Connect with us

Published

on

Former Labour MP Mike Amesbury will walk free after winning an appeal against his 10-week jail sentence for punching a man in the street.

The sentence handed to him on Monday will now be suspended for two years.

It means the Runcorn and Helsby MP will not be jailed, unless he commits any more crimes within that time.

Politics latest: I can trust Trump, says Starmer

Honorary Recorder of Chester Judge Steven Everett, sitting with two magistrates, also ordered Amesbury to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work, undertake a 120-day alcohol monitoring requirement, go on an anger management course and carry out 20 days of rehabilitation work.

Amesbury, 55, pleaded guilty in January to beating by assault after punching Paul Fellows, 45, in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in the early hours of 26 October after his constituent asked him about a bridge closure.

He had been set to serve 40% of his sentence – four weeks – in prison followed by a year on licence.

More from Politics

However, his lawyer launched an appeal shortly after he was sentenced and after the appeal was heard at Chester Crown Court on Thursday, the judge said his jail time should be suspended.

Amesbury arrived at the court in a prison van, having spent three nights in prison, and was led into the building in handcuffs by an officer.

The judge initially ordered a 12-month alcohol monitoring requirement, but changed his mind and said it should be 120 days.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

CCTV shows Labour MP punch man

The Labour Party, which suspended Amesbury shortly after the incident, said he would not be allowed back into the party after his original sentencing.

However, he remains an independent MP and will continue to receive his £91,000 salary under parliamentary rules, which state an MP only has their salary removed when they are no longer an MP.

Amesbury has been urged to resign by Labour and Reform but has not done so and a recall petition cannot be issued until he has exhausted any appeals. He has not yet indicated if he will appeal his latest sentence.

A recall petition kickstarts a by-election if 10% of an MP’s constituents sign it.

Read more:
Yvette Cooper calls for new Runcorn MP

Starmer refuses to say if further tax rises will be imposed

Footage replayed in court on Thursday, showed Amesbury punching Mr Fellows in the head, knocking him to the ground then punching him five more times.

He was heard saying: “You won’t threaten your MP again will you, you f****** soft lad?”

The hearing was told Amesbury gave a prepared statement in a police interview where he initially claimed he had been approached by a man “shouting and screaming” about local and national matters, including a local swing bridge and immigration.

MP Mike Amesbury (right) arrives at Chester Ellesmere Port and Neston Magistrates' Court, where he will be sentenced on a charge of assault, after he was found guilty of attacking Paul Fellows in Frodsham, Cheshire, on October 26. Picture date: Monday February 24, 2025. PA Photo. See PA story COURTS Amesbury. Photo credit should read: Peter Byrne/PA Wire

In the statement, he told police: “I thought I was about to be physically assaulted by this male. I was terrified and felt vulnerable and cornered by the male and others in the group.”

He said the man’s “arms were swinging” and he thought there was no option but to “defend” himself.

Judge Everett said: “What he said to police doesn’t seem to fit in with the CCTV in pretty well any respect.”

Amesbury’s barrister told the court he had spent three nights in prison, “an experience he will never forget, certainly”.

He said the “public shaming” and “embarrassment” had a huge impact on Amesbury, who he said “will learn a painful lesson”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Bank CEO calls out Washington’s debanking “skullduggery”: Bitcoin Investor Week

Published

on

By

Bank CEO calls out Washington's debanking “skullduggery”: Bitcoin Investor Week

Recent efforts to “debank” crypto firms in the US revealed a “staggering” level of corruption among government officials, and the problem is not yet resolved, one banking executive said in a Feb. 27 interview during Bitcoin Investor Week. 

“The magnitude of skullduggery that is happening in Washington D.C. is really incredible… and it’s not over yet,” Caitlin Long, Custodia Bank’s founder and CEO, said during a panel at the event.  

In 2023, the US Federal Reserve, which regulates banks, stymied Custodia’s efforts to service crypto firms by denying the bank access to a master account, citing Custodia’s involvement in “crypto-asset-related activities.” 

A master account would allow the bank to custody assets directly with the central bank and access payment rails for inter-bank transfers. Custodia took legal action against the Fed in a bid to reverse the decision. 

Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long speaks at Bitcoin Investor Week. Source: Cointelegraph

Related: FDIC releases 790 pages of crypto-related letters in regulatory pivot

Industry outrage over alleged debanking reached a crescendo when a June 2024 lawsuit spearheaded by ​​Coinbase resulted in the release of letters showing US banking regulators asked certain financial institutions to “pause” crypto banking activities.

US President Donald Trump, who started his term on Jan. 20, has criticized the prior administration’s approach to crypto-friendly banks and vowed to better integrate cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins, into the regulated financial system. 

In a Jan. 23 executive order, Trump told agencies to prioritize “fair and open access to banking services” for digital asset firms.

Stablecoin scrum

However, the battle for regulatory clarity isn’t over, Long said. Instead, it has evolved into a multi-directional fight among different types of stablecoin issuers seeking preferential rules, she said. 

There is an ongoing “scrum between the big banks… and the incumbent stablecoin issuers, and then there’s Tether,” which is not based in the US, Long said. 

The result has been “this incredible flow of money that has gone from the banks and the crypto industry to people in [Washington] D.C., and they’re all going to fight,” Long said. 

“I don’t know how it’s going to come out,” she added.

Magazine: Godzilla vs. Kong: SEC faces fierce battle against crypto’s legal firepower