Connect with us

Published

on

The treatment of Jess Phillips over recent days tells me all I need to know about the epidemic of misogyny, abuse and violence against women and girls that still plagues our culture.

The domestic violence campaigner-turned politician, who has spent her career fighting for victims, has found herself the subject of abuse on an industrial scale over the past week that has put her in danger.

In dark moments, it has left her wondering whether she should give up frontline politics for good and go back to the women’s hostels where her work with vulnerable women and girls began.

Outspoken and a women’s campaigner, Phillips has long been a lightning rod.

But when the world’s richest man, who owns a social media platform with 211m followers, starts trolling you as a “rape genocide apologist” – complicit in a what he claims is a cover-up of the most disgusting and sickening abuse – that’s a different order of attention, and danger.

This week, the female politician charged with trying to protect the actual victims of these unspeakable crimes became subject to an avalanche of abuse – and threats – herself.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Abuse of me nothing compared to that of victims

It was undoubtedly horrific for Phillips, who tells me she felt physically sick and hunted as the tweets came raining down.

More on Jess Phillips

And, as everyone piled in with their outrage and indignation, where were the voices of the actual victims themselves?

It has been so vicious, noisy and fraught as the very serious matter of grooming gangs and the exploitation, rape and torture of young victims turned into a political battleground of finger pointing and point scoring.

Imagine for a moment you’re a victim of grooming, rape, or torture and you’re seeing your own trauma being bandied around. Let down once before, how might this furore feel for those victims now?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jess Phillips: Musk’s comments are ‘ridiculous’

The Conservatives are now calling for a national inquiry into grooming gangs.

Labour shout hypocrisy, but find themselves on the receiving end of an online movement criticising safeguarding minister Jess Phillips and Keir Starmer’s record as the country’s former chief prosecutor.

It prompted The Times’ investigative reporter Andrew Norfolk – who revealed the wide scale abuse of young white girls predominately by Asian men of Pakistani descent back in 2012 – to this week to defend Starmer, who he said had been instrumental in making more prosecutions possible.

He added that there was a “huge increase in convictions” when Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions back in the early 2010s.

This is a scandal that has run for decades and was properly exposed by Norfolk, who’s reporting led to a string of independent inquiries, resignations, police investigations and successful prosecutions.

But it was re-ignited last week by a decision by Philips, revealed by GB News, not to hold a government-led inquiry of grooming gangs in Oldham.

This is because previous investigations, in towns including Telford, Rochdale and Rotherham, were all independent investigations led by the local authority.

That’s not to say Phillips doesn’t want a inquiry in Oldham – she’s encouraged the council leader to set one up. However, the evidence is clear that victims are more likely to come forward when it’s a local inquiry rather than a national one.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: A sky News investigation

But somehow this lit the touch paper for Elon Musk – a tech billionaire strong on tweeting, but light on knowledge of the actual situation in the UK – who launched an avalanche of claims over grooming.

He galvanised opposition politicians to call for action and created a storm that has brought movement from the government too.

This week, Labour committed to implementing some of the recommendations of the Jay Review into child sexual exploitation.

The Jay Review was published in 2022 under the Conservative government, but its suggestions were not enacted by the relevant ministers.

Read more:
Victims of grooming gangs can have inquiry if they want one, Jess Phillips says
What happened in the grooming gangs scandal?
Grooming gangs scandal timeline

Phillips is also setting up a victims’ board that will sit in the Home Office and advise and give feedback on changes that need to be made to get the truth and justice for victims.

There remain questions about whether there should be more? Reform and the Conservatives want a national inquiry into the specific question of grooming gangs – what is their prevalence, their root causes and the institutional failings that let tens of thousands of victims down?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sir Keir Starmer hits back at those who criticised his handling of child grooming gangs.

Andrew Norfolk, while stopping short of calling for a national public inquiry, does believe the root causes of grooming gangs have not been properly examined.

He believes they will never be fully stamped out until there’s proper research into what allowed these gangs to flourish.

In her 2022 report into child sexual exploitation, referencing her 2014 inquiry into grooming gangs in Rotherham, Professor Alexis Jay noted “the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by their victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors didn’t engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discussion how they could jointly address the issue”.

Norfolk, in The Times this week, puts it like this: “It is very difficult to talk about this stuff without being accused of being Islamophobic. That is not going to change.

“Why one very small sub-section of one minority ethnic community was so overwhelmingly, disproportionately responsible for these crimes – that is work that would be vital in bringing about understanding that could enable changes to take place.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chief executive of The Survivors’ Trust, Fay Maxted says she wants to see action now.

Jess Phillips argues that another inquiry is not what is needed, pointing to the Jay Review, and a string of other independent investigations.

She tells me she wants to get on with getting justice for victims and stamping out sexual abuse.

“There is nothing I will not consider going forward,” she told me, be it prevention programmes, working on community relations, tackling peer-on-peer abuse. And, if the victims want it, a national inquiry.

More on this story:
Jess Phillips hits back at Elon Musk
Why is Musk so interested in UK politics?

You have probably read the headlines over recent days, and you might have felt battered by the noise.

You might be confused about what is going on as politicians trade blows in the Commons and Musk rants online.

You have perhaps read some of the court transcripts of historic cases circulating online that document crimes against young girls so disgusting and barbaric that it makes you want to weep.

That’s why on this week’s Electoral Dysfunction we try to take a step back and spend quite a bit of time talking to Jess Phillips about not just the events of the past few days, but the long shadow of grooming gangs and child abuse.

We talk about Phillips’ own feelings when those Musk tweets landed and what being in the eye of the storm meant for her safety. We talk about the criticisms levelled at her and the prime minister.

I ask her about accusations of cover-ups in order not to stoke racial tensions in local communities, why she doesn’t support a national inquiry and her frustrations at those in positions of authority – be it councillors, social workers, police officers – who failed to protect girls and still haven’t faced a reckoning.

After all the heat and noise, I hope it can offer a bit of explanation and a little light too.

You can listen to Beth’s full interview with Jess Phillips in a special episode of Electoral Dysfunction released on Thursday.

Continue Reading

Politics

Sex offenders to be denied refugee status under plans to improve women’s safety

Published

on

By

Sex offenders to be denied refugee status under plans to improve women's safety

Migrants convicted of sex offences in the UK or overseas will be unable to claim asylum under government plans to change the law to improve border security.

The Home Office announcement means foreign nationals who are added to the sex offenders register will forfeit their rights to protection under the Refugee Convention.

Politics latest: Tory-Reform coalition would be disaster, warns PM

As part of the 1951 UN treaty, countries are allowed to refuse asylum to terrorists, war criminals and individuals convicted of a “particularly serious crime” – which is currently defined in UK law as an offence carrying a sentence of 12 months or more.

The government now plans to extend that definition to include all individuals added to the Sex Offenders’ Register, regardless of the length of sentence, in an amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which is currently going through parliament. It’s understood they also hope to include those convicted of equivalent crimes overseas.

Those affected will still be able to appeal their removal from the UK in the courts under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

More than 10,000 people have now been detected crossing the Channel. Pic: PA
Image:
More than 10,000 people have now been detected crossing the Channel. Pic: PA

It is unclear how many asylum seekers will be affected, as the government has been unable to provide any projections or past data on the number of asylum seekers added to the Sex Offenders’ Register.

More from Politics

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: “Sex offenders who pose a risk to the community should not be allowed to benefit from refugee protections in the UK.

“We are strengthening the law to ensure these appalling crimes are taken seriously.”

Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls Minister Jess Philips said: “We are determined to achieve our mission of halving violence against women and girls in a decade.

“That’s exactly why we are taking action to ensure there are robust safeguards across the system, including by clamping down on foreign criminals who commit heinous crimes like sex offences.”

Read more:
PM ‘doesn’t want to see strike action’
Former Streeting aide avoids jail after exposing himself

The Home Office would like voters to see this as a substantial change. But that’s hard to demonstrate without providing any indication of the scale of the problem it seeks to solve.

Clearly, the government does not want to fan the flames of resentment towards asylum seekers by implying large numbers have been committing sex crimes.

But amid rising voter frustration about the government’s grip on the issue, and under pressure from Reform – this measure is about signalling it is prepared to take tough action.

Conservatives: ‘Too little, too late’

The Conservatives claim Labour are engaged in “pre-election posturing”.

Chris Philp MP, the shadow home secretary, said: “This is too little, too late from a Labour government that has scrapped our deterrent and overseen the worst year ever for small boat crossings – with a record 10,000 people crossing this year already.

“Foreign criminals pose a danger to British citizens and must be removed, but so often this is frustrated by spurious legal claims based on human rights claims, not asylum claims.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Has Labour tackled migration?

The Home Office has also announced plans to introduce a 24-week target for appeal hearings (known as “first-tier tribunals”) to be held for rejected asylum seekers living in taxpayer-supported accommodation, or for foreign national offenders.

The current average wait is 50 weeks. The idea is to cut the asylum backlog and save taxpayers money – Labour have committed to end the use of asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.

It’s unclear how exactly this will be achieved, although a number of additional court days have already been announced.

The government also plans to crack down on fake immigration lawyers who advise migrants on how to lodge fraudulent asylum claims, with the Immigration Advice Authority given new powers to issue fines of up to £15,000.

Continue Reading

Politics

US senators press for answers on Trump’s crypto interests

Published

on

By

<div>US senators press for answers on Trump's crypto interests</div>

<div>US senators press for answers on Trump's crypto interests</div>

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has called on government officials to address questions related to US President Donald Trump’s memecoin and his media company.

In an April 25 letter to Jamieson Greer, acting director of the US Office of Government Ethics (OGE), Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts and California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff requested that officials address concerns about Trump’s memecoin after the president announced a dinner and White House tour for some of the individuals who held the most TRUMP tokens. The two senators requested that Greer provide information on safeguards and guidelines related to whether foreign actors and others could buy political influence with the president, potentially impacting his policy positions and federal pardons.

“President Trump’s announcement promises exclusive access to the presidency in exchange for significant investment in one of the President’s business ventures,” wrote the two senators.

“In promising such access, this proposition may implicate several federal ethics laws and constitutional prohibitions, including the federal bribery statute and emoluments clauses of the US Constitution. It also raises the troubling prospect that foreign actors are using the memecoin as a vector to buy influence with President Trump and his associates without needing to disclose their identities publicly.”

Investments, SEC, United States, Donald Trump, Corruption
April 25 letter from Sens. Warren and Schiff to OGE. Source: Sen. Schiff

The letter was sent the same day Warren reportedly expressed similar concerns about Trump’s potential conflicts of interest with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to an April 25 Reuters report, the Massachusetts senator urged SEC Chair Paul Atkins to ensure that oversight of Trump’s media company was “free from undue political interference and influence from the President and his administration.”

Related: Trump’s WLFI crypto investments aren’t paying off

Though ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, Warren does not have the authority to direct Congress’s agenda with Democrats in the minority. Two Democrats in the Senate and House of Representatives have already called for Trump’s impeachment over his memecoin dinner.

Warren added:

“The American people deserve the unwavering assurance that access to the presidency is not being offered for sale to the highest bidder in exchange for the President’s own financial gain.”

At the time of publication, it was unclear who among the top TRUMP memecoin holders would attend the dinner, scheduled to be held on May 22 at Trump’s golf club in Washington, DC. Speculation and analysis of users suggested that Trump supporters, including Tron founder Justin Sun, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and others, could attend, though none had been confirmed as of April 28.

Magazine: Trump’s crypto ventures raise conflict of interest, insider trading questions

Continue Reading

Politics

Polymarket bets on Mark Carney win as Canadians head to the polls

Published

on

By

Polymarket bets on Mark Carney win as Canadians head to the polls

Polymarket bets on Mark Carney win as Canadians head to the polls

Crypto users betting on the outcome of the snap election to determine the next Prime Minister of Canada appear to be favoring a Liberal Party victory as residents head to cast their votes.

As of April 28, cryptocurrency betting platform Polymarket gave current Canadian Prime Minister and Liberal Party candidate Mark Carney a 79% chance of defeating Conservative Party candidate Pierre Poilievre in the race for the country’s next PM. Data from the platform showed users had poured more than $75 million into bets surrounding the race, predicting a Poilievre or Carney victory.

Canada, Betting, Voting, Elections
Polymarket chances favor the Liberal Party’s Mark Carney over the Conservative Party’s Pierre Poilievre to be the next Canadian Prime Minister. Source: Polymarket

The odds suggested by the platform, as well as those from many polls, show a nearly complete reversal of fortunes between the two candidates after former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned in January. Trudeau and, by association, many in the Liberal Party, faced criticism over the handling of Canada’s housing crisis and questions about how he would face US President Donald Trump’s then-proposed tariffs.

Following Trudeau’s resignation, Trump stepped up rhetoric disparaging Canada, repeatedly referring to the country as the US’s “51st state” and Trudeau as its “governor.” The US President also imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from Canada in March. The policies seem to have led to increasing anti-Trump sentiment in Canada, with many residents booing the US national anthem at hockey games and making comparisons between the president and Poilievre.

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.

Continue Reading

Trending