Ofsted has revealed what new report cards for schools could look like – as the sister of a headteacher who took her own life says the proposals are a “rehash” of a “dangerous” system.
Schools in England could instead be judged across a variety of different areas – including attendance and inclusion – using a colour-coded five-point scale.
But Mrs Perry‘s sister Professor Julia Waters said: “I am worried that this proposal is a rehash of the discredited and dangerous system it is meant to replace.”
Image: Ofsted change is ‘vindication’, says sister of headteacher Ruth Perry
She said while the new model has some improvements, it “retains many of the dangerous features of the previous system, while introducing a series of changes with potential new risks to the wellbeing of teachers and headteachers”.
“My sister Ruth Perry died as the result of a rude and intimidating Ofsted inspection, and its disproportionate consequences on her and her school,” she said.
“Ofsted says it has listened, but it still does not appear to have adequately learned.”
More on Education
Related Topics:
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said she recognises the “tragedy of Ruth Perry’s death and the impetus for change her sister has brought to the system”, adding she has spoken to Prof Waters about the need for Ofsted reform.
“On the report cards in particular, I think parents are more than able to understand and take on greater information about what’s happening within their children’s school, both in terms of strengths but in terms of weakness and where there’s further work required on improvements,” she said.
The minister said she “fundamentally rejects” the idea that parents do not want to know more about areas in need of improvement, as well as “where there is excellence”.
Image: Report card proposal. Pic: Ofsted
A 12-week consultation on the inspection process for schools teaching pupils of all ages, including further education institutions, was launched on Monday.
The proposals include a new report card format to replace the single-word grade system, where schools were given an “Outstanding”, “Good”, “Requires Improvement”, or “Inadequate” rating.
Instead, judgements will be made using a 1-5 grading system using the terms: “Exemplary”, “Strong”, “Secure”, “Attention Needed”, and “Causing Concern”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:29
Is new Ofsted system ‘dangerous’?
The previous judgements will remain valid until schools undergo another inspection under the new model.
Safeguarding will be assessed as a standalone category and will be classified as either met or not met.
The number of inspection areas in schools will expand from four to nine, or ten for those with a sixth form.
Under the new proposal, the areas of inspection will be Achievement, Attendance, Behaviour and Attitudes, Curriculum, Developing Teaching, Inclusion, Leadership and Governance, Personal Development and Well-Being, Sixth Form, and Safeguarding.
Ofsted has already started training inspectors to facilitate the changes for the new style inspections.
Chief inspector of Ofsted Sir Martyn Oliver said: “The new report card will give parents a clearer picture, while helping schools focus on meaningful improvements.
“We will make sure that we deliver for parents regardless of what we do.
“Our mission is to improve education for all children, particularly the most disadvantaged.”
But Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union, said Sir Martyn “has failed to deliver”.
“The proposals outlined in today’s consultation will make matters worse, not better,” he said.
“The secretary of state was right to remove one-word judgements, because she recognised the damage that they cause.
“Instead, the 1 to 5 grading scale proposed for the report card maintains the current blunt, reductive approach that cannot capture the complexity of school life nor provide more meaningful information to parents.”
Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government’s controversial welfare bill.
Sir Keir Starmer’s Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion.
MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.
Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole – close to breaching Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules set out last year.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:36
Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma
In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were “costs” to watering down the welfare bill.
“I’m not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that,” Ms Reeves told the outlet.
More on Rachel Reeves
Related Topics:
“We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement.
“So we’ll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.”
Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised.
The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more.
Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”
In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a “tough day” before adding: “People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday.
“Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
“In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,” he said. “That’s what it was yesterday.
“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”