the universe, helium is pretty rare on Earth – and we are rapidly running out. As such, there are intense economic and political pressures to find new and reliable sources of helium somewhere, anywhere else, and that demand has sparked a new modern space race focused on harvesting helium on the Moon and getting it back home.
To that end, companies like American lunar mining startup Interlune and the Iowa-based equipment experts at Vermeer are partnering on the development of suite of interplanetary equipment assets capable of digging up lunar materials like rocks and sand from up to three meters below the surface, extract helium-3 (a light, stable isotope of helium believed to exist in abundance on the Moon), then package it, contain it, and ship it back to Earth.
“When you’re operating equipment on the Moon, reliability and performance standards are at a new level,” says Rob Meyerson, Interlune CEO. “Vermeer has a legacy of innovation and excellence that started more than 75 years ago, which makes them the ideal partner for Interlune.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Enter: Japan

America isn’t the only spacefaring nation eyeing a helium mine on the Moon. Japan announced similar plans back in 2023, with Japanese construction giant Komatsu announcing plans to develop a fully electric excavator capable of operating on the lunar surface.
The company showed a scaled prototype of the machine at the 2025 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas (above), emphasizing the need to develop new ways to operate equipment assets in the extreme temperatures of extraplanetary environments beyond diesel or even hydrogen combustion.
On the airless surface of the moon, it would be impossible for an internal combustion engine to operate on the moon’s surface because there is no oxygen for combustion. Electrically powered machines seem the obvious solution with solar power generation supplying the electricity. But the answer is not that simple.
Temperature changes on the surface of the moon are extreme. They can soar to 110° C and plummet to -170° C. Developing electric construction machinery to perform in this environment is no easy task, but Komatsu is tackling issues one by one as they appear. Using thermal control and other electrification technologies, we are engineering solutions.
Despite Komatsu’s apparent head start, however, Vermeer seem to pulled ahead – not just in terms of machine development, but in terms of extraction potential as well.
“The high-rate excavation needed to harvest helium-3 from the Moon in large quantities has never been attempted before, let alone with high efficiency,” said Gary Lai, Interlune co-founder and CTO. “Vermeer’s response to such an ambitious assignment was to move fast. We’ve been very pleased with the results of the test program to date and look forward to the next phase of development.”
Interlune is funded by grants from the US Department of Energy and NASA TechFlights. In 2023, the company received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research award to develop the technology to size and sort lunar regolith (read: dirt). Interlune has raised $18 million in funding so far, and is planning its first mission to the Moon before 2030.
Electrek’s Take

We’ve got space travel, weird mineral extraction from another planet that’s essential for our technology, and a rapid, unchecked proliferation of AI. All we need now is big worms, a whole bunch of hallucinogenic narcotics, and the will to smash up a bunch of data centers with baseball bats – then we’ll have a pretty decent Dune LARP going. Yee-ha!
SOURCE | IMAGES: Interlune.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway