Bridget Jones: A heroine of our time or an absolute disgrace?
A perennial singleton among the smug marrieds, with a passion for Chardonnay, big knickers and emotional f***wits.
Who is Bridget Jones and why is she beloved by so many?
Created by Helen Fielding as an anonymous way to write about being a single girl in London, Bridget first came to life in a weekly column in the Independent.
Fielding didn’t think it would last six weeks. She was very wrong, and Bridget Jones is still alive and kicking nearly three decades later with four novels, four movies and a legion of fans worldwide.
First off, we have to pay homage to Jane Austen. Without Pride And Prejudice, Bridget Jones wouldn’t exist.
The entire plot line of Bridget Jones’s Diary is built around the love triangle of Elizabeth Bennett, the dashing but aloof Mr Darcy and the absolute cad Mr Wickham – but retold in1990s London with Bridget, Mark Darcy and Daniel Cleaver.
As a drinking, smoking, swearing and non-corset-wearing Elizabeth Bennett, Bridget was a big hit. Set loose in the capital in the hedonistic ’90s, there was plenty of fun to be had, and plenty to poke fun at.
Created pre-social media, we can only imagine a world in which Bridget was documenting her weight and alcohol units on TikTok instead of in her diary…
Pic: Moviestore/Shutterstock
The first movie
There was a media meltdown when American actress Renee Zellweger was cast as Bridget Jones, and the fact she put on 25lbs for the role was front-page news for months. It’s fair to say the obsession with Zellweger’s weight has pretty much continued to this day.
With life imitating art, while Bridget religiously notes her weight every day in her diary, the world became obsessed with Zellweger’s own size – very much proving the point that her character’s obsessive relationship with the scales reflected society’s obsession with female appearance.
Of course, we don’t know how tall Bridget is, so despite knowing her daily calorie intake and weight to the pound, we have no idea how big or small she actually is, just her own perception of her size.
Meanwhile, qualms over how convincing Zellweger would be at pulling off a British accent were quickly quashed when she nailed it, with the help of the same voice coach who worked with Gwyneth Paltrow on Shakespeare In Love. It’s faultless.
Pic: Rex Features
Brat Bridget and feminist Marmite
Bridget was Brat long before Brat was a thing. Smoking like a chimney, with a questionable dress sense and sporting hair that – unlike pretty much 99% of films – looks messy and real, Bridget was relatable and became an instant icon to many women – particularly those over 35 – who felt largely ignored by society.
However, the character was feminist Marmite – while some loved Bridget, others hated her and everything she stood for.
Some felt her obsession with her appearance and finding a man flew in the face of what it meant to be an independent woman – and everything the first waves of the feminist movement had fought for.
Others thought that for a generation that had been told they could have it all, Bridget’s battles to try to achieve all that society told her she should, were a valiant attempt to triumph in an impossible situation.
Pic: Rex Features
Principled, honest and unwaveringly kind – while Bridget may not have been perfect, in an era of heroin chic, lad mags and outrageously unrealistic beauty standards, there were plenty less wholesome role models for young women to aspire to.
Pre-MeToo world
The first books and films came to life in a pre-MeToo world and boy do you know it – there’s lots of bum-pinching, and inappropriate comments in the office and beyond. Mr Tits Pervert was not an anomaly.
Helen Fielding has since said she was shocked when rewatching to note the amount of inappropriate behaviour Bridget has to put up with.
Each film has a structure running from the end of one year, through Christmas and New Year, and looking ahead to a new start.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Why is Bridget Jones so popular?
Nostalgic soundtracks are a staple, with lip-synced favourites a mainstay of every film. If you’ve never cried into your wine glass while singing All By Myself, you’ve never lived.
The films also have a largely returning cast – who like Bridget have been in our lives for years. Watching them grow up from movie to movie – as we do too – is part of the joy.
We also get to look forward to a ‘Mr Darcy in the lake moment’ in every film – be it in a river, an aqua aerobic pre-natal class or a pond, with the latest re-enactment courtesy of a half-naked Leo Woodall – who incidentally was born in the year the first novel was published.
The fight scenes in the first two films have also become something of a cultural touchstone, largely thanks to the fact that middle-aged men ineffectually kicking each other while hopping around is rarely portrayed on the silver screen.
Pic: Rex Features
The second film
Bridget Jones: The Edge Of Reason sees Bridget continue her unbelievably lucky streak when it comes to jobs. While she started out as a PR in a publishing house (most notably promoting the highbrow read Kafka’s Motorbike) she then stumbled into TV production, which quickly and inexplicably segued into becoming a TV presenter.
In this movie she lands the dream role of a travel presenter, despite a complete lack of geographical knowledge, and it provides the basis of the plot which revolves around getting stranded in Thailand after accidentally smuggling drugs.
We can’t ignore some issues around this one, not least scenes in a Thai jail in which Bridget sings some Madonna and then hands out bras and chocolate before being freed by Mark Darcy. The movie faced criticism for perpetuating “white saviour” stereotypes, and is not Bridget’s finest moment.
Read more from Sky News:
Buffy is back: Gellar teases return of hit TV series
TV chef denies inappropriate behaviour
Alerts issued as temperatures plummet
Unexpected cameos punctuate the first three movies – from Salman Rushdie and Jeremy Paxman, to Paul Nicholls (aka Joe Wicks from EastEnders – a massive heartthrob at the time), to Ed Sheeran.
Pic: Rex Features
The third film
Bridget Jones meets Three Men And A Baby in the third movie Bridget Jones’s Baby, with the novel actually following the film rather than vice versa. It was based on articles written by Fielding in 2005.
Spoiler alert – Hugh Grant wasn’t up for this one. Luckily, Patrick Dempsey – the man who played Dr McDreamy in Grey’s Anatomy – stepped in. It good-naturedly cracks through the challenges of having a baby as a geriatric, single-working mum and somehow picking the right guy at the end of it all. Bridget gets her fairytale wedding, her man and of course becomes a mum.
While the first couple of films contained more smoking than would be believed, this one saw the franchise ditch the habit, a reflection both of Bridget’s new responsibilities and the changing fashions of the time.
While Grant sat this one out, there was hope for fans that he would return thanks to a cheeky front-page splash at the end of the film declaring him alive and well a year after he was presumed dead following a plane crash (in the bush).
Pic: Universal Pictures
The fourth film
It’s not quite a full-on reunion for the fourth film – but almost. Bridget’s life has taken some unexpected turns, and while Daniel Cleaver may have risen from the dead, there is a new and much bigger hole in her life.
You will need to take tissues into this one, unless you have a heart of stone.
While past casts have been notable for their lack of diversity, this one also looks a bit more like the multicultural capital Bridget lives in.
Bridget now has a shelf full of diaries and rye observances include a takedown of the dismissal of “women of a certain age”, a lip-filler-esque fail that pokes fun at attempts to cheat age and the baffling modern phenomenon of buttonless lifts.
Pic: Rex Features
The end of an era?
Is this the end for Bridget? For now. The exploration of her life from her early 30s to her mid-50s has seen her find love, forge a career and have a family. But it’s not out of the question we could venture into the next stages of her life at some point.
Helen Fielding is still writing books, just not about Bridget. With a new legion of Gen Z fans now introduced to – and loving – Bridget, never say never.
And while Bridget may have found her happy ever after – all fans of the books will know It is a truth universally acknowledged that when one part of your life starts going okay, another falls spectacularly to pieces. So, watch this space.
From soaring power ballads to novelty earworms, disco to metal and even “ouija pop”, there’s nothing quite like Eurovision – watched by millions around the world, tuning in to celebrate live music’s weird and wonderful.
Politics has always played a part, despite insistence by organisers the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) that it remains politically neutral.
Countries have pulled out or been banned in previous years – most notably Russia in 2022, just days after the invasion of Ukraine.
But it now seems like Eurovision could be facing its biggest political crisis yet.
Yuval Raphael represented Israel at this year’s contest, held in Basel in May. Pic: AP
In the last two years, there has been growing controversy over Israel’s participation, with protests in host city Basel, Switzerland, earlier this year, and Malmo in Sweden when it held the competition in 2024.
Ahead of next year’s ceremony in Vienna, Austria, tensions have risen already.
Earlier this month, Irish broadcaster RTE made an announcement: it will boycott the competition if Israel is allowed to take part. The Netherlands and Spain quickly followed suit, and other countries including Slovenia and Iceland have suggested similar.
It comes amid increasing criticism of Israel’s continued military action in Gaza, launched in response to the attack by Hamas militants on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, which left some 1,200 people dead.
The Eurovision Song Contest Reference Group, the competition’s governing body, has extended the deadline for broadcasters to confirm participation to mid-December. It says a decision on Israel’s participation is pending and that it has “taken note of the concerns expressed by several broadcasters”.
Politics at Eurovision – and why is this different?
Kalush Orchestra won for Ukraine in 2022. Pic: AP/Luca Bruno
What is unfolding now is unlike anything that has come before, says Dean Vuletic, a historian of contemporary Europe and author of Postwar Europe In The Eurovision Song Contest.
“Politics has always been there,” he says. “Countries have always used the contest to send political messages. For example, in the very first contest in 1956, West Germany was represented by a Jew and a Holocaust survivor.
“In recent years, though, things have changed because the European Broadcasting Union has had to make political decisions.”
Vuletic cites Belarus’s exclusion in 2021, after the country had experienced large protests over the disputed re-election of leader Alexander Lukashenko, and its entry was deemed too political.
The following year, Russia was kicked out just a few days after the start of the invasion on Ukraine. The EBU said at the time that Russia’s participation would “bring the competition into disrepute”.
But these are not the first examples of countries being excluded from the competition; this first happened in the early 1990s, when the then Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was banned due to UN sanctions.
“When it came to Belarus, Russia, there were also European sanctions,” says Vuletic. “Israel was for a long time not subject to sanctions from European countries for its actions in Gaza – although in recent days we’ve seen that changing.”
What about the BBC?
Remember Monday represented the UK at Eurovision in 2025. Pic: MANDOGA MEDIA/picture-alliance/dpa/AP
BBC director general Tim Davie has said the corporation is “aware of the concerns” raised, but the song contest has “never been about politics”.
A spokesperson for the broadcaster sent a similar statement to Sky News, saying: “We are aware of the various views and concerns which have been expressed in recent days in relation to next year’s Eurovision. At this stage, we will continue to be part of the discussions, led by the European Broadcasting Union, with other members and broadcasters.
“Eurovision has never been led by politics, it has been – and is – a celebration of music and culture that brings people together from across the world.”
Why is Spain’s stance particularly important?
Spain is one of Eurovision’s “Big Five” countries, a group which also includes France, Germany, Italy and the UK. While the host broadcaster – decided by the previous year’s winner – will often contribute most towards the cost of staging the contest, the Big Five will also make up a significant amount.
These countries are big markets for Eurovision and acts are given direct entry to the final because of this. They also act as reserve countries should a winning country not be able to host; in 2023, the UK stepped in following Ukraine’s win the previous year.
Pic: Corinne Cumming/ EBU
“Dr Eurovision” Paul Jordan, who has a PhD in the subject and also worked behind the scenes as part of the EBU’s communications team between 2015 and 2018, says Spain’s stance has increased the pressure.
“There’s always been these tensions but there’s never been a kind of threat of a mass boycott in the way that has happened now,” he says. “The fact they are now outwardly saying they won’t participate with Israel in, that could make the EBU sit up and take notice because there is potential funding pitfalls and audience pitfalls.
“Having a big five country not part of the contest could potentially unravel the funding model. I also think the funding itself potentially needs to be looked at in the context of the financial challenges facing public broadcasters today.”
The EBU has said it is “assessing the potential impacts” of broadcasters pulling out. When asked by Sky News if this includes financial ones they, simply said that “all impacts will be assessed”.
Are other countries likely to follow suit?
Germany, represented by Abor & Tinny at this year’s event, has said it will support the EBU’s decision. Pic: MANDOGA MEDIA/picture-alliance/dpa/AP
Sky News has contacted broadcasters set to take part in the event. Italy’s RAI, another of the Big Five, said it hoped to have news on the issue soon. Germany’s SWR said its parent company, ARD, supports the consultation process and will back the EBU’s decision.
In a statement, an SWR spokesperson said the goal is “to reach a well-founded and sustainable agreement that aligns with the values” of the EBU.
“The ESC has been a major musical event for decades, connecting people across Europe and beyond through diversity, respect, and openness, regardless of origin, religion, or beliefs. It is a competition organised by EBU broadcasters, not by governments.”
Experts agree the number of countries threatening a boycott will likely increase – although it could work both ways.
“We have to see what this period of consultation will bring, which countries will also join the calls for a boycott of the contest if Israel does participate, which countries might be steadfast in their support of Israel,” says Vuletic.
“For now, that’s not clear, whether countries will actually be so supportive of Israel so as to themselves contribute to a boycott of the contest. That would be a very big political message because if they take the side of Israel and not of their European partners, then we might see even greater ramifications of this crisis.”
What has Israel said?
Netta won the competition for Israel in 2018. Pic: Armando Franca/AP
Israel’s broadcaster, Kan, did not respond to Sky News’ request for comment.
However, chief executive Golan Yochpaz reportedly told the Times of Israel that the event should not become political and that that there is “no reason” why Israel should not be part of it.
He also highlighted Israel’s success in the competition, with one win in 2018 and three other top-five finishes in recent years.
The situation in Gaza
More than 65,000 people in Gaza have now been killed in the war, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. The figure does not specify the number of Hamas members killed.
The ongoing military action continues following the Hamas terror attack on Israel in October 2023, which saw around 1,200 people killed and 251 people taken hostage. Forty-eight remain in Gaza, but fewer then half are thought to still be alive.
Earlier in September, a UN commission agreed Israel is committing genocide – the first time such an explosive allegation has been made publicly by a UN body. Israel has vehemently denied this claim as “distorted and false”.
Sky News analysis shows thousands of families remain in crowded tent camps in Gaza City, with the UN estimating last week that a million people remain there.
Israel, however, believes 40% of the population has already fled south and earlier this week opened a new evacuation route for 48 hours.
What happened at the contest this year and in 2024?
Final scores for the Eurovision Song Contest 2025. Pic: BBC
Israeli contestant Yuval Raphael, a survivor of the October 2-23 Hamas attack, won the public vote with the song New Day Will Rise, and at one point looked set to be crowned the overall winner of this year’s competition – but ultimately finished second when the jury vote was included.
There were protests before and during her performance.
“I was just metres away from pro-Palestinian protesters who threw red paint when the Israeli artist appeared on stage,” says Vuletic. “And of course, it must be hugely stressful for these artists. There are also increased security measures, especially for these artists who are targeted.
“You could sense the tension in the arena when it became apparent that Israel could win the contest. A lot of people were willing to allow Israel to participate in the contest, they were not necessarily supporting the Netanyahu government… but when it appeared that Israel really could win the contest you could really sense this fear among the live audience in the arena, that the contest could be held in Israel the following year.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Protest during Israel’s Eurovision song
Having Israel as a host country would lead to a lot more countries boycotting, he says.
“It’s become so toxic,” says Jordan. “You see now, booing on the stage in a way that you had for Russia before. But really, in 2024, it became much more pronounced.
“Eurovision is meant to be joyous. And I remember the day of the [2024] final being with friends in a pub. And it just felt like an impending sense of doom, something was going to go wrong… it just felt that this is a house of cards that could potentially come falling down…
“Eurovision for me was all about escapism, they call it the Eurovision bubble. And that was a very special thing. And I feel now that’s kind of changing. It feels like an event that we all grew up with, now at 70 years old, and it could potentially start to unravel. It’d be a great shame, I think, culturally, if that does happen.”
Who else has commented?
Austria will host the event in 2026 following singer JJ’s win. Pic: Reuters
Austrian singer JJ, who won this year’s competition, has also reportedly called for Israel’s exclusion in 2026.
Following his win in May, singer JJ said it was “disappointing to see Israel still participating”, according to Spanish newspaper El Pais. “I would like the next Eurovision to be held in Vienna and without Israel,” he added.
And Austria will of course host the show next year.
Read more from Sky News:
More prison officers to get stab-proof vests and Tasers
Lib Dems toughen up immigration rhetoric
Dropping Chinese spy charges ‘leaves door open’
In a statement sent to Sky News, broadcaster ORF said the decision is a matter for the EBU.
“It is always the public broadcaster of a country that takes part in the Eurovision Song Contest, not the government or country itself,” an ORF spokesperson said. “Ultimately, however, the decision regarding participation is a matter for the EBU and its members. ORF will be a good host for all delegations in May 2026.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Russia’s alternative Eurovision
What happens now?
The competition’s director, Martin Green, has said the EBU understands “the concerns and deeply held views around the ongoing conflict in the Middle East” and that the organisation is still consulting with all members “to gather views on how we manage participation and geopolitical tensions”.
Broadcasters have until mid-December to confirm whether or not they are taking part – and the EBU then has a decision to make.
Entertainment
Jonathan Pie: British satirist’s free speech warning to UK after Jimmy Kimmel show taken off air
The UK has to be “careful” and protect free speech as debate becomes “more and more toxic” on both sides of the Atlantic, a British satirist has said.
Tom Walker, better known as the ranting fictitious newsreader Jonathan Pie, has issued the warning after US talk show Jimmy Kimmel was taken off air for comments he made following the death of Charlie Kirk.
Speaking to Niall Paterson on the Sky News Daily podcast, Walker said he believes he wouldn’t be able work as a satirist in America today as the Trump administration appears to be cracking down on those who speak out against him.
Tom Walker as his satirical creation. Pic: Jonathan Pie
He added: “I genuinely don’t think I would be allowed into the country. That might sound dramatic, but they go through your social media posts. I think Trump thinks that not agreeing with him is anti-American, whereas it’s not, it’s anti-Trump, it’s anti-Republican. So a lot of my posts would be seen as anti-American.”
Walker went viral in 2016 after posting a clip of Jonathan Pie passionately blaming “the left” for Mr Trump’s victory in the US election the same year.
The comedian argued that left-leaning people had “lost the art” of engaging with anyone with a different opinion to them and urged them to “stop thinking everyone who disagrees with you is evil, racist or sexist or stupid”.
Asked by Niall if he believes Kimmel, who has a long history of speaking out against Mr Trump, is partly responsible for the rise of the populist president, Walker said: “No, I don’t… Most of these late-night hosts are left-leaning and Trump is an own goal for satire.
“I don’t think there was much that Jimmy Kimmel said in his monologue the other day that was anywhere near as divisive as the rhetoric coming from Donald Trump or (vice president) JD Vance, so there is an inherent hypocrisy there.”
However, Walker believes “right-wingers” are not the only reason free speech is under a “huge amount of threat in America”.
The satirist, who counts himself as being left-wing, continued: “I think the left have enabled a culture where people don’t feel that they’re able to express their views.
“The left-wing were the flag-bearers of cancel culture. And now it’s sort of coming back to bite us in a terrifying way.”
Kimmel was taken off air months after US talk show host Stephen Colbert had his show cancelled – something his fans have attributed to his criticism of Mr Trump.
Read more:
Ted Cruz blasts ‘mafioso’ threats over Kimmel suspension
What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk?
US talk show hosts react to Jimmy Kimmel cancellation
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
US talk show titans speak out
Meanwhile, the US president appeared to encourage NBC to cancel the talk shows of Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers in a Truth Social post on Thursday. Both presenters are known to have made jokes about Mr Trump in the past.
Asked whether the UK should be worried about free speech apparently being targeted in the UK in a similar way, Walker said: “I think that there are issues of free speech in this country. I don’t think it is quite as bad as what’s happening in America, but we have to be careful. The debate on both sides of the Atlantic is becoming more and more toxic, I think. And it’s divide and conquer. ‘You’re either with me or you’re against me’. And I think both sides have to take some responsibility for that.”
Walker pointed out that when he posted a satirical video on X called “The Death Of Discourse” in relation to the Kirk assassination, he was attacked by social media users on both the left and right of politics.
He added: “I think that’s the problem… We have forgotten how to talk and listen to people that we fundamentally disagree with.”
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment12 months agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024