Connect with us

Published

on

From shattering the record for most executive orders signed on a first day in office, a bishop imploring him to have mercy on immigrants and LGBTQ+ people, Melania’s hat and Mark Zuckerberg’s wandering eye – the first few days of Trump 2.0 has been not just the talk of the town in Washington DC, but in Westminster too.

President Trump himself said as he took the mantle of 47th president of the United States that he wants to make his second term “the most consequential in US history”.

What is becoming even more clear as campaigning gives way to governing is that Trump 2.0 could prove vastly consequential for us too.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Talk to those around Whitehall and in the government, and there is a quiet acknowledgement of the ill-wind that is blowing from America towards liberals like Sir Keir Starmer as President Trump pulls out of climate accords, ramps up the war on purging government workers in diversity, equity and inclusion roles, and begins to roll out an aggressive immigration crackdown from mass deportations to a broad ban on asylum.

But what you will see in the coming weeks, is a pointed effort on the part of the government to neither comment nor engage on US domestic issues. This is likely to infuriate liberals and progressives both in the Labour Party and voter base, but when it comes to Trump 2.0 pragmatism reigns.

More on Donald Trump

This is partly, say those in government, because of the difference in the win this time around.

Trump not only won the Electoral College, he won the popular vote – the first time a Republican candidate has won both in 20 years – and control of the House of Representatives and Senate. That gives a legitimacy and power that he didn’t have last time around and that momentum looks set to stay, at least until the mid-terms in two years’ time.

It is also because the Labour government, and wider Europe, needs Trump onside.

On the big issues facing the government, the US looms large, be it on economic growth – tariffs and trade deals – or security – Ukraine and the Middle East.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Middle East affected by Trump’s win?

Whether you love or loathe Donald Trump, the decisions he takes on how to handle Israel, Gaza and Iran or bring about peace in Ukraine matters to us, and that means pragmatism must reign and punches pulled when it comes to the deep ideological divisions that are so obvious between Donald Trump’s politics and that of Keir Starmer.

We are entering more turbulent times and one very senior political figure admits it is going to be “rocky”.

They say this is because we find ourselves in a period where the organising principle for western foreign policy – the rules-based international order – is in quick retreat, as the US and Europe struggle to contain territorial and political ambitions of authoritarian countries like Russia and China.

Tricky terrain to navigate, the four priorities Starmer will want to try to land with President Trump when he gets an audience in the coming weeks are – Ukraine, the Middle East, tariffs and trade.

On the first, the contours of a plan are being discussed but the challenge is to get Putin to the negotiating table.

Russia, aware that President Trump is unwilling to keep pouring military aid into Ukraine, will want to carry on for as long as possible.

The task for allies is to persuade President Trump to go in hard on Putin so he is forced to the table in a position of discomfort.

We saw some of this from President Trump this week as he warned Putin of punishing sanctions on Russia should Moscow refuse to negotiate.

But there will be demands for Ukraine too, not least an expectation from President Trump that in return for US military support, President Zelenskyy must send younger Ukrainian men to the battlefield and lower the conscription age from 25 to perhaps as young as 18.

This will be incredibly difficult for President Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people who have already sacrificed so much in a war they did not ask for and didn’t want.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key moments from Trump’s inauguration

As part of any ceasefire deal, expect the UK to be involved in a European peacekeeping force.

Expect too for Trump to ramp up pressure on NATO countries to boost defence spending from 2% of GDP to 3% or more (Trump called for the defence spend baseline of NATO members to be 5% in recent weeks).

Needless to say, the US’s handling of the Ukraine war and our role in that will be critical to not just our foreign policy, but national conversation in the coming months.

When it comes to the Middle East, the situation is trickier still.

I’m told there is some concern with the Foreign Office that Israel could make the case to Trump that the depletion of Iran’s proxies – Hezbollah and Hamas – make this a moment to target Iran.

There is nervousness that Trump, who has long made his acute dislike of Iran clear (last time around he abandoned the Obama nuclear deal with Tehran), buys into that and escalates a wider conflict in the region.

Even the risk of the US green-lighting a direct attack from Israel on Iran will only serve to accelerate Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Experts analyse Melania’s inauguration look

Where Starmer is hoping to make some progress is on trade.

President Trump, a big Brexit and Boris Johnson backer, talked up a US-UK trade deal in his first term, only for President Biden to put it on the backburner.

Now, the UK government is hoping there will be some sectoral deals in which our two countries can improve trading relations in return for the UK offering President Trump perhaps assurances around his security concerns regarding China (you might remember back in 2020, pressure from the US prompted the the government to U-turn on allowing Huawei to have a role in its new generation of 5G networks).

How this plays out, even as the Labour government looks to build trading ties with Beijing, will be something to watch.

One obvious question will be – can the UK benefit from renewed UK-China trade ties without annoying Trump?

The final big issue for the UK is tariffs, but for now it doesn’t look like Trump is taking aim at the UK.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump threatens trade tariffs

Instead, he has this week announced he’s considering imposing a 10% tariff on Chinese-made imports as soon as 1 February.

Starmer needs it to stay that way, given his plan for “national renewal” hinges on economic growth – which is looking precarious even without the prospect of tariffs on exports to the US.

Analysts had warned that a blanket 10% tariff could cost British industry $3bn (£2.5bn) a year, with cars, aerospace, pharmaceuticals and machinery among the sectors to be hardest hit.

One area where the government is more quietly confident is on the matter of its pick for ambassador, Lord Mandelson.

While rumours have been flying around that the architect of New Labour and former EU trade commissioner might get vetoed by President Trump, sources in government expect him to be appointed, and believe his nous as a political operator, coupled with his expertise in trade negotiations, make him a good choice.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could Trump stop the new UK ambassador?

But the bigger question is whether he can become a Trump whisperer in replacing current ambassador, Karen Pierce, who is well-regarded and liked by the Trump team.

How to handle Trump will undoubtedly be a test for Starmer, not just in his direct dealing but in the ripple effects of the Trump White House on British politics and his own supporters.

What goes in his favour is that he deals in facts not emotions, so is unlikely to be ruffled with whatever Trump and his allies throw at him.

His bigger challenge will perhaps be keeping the rest of his party in line when he wants pragmatism rather than principle to rule the special relationship.

Continue Reading

UK

Mother jailed for 10 years after her four sons died in house fire while she was out shopping

Published

on

By

Mother jailed for 10 years after her four sons died in house fire while she was out shopping

A woman whose four young boys died in a house fire after she went to a supermarket has been sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Deveca Rose, 30, was found guilty of the manslaughter of her two sets of twins, Leyton and Logan Hoath, aged three, and Kyson and Bryson Hoath, aged four, in October last year.

Jurors were told the four children died after a discarded cigarette or upturned tea light sparked a blaze at the family house in Collingwood Road, Sutton, in south London.

Judge Mark Lucraft KC said during sentencing on Friday: “There are no words to describe this case other than a deeply tragic one.”

During the prosecution’s opening statement last year, Kate Lumsdon KC alleged that Rose left the children alone to visit a supermarket on the evening of 16 December 2021.

She also told the court at the time that “there was rubbish thickly spread throughout the house”.

Deveca Rose has been jailed over the deaths of her sons. Pic: PA
Image:
Deveca Rose has been jailed over the deaths of her sons. Pic: PA

Children ‘too young’ to escape

Rose, who the court heard suffered from mental health problems, covered her head with a thick hood and hid her face as she was sentenced.

Judge Lucraft told the court that the children were left alone by their mother in an “unsafe” house that was lit using tea light candles when the fire broke out.

He then noted that she had already been to Sainsbury’s earlier that day, and her second trip at the time of the fire was not to purchase any items that were “essential or vital”.

The front door was locked at the time of the fire, the judge noted, and smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in the home were either not working or were out of battery.

“You were not there, and the children were too young to know what to do,” he said.

“As a result of what you did, they were all killed.”

He then described the victims as lively and engaging children who were “deeply loved” by all who had a role in their care.

The aftermath of the house fire in Sutton. Pic: PA
Image:
The aftermath of the house fire in Sutton. Pic: PA

After the fire started, the court heard that the children ran upstairs and started calling for help.

A neighbour attempted to break down the front door, and firefighters later found their bodies under beds once they entered the property.

The boys were rushed to separate hospitals, where they died from inhalation of fumes that night.

Rose arrived home while firefighters were still tackling the blaze, and claimed she left the children with a friend called Jade. Police concluded she either did not exist or was not at the property that day.

The court heard social worker Georgia Singh had raised concerns about the family and that the case was closed three months before the fire.

Previously, a health visitor had also expressed worries, but they were not followed up after she retired, jurors were told.

The children had not attended school for three weeks before their deaths.

It also heard evidence which suggested Rose may have suffered from a personality disorder – but the prosecution said this was not a defence.

Read more:
Grandson of pie tycoon jailed over Christmas Eve murder
Judges on historic Sara Sharif court proceedings can be named

Dad of boys ‘will never recover’

Dalton Hoath, father of the boys, told the court ahead of sentencing that losing his sons was “the worst day of my life”.

In a victim impact statement read to the court by a relative, he said: “Their lives had just begun but were cut so short. It was every parent’s worst nightmare… I have tried to be some sort of normal for my own family now.

“I will never recover from losing my funny, beautiful boys. I have to fight for all of us left behind and live with this massive pain in my heart before I meet them again.”

The boys’ grandfather Jason Hoath also told the court, “the pain from this loss has shattered my life in every possible way,” while their great-grandmother Sally Johnson said: “The thought of them crying and screaming out will haunt me forever.”

Step-grandmother Kerrie Hoath later said outside of the court that the children had been “cruelly taken away from us” by Rose.

She then added: “The impact [the children] have made on us in their short lives cannot be measured and will never be forgotten.

“We miss them every day and will always hold them in our hearts. While there will be better days to come, the hole that has been left by our children’s deaths cannot be filled.”

Continue Reading

UK

Judges who oversaw family court proceedings related to care of Sara Sharif can be named

Published

on

By

Judges who oversaw family court proceedings related to care of Sara Sharif can be named

Three judges who oversaw family court proceedings related to the care of Sara Sharif can be named next week, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Mr Justice Williams issued a ruling last year that the three judges involved in historic family court cases related to Sara, as well as social workers and guardians, could not be named due to a “real risk” of harm from a “virtual lynch mob”.

News organisations had previously appealed against Mr Williams’s decision on the grounds of transparency about the court case relating to the murder of the 10-year-old.

Sara’s father Urfan Sharif and her stepmother Beinash Batool were jailed for life in December for years of horrific “torture” and “despicable” abuse that led to her death.

On Friday, Sir Geoffrey Vos said: “In the circumstances of this case, the judge had no jurisdiction to anonymise the historical judges either on 9 December 2024 or thereafter. He was wrong to do so.”

He added that “if, notwithstanding the lack of evidence to that effect, the judge was concerned about their being named, there were other, more appropriate, ways to protect them”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From December: Sara Sharif’s father and stepmother jailed

Sir Geoffrey added on Friday that “judges will sit on many types of case in which feelings run high” and “where there may be risks to their personal safety”.

More on Sara Sharif

“It is up to the authorities with responsibility for the courts to put appropriate measures in place to meet these risks, depending on the situation presented by any particular case,” he said.

“The first port of call is not, and cannot properly be, the anonymisation of the judge’s name.”

He also said that Mr Williams “got carried away” in his ruling and “behaved unfairly” toward two journalists. He then noted that the High Court judge made an “unwarranted” sarcastic remark about a 2021 Channel 4 programme.

Sir Geoffrey told the court: “He said, for no reason that I could discern: ‘Thank goodness that journalists don’t have to operate as the courts do and hear both sides before delivering their verdict!’.

“Such sarcasm has no proper place in a court judgment.”

Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal heard the judges who oversaw court proceedings had “serious concerns” about the risks posed to them and their families if they were named.

It also heard that two of the judges are retired, with the third still sitting as a judge, and that all three wanted “to convey their profound shock, horror and sadness about what happened to Sara Sharif”.

Mr Williams previously also argued that holding individuals involved in those proceedings responsible was “equivalent to holding the lookout on the Titanic responsible for its sinking”.

Urfan Sharif, Beinash Batool and Faisal Malik.
Pic: Surrey Police
Image:
Urfan Sharif, Beinash Batool and Faisal Malik.
Pic: Surrey Police

Previously released documents showed that Surrey County Council first had contact with Sharif and Sara’s mother, Olga Sharif, in 2010 – more than two years before Sara was born.

At the time, the council had received “referrals indicative of neglect” relating to her two older siblings, known only as Z and U.

The authority began care proceedings concerning Z and U in January 2013, and involved Sara within a week of her birth.

Between 2013 and 2015, several allegations of abuse were made that were never tested in court, with one hearing in 2014 told that the council had “significant concerns” about the children returning to Sharif, “given the history of allegations of physical abuse of the children and domestic abuse with Mr Sharif as the perpetrator”.

Read more from Sky News:
All the cancellations and closures caused by Storm Eowyn
Record number of children living in B&Bs beyond legal limit

In 2019, a judge approved Sara moving to live with her father at the home in Woking where she later died after a campaign of abuse.

Sharif and Batool were jailed for life for Sara’s murder in December, with minimum terms of 40 years and 33 years.

Her uncle, Faisal Malik, was jailed for 16 years after being convicted of causing or allowing her death.

In a statement after the court’s ruling, freelance journalists Louise Tickle and Hannah Summers – who challenged Mr Williams’s order – said: “We feel that any other decision would have set a dangerous precedent going forward and undermined the efforts undertaken over the last two years to open up the family courts to greater transparency.

“There now need to be real efforts to work out what went wrong in this heartbreaking case where a young girl’s life was stolen from her, and what might need to change.”

Continue Reading

UK

Dylan Thomas: Grandson of pie company tycoon jailed over murder of friend in ‘frenzied attack’

Published

on

By

Dylan Thomas: Grandson of pie company tycoon jailed over murder of friend in 'frenzied attack'

The grandson of a pie company tycoon who killed his best friend in a “frenzied attack” on Christmas Eve has been sentenced.

Dylan Thomas, 24, killed William Bush, 23, at the property they shared in the Llandaff area of Cardiff on 24 December 2023.

Thomas had admitted manslaughter by diminished responsibility but denied Mr Bush’s murder.

At Cardiff Crown Court in November, a jury of 10 men and two women found him guilty of murder.

On Friday he was handed a life sentence, with a minimum term of 19 years imprisonment, minus the time he has already spent in custody.

Mr Bush sustained 37 stab wounds in total, including 21 to the neck, and his cause of death was given as “multiple stab wounds to the neck and trunk”.

The court heard Thomas used two knives – a kitchen knife and flick knife – in the attack on Mr Bush.

More on Cardiff

Thomas, who the trial heard has schizophrenia, had claimed in the immediate aftermath of the attack that he was acting in self-defence.

He is the grandson of Sir Stanley Thomas, the founder of Peter’s Pies, a company based in South Wales.

Dylan Thomas, has been jailed for life at Cardiff Crown Court.
Pic:South Wales Police/PA
Image:
Dylan Thomas. Pic: South Wales Police

Reading a victim impact statement, Mr Bush’s sister Catrin said her brother’s life was taken “in the most barbaric and cruel way”.

“Instead of Will returning home for dinner on Christmas Eve it was Dyfed-Powys Police knocking on our door informing us that Will had died,” she said.

Ms Bush said her family could not “begin to comprehend the fear and suffering that Will endured on that day”.

“Will was such a loyal, funny and caring person. He lit up every room he walked into with his cheeky grin and quick-witted humour,” she added.

“I sat through as much of the trial as I could bear, as you can imagine some of the evidence was too heartbreaking for me to sit through.”

William Bush
Pic:South Wales Police
Image:
William Bush. Pic: South Wales Police

William Bush’s father, John David Bush, told the court he couldn’t attend any of the previous hearings but was “determined” to attend the sentencing.

“The instinct of all parents is to love and protect our children and to keep them safe, but we were not able to do this and this haunts us every day,” he said.

“All aspects of his life, and indeed his body, have been dissected. He has had no privacy in death.”

Mr Bush added: “His life was short, but he had, and continues to have, meaning.

“Imagine all the things that you would have missed if you had died at 23. Marriage, children, family, the daily joys of the life.”

Catrin Bush, sister of William Bush, speaks outside Cardiff Crown Court after Dylan Thomas was found guilty of his murder
Image:
Catrin Bush, sister of William Bush, spoke outside Cardiff Crown Court upon the verdict

In her victim impact statement, Mr Bush’s long-term girlfriend Ella Jeffries said he was “petrified of dying” and his death had “left an indescribable pain and a darkness in [her] life”.

“Will was the love of my life and meant everything to me,” she said. “Life will never be the same without Will.”

In mitigation, Orlando Pownall KC said Thomas was a “young man” at the time of the offence and has “no previous convictions”.

Mr Pownall also cited Thomas’s mental illness, after his trial heard he lived with schizophrenia.

Handing down her sentence, Mrs Justice Steyn said Thomas murdered Mr Bush in a “sustained and ferocious knife attack”.

She said Mr Bush was “senselessly murdered and deprived of many, many decades of a happy and fulfilling life”.

“The sentence I will pass is not intended as a measure of the value of Will’s life, that is beyond measure,” she added.

She said the “frenzied attack” was persistent in nature and “must have terrified the deceased and caused him great pain and distress”.

Mrs Justice Steyn thanked those who had brought Thomas to justice and paid tribute to Mr Bush’s family for their “dignity, fortitude and restraint”.

Read more from Sky News:
The 14 minutes of terror that left three children dead
Woman jailed for causing eight-month-old baby’s death

Detective Constable Joanne Harris from South Wales Police said the force’s thoughts were with Mr Bush, his family and girlfriend.

“While we recognise that Dylan Thomas’ sentence of 19 years’ imprisonment won’t bring William back, we do hope that this outcome goes some way to allowing the family to grieve and help in some way with their heartbreak,” she said.

Chris Evans from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the level of violence inflicted upon Mr Bush was “terrifying” and “led to the tragic death of a young man”.

Continue Reading

Trending