The 50-year-old, who denied charges of manslaughter and murder, gave different accounts of what happened in the seconds before he plunged a kitchen knife 11cm into her chest.
Scarlett’s mother, Sarah Hall, was the only other person in the room, and stood by her partner, previously telling Teesside Crown Court that Vickers would never have harmed her.
During sentencing, Nicholas Lumley KC, defending, said: “Sarah Hall remains resolute in her belief that the father of her only child did not intend Scarlett any harm and his parents are of the same view.”
Ms Hall did not see the knife sticking in her daughter, Mr Justice Cotter said, because Vickers immediately removed it and put it on the side in the kitchen.
The jury, by a majority of 10-2, convicted him of murder after 13 hours of deliberations, rather than the less serious alternative of manslaughter, or to clear him.
Ms Hall and other family members in the public gallery looked stunned when the verdict was delivered.
Vickers himself did not react in the dock.
His sentence is the lowest minimum term the judge can pass down for a murder verdict.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:04
Killer dad told police: ‘We were mucking about’
During the trial, Vickers insisted his daughter’s death had been a “freak accident”.
He claimed he had swiped what he thought were tongs along a work surface, into her chest, and never realised it was a knife.
The judge described his version of events as “unconvincing and wholly implausible”.
Prosecutor Mark McKone KC had told jurors that Scarlett’s death was not an accident.
Home Office pathologist Dr Jennifer Bolton explained to the jury that how the knife went into Scarlett’s chest meant it must have been held in a hand, with force.
Smoked cannabis and drank wine
During the sentencing, Mr Justice Cotter said Vickers had “smoked cannabis and drank some wine” after work.
Ms Hall was cooking spaghetti bolognese when Scarlett came down from her bedroom, around 10.15pm, and they were said to have thrown grapes at each other for fun.
Image: The knife that Scarlett was killed with.
Pic: PA
The mother said she then snipped at Vickers with the tongs and he complained it hurt – to which Scarlett called him “wimpy”.
Ms Hall claimed to turn away to serve the meal and then heard Scarlett say “ow”.
When she looked back, their only child was said to be pouring with blood.
In the 999 call, Ms Hall told the operator they had been “messing about” and her partner had thrown something at their daughter and “he didn’t realise”.
Vickers told one paramedic that his daughter had lunged towards him during a bout of play-fighting, the court was told.
“Exactly what then happens only you know,” The judge said, referring to the moment of the stabbing.
For the sentencing, the court heard the judge took into account the fact it was a momentary act, with no premeditation.
‘Loss of temper’
Mr Justice Cotter continued: “Scarlett was just 14, a normal, healthy girl with a long life ahead of her when it was cut short by you.
“She died in the kitchen of her own home within minutes of having been stabbed.
“It went from an ordinary, happy family Friday night to tragedy within seconds due to what must have been your loss of temper.
“There is no other plausible explanation.”
He added: “You have never given a truthful explanation of what happened.”
Speaking outside court, Detective Superintendent Craig Rudd said: “We may never know precisely what happened in that kitchen, but we can be certain there is no justification for what Simon Vickers did.
“Had he not picked up that knife Scarlett would still be alive today.
Assisted dying cases would not need to be signed off by a High Court judge, the MP behind a new bill has proposed.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is expected to bring forward amendments to her proposal so a multi-disciplinary panel of experts will examine cases and have the power to grant permission for assisted death.
Three-member panels would be chaired by a retired High Court judge, King’s Counsel or a person with similar qualifications – and their decisions could “if required” be reviewed by the High Court.
In the initial version of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which was backed by MPs in November, a High Court judge would have to approve requests for assistance after assent from two doctors.
Ms Leadbeater has described the amended plan as a “judge plus” system, arguing that it strengthens safeguards against pressure or coercion as it gives an “enhanced role for professionals such as psychiatrists and social workers”.
However assisted dying critics say safeguards have been watered down, with Tory minister Danny Kruger calling the change “a disgrace”.
Labour MP Diane Abbott said the bill was “rushed, badly thought out legislation” which “needs to be voted down”, while former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said “even the weak safeguards that existed are being dropped”.
More on Assisted Dying
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:42
Opinions remain divided after assisted dying vote
The proposal will be voted on by a committee of MPs who will begin going through the bill line by line on Tuesday.
The committee, selected by Ms Leadbeater, has a 14-9 majority in favour of assisted dying based on November’s vote.
‘There’s a role for other experts to play’
In an interview with Sophy Ridge on Sky’s Politics Hub, filmed on Monday afternoon, Ms Leadbeater was challenged about whether a High Court judge would be specifically required in all cases.
“I think there’s a role for other experts to play,” she said and referred to expert evidence politicians have been hearing about the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.
“I think what came through in the evidence was the need for a multidisciplinary approach. That’s something I’m giving serious consideration to.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
How did MPs vote on assisted dying?
“I think the legal oversight is really important, but I think that multidisciplinary approach could actually enhance the bill even further,” she added.
The new proposals would also involve the creation of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commission to oversee all applications, chaired by a High Court judge or senior former judge.
Cases would be referred to multi-disciplinary panels which can grant approval.
The panel is tasked with ensuring people have the capacity to make the decision without pressure or coercion.
The bill also requires two independent doctors to submit reports on each person applying for permission to die.
In January, learning disability charity Mencap warned that discussions around the option of assisted dying might risk pushing “people in a course that they don’t, they may not want to go down”.
Sky News understands it is now likely to re-open after Parliament’s half-term recess, on Monday 24 February, meaning it will have been shut for five weeks.
The decision to re-open was taken at a secret meeting of the House of Commons Commission, chaired by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle.
“The commission will be providing an update shortly,” a source told Sky News. That update could come as early as later this week.
The bar was closed after a parliamentary researcher complained her drink had been spiked. The woman told bar staff and security personnel the drink had been tampered with.
The alleged incident, said to have taken place at about 6.30pm on Tuesday 7 January, in the first week after Parliament returned from recess, prompted a police inquiry.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman confirmed an investigation had been launched and the victim was being supported. No arrests have been made, however.
The decision to close the bar was taken by Sir Lindsay, in consultation with the clerk of the House, Tom Goldsmith, and the director of parliamentary security, Alison Giles.
Announcing the closure on Friday 17 January , a House of Commons spokesperson said: “Strangers’ Bar will close from Monday 20 January while security and safety arrangements are reviewed.
“The safety of everyone on the estate remains a key priority of both Houses.”
It has been reported that one result of the review will be CCTV cameras being installed in the bar. Another possible outcome is changes to who is eligible to use the bar.
The House of Commons Commission is Parliament’s most senior rule-making committee. It is made up of seven MPs, including the Speaker, and four lay members.
The other MPs are Commons Leader Lucy Powell, the Tories’ shadow leader Jesse Norman, Labour MPs Rachel Blake and Nick Smith, former Tory cabinet minister Steve Barclay and Lib Dem MP Maria Goldman.
Neighbours have been left in “shock” and fear after the sudden deaths of a popular British couple in rural France.
Dawn and Andrew Searle, who have not yet been officially named by French authorities, moved to the hamlet of Les Pesquies, south of Villefranche-de-Rouergue, in southern France, around a decade ago.
The couple, who are in their 60s, are believed to have been found dead by a German friend who lives nearby, after Mr Searle did not turn up for one of their regular walks.
Image: Andrew and Dawn Searle’s home
Ms Searle’s son, the country musician and former Hollyoaks star Callum Kerr, said in a statement posted online that he and his sister, Amanda Kerr, and Mr Searle’s two children, Tom and Ella Searle, were grieving.
Investigators are reportedly looking at whether the British couple were killed during a burglary, but all lines of enquiry, including murder-suicide or potential links to Mr Searle’s previous work as an organised crime financial investigator in the UK – are open.
A neighbour who knew them very well told Sky News they were “very happy people, joyful, very nice and would talk to people even if they didn’t know them. They always had a smile on their face.”
Ms Searle’s body was reportedly found outside their home, naked, with jewellery found scattered nearby, while Mr Searle’s body was discovered inside the house and had been gagged, according to local media.
More on France
Related Topics:
There was little sign of their deaths at their home in the idyllic village on Monday, apart from the yellow and red Gendarmerie tape still on the white gate.
Image: Police at the scene. Investigators are reportedly looking at whether the British couple were killed during a burglary
Locals described them as “good neighbours” who would often be seen walking their two dogs.
“Each year in September they would do this big dinner with all the village and invite everyone. They were very nice people,” said a woman who lived nearby.
“It’s very sad, it’s tragic. It’s a very low-key village, everybody gets along with each other and everybody’s in shock right now, they’re surprised.
“It’s scary too. The newspapers are saying possibly it’s because of what he used to do as a job. Here locally, nobody would hold grudges.”
Image: The couple lived near Villefranche-de-Rouergue Aveyron in southern France
A LinkedIn profile in his name says he retired in 2015 after working for Barclays and Standard Life, and was “enjoying life in rural France”.
His page talks about having “over 20 years experience specialising in Financial Crime Prevention (AML, Fraud and Anti-Bribery) with a high profile in the industry and an extensive network of contacts”.
Another woman said she was about to buy a house in the hamlet but is now having second thoughts, adding: “I don’t feel safe here anymore”.
A postman said there was a big UK expat community in the area, with around 20 British people on his round.
The Searles have lived in the village permanently for 10 years and are said to be very integrated with the community.
“They would enjoy life, they would travel and sometimes go home as well,” a neighbour said.
The mayor of Villefranche-de-Rouergue, Jean-Sebastien Orcibal, who also lives in Les Pesquies, previously told broadcaster France 3 the deaths were “something criminal, a homicide very clearly”.
However, the public prosecutor Nicolas Rigot-Muller said that while both “died violent deaths… all hypotheses remain open” while investigations continue.
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “We are supporting the family of a British couple who died in France and are liaising with the local authorities.”