Connect with us

Published

on

The post may be seen as glittering and the man as controversial and divisive but beyond those truths, the role of British ambassador to Washington is pivotal and relationship-defining.

That is particularly the case right now: to navigate the “special relationship” through Donald Trump‘s second presidency.

And so this is not a decision that would have been taken without serious consideration despite the baggage some may see Lord Mandelson as carrying.

It follows months of speculation over who could get the job.

‘Brutal’ figure ‘an inspired choice’ – politics latest

Back last summer, before Trump won the election, a candidate had already been identified by former prime minister Rishi Sunak. He’d given the nod to his national security advisor Sir Tim Barrow, a former ambassador to Russia and the EU.

But then Sunak lost the election. He was out along with his pick. One of diplomacy’s best jobs and Washington’s finest buildings was almost to be Barrow’s, but not quite. What a blow.

More on Donald Trump

Trump’s victory focused minds. It required a particular candidate and doubtless a particular type of character – not necessarily the same type as would have been chosen to navigate a Harris administration.

Lord Mandelson is a political shapeshifter. He is a sharp and agile operator. He is decisive and direct. But he also understands the sensitivities of navigating Trump’s unpredictable and transactional style.

All those traits could be applied to the person Lord Mandelson will take over from.

British ambassador to the US Karen Pierce pictured in May. Image: AP
Image:
British ambassador to the US Karen Pierce pictured in May. Pic: AP

Dame Karen Pierce became ambassador in 2020 towards the end of Trump’s first term.

A career diplomat, she moved into the role after the previous ambassador, Sir Kim Darroch, was effectively kicked out of America by Trump after a series of less-than-complementary diplomatic cables were leaked.

Dame Karen and her team rebuilt the relationship with Trump’s team and then fostered good terms with the Biden administration with close work on issues like Ukraine.

Read more:
How William and Trump’s meeting was arranged
Trump’s top team – here’s who is in and who is out

And under her leadership the embassy has forged close ties with the incoming Trump administration.

Some view Trump’s presidency as an existential challenge for global diplomacy. Pierce does not see him in quite those terms and nor does Peter Mandelson.

👉 Tap here to follow the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts 👈

While an extension of her term was an option for Sir Keir Starmer, sources tell me that it seems more sensible to build on the work she has done with a new ambassador who can get to know the incoming White House team from day one.

His trade background will be seen as vital. It’s a background Pierce doesn’t have. Carving out some sort of trade deal with America at a time when Trump is promising stinging tariffs will be a challenge.

Where Mandelson may fall short is foreign and military policy. In a particularly unstable world, US-UK foreign policy alignment is vital. Mandelson’s experience here does not compare to that of Karen Pierce.

Hours after the Lord Mandelson announcement, embassy staff gathered for their Christmas party in the ambassador’s residence.

No Ferrero Rocher but certainly a nostalgic vibe. Pierce has been diplomatically very effective and is very popular among staff.

Continue Reading

US

Charlie Kirk shooting suspect makes first in-person court appearance

Published

on

By

Charlie Kirk shooting suspect makes first in-person court appearance

The man accused of killing right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk has appeared in person at court for the first time.

Tyler Robinson, 22, from Utah, is charged with aggravated murder in relation to the shooting of Kirk on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem.

Charlie Kirk pictured in December 2024. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Charlie Kirk pictured in December 2024. Pic: Reuters

Video of the incident showed Kirk, 31, and a staunch ally of Donald Trump, reaching up with his right hand after a gunshot was heard as blood came out from the left side of his neck. He died shortly after.

Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How the Charlie Kirk shooting unfolded

On Wednesday’s appearance at Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah, Robinson arrived in court with restraints on his wrists and ankles and wearing a dress shirt, tie and slacks.

Read more: What we can learn about suspect from charging document

According to the Associated Press, he smiled at family members sitting in the front row of the courtroom, where his mother teared up and wiped her eyes with a tissue.

More on Charlie Kirk

He made previous court appearances via video or audio feed from jail.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

The shooting happened during Kirk’s “prove me wrong” series, which saw the father of two visit campuses and debate contentious subjects; in this case, he was discussing mass shootings.

Prosecutors say the bullet which struck Kirk’s neck “passed closely to several other individuals”, including the person questioning him as part of the event.

President Trump comforts Charlie Kirk's widow Erika at his memorial service in Arizona in September. Pic: Reuters
Image:
President Trump comforts Charlie Kirk’s widow Erika at his memorial service in Arizona in September. Pic: Reuters

A charging document about Robinson from September includes incriminating texts sent between the alleged shooter and his roommate after Kirk’s death.

Read more from Sky News:
Analysis: The real reason for Trump’s Venezuela exploits
FBI release Luigi Mangione ‘to-do list’ before alleged assassination

Judge Tony Graf also heard arguments on Wednesday about whether cameras and media should be allowed in the courtroom, with Robinson’s lawyers and the Utah County Sheriff’s Office asking for them to be banned.

Mr Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has called for full transparency and said “we deserve to have cameras in there”.

The judge has already made allowances to protect Robinson’s presumption of innocence before a trial, agreeing that the case has drawn “extraordinary” public attention

Continue Reading

US

Why is the United States about to invade Venezuela?

Published

on

By

Why is the United States about to invade Venezuela?

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 

A significant escalation in tensions between the US and Venezuela.

On Wednesday, Donald Trump announced that his military had seized an oil tanker off the coast of the South American country.

Then, a day later, the president says a land invasion is about to start.

On the podcast today, we’ll explain what’s happened, what could happen next, and answer why America is even interested in Venezuela.

Plus – Kilmar Abrego Garcia is released after months of detention, and how you can come a US citizen, for the small price of just one million dollars.

You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

Email us on trump100@sky.uk with your comments and questions.

Continue Reading

US

US won’t ‘stand by and watch sanctioned vessels’, warns White House after tanker seized off Venezuela

Published

on

By

US won't 'stand by and watch sanctioned vessels', warns White House after tanker seized off Venezuela

The US will not “stand by and watch sanctioned vessels sail the seas”, the White House has warned, after American forces seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela.

Spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters she would not speak about future ship seizures, but said the US would continue to follow Donald Trump‘s sanction policies.

“We’re not going to stand by and watch sanctioned vessels sail the seas with black market oil, the proceeds of which will fuel narcoterrorism of rogue and illegitimate regimes around the world,” she said.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefing the media. Pic: Reuters
Image:
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefing the media. Pic: Reuters

The US is gearing up to intercept more ships, six sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

One source said several more sanctioned tankers had been identified by the US for potential seizure.

Two of the people said the US Justice Department and Homeland Security had been planning the seizures for months.

American forces were monitoring vessels in Venezuelan ports and waiting for them to sail into international waters before taking action, one source added.

More on Venezuela

It comes after a crude oil tanker, named Skipper, on Wednesday was stormed by US forces executing a seizure warrant.

The ship left Venezuela’s main oil port of Jose between 4 and 5 December after loading about 1.1 million barrels of oil, according to satellite information analysed by TankerTrackers.com and internal shipping data from Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA.

A still from a video of US forces seizing a Venezuelan oil tanker, posted by Pam Bondi. Pic: X/@AGPamBondi
Image:
A still from a video of US forces seizing a Venezuelan oil tanker, posted by Pam Bondi. Pic: X/@AGPamBondi

The real reason for Donald Trump’s Venezuela exploits


Ed Conway

Ed Conway

Economics and data editor

@EdConwaySky

Donald Trump wants you to know that there is one leading reason why he is bearing down militarily on Venezuela: drugs.

It is, he has said repeatedly, that country’s part in the production and smuggling of illegal narcotics into America that lies behind the ratcheting up of forces in the Caribbean in recent weeks. But what if there’s something else going on here too? What if this is really all about oil?

In one respect this is clearly preposterous. After all, the United States is, by a country mile, the world’s biggest oil producer. Venezuela is a comparative minnow these days, the 21st biggest producer in the world, its output having been depressed under the Chavez and then Maduro regimes. Why should America care about Venezuelan oil?

For the answer, one needs to spend a moment – strange as this will sound – contemplating the chemistry of oil…

Read more

US attorney general Pam Bondi said on X, formerly Twitter, that the ship was “used to transport sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran”.

“For multiple years, the oil tanker has been sanctioned by the United States due to its involvement in an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organisations,” she added.

Ms Leavitt said that “the United States does intend to get the oil” that was onboard the vessel.

The government in Caracas, led by President Nicolas Maduro, branded the ship’s seizure a “blatant theft” and an “act of international piracy”.

Read more:
Analysis: Is this what the beginning of a war looks like?
US-Venezuela crisis explained
Why tanker seized by US was ‘spoofing’ its location

The US has been ramping up the pressure on Mr Maduro and is reportedly considering trying to oust him. It has piled on sanctions, carried out a military build-up in the southern Caribbean, and launched attacks on suspected drug vessels from Venezuela.

Now America has issued new sanctions targeting Franqui Flores, Efrain Antonio Campo Flores, and Carlos Erik Malpica Flores – three nephews of Mr Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores – as well as on six crude oil tankers and six shipping companies linked to them.

Skipper. Credit: TankerTrackers
Image:
Skipper. Credit: TankerTrackers

By seizing oil tankers, the US is threatening Mr Maduro’s government’s main revenue source – oil exports.

The sources said the US was focusing on what’s been called the shadow fleet – tankers transporting sanctioned oil to China, the biggest buyer of crude from Venezuela and Iran.

They said one shipper had already temporarily suspended three voyages transporting six million barrels of Venezuelan crude oil.

“The cargoes were just loaded and were about to start sailing to Asia,” a source said.

“Now the voyages are cancelled and tankers are waiting off the Venezuelan coast as it’s safer to do that.”

Continue Reading

Trending