Connect with us

Published

on

On Instagram , the wellness women dont seem like a political movement. Their pictures scroll by like snapshots from heaven. Angels with luminous skin offer glimpses into their livesearth-toned vignettes of gleaming countertops and root vegetables. You can look like us, feel like us, their chorus goes, if you follow our rules and purchase our powders.

Here, an influencer named Kendra Needham, known to her 369,000 followers as the Holistic Mother, recommends a red-light-therapy gadget for pain and thyroid problems. There, Carly Shankman, who posts as CarlyLovesKale, evangelizes about the healing powers of hydrogen-rich water and a probiotic oral-care regimen. Courtney Swan, the host of a health-trends podcast called Realfoodology, links to a menstrual-cycle-tracking app and her own line of immunity boosters in minimalist-chic packaging.

Scrolling through these accounts, I try to reassure myself: I eat vegetables and exercise. My body is fine the way it is, sturdy and practical like a short-bed pickup truck. But I am susceptible to retail therapy, and, boy, are these ladies sellingproducts, yes, but also anxiety that perhaps you havent been doing wellness very well at all. Linger long enough on any of their pages, and you will start to feel afraid: of seed oils, childrens cereal, hormonal birth control. Above all, you will grow more suspicious of doctors and scientists.

Cultivating such feelings has been key to the merger between Donald Trumps MAGA supporters and the wellness world that has resulted in the formation of the Make America healthy again campaign. Although many Americans are skeptical of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a scion of Americas most famous political family, as the potential next head of the Health and Human Services Department, his supporters see him as the supreme commander in the battle against Big Food and Big Pharma. Kennedy is not merely a man who has stumbled into the spotlight; he is a leader with a legion behind him.

Trumps election win has been quickly written up as evidence of his campaigns success in reaching young men via podcasts and the right-wing mediasphere. What that narrative misses is how Instagram became a rallying point of crunchy moms for a contest in which the predicted wave of women for Kamala Harris never materialized. Influencers such as these wellness women brought hordes of voters to Trump.

People who have, until this point, mostly been outsiders beating against the barricades of the health-care establishment, have at last been let inside. Now MAHA leaders see a chance to usher in their version of a wellness revolution.

Read: RFK Jr. is in the wrong agency

The wellness movement has always been about individual autonomy and responsibilityan effort to take charge of ones own physical and mental health, through diet change, the use of specialized products, or the adoption of new habits. The appetite for such health-care individualization is tremendous: Earlier this year, McKinsey estimated the global market for what it calls consumer wellness products at $1.8 trillionmaking it roughly twice the size of the pharmaceutical industry. The sheer scale of the movement suggests a culture of people feeling very out of control in their own livesand fearful of people who they deem as being in control, Mariah Wellman, a communication professor at Michigan State University who studies the wellness movement, told me.

In September, I went to Capitol Hill to cover an early MAHA event, a roundtable on American health and nutrition involving health experts moderated by Ron Johnson, the Trump-aligned senator from Wisconsin. Kennedy attended, alongside a dozen other leaders in the wellness biz, most of whom did not have relevant degrees but did have a product or a program to promote. Realfoodologys Swan and Vani Hari, the Food Babe, were there; so was Alex Clark, a podcaster for the conservative-youth organization Turning Point USA. Also present were the close Kennedy advisers and sibling co-authors of a new book about how to hack your metabolism, Casey Means, a former ear, nose, and throat surgeon, and Calley Means, a former food and pharma lobbyist who now runs a wellness company.

The panelists had a combined Instagram following of more than 16 million people, including many in my high-school and college circle. I get it: People want to be healthy, and America has a serious health problem. We spend nearly twice as much on health care per person as any other wealthy nation, yet our rates of obesity and diabetes are higher than most other countries. People feel seen by the wellness world, and often scolded by conventional health-care providers advice: Exercise more; eat your greens; get your shots.

Different versions of the wellness movement have permeated both the left and the right, and social media has drastically expanded its reach on both sides. COVID-19 exploded that influence: Masking rules, school closures, and vaccine mandates led to plummeting trust in doctors and scientists as well as frenzied do your own research expeditions.

Republicans, in particular, have benefited from that surging distrust. This summer, in Texas, I attended Turning Points annual gathering of young conservative women, where party activists and commentators mingled with anti-vax homesteaders and sourdough-making tradwives. They sold supplements and detox guides, and chanted for Trump. It was a precursor to the MAHA movement, which solidified in August when Kennedy officially endorsed Trump. Although Kennedy had also apparently been willing to endorse Vice President Harris in exchange for a role in her administration, his ultimate alliance with Trump makes more sense. Both have branded themselves as disruptors of the status quo: Down with expertise, up with matching hats. And both Kennedy and Trump are promising cure-alls for the countrys most grievous ailments.

The typical MAHA Instagrammer, according to Wellman, is a middle-to-upper-class mom between 20 and 40 years old, with a similarly situated audience of followers. For most of these influencers, their scope of expertise knows no limit. Kendra Needham, who calls herself a holistic health practitioner, posts information about mammograms, pink eye, autism, and natural remedies for curing your childs toe-walking. On her landing page, she also recommends a $47 tick-removal kit.

Like Needham, most MAHA influencers are skeptical of vaccines and critical of Americas pediatric-vaccine schedule. They allege that medical professionals oppose their ideas because they have been bought by Big Pharma, and that nutritionists are in bed with Big Food. They argue that, as Wellman summarizes it, all of the money in U.S. politics has led to the takeover of our public-health system, and that has led to increasing numbers of cancer and diabetes and heart disease and obesity. The wellness women are constantly reminding their followers that they understand the strain mothers are underthe overwhelming pressure to look good, feel good, and keep their families healthy. In their posts, they offer messages conveying solidarity. You got this, mama! they say. Its so hard to unlearn everything youve been taught.

How Kennedy would actually translate wellness into action at HHS remains to be seen. The Make America Healthy Again PAC, which isnt affiliated with Kennedy but is led by former Kennedy campaign advisers, is light on policy specifics and heavy on hopeful ambiguities about ending the chronic disease epidemic and removing toxins from the environment. That vagueness is likely an intentional effort to make Kennedy, a longtime anti-vax crusader, more palatable to skittish Republican lawmakers as they ponder his confirmation. But the MAHA influencers see no need to tread so lightly.

For months, theyve liberally peppered presidential politics into their messaging, and laid out their expectations of Kennedy and the other Trump appointees charged with fixing Americas health. Online, a groundswell has formed around a few key priorities: restricting food additives such as high-fructose corn syrup, artificial dyes, and sed oils; tap-water safety; and childhood vaccines. Their understanding is that were going to get rid of everything, from toxins to government corruption, Wellman said.

And they couldnt be more excited to get started. Clark, the Turning Point podcast host, described her vision of an America under Trump and Kennedy: Organic food in abundance. Breathe free without chemicals falling from the sky. Paychecks fat, people arent. Needham expressed incredulity at the idea that all parents arent filled with so much gratitude right now.

Kennedy himself seems eager to go wild at HHS, per his charge from Trump. Given recent statements, he may urge Americans to cook with beef tallow instead of canola oil and push for the removal of fluoride from tap water, ideas that some cardiologists and dentists say would increase rates of heart disease and tooth decay. Doctors are even more concerned about the consequences of Kennedys vaccine skepticism. If vaccination rates drop, expect a return of highly preventable childhood diseases such as measles. Kennedy has already been linked to a deadly measles outbreak in 2019 in Samoa, where local health officials said he contributed to a disinformation campaign about vaccines.

Kennedys other wellness-inspired prioritiessuch as his plan to ban TV advertising by pharmaceutical companiescould have an anti-corporate, pro-consumer appeal. The challenge, of course, is that the party with which Kennedy and his followers have aligned with is, quite famously, opposed to the kinds of regulation and funding these plans would require.

During Trumps first term, he demonstrated his unwavering commitment to deregulating both the food and agricultural sectors. A similar approach this time around could poison the Trump-Kennedy alliance and alienate the incoming presidents MAHA supporters. Or perhaps, eternally uninterested in policy detail, Trump will choose to indulge them.

For now, the MAHA influencers will continue operating as an Instagram booster club for the Trump-Kennedy agenda. And if Kennedy is ultimately confirmed at HHS, expect them to wield their following to support whichever policy he champions firstespecially if he faces resistance. Prepare for the bad guys to completely gaslight so many American people and convince them to defend their toxic products, Needham wrote on Instagram. We saw it happen with c0v!d and we will certainly see it again. We arent falling for it.

Read: America cant break its wellness habit

The prospect of a MAHA takeover at HHS is alarming to the people who have spent their lives studying public health. In recent months, many have launched their own countermovementdespite how Sisyphean that task looks right now.

The MAHA movement, its critics say, obscures the systemic problems with American health in favor of minor detailsand profits from doing so. They point to figures such as Hari, the Food Babe, who has long decried various artificial food ingredients and whose recent quest has been to force Kelloggs to remove certain additives from Froot Loops. The additives in question, four dyes and a preservative, have been linked to health problems in larger doses, though the FDA has deemed them safe in the smaller amounts of a typical portion. Haris project has spawned petitions and protests; meanwhile, she promotes her own, additive-free products to her 2 million followers on Instagram.

Americans are not unhealthy because of individual ingredients, Jessica Knurick, a dietician with 186,000 Instagram followers, told meand other professionals in the field tend to agree. Americans are unhealthy because they consume too many calories, dont move enough, and arent getting enough fiber. And because nutrient-dense foods arent affordable for families, and schools are reimbursed only about $4 for every lunch a student eats. Programs that help families access and afford healthy food are constantly being cuttypically by Republican politicians.

The social determinants of health are never talked about by this movement, Knurick said. Of course, social determinants dont sell supplements. This is not a movement to make America healthy, Knurick said. Theyre trying to erode trust in health expertsand their motive for doing so, she argues, is to make money, secure votes for Republicans, and distract from the new administrations coming bonfire of regulations.

Communicating all of this is a complicated jobone too complicated for Instagrambut that hasnt stopped Knurick from trying. She and other health experts on Instagramincluding the Food Science Babe, a chemical engineer and food scientist whose name is a rejoinder to her wellness nemesis, the Food Babe; Andrea Love, an immunologist and a microbiologist; and the nutritionist Adrian Chavezhave made hundreds of videos and posts in recent weeks responding to MAHA claims, point by point. Getting audience and attention is a tough task, because accurate science communication is nuanced. And frankly, nuance is kind of boring.

Right now, MAHA is on offenseand any criticism of the movement guarantees days of harassment, emailed death threats, and accusations of corruption. Even though were called paid shills all the time, were doing these videos in our free time, after we get home from work, Love, the immunologist, told me. Its the consequence of MAHAs ascendance that she and other critics fear most: a society not only distrustful of science and expertise, but actively hostile toward both.

Since Trumps win last month, the wellness influencers have been celebrating. Its our time, CarlyLovesKale wrote on Instagram. This is the shift our world needs. But they are frustrated, too, to be facing so much scrutiny. Resistance is wrong, they say, and questioning their motives makes you complicit. If you had told me that in 2024 we would have people actively against making America healthy again, I wouldnt have believed you, Swan, of Realfoodology, wrote. If you are against a healthier food system, she added, youre def not on the right side of things.

After all, the MAHA victors insist they are selling a healthier America. Who wouldnt want to buy that?

Continue Reading

Business

Economy shows surprise growth at end of 2024 – but living standards hit

Published

on

By

Economy shows surprise growth at end of 2024 - but living standards hit

The UK economy grew fractionally during the final three months of 2024, according to early official figures, which ease the immediate risk of a recession.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported a 0.1% rise in gross domestic product (GDP) during the fourth quarter, with only a recovery for growth in Christmas spending and manufacturing during December coming to the rescue.

Economists had been largely expecting a contraction of 0.1% for the three month period following a zero growth reading for the previous three months to September.

Money latest: Reaction as economy shows surprise growth

The risk of shallow recession is still there, however, because the margins between contraction and growth are so tight in the data that likely future revisions may tip the balance either way.

The wider ONS figures showed that across 2024 as a whole, total GDP grew by 0.9%.

But a closely-watched measure for living standards in the economy, GDP by head of population, showed a contraction for two consecutive quarters.

The figures maintain intense pressure on the government as it has made achieving economic growth its priority for the parliament.

Its term did not begin in a way that would bolster business and consumer confidence.

Analysis: Why relief over economy may be temporary

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer defends handling of economy


Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and his chancellor were accused of an own goal last summer after warning of a tough budget ahead to bolster dire public finances.

While October’s measures were aimed at sparing pain from working people, companies argue that hikes to employer National Insurance contributions from April will knock investment, force job cuts, and impact pay rises.

Why relief over economy in Downing Street may be temporary



Ed Conway

Economics and data editor

@EdConwaySky

Yes there are all sorts of provisos. The UK economy is still flatlining. A 0.1% expansion, in one key measure, is about as close as you can get to zero.

Gross domestic product per head – a better measure of our living standards – is shrinking (indeed, it’s been shrinking for two quarters). And the UK remains far weaker than the leading G7 economy – the United States.

But even after taking all that into account, it’s hard not to conclude that the chancellor will be celebrating today’s GDP figures. After all, economists had expected the economy to shrink by 0.1% rather than growing. Thanks to a late spurt in growth in December, it actually grew.

Moreover, up until today’s figures, the profile of economic growth in the UK was frankly pretty dismal. There was zero cumulative growth since last year’s election. Now, thanks to that jump in December – an unexpected late Christmas gift for the chancellor – cumulative growth since the election is now up to 0.4%.

Of course, none of this changes the bigger economic picture. The UK economy is still stuck in a rut. The enormous growth in migration in recent years means that, once you take account of the growing population, there is considerably less income floating around for every family than there was a few years ago.

And vast swathes of the UK economy are in desperate trouble. Most notably, the industrial sectors that used to power much of the country’s growth, are contracting at a rapid rate. That is not just a UK problem – indeed, it’s shared with much of Europe. In Germany, the economy has contracted for two successive years. This deindustrialisation is one of the most significant issues facing the continent.

And that’s before one considers a few other awkward issues: the real impact of last October’s budget have yet to be felt in the economy. The Office for Budget Responsibility is widely expected to slash its growth forecasts next month, which could prompt the chancellor to further trim spending in the coming years.

Then there are other, even more profound challenges. What happens if and when the US imposes far-reaching tariffs on UK imports? How will the UK afford the dramatic increases in defence spending the White House is demanding? Now, more than ever before, it’s quite plausible that outside events cause outsize impacts on the UK economy.

In short, while today’s numbers will be a relief in Downing Street, it’s not altogether clear how long that sense of relief will last.

That backdrop is made more painful by the fact that inflation is on the increase again, with a slew of essential bills including those for water, energy and council tax all set to rise sharply in the spring too.

At the same time as the domestic difficulties, global growth is also being challenged by Donald Trump who had threatened at the time of his election victory that universal trade tariffs were imminent.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bank governor on “depressing” growth outlook

New projections from the Bank of England last week made for sobering reading, with inflation expectations for this year hitting 3.7% from the current 2.5%.

Growth, the forecast suggested, would come in at 0.75% for 2025.

In November, the Bank had expected a figure double that sum.

A lack of growth is a problem for chancellor Rachel Reeves as it typically hits potential tax receipts at a time when her budget rules over the public finances are already under strain.

👉Listen to Politics At Jack And Sam’s on your podcast app👈

It emerged on Wednesday that the Treasury had ordered a leak inquiry following a Bloomberg report that updated Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts sent to ministers had downgraded UK growth expectations.

Ms Reeves said of the ONS data: “For too long, politicians have accepted an economy that has failed working people. I won’t.

“After 14 years of flatlining living standards, we are going further and faster through our Plan for Change to put more money in people’s pockets.

“That is why we are taking on the blockers to get Britain building again, investing in our roads, rail and energy infrastructure, and removing the barriers that get in the way of businesses who want to expand.”

Read more from Sky News:
Heathrow’s multibillion-pound investment
‘Big opportunity’ for Chinese electric carmakers in UK

Shadow chancellor Mel Stride responded: “The chancellor promised the fastest-growing economy in the G7, but her budget is killing growth.

“Working people and businesses are already paying for her choices with ever-rocketing taxes, hundreds of thousands of job cuts and business confidence plummeting.

“It does not need to be this way.”

Continue Reading

Business

Why Downing Street’s relief over economy may be temporary

Published

on

By

Why Downing Street's relief over economy may be temporary

Yes there are all sorts of provisos.

The UK economy is still flatlining. A 0.1% expansion is about as close as you can get to zero.

Gross domestic product per head – a better measure of our living standards – is shrinking (indeed, it’s been shrinking for two quarters). And the UK remains far weaker than the leading G7 economy – the United States.

But even after taking all that into account, it’s hard not to conclude that the chancellor will be celebrating today’s GDP figures. After all, economists had expected the economy to shrink by 0.1%. Thanks to a late spurt in growth in December, it actually grew.

Moreover, up until today’s figures, the profile of economic growth in the UK was frankly pretty dismal. There was zero cumulative growth since last year’s election. Now, thanks to that jump in December – an unexpected late Christmas gift for the chancellor – cumulative growth since the election is now up to 0.4%.

Of course, none of this changes the bigger economic picture. The UK economy is still stuck in a rut. The enormous growth in migration in recent years means that, once you take into account the growing population, there is considerably less income floating around for every family than there was a few years ago.

And vast swathes of the UK economy are in desperate trouble. Most notably, the industrial sectors that used to power much of the country’s growth are contracting at a rapid rate. That is not just a UK problem – indeed, it’s shared with much of Europe. In Germany, the economy has contracted for two successive years. This deindustrialisation is one of the most significant issues facing the continent.

More from Money

And that’s before one considers a few other awkward issues: the real impact of last October’s budget have yet to be felt in the economy. The Office for Budget Responsibility is widely expected to slash its growth forecasts next month, which could prompt the chancellor to further trim spending in the coming years.

Read more from Sky News:
The hospital outperforming most – but still on its knees
Sky News’ correspondents give views on Trump’s call with Putin

Then there are other, even more profound challenges. What happens if and when the US imposes far-reaching tariffs on UK imports? How will the UK afford the dramatic increases in defence spending the White House is demanding? Now, more than ever before, it’s quite plausible that outside events could cause outsized impacts on the UK economy.

In short, while today’s numbers will be a relief in Downing Street, it’s not altogether clear how long that sense of relief will last.

Continue Reading

Politics

What is the loophole that allowed a family in Gaza permission to come to UK on a Ukraine resettlement scheme?

Published

on

By

What is the loophole that allowed a family in Gaza permission to come to UK on a Ukraine resettlement scheme?

A “loophole” that allowed a Palestinian family to be granted the right to come to the UK under a Ukrainian resettlement scheme was the subject of a lot of debate in the House of Commons today.

Both the prime minister and leader of the opposition criticised a decision by a judge to allow the family of six the right to enter the UK.

Sir Keir pledged to close the “loophole” after he was asked about it by Kemi Badenoch – but could not elaborate on what it was.

Sky News has read through the judgment given by Judge Hugo Norton-Taylor to understand what happened.

Politics latest: ‘Leak’ probe launched at Treasury

Why did the family apply?

The family of six, a husband and wife and their children aged 18, 17, eight and seven, lived in Gaza and their homes were destroyed after the 7 October attacks and subsequent conflict.

They ended up living in a humanitarian zone and then a refugee camp.

In January 2024, the family applied to come to the UK via the Ukraine Family Scheme form, in a bid to join one of the parent’s brothers, who is a British citizen and has lived in the UK since 2007.

While they acknowledged they were not eligible for the Ukraine scheme, the family chose to apply in an attempt to use the Home Office‘s policy on “applications for entry clearance outside the rules”.

The Home Office rejected the request, saying they were not satisfied there were “compelling, compassionate circumstances” to justify a request outside the rules.

They also noted the lack of a resettlement scheme for Palestinians.

Read more:
Judge ‘wrong’ to let Gaza family settle in UK
Palestinian family allowed to settle in UK

The appeals

Despite the Home Office saying there were no grounds to appeal, the family launched one against the decision on human rights grounds.

A judge then ruled that the initial rejection constituted a rejection of human rights, and so allowed an appeal.

Part of this appeal was under Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights – the right to a family life between the man living in Britain and his family in Gaza.

This appeal was rejected, with a lack of a Palestinian resettlement scheme noted as a reason.

An appeal was launched at a higher tribunal – and one of the arguments was that the case should be considered on its own merits and not allow the lack of a Palestinian resettlement scheme to outweigh other arguments.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PMQs: War on immigration

The loophole

It is here that the “loophole” seems to have appeared.

At this point. Judge Norton-Taylor heard the case and allowed the appeal.

In his judgment, he stated that it was “wrong to have taken the absence of a resettlement scheme into account at all”.

The judge added that there was “no evidence” he had seen that the Home Office had made a deliberate decision not to implement a Palestinian resettlement scheme.

He also noted that the lack of immigration rules on a topic should not count against someone.

In layman’s terms, the argument seems to be that just because a scheme to resettle people does not exist it does not mean they are banned from coming to the UK via humanitarian routes.

The judgment said the absence of a “resettlement scheme was irrelevant” to their decision.

What next?

Judge Norton-Taylor went on to back the claim from the family in Gaza based on the ECHR and the right to a family life between them and their relative in Britain.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Ukraine Family scheme was clearly set out for Ukrainians. We have been clear that we do not agree with this judgment and we twice vigorously contested this case.

“As the prime minister made clear, article 8, the right to a family life, should be interpreted much more narrowly. It is for the government and Parliament to decide who should be covered by the UK’s safe and legal routes.

“We are pursuing all legal avenues to address the legal loophole which has been exploited in this case. The home secretary is urgently reviewing this case to ensure the correct processes are always followed and existing laws correctly interpreted.”

👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈

They added that there was no evidence to support the argument and that data from the government shows a “very small” number of Gazans have been allowed to enter the UK – equal to roughly 150.

Sir Keir said he was planning to close the loophole, but it is not clear what this will entail.

Continue Reading

Trending