What happens when you put a boyhood fan in charge of their club?
They discover it’s not so simple to run after all. And the fans you sat with many years ago are as impatient as ever.
Anger reverberates exactly a year since Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his INEOS organisation gained day-to-day control of football operations at Manchester United.
Image: Sir Jim Ratcliffe at Old Trafford.
Pic: PA
Fans are furious about ticket price rises.
A charity helping former players has had funding slashed.
And rank-and-file staff – many loyal for years without Premier League salaries – have been swept out with 250 redundancies and warnings of more to come.
Sir Jim has taken the unpopular – but he would argue necessary – decisions to put the club on a healthier financial footing all while INEOS injected an additional £80m.
More on Football
Related Topics:
The Glazers
Being the face of cost-cutting and eradicating excesses can be reputationally damaging while the American family, still with the majority ownership, drift even deeper into the shadows.
The Glazers are blamed for the malaise and the debt burdened on a club that is one of the biggest money-makers in world football.
Image: Manchester United co-owner Avram Glazer.
Pic: AP/Craig Mercer/CSM
Image: Joel Glazer.
Pic: AP/Phelan M. Ebenhack
Just this week, United’s financial update to the New York Stock Exchange revealed they are set to make more than £650m this season.
But it also showed that the debt has climbed over £730m and has now cost more than £1bn to service in the last two decades.
Money has drained out of the club – to the Glazers – rather than, perhaps, being invested in Old Trafford upgrades or a new stadium as rivals have built glitzier, more lucrative venues.
Sky News US correspondent Mark Stone confronted executive co-chairman Avram Glazer over what has been a difficult year for the Red Devils.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Avram Glazer says he won’t sell Man Utd
When asked whether he would sell up the American businessman said: “No.”
He remained silent when asked if he was worried Sir Jim had made things worse, and also didn’t respond when asked if the Glazers should be facing more blame – as opposed to Sir Jim.
The British businessman bought a 27.7% stake in the club in February last year and took control of sporting operations. He later increased it to 29% but the Glazers remain majority owners of the club.
Floundering on and off the pitch
INEOS are now playing catch-up, trying to accelerate much-needed infrastructure upgrades, particularly at the training ground, which saw the women’s team temporarily pushed out.
But United have not been short of cash to spend on players, for the men’s team.
They have the highest net spend of any English club since Sir Alex Ferguson retired in 2013 at over £1.2bn – but without being able to add to the 13th Premier League titles he won.
In the summer and winter transfer windows, INEOS oversaw the arrival of £200m worth of new talent for the men’s team.
And yet the team is in its worst shape ever in the Premier League.
Image: Manchester United’s Diogo Dalot, left, and Joshua Zirkzee after, another, recent loss.
Pic: AP/Ian Walton
They’ve never been this low during a season – down in 15th place with 12 defeats in 25 matches.
This against the backdrop of decisions that can be viewed as bungled or quickly acknowledging mistakes.
Erik ten Hag was kept on as men’s team manager in the summer after aborting a firing plan following their FA Cup win.
But he went anyway in October – a change that cost £21m when you factor in Ruben Amorim’s release fee from Lisbon club Sporting.
It wasn’t the only hefty compensation bill.
Their pick for sporting director – Dan Ashworth – cost around £2m to prize away from Newcastle United.
But then he was ditched after just five months which, we discovered yesterday in new accounts, cost another £4m.
Fan fury
No wonder the supporters’ trust who protested against the Glazers are now aghast at “mismanagement” by the new leadership while still loading much blame on the Florida-based family.
And this while they are being asked to pay more to attend matches in fading facilities.
“Fans should not pay the price for a problem that starts with our crippling debt interest payments and is exacerbated by a decade or more of mismanagement,” the United Supporters’ Trust said.
“It’s time to freeze ticket prices and allow everyone – players, management, owners and fans – to get behind United and restore this club to where it belongs.”
INEOS – the petrochemicals giant that turned Sir Jim into a billionaire – has a lot of convincing to show they’re on the right path heading into year two at United.
And there could be the pain to come of seeing Liverpool match their record haul of 20 English titles.
Can INEOS rebuild a team and oversee the building of a new stadium without losing sight of the mission – to restore United’s greatness?
And the Glazers remain as tight-lipped as ever – but now flush with an extra £1.25bn from selling 29% to Sir Jim as he takes the heat.
Food inflation will rise to 6% by the end of the year – posing a “significant challenge” to household budgets in the run-up to Christmas, industry leaders have predicted.
The British Retail Consortium is warning that the chancellor risks “fanning the flames of inflation” if she hikes taxes in the coming budget.
Despite intense price competition between supermarket chains, the BRC has sounded the alarm over the pace of grocery price hikes.
As of this month, food inflation has risen 4% year on year – its highest level since February 2024.
The BRC said this increase is linked to global factors, such as high demand and crop struggles.
Beef, chicken and tea prices are among those that have risen the most this year – but some of the blame is being laid squarely at the chancellor’s door too.
The BRC said it was inevitable that a £7bn burden, through changes to employers’ national insurance contributions and minimum pay rules after last October’s budget, had been partly passed on to customers in the form of higher prices.
More from Money
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:29
Will we see tax rises in next budget?
It published the results of a survey of retail industry finance chiefs to illustrate its point – that nerves about what Ms Reeves’s second budget could bring were not helping companies invest in either new employment or prices.
Business was promised it would be spared additional pain after it was put on the hook for the bulk of the chancellor’s tax-raising measures last year.
However, speculation is now rife over who will feel the pain this autumn as she juggles a deterioration in the public finances.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:33
Options for wealth tax
A widening black hole is estimated at around £20bn.
The cost of servicing government debt has risen since the last budget, while U-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payment cuts have made her job even harder – making further tax-raising measures inevitable.
The survey of chief financial officers for the BRC showed the biggest current fear ahead was for the “tax and regulatory burden”.
Two-thirds of the CFOs predicted further price rises in the coming year, at a time when the headline rate inflation already remains stuck way above the Bank of England’s target of 2%.
It currently stands at 3.6%.
Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said: “Retail was squarely in the firing line of the last budget, with the industry hit by £7bn in new costs and taxes.
“Retailers have done everything they can to shield their customers from higher costs, but given their slim margins and the rising cost of employing staff, price rises were inevitable.
“The consequences are now being felt by households as many struggle to cope with the rising cost of their weekly shop.
“It is up to the chancellor to decide whether to fan the flames of inflation, or to support the everyday economy by backing the high street and the local jobs they provide.”
She concluded: “Retail accounts for 5% of the economy yet currently pays 7.4% of business taxes and a whopping 21% of all business rates.
“It is vital the upcoming reforms offer a meaningful reduction in retailers’ rates bill, and ensures no store pays more as a result of the changes.”
The US president has spent months verbally attacking Mr Powell.
More from US
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:18
Fed chair has ‘done a bad job’, says Trump
There were clear tensions between the pair last Thursday as they toured the Federal Reserve in Washington DC, which is undergoing renovations.
When taking questions, Mr Trump said: “I’d love him to lower interest rates,” then laughed and slapped Powell’s arm.
Image: There were clear tensions between the US President and Mr Powell during last week’s visit to the Federal Reserve. Pic: Reuters
The US president also challenged him, in front of reporters, about an alleged overspend on the renovations and produced paperwork to prove his point. Mr Powell shook his head as Trump made the claim.
When Mr Trump was asked what he would do as a real estate mogul if this happened to one of his projects, he said he’d fire his project manager – seemingly in reference to Mr Powell.
Image: Donald Trump challenged Mr Powell in front of reporters. Pic: Reuters
Unlike the UK, the US interest rate is a range to guide lenders rather than a single percentage.
The Fed has expressed concern about the impact of Mr Trump’s signature economic policy of implementing new tariffs, taxes on imports to the US.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:42
Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know
On Wednesday, the president said he was still negotiating with India on trade after announcing the US will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country from Friday.
Mr Trump also signed an executive order on Wednesday implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50%, excluding certain products, including oil and precious metals.
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
The committee which sets rates voted 9 to 2 to keep the benchmark rate steady, the two dissenters were appointees of President Trump who believe monetary policy is too tight.
In a policy statement to explain their decision, the Federal Reserve said that “uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated” but growth “moderated in the first half of the year,” possibly bolstering the case to lower rates at a future meeting.
Nathan Thooft, chief investment officer at Manulife Investment Management, described the rate decision as a “kind of a nothing burger” and it was “widely expected”.
Tony Welch, chief investment officer at SignatureFD, agreed that it was “broadly as expected”. He added: “That explains why you’re not seeing a lot of movement in the market right now because there’s nothing that’s surprising.”
The investment giant Apollo Global Management is close to snapping up a stake in Motor Fuel Group (MFG), one of Britain’s biggest petrol forecourt empires, in a deal valuing it about £7bn.
Sky News has learnt that Apollo could announce as soon as Thursday that it has agreed to buy a large minority stake in MFG from Clayton Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), its current majority-owner.
The transaction will come after several months of talks involving CD&R and a range of prospective investors in a company which is rapidly expanding its presence in the electric vehicle charging infrastructure arena.
Banking sources said there had been a “large appetite” to invest in the next phase of MFG’s growth, with CD&R having built the company from a mid-sized industry player over the course of more than a decade.
Lazard and Royal Bank of Canada are understood to be advising on the deal.
A stake of roughly 25-30% in MFG has been expected to change hands during the process, with Apollo’s investment said to be broadly in that range.
MFG is the largest independent forecourt operator in the UK, having grown from 360 sites at the point of CD&R’s acquisition of the company.
It trades under a number of brands, including Esso and Shell.
CD&R, which also owns the supermarket chain Morrisons, united MFG’s petrol forecourt businesses with that of the grocer in a £2.5bn transaction, which completed nearly 18 months ago.
MFG now comprises roughly 1,200 sites across Britain, with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of about £700m anticipated in this financial year.
It is now focused on its role in the energy transition, with hundreds of electric vehicle charging points installed across its network, and growing its high-margin foodservice offering.
MFG has outlined plans to invest £400m in EV charging, and is now the second-largest ultra-rapid player in the UK – which delivers 100 miles of range in ten minutes – with close to 1,000 chargers.
It aims to grow that figure to 3,000 by 2030.
CD&R, which declined to comment on Wednesday afternoon, will retain a controlling stake in MFG after any stake sale, while Morrisons also holds a 20% interest in the company.
Bankers expect that the minority deal with Apollo will be followed a couple of years later with an initial public offering on the London stock market.
CD&R invested in MFG in 2015, making its investment a long-term one by the standards of most private equity holding periods.
The sale of a large minority stake at a £7bn enterprise valuation will crystallise a positive return for the US-based buyout firm.
CD&R and its investors have already been paid hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from MFG, having seen its earnings grow 14-fold since the original purchase.
Morrisons’ rival, Asda, has undertaken a similar transaction with its petrol forecourts, with EG Group acquiring the Leeds-based grocer’s forecourt network.
EG Group, which along with Asda is controlled by private equity firm TDR Capital, is now being prepared for a listing in the US.