Two years ago, Dayni suffered the sudden and unexpected loss of her mother, Janice. The shock of her passing was traumatic enough – but what followed made the grieving process even more unbearable.
Warning: this story contains details some readers may find upsetting
Dayni was in hospital when her mother died, so it was a few days before she could view the body.
“I just couldn’t believe what I saw,” Dayni recalled. “She just didn’t look like my mum at all. She was all pushed up, with marks all over her face. And she was bloated – really bloated.”
Janice’s body had been left in the care of a funeral director, and embalmed.
But something went terribly wrong.
“She was covered in blood, severely bloated to the point of bursting,” Dayni said. “She looked battered and bruised, like she’d been attacked. But she died in her sleep. She just looked awful.”
More from UK
Desperate for help, Dayni asked another funeral director to step in and take over the care of her mother’s body.
But in hindsight, as Dayni has spent two years fighting for some kind of redress, this has only served to complicate the chain of responsibility.
As Janice’s body continued to deteriorate, it became increasingly difficult to determine who was responsible for the errors in caring for her.
Sky News has seen images of the condition of Janice’s body, which we are not publishing.
But the distress of seeing her mother in such a state had a profound effect on Dayni.
Image: Dayni speaking to Sky News
“I was devastated. I couldn’t sleep. I was thinking all sorts – had they just tossed her about like she was nothing? It’s horrible. It’s ruined my life.”
A broken system
The funeral sector in the UK remains entirely unregulated.
While trade bodies exist to uphold standards, they have little power to enforce them. And the penalties they can impose are minimal.
The most severe sanction available is expulsion – but this doesn’t prevent an expelled company from continuing to practice.
In Dayni’s case, one funeral director was investigated by their trade body, the National Society of Allied and Independent Funeral Directors (SAIF), and found to have breached standards.
They were “reprimanded” – in essence, given a telling-off – but even still, they refused to acknowledge the findings or accept responsibility.
Instead, they commissioned a report from an independent embalmer, seen by Sky News, which points the finger of blame at the second funeral director.
The second funeral director could not be investigated at all by SAIF, because they aren’t a member, though they strenuously deny any wrongdoing.
No one has any overarching responsibility
The embalmer, who was self-employed, was also given a “severe reprimand” by her trade body, the British Institute of Embalmers, as well as a “strong recommendation” to seek further training.
She could not be reached for comment.
Absent of any regulation, nobody has any overarching responsibility.
Nobody is able to give Dayni a full picture of what happened to her mother, or conduct a thorough investigation, with appropriate penalties.
When approached for comment, both funeral directors denied any wrongdoing.
We asked both trade bodies whether they were, in essence, marking their own homework, and whether they felt the sector should be regulated.
The British Institute of Embalmers said: “We would certainly welcome structured regulation within the industry. The industry does really mark its own homework.”
A spokesperson for SAIF stated: “We don’t believe the industry is marking its own homework. SAIF’s standards framework is monitored by the UK Accreditation Service. We have long supported the call for regulation of the funeral sector.”
Calls for urgent reform
Recent high-profile cases have shone a light on the urgent need for change.
And last year, Legacy Funeral Directors in Hull came under police investigation following reports of bodies not being properly cared for.
Image: Police outside the Hessle Road branch of Legacy Independent Funeral Directors in Hull in March 2024. Pic: PA
In January, a file was passed to the Crown Prosecution Service to consider bringing criminal charges.
Lindesay Mace, of the charity Quaker Social Action, said: “Most funeral directors provide good care, but the lack of regulation means there are no mandatory training requirements, no particular standards for facilities, and no oversight of premises.”
Perhaps most alarming is the absence of basic requirements such as refrigeration.
“There isn’t even a requirement to have cold storage facilities,” Lindesay explained. “Most people will find that completely unbelievable.”
Government response
The Ministry of Justice has acknowledged the concerns raised by grieving families and industry professionals alike.
In a statement, it confirmed it was “reviewing the full range of possible next steps… including looking at options for regulation.”
However, no concrete timeline has been provided.
In Scotland, the devolved government has already begun the process of regulation.
No answers, no accountability
For Dayni, the lack of regulation has left her without answers, or redress.
“When I looked into all of this and found out there were no regulations I couldn’t believe it. It’s just mind blowing. I just think it’s disgusting, and something needs to change.”
Grenfell Tower will be demolished, Angela Rayner has confirmed.
The demolition is expected to take “around two years” and be carried out “sensitively”, the government said.
The official announcement comes after the deputy prime minister met with campaigners to tell them of the decision on Wednesday evening – sparking an angry reaction.
Grenfell United has accused Ms Rayner of “ignoring” the voices of people who lost family in the fire in June 2017, which killed 72 people.
The disaster was Britain’s deadliest residential fire since the Second World War and began a national reckoning over the safety and conditions of social housing and tower blocks.
There have been discussions over the years about how best to commemorate the tragedy.
Engineering experts have said that while the tower remains stable, and it is safe for people to live, work and study nearby, its condition will worsen over time and there is no realistic prospect of bringing it back into use.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:26
Anger over Grenfell Tower plans
Why is Grenfell Tower being demolished?
In its announcement of the demolition, the government said Ms Rayner was told by engineers that the tower is “significantly damaged”.
While it “remains stable”, this is due to the supports put in place after the fire.
Engineers said it is also not “practicable” to keep many of the damaged storeys as part of a long-term memorial.
“Taking the engineering advice into account the deputy prime minister concluded that it would not be fair to keep some floors of the building that are significant to some families, whilst not being able to do so for others and knowing that, for some, this would be deeply upsetting,” the government said.
Image: Angela Rayner has confirmed that Grenfell Tower will be demolished. Pic: PA
How will the demolition take place?
The government says it wants to take the next steps “respectfully and carefully”, with continued support for the community around Grenfell.
It said no changes will take place before the eighth anniversary of the fire in June this year.
The next step is to find someone to carry out the demolition.
A “specialist contractor” will be found to come up with a “detailed plan” for taking down the tower.
The government estimates it will take around two years to “sensitively take down the tower through a process of careful and sensitive progressive deconstruction that happens behind the wrapping”.
Any leftover materials from the tower and its surrounding communal areas can be carefully removed and then returned as part of any memorial, if the community so chooses, according to the government.
Ahead of the decision being made publicly, Ms Rayner wrote to families, survivors and surrounding residents to tell them of the planned demolition.
The government says it has “prioritised” engaging with the community, and that Ms Rayner has been offering to speak with them and listen to their views for several months. The deputy prime minister also met with community groups, residents’ associations, schools and faith leaders.
These conversations have made it clear the tower “remains a sacred site” – however it is also clear “there is not a consensus about what should happen to it”.
The government said that for some the tower remains a “symbol of all they lost” and helps ensure “the tragedy is never forgotten and can act as a reminder of the need for justice and accountability”.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The visibility of the tower also “helps some people continue to feel close to those they lost”.
But the announcement added that for some, the tower is a “painful reminder of what happened and is having a daily impact on some members of the community”.
It means services between Newton-le-Willows / Wigan North Western and ManchesterOxford Road / Manchester Victoria will be cancelled, revised or diverted.
TransPennine Express services are not running between Liverpool Lime Street and Manchester Victoria.
People going between those cities are advised to travel via Warrington Central instead.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
Northern trains are also affected between Liverpool and Manchester Airport, and Chester and Leeds to Manchester Victoria.
Transport for Wales routes from Chester / Llandudno to Manchester Airport / Manchester Oxford Road are impacted, as are Holyhead to Manchester Airport services.
Replacement buses are running in some areas and tickets are being accepted on other services.
A Network Rail spokesperson said engineers were “assessing the situation in order to repair the damaged cables as quickly as possible” but the line was likely to stay closed for most of the day.
They added: “We’re really sorry to any passengers affected by this incident and urge anyone planning to travel by train between Liverpool and Manchester to plan ahead and check with their train operator for the latest travel information.”
A man who shook his partner’s toddler to death after staying up late playing video games has been jailed for life with a minimum of 25 years.
Paula Roberts left her son Charlie, aged one year and 10 months, in the care of her partner Christopher Stockton at her Darlington home while she went for an eye test, Teesside Crown Court heard.
Within minutes of her leaving, Stockton called 999 to report the toddler had gone “floppy”.
Stockton, 38, who is not Charlie’s father, was convicted of the boy’s murder and child cruelty in December.
Image: Christopher Stockton has been sentenced for the killing. Pic: Durham Constabulary/PA
Sentencing Stockton, Mr Justice Goss said Charlie, who was born two months prematurely and had difficulty communicating, was particularly vulnerable.
The judge said only Stockton knew why he inflicted the fatal blow which caused brain injuries similar to those seen in a car crash, a crushing incident or a fall of several storeys.
“You have robbed his family of the joy of bringing up a child and of sharing life events with him. No court can undo the harm you have caused,” he said.
Roberts was sentenced to four years in prison on Friday.
Image: Paula Roberts had concerns about Stockton, but did nothing. Pic: Durham Police
Having initially denied a child cruelty charge, she eventually admitted neglecting her son by failing to get Charlie medical treatment for bruising caused by Stockton over several weeks.
During the police investigation into Charlie’s death, detectives uncovered a series of photographs on Roberts’ phone which showed him with bruises and injuries to different parts of his body.
Several messages on her phone stated she would seek medical help for her boy – but she never did.
“You now recognise that you contributed to his neglect, in effect turning a blind eye to what you must have known was the reality of the situation,” the judge told Roberts.
“You remain a risk to any children in your care.”
Richard Herrmann, defending Roberts, said she had struggled with mental health issues.
She wept as Mr Herrmann said: “She has to live with the knowledge that had she acted differently it would not have happened.”
Image: Pic: Family Handout/PA
The court heard Roberts was suspicious enough about Stockton that she set up a spy camera above her son’s cot.
But the 41-year-old stayed in a relationship with him, even after she voiced her concerns about Stockton to her brother.
Stockton, who had moved in with Roberts and Charlie just seven days earlier, was in sole charge of the boy on 12 January 2024.
He was off work ill and had stayed up into the early hours playing Xbox games, and must have snapped that morning, the court was told.
Stockton inflicted a severe head injury on Charlie which caused widespread bleeding on the brain. The toddler died in hospital the next day.
Image: Charlie Roberts
Pic: Durham Police
Nicholas Lumley KC, prosecuting, told jurors Stockton “shook or threw him with such violence, deliberately and forcefully harming little Charlie”.
Stockton rang 999 and could be heard on a recording repeatedly saying “come on mate” and “wakey wakey” to Charlie, who was not breathing.
He was to tell paramedics, doctors and the police that Charlie had choked on a biscuit and that he patted the child on the back and stuck his fingers down the toddler’s throat.
Jamie Hill KC, defending Stockton, told the court he had no previous convictions, the murder was not premeditated and there was no intention to kill.
Following Stockton’s conviction, Charlie’s father Barry Greenwell said: “Charlie was a much-loved son and grandson who has been taken away needlessly, and has left the whole family with a void that will never be filled.
“As a family we are processing the recent events and are trying to come to terms with the verdict and information given that has been deeply disturbing to ourselves.”
Detective Superintendent Chris Barker, who led the investigation, said: “To install a spy camera, as Paula Roberts did, means there must have been concerns about him.
“If you have concerns about those caring for your children, you must act, speak out or ask for help.
“Charlie had everything to live for, but his life was cruelly cut short.”