
Elon Musk is a ‘Tesla founder’, but he isn’t behind its main innovation
More Videos
Published
6 months agoon
By
admin
Elon Musk is technically a “founder” of Tesla, as per a court settlement. He deserves credit for Tesla’s succes, but it is true that he isn’t behind Tesla’s main innovation.
While I’m no fan of Elon Musk, I care more about the truth than smearing him, which is not the case for a lot of his haters. One of their go-to lies they like to repeat is that he is not a “founder” of Tesla.
It’s something they use to try to discredit his achievements: “He isn’t a founder or inventor. He just buys ideas from others.”
While there’s some truth to it, it’s not the whole truth. I felt like it would be essential to set the record straight.
The early story of Tesla
Tesla was officially incorporated on July 1, 2003, by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning with the goal of building an electric vehicle manufacturer that is also a technology company – an idea that is still core to Tesla today.
In investment materials, Eberhard and Tarpenning’s early Tesla stated a goal to develop core technologies related to “the battery, the computer software, and the proprietary motor.” These are still Tesla’s core technologies today.

But Tesla’s most important innovation was the use and packaging of cylindrical li-ion battery cells, previously mainly used in consumer electronic products, like laptops, in large battery packs for electric vehicles.
That was really a game changer and it’s an idea that precede Elon Musk’s involvement with Tesla.
While incorporated in 2003, Eberhard and Tarpenning had been working on the idea for a while. They had previously founded NuvoMedia where the two founders built of an early handheld device, the Rocketbook, an ebook reader, back in 1996.
They sold the company in 2000, but before that, they were working on the next-generation of their ebook and in sourcing the batteries, they noted some impressive improvements in the capacity and cost of li-ion battery cells.
The two engineers had serious concerns about climate change and oil import. They did the math and concluded that powering transportation with batteries using renewable energy would have a significant impact on reducing emissions and climate change.
Tesla didn’t invent electric cars. They had been around for 100 years by the time the company was founded, but they required making compromises compared to fossil fuel-powered vehicles, which prevented them for gaining in popularity.
That was Tesla’s difference-maker: making cars with the latest li-ion battery cells developed for consumer electronics, resulting in electric vehicles without compromises.
This core idea were reflected in Eberhard’s guiding principles for Tesla:
1) An electric car should not be a compromise. With the right technology choices, it is possible to build electric cars that are actually better cars than their competition.
2) Battery technology is key to a successful electric car. Lithium ion batteries are not only suitable of automotive use; they are game-changing, making decent driving range a reality.
3) If designed right, electric cars can appeal to even the most serious car enthusiast, as electric drive is capable of seriously outperforming internal combustion engines.
That has been the basis of Tesla’s success. The idea of leveraging the incredible progress with li-ion batteries in the 1990s to deliver electric vehicles with no compromise.

This was Tesla’s core innovation. It sounds simple, but it took incredible work. No battery manufacturer wanted to build li-ion cells for EVs, so Tesla had to buy off-the-shelves cells meant for laptops and package thousands of these cylindrical cells into battery modules and packs that could be viable in a car. It’s an idea that had never been done before.
And an idea is worth nothing without execution.
Tesla couldn’t have happened without Elon Musk
Musk claims that his interest in electric vehicles predates Tesla. There’s no reason not to believe him, but there’s no evidence that he had anything to do with the abovementioned concept.
In fact, before his foray into Silicon Valley’s internet startup boom, Musk went to Stanford University to study supercapacitors, which he claims he did with the hope of using them in electric vehicles. This would suggest that he thought supercapacitors would be the future of EVs rather than Li-ion batteries.
Musk and Tesla got together through a company called AC Propulsion.
AC Propulsion pioneered the resurgence of electric vehicles and built the tZero electric sports car in the 1990s.

First, it used lead-acid batteries like its predecessors, but the company converted it to lithium-ion battery cells in the early 2000s. It’s not clear who had the idea first or if it was parallel thinking, but we do know that AC Propulsion and Eberhard were in contact during the conversion.
Eberhard tried to convince AC Propulsion to commercialize the new tZero, but the company refused because it focused on another product. That’s when Eberhard and Tarpenning decided to launch Tesla.
How did Musk come into the picture?
Musk, who was working on SpaceX at the time, was contacted by JB Straubel, a young electrical engineer with a longstanding interest in electric vehicles, including building his own Porsche EV in his garage.
Fresh out of school, Straubel was working on high-altitude hydrogen-powered electric aircraft at the time—something that was of interest to Musk, so they got together. The conversion eventually pivoted to electric vehicles, and Straubel, being deeply connected in this small world, made Musk aware of AC Propulsion.
They test-drove the tZero with lithium-ion batteries, and Musk was sold. Like Eberhard, he tried to convince AC Propulsion to commercialize the product. Tom Gage, AC Propulsion’s CEO, again refused, but since they were thinking the same way, he connected Musk to Eberhard, who had just launched Tesla with Tarpenning, along with Ian Wright, who had joined the two engineers.
A few months later, in February 2004, Musk led Tesla’s series A investment round, with $6.5 million of the $7.5 million coming from his pockets.
Eberhard became CEO, and JB Straubel, who, despite his young age, had the most experience building electric cars, joined as Chief Technology Officer.
Musk was busy with SpaceX, but he was more active within Tesla than simply being an investor and board member.
As Tesla was working on the Roadster, Musk led several other rounds of financing, providing a large part of the funding himself.
Things turned for the worse in 2007. Tesla was having issues bringing the Roadster to production within its budget. The move to use the Lotus Elise chassis proved to be a mistake, and by the end, the Tesla Roadster had only shared 6% of its parts with the Elise, as most of it had to be reworked.
In the summer of 2007, the board, led by Musk, asked Eberhard to step down. Several interim CEOs followed before Musk took over himself in 2008.
Eberhard fully left the company, and in 2009, he sued both Tesla and Musk for ousting him. Both sides accused each other of being behind Tesla’s problems, and Eberhard claimed Musk was “rewriting history” as if he had founded Tesla himself.
Ultimately, a judge dismissed part of Ebarhard’s lawsuit, and then both parties settled and agreed that five people could call themselves co-founders at Tesla: Eberhard, Tarpenning, Wright, Musk, and Straubel.
Electrek’s Take
Now, in a civil case like this, the outcome is not necessarily the most just. Generally, those with the most money and the best lawyers win.
So, I’m not going to claim that there’s no value in questioning whether or not Elon is truly a Tesla founder. I get that there’s nuance here, but all parties involved have settled the matter. My main point is that it doesn’t really matter.
Tesla’s core idea was to create an electric vehicle without compromise by leveraging improvements in lithium-ion battery cell technology. However, all evidence points toward Musk’s not being involved with this core idea.
With that said, we need to give credit where credit is due. He recognized it as a good idea and put more money into making it happen than any was willing to do at the time.
Therefore, you could make the argument that Tesla wouldn’t have happened with Musk – making the founder argument moot.
After that, you also have to give some credit to Musk for Tesla’s success. He has been the CEO since 2008 and the company accomplished incredible things under his leadership. They succeeded in making EVs mainstream and pushed the industry to transition to battery-electric vehicles.
To this day, it is Musk’s original ‘Tesla Secret Master Plan’ in 2006 that convinced me Tesla would be the company to bring EVs into the mainstream. The plan made sense, and it was executed under his leadership. He took the original idea, fleshed it out, financed it, and then led the team that made it happen.
The last point is important because that’s where I start to agree with Musk’s naysayers again. Musk’s fans like to claim that he is some sort of engineering genius. Jamie Dimon just called him “our Einstein”. While I can admit that Elon is smart and has an above-average understanding of many physics and engineering principles, comparing him to one of the most impactful theoretical physicists of all time is pure madness.
While Musk has made technical contributions to Tesla, I think they are often overblown by his fanbase and Tesla’s team doesn’t get enough credit. JB Straubel, Tesla’s longtime Chief Technology Officer until 2019, and his teams should get the vast majority of the credit for the technical contributions and advancements to battery technology and power electronics that made Tesla successful.
There are too many to name them all, but I have been reporting on Tesla for more than a decade. Through my reporting, sources have praised people like Straubel, Drew Baglino, Kurt Kelty, Colin Campbell, Peter Rawlinson, Charles Kuehmann, Alan Clarke, Dan Priestley, Lars Moravy, David Zhang, Evan Small, and Franz von Holzhausen for their contributions to Tesla.
In short, yes, it’s OK to say Elon Musk co-founded Tesla. Yes, he had a critical role in the company’s survival and success, but I also think it’s fair to say that he wasn’t behind Tesla’s main innovation, and the company’s top talents don’t get nearly enough credit for delivering on the mission.
The mission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy is a beautiful one and it is what attracted much of the top talent at Tesla.
Unfortunately, Musk’s leadership over the last few years has steered Tesla away from that mission, which is my main worry about the company.
Regardless, I wanted to set the record straight on his contribution before he completely destroys his own reputation and credibility.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
Faraday Future unveils FX Super One, an EV minivan with a funny F.A.C.E.
Published
5 hours agoon
July 18, 2025By
admin

Faraday Future is still kicking and unveiled its next planned vehicle tonight – the FX Super One, an all-electric MPV.
The FX Super One is an MPV, “Multi Purpose Vehicle,” which is… basically the new word for a minivan.
Minivans have gotten less popular in recent years, as the entire industry has been infected with the SUV virus. But they still offer a lot of the same benefits they always did, like more room for passengers and cargo.
The problem is, there just aren’t many EV minivans. In the US, we’ve basically got the ID.Buzz, and that’s about it… so far.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
But we’ve also seen and heard of some upcoming prototypes, making us think that perhaps this could be a bit of a trend in upcoming models – much as electric 3-row SUVs have been a trend for the last year or two.
For example, the Kia PV5, a potential upcoming Chevy Express, and an upcoming electric van from Mercedes all look like they could fit that bill.
Outside of the US market, electric vans are much more popular. This is particularly true in China, where many electric MPV models are available.
Into this segment wades Faraday Future, the US-based but decidedly China-flavored electric vehicle startup founded by Chinese businessman YT Jia, who is currently its Co-CEO along with Matthias Aydt.
Faraday’s current car, the FF91, is a huge, powerful, comfortable, very expensive, and incredibly low production vehicle which was first unveiled in 2017 and finally went into production in 2023. As of the start of this year, the company has sold around 16 cars. (And we got to drive it around a racetrack, read more thoughts on the car & company here)
But a low-volume hypercar… er, hyper-SUV?… does little to make a dent in overall consumer EV demand, so the next car Faraday has unveiled will maybe strike a little closer to the center of consumer demand than their first effort.

Unveiled tonight at a public event in Los Angeles (and seen by us a couple weeks ago at a private event), the FX Super One doesn’t make quite as many pie-in-the-sky promises as the original FF91 did, though it does include its own fair share of flashy features and plenty of question marks still to be answered.
Perhaps the most headline-grabbing feature is something Faraday is calling the “AI F.A.C.E.,” which seems to be an optional feature as only one of the prototypes we saw had it installed. This consists of an array of LEDs at the front of the vehicle, in place of the radiator grille, which can light up to display just about anything you can dream of – as long as it’s relatively low resolution (but certainly higher resolution than, say, traditional headlights).
Faraday showed several animations of what this could be used for, including videos showing off the car or sample atmospheric designs, or much more interestingly: emoji-like animated faces showing off certain emotions.
Beyond this, the specs of the vehicle seem quite fluid – which, frankly, is probably a good thing given the tall promises made by the FF91 at unveiling.
It instead replaced all those promised exceptional specs with a bunch of promises about AI, claiming that the car will be your companion, your avatar, your co-pilot. This was all mumbo-jumbo as far as I’m concerned.
Faraday differentiated its “AI-MPV” from a “traditional minivan” by claiming that this vehicle will have a “balance between luxury and premium,” but with better power and handling than either minivans or full-size SUVs.
It didn’t specify a price yet, but it did state that the FX Super One would have “premium pricing” but also would compare with a traditional minivan in total ownership cost. Elsewhere, Faraday stated that it will be “an affordable mass market MPV.” It even asked, in the presentation, what price attendees feel like they would pay for the vehicle. Feel free to sound off in the comments below with your thoughts.
If those phrases seem to be in conflict with one another, it could be because Faraday did drop some hints at potential higher-end configurations, speaking to a likely large spread of prices across the model range.
While the examples we saw were configured like traditional 3-row minivans (they insisted that nobody take photos of the unfinished interior, but it has both 6- and 7-seat configurations), Faraday suggested that a more limo-like experience could be had with vehicles configured for a comfortable back seat experience, with lots of legroom, a TV, and a fridge.
At today’s introductory event, we even got a short chance to take a ride in the car, albeit just in circles around a parking lot. We got a quick chance to try riding in the 2nd and 3rd row seats in the 6-seat configuration. Although we weren’t allowed to take any cameras with us, so you’ll have to take my word for it.
The pass-thru to the 3rd row is a little tight, probably owing to the size of the 2nd-row seats, which are large and comfortable. But with the 2nd-row seat positioned in such a way to give me a full foot or two extra feet worth of leg/knee room, I could still fit comfortably into the 3rd row. There is no question that 6 adults could fit comfortably into this car even for a long ride.
And while, again, the ride was just around a parking lot, we had our driver punch it a little, and the car felt plenty powerful enough, especially for a minivan. But this should be no surprise for an electric vehicle from a company whose other car, the FF91, boasts 1,050hp.
We briefly tried out the “zero-G” 2nd-row seat, which reclines into an almost horizontal position. With the massage seats turned on, this was definitely a comfortable experience. There seems to be room for a possible fold-down TV on the roof of the vehicle, but one wasn’t installed in the prototype we rode in. The prototype did, however, have a small fridge between the front seats, but it wasn’t activated during our short demo.
Faraday called this configuration the “GOAT Edition,” and showed a rendering of what the backseat might look like.


This edition would offer more of a “VIP experience,” and we’d expect a higher price to boot. Faraday said it was aiming to unseat the Escalade as the car of choice for VIPs, which is notably a six-figure car in all but the most bare base model configurations.
This exceptional rear seat comfort seems like it will be important not just for the VIP market, but the China market. Most Americans, even the very wealthy, will still drive their own cars. But in China, having a driver is much more common, and there is more of a focus on rear seat comfort (we saw the same with Faraday’s first vehicle, the FF91).
Faraday was a bit cagey when talking about international sales, but did say that it is targeting 10,000 “global” reservations tonight. We would not be surprised if a significant percentage of those reservations come from a country where minivans are popular and rear seat comfort is a priority, and which happens to hold about a fifth of the world’s population.

In its press materials about the car, Faraday focused largely on comfort and safety, saying the car will have “360º safety, active + passive” and all-time all-wheel drive. The Super One has promised plenty of sensors for driver aids, including a “vision-first VLA system powered by lidar, millimeter-wave radar, ultrasonic sensors, and high-definition cameras”
As some of the few specific specs in the release, it mentioned a 130-inch wheelbase, 51.2-inch cabin height and 39.4-inch third-row legroom. It highlighted how this gives exceptional space efficiency, with flexible sliding rows, room for six golf bags, and fold-flat seats to turn into a camper bed.


Faraday refers to those seats as “zero-G” and says “every seat is the VIP seat.” If they’re anything like the rear seats in the FF91, which is extremely comfortable, then that will be something.
It also highlighted the various software features the car will include, like voice recognition, gestures, over the air updates, and AI suffused throughout the car’s tech. It said the FX Super One could function as your “Mobile AI Office.” It has also said that the FX Super One could be a “Mobile Livestream Studio” (hmm, where have we heard that before…)

Faraday did bring up one feature that I thought was questionable – the possibility of including a “range-extending” gas engine. It called this the “AI Hybrid Extended Range” powertrain, keeping with the trend of using “AI” in as many superfluous ways as possible.
This feels like it could be a misstep, because Faraday has been an all-electric brand since the start. As if spinning up production on a mass market minivan wasn’t hard enough, now Faraday is adding another powertrain option to the mix – and one which it has no experience with.
This means having to design the powertrain packaging two different ways, source more parts, compromise the design of one powertrain to make room for the other, and so on. That’s a lot of work to do on the revenue from the sale of 16 total units to date (though Faraday did just raise $105 million to help with this, and also said the hybrid version would come after the all-EV one).
Faraday pointed out that it is one of the only American EV startups left, able to avoid bankruptcy like so many of its kind – Fisker, Canoo, Nikola, Lordstown, and so on. It put itself alongside Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid, claiming to be one of only four American EV startups that has not gone bankrupt yet. This list may not be exhaustive, but Faraday does make a point that it is one of the few that is still in business.

But I would argue that, while their tech is actually fairly impressive (Faraday showed us an update to their voice recognition system which worked great at interpreting natural speech, even with stumbles and pauses, and supports 50+ languages, with help from OpenAI – an actual concrete practical use of AI), I wouldn’t so much call Faraday “thriving” or put it in the same category as other existing American EV startups.
Faraday spoke of its “capital efficiency” and showed a graph of how much less money it spends than its three compatriot companies, suggesting that its small team held an advantage over the other companies as a result. But those companies have each sold at least five digits worth of cars, which is a lot more than the two digits worth of cars that Faraday has sold.
And that brings up another point about Faraday’s private presentation which irked me: there was a lot of talk about the stock before we got to talking about the car. Now, this was a private event and several investors were there after all, but it still struck me that the last time I talked to the company (when it had a big stock price jump last May), it was about the stock, not a car.

This is emblematic of what I think is an issue with the company – I know it’s popular today for basically every company to chase the stock market to some extent, in our overly financialized economy. And in the startup EV space, you don’t have to look far to find one specific company which has been quite successful despite that it often seems to treat the stock as the product more than the cars themselves.
But that company (it’s Tesla, if you haven’t guessed) at least has products, and has good products too. Tesla may have a lot of hype too, but it started with a eye-opening product, it delivered that product, and then continued to iterate and improve and deliver more products. The first of those products (Roadster) was delivered before the company went public at all, and the excessive focus on pumping the stock with hype for constantly-delayed product releases really didn’t start until several years later (perhaps the mid-2010s with respect to products like FSD and solar roof, though Model 3 and Model Y both delivered roughly on their promises, and its only lately that everything Tesla does has been underwhelming or past-deadline).
In contrast, Faraday has taken a long time to deliver just 16 vehicles (it had targeted a yearly run rate of 10,000 cars by the start of 2025), and now it’s promising a whole new vehicle, a new powertrain, and a whole new pile of incomprehensible acronyms and branding.
In their short presentation, here are some of the novel acronyms and branding I heard: AI-HER, Super EAI F.A.C.E., X Super One, EAI-MPV, AIEV, Semantic VAD, VLA, Super AP + EAI platform, and the ultimate champion, the FF EAI Embodied Intelligence AI Agent 6×4 Architecture.

This is too much. Maybe Faraday doesn’t have to appeal to “normies” right now, as it has only sold 16 vehicles, but at some point you need regular joes and janes to buy your car. And those buyers are still – to far too high of a degree, I would argue – scared by electric cars.
You’re not going to sell the tech-resistant by throwing a million acronyms at them. You’re going to sell them by giving them a good product at a reasonable price that makes them feel like their concerns have been addressed and that they can just use it normally without thinking about it.
This was exhibited by one conversation I had at the unveiling, with a lovely couple from St Louis. They didn’t ask me what I thought of the FF EAI 6×4 Architecture, they said “well it gets both really hot and really cold in St. Louis, can an electric car handle that?”

Those are the questions on the mind of your buyers. If you want to sell cars, those are the questions you need to answer. Making people feel weird, making EVs feel foreign, isn’t going to answer those questions for them.
But that’s just the thing: you do that if you want to sell cars.
Again, I think Faraday’s tech is pretty good. They have a very cool voice recognition system, their screen is responsive, they even have a clever solution for the problem of physical vs. screen controls for volume and HVAC (you can swipe up/down and left/right with three fingers to change volume/temperature, respectively). And the FF91 has some real superlatives to it (though you’d expect so at that price).
But the company suffers from a lack of focus on the mission of building vehicles – a mission that it really has not yet completed at any significant scale. Getting any car to market is an achievement, and one which many thought Faraday would not accomplish. But as I’ve stated before, I think all this complicated branding, excessive injection of “AI” into every sentence, and focus on buzzwords and promises is all a distraction. I don’t think it helps to sell cars, or helps to build them – except insofar as the company is able to trick the stock market into thinking it deserves some of the excessive money being thrown at anything with the letters “AI” on it right now. So there is that, I guess.
So once again, this turned more into a discussion of Faraday the company than the FX Super One the car. But that’s bound to happen until a successful vehicle project gets off the ground and meets its targets.
Will the FX Super One be that vehicle project? We’ll have to wait and see. Our first indication might be how many reservations Faraday is able to get tonight, as it’s targeting 10,000 global reservations in 48 hours (a lower goal than the 64k hand-raisers they got 36 hours after the FF91 reveal, exceedingly few of which converted into orders, but those were zero-cost reservations).
Update: Faraday says that it already has over 10,000 reservations, likely counting pre-orders that were open prior to this event.
If you’d like to be one of reservers, feel free to get in line over at their website, where reservations should be live now, and where the company has already been taking refundable $100 pre-reservations for a little while. We’re sure we’ll here more soon about how those numbers turn out in the coming days, and Faraday says more info on specs and pricing will be announced later this year, but that it wants to start deliveries in 2026 (which seems ambitious).
To catch the rest of the event livestream (and perhaps see a replay afterwards), go check out Faraday’s website.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Electric Bronco, 6 passenger Model Y, and Waymo’s is bigger than Elon’s
Published
8 hours agoon
July 18, 2025By
admin
We’ve got huge news in the 4X4 Ford world with the launch of the first-ever all electric Ford Bronco. Plus, we’ve got a new long-wheelbase Model Y from Tesla and a full-scale d*ck-measuring contest in the world of full self driving. All this and more on today’s episode of Quick Charge!
We’ve also got a $300 million investment from Uber into Tesla Robotaxi rivals Lucid and Nuro and a suitably rapid successor to Lancia’s legendary HF nameplate – that could be an ideal new-age Neon, if Stellantis grows the stones to bring it Stateside.
Source Links
Prefer listening to your podcasts? Audio-only versions of Quick Charge are now available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, TuneIn, and our RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players.
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (most weeks, anyway). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Got news? Let us know!
Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.

If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
These are the 5 best EV financing offers right now
Published
8 hours agoon
July 18, 2025By
admin

Some of the best financing deals on EVs are offering 0% APR for up to 72 months, and if you combine that with an electric car eligible for the $7,500 federal tax credit, you get a pretty solid deal if you’re looking to buy.
However, the EV federal tax credit dies a premature, unnecessary death on September 30, 2025, thanks to the Republican-controlled Congress, so check out the best EV financing deals below that our friends at CarsDirect have surfaced.


2024 Acura ZDX – 0% APR For 72 Months + up to $10,000 cash
It’s not every day you can pair 0% APR for six years with up to $10,000 in savings, but that’s what’s on the table for the 2024 Acura ZDX through September 2.
For the A-Spec trim with all-wheel drive, buyers get $6,000 off the MSRP. Go with rear-wheel drive, and that drops to $3,500. The Type S also gets a $2,500 cut.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
If you own an Acura or a competing brand, there’s an extra $4,000 loyalty or conquest cash offer in the mix.
Click here to find a local dealer that may have the Acura ZDX in stock. – trusted affiliate link

2025 Toyota bZ4X – 0% APR For 72 Months + $2,500 cash
In many regions, Toyota is offering 0% APR plus $2,500 in bonus cash on the 2025 bZ4X when you finance through Toyota Financial Services. That $2,500 is basically a rebate tied to Toyota’s promotional interest rate.
This offer wraps up August 4, so if the bZ4X is on your list, now’s a good time to make a move.
Click here to find a local dealer that may have the Toyota bZ4X in stock. – trusted affiliate link

The 2025 Subaru Solterra is sticking with its usual deep-discount playbook of 0% APR for 72 months through July 31. But there’s a lesser-known perk worth flagging.
According to a national dealer incentive bulletin, Subaru is also kicking in $2,500 in dealer cash. You can stack it with the 0% financing deal, but don’t expect it to be plastered all over ads – it’s a behind-the-scenes offer, so shopping around could pay off.
Click here to find a local dealer that may have the Subaru Solterra in stock. – trusted affiliate link

2025 Honda Prologue – 0% APR + $11,500 cash
Through September 2, Honda’s got one of the most generous EV deals around on the 2025 Prologue: 0% APR plus up to $11,500 in bonus cash.
Here’s how it breaks down if you finance through Honda Financial Services: $5,500 in cash off the top, a $3,500 loyalty or conquest bonus if you already drive a Honda (or are switching from a competitor), and another $2,500 on top of that. It’s all stackable. Plus, the 2024 Honda Prologue is eligible for a $7,500 federal tax credit on purchases.
The catch? You need to live in California or another ZEV state to get the full package. But even outside those areas, Honda’s still offering solid cash incentives that make the Prologue well worth a look.
Click here to find a local dealer with the Honda Prologue in stock. – trusted affiliate link

2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E – 0% APR + $0 Down + 0 payments for 90 days
Ford’s rolling out a “zero-zero-zero” deal on the 2025 Mustang Mach-E: You get 0% APR for 60 months, $0 down, and no payments for the first 90 days.
To sweeten the deal, Ford is throwing in a free home charger plus free installation. If you’re already set up with home charging or just not interested, you can opt for an extra $500 bonus instead.
For a popular EV like the Mach-E, this is one of Ford’s most aggressive financing offers in a while, especially with that no-payment cushion built in.
Click here to find a local dealer that may have the Ford Mustang Mach-E in stock. – trusted affiliate link

The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike