Connect with us

Published

on

A Labour MP’s bill to prevent children from “doom scrolling” on social media is expected to get government backing today, after its proposals were watered down.

Josh MacAlister, a former teacher, has been campaigning for tighter limits on younger teenagers spending hours a week on apps such as TikTok and Snapchat.

He told Sky News that today’s bill, which will be debated by MPs, was a “meaningful first step” towards making children safer online and hoped it would be “just the start” of government action on the issue.

The MP had originally called for a smartphone ban in schools, tougher action by Ofcom and raising the “digital age of consent” at which children can use most social media to 16.

But in the face of ministerial opposition, his bill now just calls for chief medical officers to review the evidence on screen-based harms – which was last looked at in 2019 – within a year.

File pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

When that review is complete, the government must decide whether there is a case to raise the age at which children can use social media from the current age of 13.

Mr MacAlister said: “We’ve managed to persuade lots of MPs and make a big noise about this issue, which is that for too many children, smartphones and social media are really addictive and taking a lot of their time and attention.

More on Online Safety Bill

“That issue for too long hasn’t been debated in parliament. My private members’ bill will get the government to come back within a year on the question of raising the age of digital consent, and that would be a really important step forward in this campaign to make sure that parliament takes these issues seriously.

“We chose 13 a long, long time ago. Is that right? You know, in Norway it’s 15. In France it’s 15. I’m asking them to consider, ‘should we be setting it at a higher age?’

“Different countries are trying different things out, but they all start with the same common problem, which is kids spending lots of time online that they used to spend in real life outdoors, doing things with their friends.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From December: Government cracks down on social media

Charities urge minister to back bill

Asked if he was disappointed that ministers had not been willing to go further, he said: “This is just the start. If you look back at previous debates about smoking or car seatbelts, often it was dozens of pieces of legislation that led to the conclusion.”

Mr MacAlister, the MP for Whitehaven and Workington, will tell MPs that changing the age at which a child can consent for their data to be shared online to 16 would give parents more control, and force platforms to enforce more rigorous age verification.

A minister will respond to the plans, which have attracted cross-party support. It’s expected that the government will agree to take the proposals further.

Ten children’s charities, including Barnardo’s and the NSPCC, have written to Peter Kyle urging him to support the bill, saying that the online world poses “significant risks to children” and that “current legislation does not go far enough” in restricting screen time.

Read more:
Loophole in law on apps ‘leaves kids vulnerable to abuse’
Websites hosting pornographic content must have age checks by July – Ofcom

It’s understood that the tech secretary wanted to make sure the Online Safety Act, which was passed by MPs in 2023 and is being implemented in stages this year, is completed first. It intends to protect young people from illegal and harmful content.

The government has opposed a smartphone ban in schools, saying this should be up to headteachers.

Today, the most extensive polling of young people aged 16-24 shows that 62% of this age group say social media does more harm than good, both men and women.

Only 22% of the 2,000 young adults polled by the company More in Common think it does more good than harm.

Four in five of this age group also say they would try to keep their own children off social media for as long as possible.

Half of this generation, who grew up with smartphones, agree they spent too much time on their phones and social media during childhood.

Read more from Sky News:
Killer convicted of raping ex-girlfriend before murdering her
Nigel Farage hits back at one of his own Reform MPs

‘This isn’t just parents’

Anna McShane, director of The New Britain Project, which commissioned the polling, said: “This isn’t just parents worrying about their kids, young people themselves are saying social media has become more addictive, more negative, and more harmful.

“They’ve grown up with it, and now they’re warning us about its dangers.”

A Department for Technology spokesperson added: “We are committed to keeping young people safe online whilst also ensuring they can benefit from the latest technology.

“By the summer, robust new protections for children will be in force through the Online Safety Act to protect them from harmful content and ensure they have an age-appropriate experience online.

“The government’s response to the private members’ bill will follow during second reading of the bill, as per parliamentary process.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Richard Rice says Reform UK made ‘right judgement’ to suspend MP over allegations of bullying

Published

on

By

Richard Rice says Reform UK made 'right judgement' to suspend MP over allegations of bullying

Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice has said it was “right” to suspend the MP at the centre of bullying and threat allegations.

The party announced on Friday that they had reported Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe to police following allegations of bullying made by two women and threats made against Reform’s chair.

Many have questioned the timing of the announcement, as it came the day after Mr Lowe appeared to question Nigel Farage‘s leadership of the party. Mr Lowe has denied all the allegations.

Mr Tice was asked why the incidents have only come to light now, when complaint were made to police in December.

Rupert Lowe. File pic: PA
Image:
Rupert Lowe denies the allegations against him. Pic: PA

He told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: “There’s been a variety of instances and you have to make difficult judgements through the process.

“But of course it’s unfortunate. Of course it’s difficult.

“But there are these allegations of bullying by two separate female members of staff to the parliamentary authorities. Those clearly have to be dealt with in the proper, responsible way.”

More on Nigel Farage

He added: “Rupert has been doing some great work on a variety of important issues, but ultimately, if you can’t work with someone, if the situation becomes impossible, which regrettably… then you have to say, this is not going to end well.

“And so we made the right judgement.”

Mr Tice also pointed out that if the party had brushed the incident “under the carpet” or tried to cover it up, then “everyone would’ve been raging”.

Read more:
Farage-Lowe row escalates
Lowe invites Nigel Farage to dinner
MP reported to police

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reform UK row explained

Asked if the situation was “fishy” due to the timing of the party’s pronouncement, Mr Tice strongly disagreed.

“The reality is, behind the scenes, there have been a number of difficulties and challenges, and you get to the point where you say, enough’s enough,” he said.

Mr Farage wrote in the Telegraph overnight, saying the party “did our best to keep a lid on things but, in the end, containment strategies invariably fail”.

Mr Tice said an incident with party chair Zia Yusuf recently was the catalyst for taking action against Mr Lowe.

Mr Lowe has vehemently denied the claims against him, and said he was targeted for challenging the way the party was being run.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Posting on social media just before Mr Tice’s interview, Mr Lowe said this included his outspoken stance on wanting to deport all illegal migrants.

He said: “I have been warned by those at the top of Reform about my position on deportations. As you likely know from reading my extensive output on the subject, I did not listen to a word said.

“We need deportations, and lots of them.

“I make no apologies for stating that.”

Continue Reading

Politics

UK has no plans for conscription – but future decisions will respond to ‘new reality’, says minister

Published

on

By

UK has no plans for conscription - but future decisions will respond to 'new reality', says minister

The UK is not considering introducing conscription to ready the country for a potential war – but decisions may be needed in the future to respond to the “new reality” we are now living in, a minister has told Sky News.

In an interview with Trevor Phillips, Latvian President Edgars Rinkeviks has urged European countries to follow his country’s lead and “absolutely” introduce conscription, conceding the continent is “quite weak” militarily.

Politics latest: Calls for European nations to reintroduce conscription

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Debate’ in Latvia about introducing conscription for women

Asked if the UK government is considering introducing the measure to boost the armed forces, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden said it is important the UK does not find itself operating under “old assumptions” – and that it may be “decisions are needed in the future that respond to a new reality”.

He told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: “We are not considering conscription, but of course we have announced a major increase in defence expenditure.

“We do have to recognise that the world has changed. The phrase ‘step up’ is used a lot. Europe does have to step up in terms of its own defence.

President Trump isn’t actually the first president to say that, but he said it more loudly and with more force than his predecessors – so, I think we have got to recognise that moment.”

‘UK cannot cling to old assumptions’

He added: “When the world is changing as fast as it is, it’s important that we don’t cling on to old assumptions.

“I think the prime minister has played a tremendous role in recent weeks in responding to that situation and explaining it to the public.

“That is why the decision on increasing defence expenditure was needed.

“It may be why other decisions are needed in the future that respond to a new reality, and that we don’t find ourselves caught operating under the same assumption as we used to in the past when the situation has changed.”

‘Battlefield is changing’

Sir Keir Starmer has promised to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP but has not set out when this will be achieved. Ministers say a defence review to be published this spring will set out a “roadmap” to it.

The number is much lower than the US president has demanded NATO members spend on defence, with Mr Trump saying they should all be spending 5% – an amount last seen during the Cold War.

Asked if the “new reality” involved a bigger army, Mr McFadden said ministers were waiting for the conclusion of the review.

But he added: “One thing is for sure, you would not spend money today on the same things as you would 10 years ago.

“The experience of the three years of the war in Ukraine has shown just how fast the battlefield is changing in terms of cyber, drones, the use of intelligence.”

History of conscription in UK

In the UK, military conscription has existed for two periods in modern times.

The first was from 1916 to 1920 following the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, due to the dwindling number of volunteers for military service.

Lord Kitchener’s campaign – promoted by his famous “Your Country Needs You” poster – had encouraged more than one million men to enlist by January 1915. But this was not enough.

In January 1916, after much debate, the Military Service Act was passed. This imposed conscription on all single men aged between 18 and 41, but exempted the medically unfit, clergymen, teachers and certain classes of industrial worker.

Conscientious objectors – men who objected to fighting on moral grounds – were also exempt, and were given civilian jobs or non-fighting roles at the front.

Conscription was not applied to Ireland because of the 1916 Easter Rising, although many Irishmen volunteered to fight.

A second Act passed in May 1916 extended conscription to married men, and in 1918, during the last months of the war, the age limit was raised to 51.

Conscription was extended until 1920 to allow the army to deal with continuing trouble spots in the Empire and parts of Europe.

In the run-up to the Second World War, plans for limited conscription applying to single men aged between 20 and 22 were given parliamentary approval in the Military Training Act in May 1939. This required men to undertake six months’ military training.

When Britain declared war against Germany on 3 September 1939, the National Service (Armed Forces) Act imposed conscription on all males aged between 18 and 41.

Those medically unfit were exempt, as were others in key industries and jobs such as baking, farming, medicine, and engineering, while conscientious objectors had to appear before a tribunal to argue their reasons for refusing to join up.

In December 1941, a second National Service Act was approved, making all unmarried women and all childless widows between the ages of 20 and 30 liable to call-up.

The last conscription term ended in 1960, although many soldiers chose to continue in the service beyond 1963.

The Conservatives’ first policy announcement of last year’s general election campaign was that the party would introduce a new form of mandatory National Service for 18-year-olds.

Asked if the Tories still stood by the plan which was in their manifesto, shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: “We are obviously not going to write our manifesto now, so I am not going to recommit to things in the previous manifesto.

“We’ll need to do the thinking properly. I am not going to speculate four years ahead of the election.

“I don’t think it was really exactly conscription that was being proposed, it was a National Citizen Service which is a bit different.

“The idea of getting younger people to do voluntary work and perform useful tasks is not a bad idea.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Right time’ to think about conscription

Last year, Britain’s former top NATO commander told Sky News it was time to “think the unthinkable” and consider introducing conscription.

General Sir Richard Sherriff, ex-deputy supreme allied commander of the military organisation, said: “I think we need to get over many of the cultural hang-ups and assumptions, and frankly think the unthinkable.

“I think we need to go further and look carefully at conscription.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Michael Saylor pushes US gov’t to purchase up to 25% of Bitcoin supply

Published

on

By

Michael Saylor pushes US gov’t to purchase up to 25% of Bitcoin supply

Strategy founder Michael Saylor says the US government should aim to hold a quarter of Bitcoin’s entire supply by 2035, when 99% of all BTC will have been issued.

Continue Reading

Trending