Marina Strange is 90 and lives alone. She had a heart attack last week, her third in two years. It took two hours for an ambulance to reach her. Marina was impressed.
“I was surprised the ambulance came within two hours. I thought that was very good,” she told Sky News.
Marina also has an untreatable tumour, so she’s gotten to know the hospital well over the last few years, and this is the service she’s come to expect.
Marina was one of 7,678 patients to arrive at the care of Royal Berkshire NHS Trust by ambulance so far this winter, where Sky News has spent the past few months speaking to patients, consultants and those responsible for running the hospital.
Far from being an extreme example, the hospital is performing close to or even outperforming the national average in most measures. The experiences we’ve seen are normal for NHS patients in 2025.
Image: Marina Strange, 90, was impressed that an ambulance reached her within two hours after she had a heart attack
On 9 January we were scheduled to come and film with the respiratory ward. It was too busy for us to come in.
We spoke to Chief Executive Steve McManus about it:
“Our ward occupancy at the moment is running around 99% of our beds, so we are absolutely full,” he said.
“Almost half of [our respiratory unit] has been given over for patients with flu – and we’ve got a lot of very unwell patients at the moment. Each morning over the last few days we’ve been starting the day with another 20-30 patients in the emergency department waiting for beds, so the pressures are really significant.”
Flu and other viruses, like norovirus and now also COVID, tend to peak around the winter months when people spend more time indoors in close proximity to one another.
This year’s surge was particularly bad. It’s on the decline again now, but peaked in early January at a level almost twice as high as last winter.
Bed occupancy in Royal Berkshire has averaged 94.7% this winter.
Again, far from being an outlier, this is only slightly worse than the average across England of 93.6%. The recommended maximum to achieve efficient operations and transfer between emergency care and other hospital departments is 92%, so at least 8% of beds should be free at any one time.
That has only been achieved on ten days out of 60 this winter across England. All of those days were between 21 December and New Year’s Day, so for the entire rest of winter the service has been over capacity.
We came back to Royal Berkshire the next day – 10 January – and spoke to Dr Omar Mafousi, the clinical lead at the hospital. He explained how a lack of beds in the main hospital affects the emergency care his team can provide.
“We say every year it gets a little worse. This year has felt worse than any other year that I remember and I’ve been a consultant for 15 years in emergency medicine.
“We can’t [have patients in A&E long term]. We’ve only got 20 major cubicles but 25 waiting for a bed. Some are on chairs, some are in the waiting room, but we have no space to bring patients off an ambulance to see and examine them.”
“Almost every single bay is full, there’s just one free at the moment. There are patients waiting to be transferred to the wards, and while we’ve been here in the last couple of minutes two more patients have been brought in by ambulance. Things in the emergency department change very very quickly”.
Image: Dr Omar Mafousi has been a consultant in emergency medicine for 15 years
Accident and emergency
We’d first spoken to Dr Mafousi in the emergency department on Wednesday 4 December. It was at the beginning of winter and the number of flu cases had yet to really spike.
At 1pm 191 patients had already come through. Dr Mafousi says these kind of numbers are the “new norm”.
“We probably see about 480-500 patients a day on busy days, sometimes over 500 on really busy days. That’s becoming more and more frequent.
“Attendances are going up and up and up year-on-year and we are struggling. We are trying to cope as best we can and give patients the best care we can, but that’s not always possible.”
In 2010 NHS England set a standard of no more than 5% of patients waiting more than four hours to be admitted, transferred or discharged.
That target hasn’t been met in a decade. Every winter since COVID it’s gotten higher than 20% – four times higher than the target.
In December it was 28.9%. At major A&Es (not speciality centres or minor injuries units), it was 44.7%, almost one in two.
Again Royal Berkshire is fairly normal – 5,293 of the 11,972 patients at the major A&E (44.2%) waited longer than four hours.
At the time we were there, 14 patients had been waiting over 15 hours.
“Without a doubt that is too long,” said Dr Mafousi. “That’s not what anyone wants. No one in this Trust wants that to happen.”
There used to be a bit of respite in summers, when more beds were free from winter virus patients and people could flow more quickly and easily through the system.
Waits in the middle of summer now are worse than even the most dangerous winter peaks of years gone by.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine estimated that waits longer than four hours at A&E had contributed to 23,000 excess deaths in 2022.
Ambulance handover delays
A&E delays don’t just affect the patients who are at hospital, they also make it more difficult to treat new patients. Part of the reason it takes so long to get ambulances out to people like Marina when they have heart attacks is because of “handover delays”.
The NHS guidance allows a standard of 15 minutes from the ambulance’s time of arrival at A&E to having handed over care of the patient to A&E staff.
If A&Es are full, ambulances can’t offload their patients, so they aren’t available to get out to see new patients.
At Royal Berkshire this winter the average has been 25 minutes. That’s not far off double the time it should take, but again that’s better than average. In England as a whole it’s 40 minutes, up from 32 minutes over the same dates last year.
One in seven ambulance handovers now takes over an hour. That figure has more than trebled in just the last four years.
As well as meaning potentially worse care for the patient in the ambulance, handover delays ultimately contribute to delayed response times as well.
Ambulance calls are of course categorised by seriousness, with the most serious life-threatening cases put into Category 1 – usually for people that aren’t breathing.
People experiencing heart attacks, like Marina, should usually go into Category 2 – emergency cases. The target is that an ambulance should arrive for these patients within 18 minutes.
In December the average wait across England for these patients was over 47 mins, almost three times as long. That was slightly worse than last year, but in fact better than December 2022 and 2021. In 2022 it peaked at a scarcely believable 1 hour and 32 minute average.
In the last pre-pandemic year it was 27:57 in December and 20:55 in January – still over target but not to the same scale as now.
In total, more than 600,000 hours have been lost to ambulance handover delays this winter. The cost to the ambulance service of 600,000 hours of time is upwards of £100m.
Crumbling infrastructure
Part of the problem is capacity. Royal Berkshire opened in 1839 and parts of that original building are still in use to this day. Other parts can’t be used anymore because they’ve fallen in to disrepair.
One building hasn’t been in use for more than ten years. £2.5m has been spent to keep it from collapsing. £15m would need to be spent to make it useable. The Trust is now considering filling the building with concrete to make it safer.
A hospital that is running out of space and money has no alternative but to waste both.
Plans have been approved for a new hospital at a different site, to replace Royal Berkshire, as part of the previous government’s plan to deliver 40 new hospitals by 2030.
Labour have since branded those plans “uncosted and undeliverable”, and have said work can’t start at that site until 2037 at the earliest.
The estimated cost is already over £100m and could be four times higher by the time it’s ready.
But it’s not just the main hospital where space is short.
Colin Waters is another Royal Berkshire patient we spoke to. He’s been there ten days after a car ran him over, fracturing his leg and dislocating his ankle.
He’s stable now and doesn’t actually need to be on the acute ward anymore, but he still needs some care.
Image: Colin Waters had been at Royal Berkshire for ten days when we spoke to him, after a car ran him over, dislocating his ankle and fracturing his leg
He’s due to be transferred to a community hospital where he can receive physiotherapy and start his rehabilitation, but no space has opened up.
There have been an average of over 200 patients a day across Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire who are “fit to be discharged” but still occupying a hospital bed because no safe alternative care setting is available. It peaked on 25 January at over 300 patients.
Across the country it peaked on 1 February. There were a total of 13,894 patients remaining in hospital who no longer needed to be there. In many cases, like Colin’s, they will not be receiving the specialist care they actually need at that time.
All of those full beds contribute to patients not being able to flow through the system from A&E, which adds to the ambulance handover delays. But they also mean that people have to wait longer to book in operations they need.
The waiting list for routine operations currently stands at 7.5m – or more than one in eight people in the country. 221,889 people on that list have been waiting for treatment for over a year.
That number is 120 times higher than before the pandemic.
Among Royal Berkshire’s patients alone, there are more than 60,000 on the list and almost 3,000 of them have been waiting over a year.
The ailments people need operating on to fix don’t go away while the wait goes on. They affect quality of life at a minimum, and in many cases will require ongoing care from other NHS services, or could reach the level where it becomes an emergency that adds to the pressure on the ambulance service or A&E.
Simon Shurey, another patient we spoke to, is a classic example of someone with a multitude of complex and competing healthcare needs that affect him daily, but also occasionally extend to requiring emergency care.
He’s had asthma all his life. Five years ago he was diagnosed with COPD, a lung condition that makes breathing difficult. And six months ago he was put into a coma after developing sepsis following a kidney infection.
He says he’s waited up to two days for a ward bed on previous visits.
When we spoke to him on 19 December, he had been in hospital for five days, having been rushed in by an ambulance because of flu.
He had to be kept in a side room to stop his infection spreading to other patients. Like Marina, he’s also grateful to healthcare workers sensitive to the pressures on them, despite the multitude of health concerns he’s facing.
“Every time you come in – and I use the hospital a fair bit lately, sadly – it’s getting worse for them. There seems to be so much pressure on them.”
Health anxiety
One of the reasons for the increased pressure on healthcare workers in recent years – in addition to increased medical issues – is because people are more concerned and aware of their health, in a way in which they weren’t before the pandemic.
Dr Amrit Sharma runs four GP surgeries near Royal Berkshire. He says that since COVID there has been an increase in health anxiety, and people presenting with physical symptoms that extend from mental health issues.
“The level of appointments have changed significantly. That’s got to be around anxiety. That’s what we see every day. People are more fearful and anxious about their health.
“Some awareness [of personal health] is needed to catch things like cancers, but our concern is that we’re seeing young people coming in with self-limiting illnesses, or symptoms that are physical but related to mental health conditions, like chest pains or palpitations or breathing problems.”
More than a million people who tried to reach their GP in December couldn’t get through, despite there being more appointments than ever before.
There were 40m appointments in December 2024, compared with less than 30m in 2018.
Health anxiety is something that Dr Mafousi says also contributes to more pressure and longer waits in emergency care.
“I see people who don’t need to be here, I see people who need to be here but have come here a bit late, I’ve seen people who are just concerned, I see people sent by their friends because their friends are concerned, there’s a combination of all this.
“There’s a lot of anxiety after Covid and we’ve seen that. Young people with chest pain which they’ve had for a few minutes and are concerned they’ve had a heart attack. There’s a lot of little things which before would have been nothing but now are something.”
Whether it’s increased anxiety or increased illness, the demand on the NHS is at unprecedented levels and it simply isn’t able to cope. Targets are being missed in pretty much every department, and the ultimate result of missed targets is worse health or an increased chance of death for patients all over the country.
There are hundreds of other stories like Marina’s, Colin’s and Simon’s that could be told every day from all parts of the country.
We’ve spent time in just one hospital. And it’s a hospital that is performing in a fairly typical way, for England in 2025. Thousands of patients are seeking treatment every day in hospitals that are performing worse than this.
The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open-source information. Through multimedia storytelling, we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.
A group of masked protesters became “aggressive” towards police at Canary Wharf shopping centre after an anti-asylum demonstration, police say.
A group of people entered the shopping centre around 4.30pm and a “small number of masked protesters” then became aggressive towards members of the public and police, the Metropolitan Police said in a statement.
Police issued an order to “prevent people concealing their identity with masks” and a dispersal order was also put in place.
Video seen on social media showed young children among the protesters, with some of them wearing England flags.
Officers said: “We are aware there are young children in the protest area and while we deal with any criminality our officers are ensuring the safety of them is paramount.”
Police said four people were arrested on Sunday afternoon during the protests, including for common assault by a protester on a member of the public, possession of class A and B drugs, assault on police/public order offences and failure to disperse.
“One of our officers was punched in the face – luckily they did not suffer significant injury,” a spokesperson said.
Commander Adam Slonecki, in charge of policing London this weekend, said: “We had plenty of officers on the ground who moved in swiftly to deal with the criminality that occurred inside and outside the shopping centre. We will not tolerate this kind of behaviour.
“Today’s protest saw many community members attend, including women and children, and we worked to ensure the safety of those there to peacefully represent their views. Those who arrive at protests masked and intent on causing trouble will continue to be dealt with robustly at future protests.”
Image: People protest outside the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf. Pic: PA
Image: Counter-protesters also assembled outside the Britannia International Hotel. Pic: PA
Protesters from both sides of the divide over the UK’s immigration policies gathered outside the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf on Sunday afternoon.
Around a dozen anti-immigration protesters were joined by about 100 counter-protesters holding banners saying “stand up to racism” and “stop the far right” on the other side of the road.
Demonstrators then left the hotel location – kept apart by police.
Sunday’s events in east London follow an incident in West Drayton, west London, on Saturday when a group of masked men were among those who attempted to enter a hotel housing asylum seekers.
Reform UK has hit back at both the Archbishop of York and the government following criticism of its immigration policies.
Leader Nigel Farage announced the party’s flagship immigration plan during a flashy news conference held at an aircraft hangar in Oxford on Tuesday.
The party pledged to deport anybody who comes to the UK illegally, regardless of whether they might come to harm, and said it would pay countries with questionable human rights records – such as Afghanistan – to take people back.
It also said it would leave numerous international agreements, and revoke the Human Rights Act, in order to do this.
The policy was criticised by the Conservatives, who said Mr Farage was “copying our homework”, while parties such as the Liberal Democrats and the Greens condemned it.
More on Migrant Crossings
Related Topics:
Image: Archbishop Stephen Cottrell and Richard Tice MP. Pics: PA
But the plan came under fire from an altogether different angle on Saturday, when the Archbishop of York accused it of being an “isolationist, short-term kneejerk” approach, with no “long-term solutions”.
Stephen Cottrell, who is the acting head of the Church of England, told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that he had “every sympathy” with those who find the issue of immigration tricky. But he said Reform UK’s plan does “nothing to address the issue of what brings people to this country”, and would in fact, make “the problem worse”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:50
In full: Richard Tice on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips
Speaking on the same programme, Richard Tice, Reform’s deputy leader, responded to the archbishop’s criticisms, saying that “all of it is wrong”.
The MP for Boston and Skegness said he was a Christian who “enjoys” the church – but that the “role of the archbishop is not actually to interfere with international migration policies”.
Mr Tice then turned his fire on the government, accusing ministers of being “more interested in protecting the rights of people who’ve come here illegally… than looking after the rights of British citizens”.
He accused ministers of having “abandoned” their duty of “looking after the interests of British citizens”.
Mr Tice reaffirmed his party’s policy that the UK should leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), calling it a “70-year-old, out-of-date, unfit-for-purpose agreement”.
The Reform UK deputy leader also:
• Defended plans to pay the Taliban to take migrants back, comparing it to doing business deals with “people you don’t like”
• Said the Royal Navy should be deployed in the English Channel as a “deterrent”, but added: “We’re not saying sink the boats”
• Urged the government to call an early general election
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
18:09
Farage ‘wants to provoke anger’
Meanwhile, Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, told Sky News that Reform “want to provoke anger, but they don’t actually want to solve the problems that we face in front of us”.
She told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips the UK had a “proud tradition [of] supporting those facing persecution”.
But she added: “We will make sure that people who have no right to be in this country are removed from this country. That’s right. It’s what people expect. It’s what this government will deliver.”
Ms Phillipson also insisted there “needs to be reform of the ECHR” and said the home secretary is “looking at the article eight provisions”, which cover the right to a private and family life, to see “whether they need updating and reforming for the modern age”.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
However, she refused to say what the government would do if it is found that the ECHR is unreformable. Instead, she defended Labour’s position of staying in the governance of the convention, saying that honouring the “rule of law” is important.
She added: “Our standing in the world matters if we want to strike trade deals with countries. We need to be a country that’s taken seriously. We need to be a country that honours our obligations and honours the rule of law.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:15:33
Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:35
Asylum seekers to remain at Bell Hotel
Ms Phillipson was also drawn on the recent court ruling in favour of the Home Office, which overturned an injunction banning The Bell Hotel in Epping from housing asylum seekers.
Challenged on whether the government is prioritising the rights of asylum seekers over British citizens, she said it “is about a balance of rights”.
The cabinet minister also repeated the government’s plans to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by 2029.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
7:08
‘We should have overruled law’
Shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart said the Conservatives would be willing to leave the ECHR – if this route is recommended to them.
The Tories have asked a senior judge to look into the “legal intricacies” of leaving the convention, which he said is “not straightforward”. He said when the party receives that report, it will then make a decision.
Challenged on whether the Tories will leave if that is what the report recommends, he added: “If that’s what’s necessary, we will do it.”
Mr Burghart also said he believed the previous Conservative government’s biggest mistake was that “we did not go far enough on overruling human rights legislation”, which prevented it from “taking the tough action that was absolutely necessary”.
But he added the Conservatives have now “put forward very clear legislation that would solve this problem” – though he concluded Labour “isn’t going to do it” so the problem “is going to get worse”.
The Archbishop of York has told Sky News the UK should resist Reform’s “kneejerk” plan for the mass deportation of migrants, telling Nigel Farage he is not offering any “long-term solution”.
Stephen Cottrell said in an interview with Trevor Phillips he has “every sympathy” with people who are concerned about asylum seekers coming to the country illegally.
But he criticised the plan announced by Reform on Tuesday to deport 600,000 people, which would be enabled by striking deals with the Taliban and Iran, saying it will not “solve the problem”.
Mr Cottrell is currently acting head of the Church of England while a new Archbishop of Canterbury is chosen.
Image: Pic: Jacob King/PA Wire
Image: The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell in 2020.
File pic: PA
Phillips asked him: “What’s your response to the people who are saying the policy should be ‘you land here, unlawfully, you get locked up and you get deported straight away. No ifs, no buts’?”
Mr Cottrell said he would tell them “you haven’t solved the problem”, adding: “You’ve just put it somewhere else and you’ve done nothing to address the issue of what brings people to this country.
More on Migrant Crisis
Related Topics:
“And so if you think that’s the answer, you will discover in due course that all you have done is made the problem worse.
“Don’t misunderstand me, I have every sympathy with those who find this difficult, every sympathy – as I do with those living in poverty.
“But… we should actively resist the kind of isolationist, short term kneejerk ‘send them home’.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:04
What do public make of Reform’s plans?
Image: Nigel Farage at the launch of Reform UK’s plan to deport asylum seekers. Pic: PA
Asked if that was his message to the Reform leader, he said: “Well, it is. I mean, Mr Farage is saying the things he’s saying, but he is not offering any long-term solution to the big issues which are convulsing our world, which lead to this. And, I see no other way.”
Mr Farage, the MP for Clacton, was asked at a news conference this week what he would say if Christian leaders opposed his plan.
“Whoever the Christian leaders are at any given point in time, I think over the last decades, quite a few of them have been rather out of touch, perhaps with their own flock,” he said.
“We believe that what we’re offering is right and proper, and we believe for a political party that was founded around the slogan of family, community, country that we are doing right by all of those things, with these plans we put forward today.”
Sky News has approached Mr Farage for comment.
Farage won’t be greeting this as good news of the gospel – nor will govt ministers
When Tony Blair’s spin doctor Alastair Campbell told journalists that “We don’t do God”, many took it as a statement of ideology.
In fact it was the caution of a canny operator who knows that the most dangerous opponent in politics is a religious leader licensed to challenge your very morality.
Stephen Cottrell, the Archbishop of York, currently the effective head of the worldwide Anglican communion, could not have been clearer in his denunciation of what he calls the Reform party’s “isolationist, short term, kneejerk ‘send them home'” approach to asylum and immigration.
I sense that having ruled himself out of the race for next Archbishop of Canterbury, Reverend Cottrell feels free to preach a liberal doctrine.
Unusually, in our interview he pinpoints a political leader as, in effect, failing to demonstrate Christian charity.
Nigel Farage, who describes himself as a practising Christian, won’t be greeting this as the good news of the gospel.
But government ministers will also be feeling nervous.
Battered for allowing record numbers of cross- Channel migrants, and facing legal battles on asylum hotels that may go all the way to the Supreme Court, Labour has tried to head off the Reform challenge with tougher language on border control.
The last thing the prime minister needs right now is to make an enemy of the Almighty – or at least of his representatives on Earth.